Updated Version of CONNECT for Health Act Introduced in Congress Center for Connected Health Policy May 4, 2021 Last week an updated version of the CONNECT for Health Act was introduced in Congress. Last week an updated version of the CONNECT for Health Act was introduced in Congress. The bill, which was first introduced in 2016 but has been repurposed in this newest version to remove restrictions on telehealth for mental health, stroke care and home dialysis in certain circumstances. It also addresses several of the restrictions in Medicare, including geographic limitations, expanding originating sites to include the home, restrictions on federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) reimbursement and gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services the ability to waive other telehealth restrictions permanently. For more information, see the press release, or read the bill’s summary published by Senator Schatz office. Stay tuned for a deeper dive and further analysis from CCHP next week. Press Release: https://www.schatz.senate.gov/press-releases/schatz-wicker-lead-bipartisan-group-of-50-senators-in-reintroducing-legislation-to-expand-telehealth-access-make-permanent-telehealth-flexibilities-available-during-covid-19-pandemic Summary: https://www.schatz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CONNECT%20for%20Health%20Act%20of%202021_Summary.pdf < Previous News Next News >

Celebrating 2021 National Rural Health Day Southwest Telehealth Resource Center Dec. 1, 2021 Since 2010 the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health has designated the 3rd Thursday in November as National Rural Health Day to celebrate the rural leaders and champions in rural communities. This year the Arizona Telemedicine Program and the SWTRC joined with the Arizona Rural Health Association and the Arizona State Office of Rural Health to kick it off in Arizona with a “2021 Mid-Year Rural Health Policy Roundup” webinar by Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association. Since 2010 the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health has designated the 3rd Thursday in November as National Rural Health Day to celebrate the rural leaders and champions in rural communities. This year the Arizona Telemedicine Program and the SWTRC joined with the Arizona Rural Health Association and the Arizona State Office of Rural Health to kick it off in Arizona with a “2021 Mid-Year Rural Health Policy Roundup” webinar by Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association. This webinar streamed live to a national audience on November 15th and the recording and presentation slides are available at: https://telemedicine.arizona.edu/webinars/previous for on-demand playback. Each year the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health selects a Community Star from each of the 50 states. The 2021 Community Star report, https://en.calameo.com/read/0045723395dc12ef8ac48, includes stories of how each Community Star is working to improve life in their rural community. Congratulations to all of the 2021 Community Stars! Matthew Probst, PA-C Chief Quality Officer and Medical Director El Centro Family Health Mathew Probst is the Chief Quality Officer and Medical Director for a Federally Qualified Health Center located Northeast of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Under his leadership, Mr. Probst was able to implement initiatives at the start of the pandemic which resulted in his county having one of the lowest fatality rates and one of the highest vaccination rates in the county. Read more about why Mr. Probst was featured in an award-winning documentary named The Providers: https://en.calameo.com/read/0045723395dc12ef8ac48 < Previous News Next News >

Healthcare Breaches: 40.7 Million Patients Affected By Dr. Maheu April 5, 2021 There were 758 breaches publicly posted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) breach portal in 2020, affecting 40.7 million patients. However, the breaches listed on the HHS breach portal only reflect breaches affecting 500 or more patients, making it likely that the number of breaches was much higher. Each year Protenus, along with databreaches.net, conducts a breach report to assess the state of healthcare cybersecurity. Their 2021 Breach Barometer examined healthcare breaches occurring in 2020 and compared the findings to 2019 breaches. Read more about previous healthcare breaches on TBHI blogs: Healthcare Data Breach compromised 295,617 patients, Major Healthcare Hack Targets Mental Health Provider and Healthcare Breach: Email Breach Affects Behavioral Health Organization. More details on healthcare breaches, hacking incidents, insider breaches of 2020 are discussed below. Healthcare Breaches in 2020 There were 758 breaches publicly posted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) breach portal in 2020, affecting 40.7 million patients. However, the breaches listed on the HHS breach portal only reflect breaches affecting 500 or more patients, making it likely that the number of breaches was much higher. Through their analysis of 2020 breaches, Protenus determined a 30% increase in healthcare breaches compared to 2019. Hacking Incidents in 2020 The leading cause of 2020 healthcare breaches resulted from hacking incidents representing 62% of reported incidents, with a 42% increase in these types of incidents from the previous year. The 277 hacking incidents compromised the protected health information (PHI) of more than 31 million patients. Part of the reason hacking skyrocketed in the healthcare sector is due to hackers exploiting the COVID pandemic, in some cases posing as government agencies to gain access to sensitive information. The issue was a major cause for concern, with the FBI and HHS warning healthcare organizations against “an increased and imminent cybercrime threat to U.S. hospitals and healthcare providers.” Researchers stated, “By making investments to protect patients, health systems, in turn, protect themselves from severe reputational damage, financial penalties, or care disruptions stemming from hacking incidents. Under obligation to do no harm, healthcare organizations must adopt advanced tools capable of preventing hacks and their frightening consequences for patients.” Insider Breaches in 2020 The second most common cause behind healthcare breaches in 2020 was insider breaches. Insider breaches occur when an employee of a healthcare organization accesses PHI without cause. Insider breaches represented 20% of reported incidents, with 111 incidents of insider breaches compromising the PHI of 8.5 million patients. “A zero-tolerance stance on snooping is important, but it will never be enough to prevent innocent mistakes or nefarious hackers,” researchers wrote. “Only by using compliance analytics to calculate the risk score of any anomalous access can organizations surface and prioritize interactions with data that truly warrant attention…. Noncompliance is critically important to identify and prevent, especially when organizations are struggling financially. Compliance incidents are costly because of all that goes into reconciling them. On top of paying penalties, health systems must do damage control,” they added. HIPAA Resources Need assistance with HIPAA compliance? Compliancy Group can help! They help you achieve HIPAA compliance, with Compliance Coaches® guiding you through the entire process. Find out more about the HIPAA Seal of Compliance® and Compliancy Group. Get HIPAA compliant today! Link: https://telehealth.org/healthcare-breaches-2/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=New+COVID-19+FCC+Telehealth+Grant+%7C+TBHI+Telehealth+News+4%2F14%2F21&utm_campaign=April+13th+Newsletter&vgo_ee=L60XUD6gIFzXzaAzbkkf6r35hO7C%2FF3J%2FgQB9Uu3XAY%3D < Previous News Next News >

Opportunity Knocking — Empanelment, COVID-19 and Telehealth By Trudy Bearden, PA-C, MPAS February 17, 2021 Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment. Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment is a foundational component of primary care and is essential in population health management. In 2019, the People-Centered Integrated Care collaborative, participants from 10 countries developed an overview of empanelment and a comprehensive definition: Empanelment is a continuous, iterative set of processes that identify and assign populations to facilities, care teams, or providers who have a responsibility to know their assigned population and to proactively deliver coordinated primary health care. That definition is accurate and comprehensive, but we must appreciate the recent, succinct statement by my Empanelment Learning Exchange colleague Elizabeth Wala, Global Advisor, Health and Nutrition at Aga Khan Foundation: “Empanelment is grouping patients under providers.” Opportunity. As a primary care clinician and health care consultant, I have been thinking hard since April 2020 about the importance of empanelment, telehealth and the COVID-19 pandemic. Just to be clear, I’m using the term telehealth as defined by the discrete set of services described by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) List of Telehealth Services. Similarly, there are amazing opportunities for other remote services, including chronic and principal care management, remote patient monitoring, virtual check-ins and more that lend themselves to applying empanelment to improve health and well-being. Maybe for another blog … Most clinicians use electronic health records (EHRs) these days and can run or request reports on their patient panels to identify which patients may need health care services. Empanelment provides each clinician with a list of names of their patients along with additional information such as age, date last seen, diagnoses, preventive and chronic care that is due and more. Here are some of the ways we can leverage empanelment and telehealth to keep people safe, expand access and capture revenue. Check in on the unseen and unknown. Empanelment is not just about those who seek health care services from us, although that’s often how it starts. The beauty of empanelment is that there should be no people on a clinician’s panel who are “unseen and unknown.” However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 41% of U.S. adults have delayed or avoided medical care during the pandemic because of concerns about COVID-19, which presents us with an opportunity. Identify who hasn’t been seen in the past 6-12 months for each clinician’s panel. Have clinicians go through the list and identify who should receive a check-in call and who should be scheduled for a telehealth visit. There may not be reimbursement for those check-in calls; although there are service codes and reimbursement for virtual check-ins, those check-ins are technically supposed to be initiated by the patient. Conduct advance care planning. If ever there was a time! And it can be accomplished by telehealth — using codes 99497 (~$85) and 99498 (~$74) — with decent reimbursement. Start with all individuals 65 and older in your panel. Ensure high-risk patients know about telehealth. Now more than ever, know who your top 5-10% highest risk patients are, including those at highest risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. These patients will benefit from having telehealth as an option perhaps more than any other population in your practice. Conduct targeted outreach to the top 5-10% high-risk patients to schedule a telehealth visit, if needed or to let them know about telehealth as an option. Address chronic and preventive gaps in care. As people delay care and as team-based care and pre-visit planning workflows seem to fall by the wayside, I am concerned that missed and delayed diagnoses will soar, which is both terrible for individuals and families, but is also one of the most common reasons for malpractice claims. Use panel data to identify who’s due for what: Chronic conditions, e.g., office visits, tests, vaccines, prescription renewals Preventive services, e.g., well-child visits, colorectal cancer screening (CRC), vaccinations Advise patients about the services that are due by phone, text or letter and schedule those for telehealth visits, if needed. Consider this a call to action for primary care practices! If you’re not already leveraging empanelment to optimize telehealth, expand access, make sure people are doing okay and keep people safe, what can you do by next Tuesday to up your game? < Previous News Next News >

New Wave of Federal Bipartisan Bills to Expand Telehealth Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 A good majority of the recently introduced bills focus on increasing telehealth reimbursement, however a few look to increase funding for telehealth services and infrastructure. At present, CCHP is tracking over 100 pieces of telehealth legislation in the current federal legislative session. This month we have seen a number of bipartisan bills introduced, continuing the federal push to expand telehealth availability and codify flexibilities allowed during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE). A good majority of the recently introduced bills focus on increasing telehealth reimbursement, however a few look to increase funding for telehealth services and infrastructure. It is notable the significant amount of support from both sides of the aisle for telehealth. For instance, representatives Dan Newhouse (R-WA) and Tom O’Halleran (D-AZ) introduced the Rural Remote Monitoring Patient Act (HR 4008) that would establish a pilot grant program to support the use of remote patient monitoring in rural areas. Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) introduced as part of a package of telehealth bills a reintroduction of a bill similar to legislation from 2020 titled the Telehealth Health Savings Account (HSA) Act (S 2097). The Telehealth HSA Act would allow employers to offer high-deductible health plans that include telehealth services without limiting employees’ ability to use health savings accounts. According to Kennedy’s press release, “a current IRS regulation stops employees from making or receiving contributions to HSAs if they hold a high-deductible health plan that waives the deductible for telehealth services, meaning employees holding high-deductible health plans often need to pay out of pocket for telehealth services. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act (HR 748) temporarily waived this regulation, but S 2110 would make the waiver permanent.” We have also seen a few of the recent bills look at audio-only and codifying pandemic telehealth flexibilities. The Protecting Rural Telehealth Access Act (S 1988) by Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and also sponsored by Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), would: *Allow payment parity for audio-only telehealth services *Make permanent the ability for patients to be treated at home *Let rural health clinics (RHCs) and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) serve as distant sites for telehealth services The Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2021 by Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), introduced with Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI), makes the following permanent changes: *Removes originating site and geographical limitations *Maintains telehealth flexibilities for RHCs/FQHCs *Expands coverage for audio-only services *Removes restrictions that limit clinicians’ ability to remotely monitor and track patient health and provide them access to innovative digital devices Additionally, we have seen bipartisan support around broadband legislation, such as from Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Angus King (I-Maine), and Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who recently introduced legislation which seeks to address the digital divide. Their Broadband Reform and Investment to Drive Growth in the Economy (BRIDGE) Act of 2021 would allow states to deploy “future-proof” networks able to meet communities’ broadband needs, including supporting local initiatives on affordability, adoption, and inclusion. According to Bennet’s press release, The BRIDGE Act would: *Provide $40 billion to States, Tribal Governments, and U.S. Territories for affordable, high- speed broadband *Prioritize unserved, underserved, and high-cost areas with investments in “future proof” networks *Encourage gigabit-level internet wherever possible while raising the minimum speeds for new broadband networks to at least 100/100 Mbps, with flexibility for areas where this is technologically or financially impracticable *Emphasize affordability and inclusion by requiring at least one affordable option *Increase choice and competition by empowering local and state decision-making, lifting bans against municipal broadband networks, and allowing more entities to compete for funding Lastly, additional information was just released regarding Cures 2.0 – another bipartisan bill, which creates the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a President Biden budget request proposal. According to a discussion draft and section-by-section summary, Cures 2.0 will address a variety of areas, including telehealth access, while incorporating and building upon several additional bipartisan bills, such as the Telehealth Improvement for Kids’ Essential Services (TIKES) Act (H.R. 1397 / S. 1798) and Telehealth Modernization Act (H.R. 1332 / S. 368). The telehealth provisions proposed in Cures 2.0 include: *Review the impact of telehealth on patient health and encourage better collaboration *Provide guidance and strategies to states on effectively integrating telehealth into their Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) *Make many of the COVID-19 PHE flexibilities post-pandemic permanent, such as: -Removing the geographic and originating site restrictions -Expanding the range of health care providers that can be reimbursed by Medicare for furnishing telehealth services to any health care professional eligible to bill Medicare -Enhancing telehealth services for use by FQHCs, RHCs, hospices, and for home dialysis The authors anticipate that the Cures 2.0 bill will be introduced in the coming weeks and hope to see it signed in the fall. While the fate of these telehealth bills is yet to be seen, it does seem to highlight strong federal support for expanding access to telehealth post PHE with such a large amount of bipartisanship support behind them. Given Medicare’s historically conservative approach in regard to telehealth pre-PHE, any additional shift would be significant. CCHP will continue to update its tracking tools and monitor the ever evolving telehealth landscape as we continue to move through the current federal legislative session. < Previous News Next News >

CMS Releases Final Calendar Year (CY) 2023 Physician Fee Schedule CCHP November 08, 2022 Last week, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final rule for the CY 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). CMS finalized many of their telehealth proposals, which primarily focused on what services will be covered by the program and what will happen immediately following the end of the public health emergency (PHE), including during the 151-day grace period included in the 2022 Budget Act. CMS clarified that the list of services that were temporarily allowed to be delivered via telehealth and reimbursed by Medicare during the PHE, will still be allowed during the 151-day grace period. Additionally, CMS added more of the temporary telehealth PHE list codes to a category of services that would remain through the end of 2023. The rule also reiterates the requirement for an in-person visit in the first 6-months of an initial telehealth mental health visit and every 12 months afterward (with exceptions), and clarifies that won’t be implemented until 152 days after the end of the PHE. They will address the specifics around coding and reporting these types of services through guidance and a sub-regulatory process in the future to ensure a smooth transition after the PHE ends. Stay tuned for an in-depth In Focus write up from CCHP on the 2023 PFS next week, as well as a new factsheet focused on the telehealth elements in the final rule. See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/its-here-cms-releases-2023-physician-fee-schedule-plus-new-resources-on-telehealth-policy-from-hhs-cchp < Previous News Next News >

Review of Veterans Health Administration’s Use of Telehealth During Pandemic Center for Connected Health Policy April 2021 Veteran’s Affairs Office of the Inspector General (OIG) assessed the Veterans Health Administration’s virtual primary care response to the COVID-19 pandemic. From February 7 to June 16, 2020, the Veteran’s Affairs Office of the Inspector General (OIG) assessed the Veterans Health Administration’s virtual primary care response to the COVID-19 pandemic, based upon reviewing primary care encounter data, interviews with VHA leaders, and use of primary care provider questionnaires. In its report, the OIG found that face-to-face primary care visits decreased by 75% and contact by telephone represented 81% of all primary care encounters. In regards to VA Video Connect (VVC), providers stated that not only were there technical complications related to specifically scheduling VVC visits, but many patients didn’t have internet access or the appropriate equipment needed for video calls. The OIG identified the need for additional training and support for veterans and test visits with patients and staff to walk through the process before the visit. In addition, the OIG recommended the Under Secretary for Health evaluate veteran access to reliable internet connectivity necessary for use of VVC and take appropriate action. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General: https://www.va.gov/oig/ Veterans Health Administration: https://www.va.gov/health/ < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth helps stop suicidal ideation for many patients, study finds Bill Siwicki December 29, 2022 One person dies from suicide every 11 minutes in the U.S. A new study shows that telemedicine can be used to treat more severe mental illness – contrary to previous thought. Recently, the Journal of Medical Internet Research published some significant data highlighting the efficacy of psychiatric care delivered through telehealth: Those in the treatment group were 4.3 times more likely to have suicidal ideation remission. This is noteworthy because telehealth has not traditionally been equipped to treat those with the most severe symptoms of mental health due to the oversight necessary to actually provide safe, effective treatment, said Dr. Mimi Winsberg, chief medical officer at Brightside Health, which led the study. We spoke with Winsberg to get an in-depth look at this study and what the results mean for the future of telehealth and mental healthcare. Q. Please talk about your new study that examines the impact of telepsychiatry on reduction in suicidal ideation over time. Who was involved? What kind of care did they receive? What role did technology play? A. The study, which was published in JMIR Formative Research, sought to determine if Brightside Health's telehealth platform, which is equipped with precision prescribing clinical decision support, could successfully reduce suicidal ideation among enrolled patients, versus a control group who tracked their symptoms on the platform without receiving care. Another goal of the study was to describe the symptom clusters of patients who present with suicidal ideation in order to better understand the psychiatric symptoms associated with suicidal feelings. The study was large scale including participants of diverse geography and social demographics. It included a total of 8,581 people who completed a digital intake on the Brightside platform. Of those, 8,366 elected to receive psychiatric care from Brightside, while 215 tracked their symptoms on the platform without receiving care. Those who elected to receive psychiatric care through Brightside received a minimum of 12 weeks of treatment that included video visits with their providers, asynchronous messaging, and a prescription of at least one psychiatric medication. Brightside's technology platform was used to deliver clinically validated measures of depression and anxiety, as well as questions about clinical presentation, medical history and demographics. The proprietary precision-prescribing platform embedded in the tech platform analyzes these data points using an empirically derived algorithm to provide real-time care guidelines and clinical decision support to its providers using a computerized symptom cluster analysis. Q. The study led to some very promising outcomes. Please describe them and the success you achieved with telemedicine. A. The study found that patients enrolled in Brightside Health's telehealth platform had reduced suicidal ideation after 12 weeks of treatment. Patients who received treatment via Brightside Health were also 4.3 times more likely to have remission of their suicidal ideation than the control group who were monitored on the platform but did not receive care. The results demonstrated that a telehealth platform equipped with clinical decision support was an effective intervention for the symptom of suicidal ideation. In addition, we found that suicidal ideation had higher correlations with cognitive symptoms of hopelessness and poor feelings of self-worth, than with the physical symptoms of depression such as disrupted sleep and low energy. Q. Telehealth hasn't traditionally been equipped to treat these kinds of patients. What made the difference here? A. Historically, we have not relied on telehealth solutions to address more serious symptoms of depression. Clinicians are hesitant to treat individuals with suicidal ideation over telehealth because of the perceived risks. However, the results of this study are significant because they demonstrate effectiveness in treating these symptoms through a telehealth platform with clinical decision support, which may help alleviate concerns about the use of telehealth in addressing suicidal ideation. Telehealth can involve more than simply connecting a provider and patient via video camera. The telehealth platform used for the study was equipped with novel features such as remote patient monitoring and clinical decision support. A sophisticated telehealth intervention can assiduously track symptom presentation and outcomes with measurement-based care and offer real-time interventions along with machine learning and algorithmically based clinical decision support to select the best treatment. Q. What does all of this mean for the future of telemedicine and mental health? A. The future of mental health via telemedicine promises more widespread adoption of solutions for the majority of behavioral health conditions, even those with increasing severity of symptoms. We may see telehealth deployed for more serious mental illness, particularly when the telehealth platform can incorporate novel technologies to optimize care delivery. Additionally, as payers and providers collaborate to deliver more effective care, telehealth will likely become more than a means to deliver care, but also a way to enhance care delivery and provide highly effective care to those who need it most with expediency. At Brightside Health, we will continue to research the impact of telehealth treatment across the spectrum of mental health conditions, including those on the higher end of the severity axis. To that end, we are launching Crisis Care, a first of its kind program delivered nationally and over telehealth to treat patients with active suicidal ideation. The program is grounded in the evidence-based Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) framework. This study in JMIR Formative Research laid the foundation for this program, and we are seeing an obvious need for such a national program in the U.S., where one person dies from suicide every 11 minutes. We look forward to furthering this important – and life-saving – work. Follow Bill's HIT coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Siwicki Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-helps-stop-suicidal-ideation-many-patients-study-finds < Previous News Next News >

Congress’ Last Minute Holiday Gift to Telehealth: The Omnibus Budget for FY 2023 Has Passed! CCHP December 23, 2022 Earlier today, Congress passed HR 2617, The Performance Enhancement Reform Act, the omnibus budget for FY 2023. HR 2617 includes several provisions impacting telehealth, including extending some of the telehealth COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities. In the budget bill passed for FY 2022, Congress had included a 151-day extension after the end of the public health emergency (PHE) for some COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities. However, with the passage of HR 2617, these flexibilities will now last until December 31, 2024. The main telehealth provisions in the bill include: For Medicare: Some telehealth flexibilities in Medicare are extended to December 31, 2024. These flexibilities include: temporary suspension of the geographic site requirement, continuing to allow the home as an eligible originating site, allowing certain providers, including FQHCs and RHCs to continue to be eligible telehealth providers during this period, delaying the in-person mental health visit requirement for services that take place when the patient is not in a geographically eligible location or at home that is found in non-pandemic telehealth policies, and continuing to allow audio-only to be used to provide some services. A study on telehealth and Medicare program integrity that will include a medical record review of claims from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. Elements to be examined include the types of services furnished, where they were furnished, and duration of services. For the VA: Development of a strategic plan to ensure effectiveness of telehealth delivered by the VA to their enrollees. Other Items: Extension of safe harbor for absence of deductible for telehealth in health savings accounts for another 2 years (for plans after December 31, 2022 and before January 1, 2025). President Biden is expected to sign the bill which will allow telehealth providers and patients to have a little more clarity on the end date of federal telehealth provisions. For more information read HR 2617 in its entirety. Wishing a wonderful holiday season and a happy new year to all! See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/congress-last-minute-holiday-gift-to-telehealth-the-omnibus-budget-for-fy-2023-has-passed < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine boosts access, decreases inequities in Montana Bill Siwicki October 10, 2022 The University of Montana College of Health has expanded its telehealth offerings across many disciplines to reach more people, especially in tribal communities. Montana has unique challenges in providing healthcare to its widely dispersed population of just over 1 million people. THE PROBLEM Out of 56 counties in Montana, 55 are designated as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), limiting access to both urgent and routine medical visits. The cost of travel and long distances between healthcare providers and patients are commonly cited reasons for patients to delay or avoid medical care. The use of telehealth technology can improve healthcare access for Montanans living in rural and tribal communities by providing access to primary care and specialty services. Montana also is home to a significant Native American population, which makes up about 7% of residents. Tribal members experience significant health disparities due partly to inequitable healthcare access. "These pre-existing strains have left many rural and tribal communities particularly vulnerable to broad-reaching impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic," said Erica Woodahl, director of the L.S. Skaggs Institute for Health Innovation and a professor at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy at the University of Montana. "Rural and tribal populations have a higher burden of chronic disease and comorbidities known to increase the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19," she continued. "Life expectancy of all Americans has decreased during the two years since the pandemic, but no group more than tribal people whose life expectancy has dropped almost seven years." The pandemic also further reduced access to routine care leading to an increase in preventable complications due to chronic conditions, including emergency room visits, hospitalizations and overall healthcare costs, she added. "Additionally, communities without nearby clinics or hospitals have not had adequate access to coronavirus testing or care, leaving rural and tribal patients vulnerable to the spread of COVID-19," she noted. "This increases pre-existing strains on rural healthcare systems due to provider shortages, limited hospital beds and other resource constraints." PROPOSAL In the telemedicine work of the University of Montana College of Health in Missoula, services would be provided through a centralized hub at the university with synchronous and asynchronous telehealth services provided to rural and tribal communities in partnership with clinics, hospitals and pharmacies across the state. The equipment purchased with help from a grant from the FCC telehealth grant program would allow for the expansion of services within UM's College of Health. "While the initial utility of telehealth technologies to improve care for underserved populations focused on immediate provision of clinical services disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, benefits to patients will extend beyond the pandemic to address the challenges of providing healthcare to Montanans," explained Shayna Killam, PharmD, a postdoctoral fellow at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy at the University of Montana. "Telehealth technologies provide clinicians with the tools necessary to bridge the gap in healthcare access and offer quality healthcare to Montana patients," she continued. "Services will specifically target patients living in rural and tribal communities with chronic medical conditions and comorbidities." The organization anticipates a broad reach across Montana, leveraging partnerships with clinical training sites and clinical affiliates to provide centralized telehealth services to a wide range of patients. "Programs in UM's College of Health were awarded $684,593 from the FCC," Killam reported. "Funds were used to purchase telehealth equipment and connected medical devices, providing critical and remote services for patients in Montana." Telehealth equipment will be used by faculty, residents and students affiliated with the University of Montana College of Health. Recipients of funding include the following: Skaggs School of Pharmacy (SSOP). Family Medicine Residency of Western Montana (FMRWM). School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science (UMPT). School of Speech, Language, Hearing and Occupational Sciences (SLHOS). MARKETPLACE There are many vendors of telemedicine technology and services on the health IT market today. Healthcare IT News published a special report highlighting many of these vendors with detailed descriptions of their products. Click here to read the special report. MEETING THE CHALLENGE Pharmacist-driven programs provide services for community-based chronic disease screening, education and management, including management of diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular risk and mental health through point-of-care testing, medication therapy management visits and consultations with telehealth pharmacists. "Connected medical devices and video conferencing hardware will be used to provide routine and urgent care visits with medical residents and providers affiliated with the FMRWM, including diagnostics and monitoring, chronic disease management, prenatal care and mental health services," Woodahl said. "UMPT programs offer home-based visits and services in end-user sites in rural and tribal communities, including remote evaluations enhanced with telehealth technology, such as vestibular function testing and gait monitoring devices, telepresence robots, and video consults with patients and other healthcare professionals," she added. Clinicians and students in SLHOS will conduct telehealth visits via high-quality video and audio equipment, which facilitate effective evaluation and treatment for articulation and voice disorders. USING FCC AWARD FUNDS The University of Montana College of Health was awarded $684,593 from the FCC telehealth grant fund to purchase telemedicine kits to enable critical, remote telehealth services and to provide internet-connected devices for remote patient monitoring services for underserved, rural and tribal populations within the state. "UM's College of Health has used the FCC telehealth award funds to expand telehealth programs offered by the interprofessional disciplines with an overarching goal of increasing healthcare access and addressing inequities in care," Killam explained. "In addition to providing accessible and equitable healthcare, telehealth technologies will be used to train future health professionals," she continued. "Proactive training of our health professions students has the potential to transform the healthcare landscape in Montana and to overcome the challenges presented by traditional models of care." The equipment purchased has empowered physical therapists to engage in remote monitoring of patients as they complete interventions within their home, said Jennifer Bell, PT, clinical associate professor, school of physical therapy and rehabilitation science. "Oftentimes, patients have difficulty with balance and functional mobility within their home," she noted. "By utilizing technology, we are able to see a patient's home environment and support their ability to move around, minimize the risk of falls and complete a home exercise program." Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-boosts-access-decreases-inequities-montana?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=womeninhit < Previous News Next News >

How Americans Feel About Telehealth: One Year Later Sykes.com April 21, 2021 In March 2020 and 2021 we polled 2,000 adults to discover their perspectives on and experience with telehealth — how have opinions changed one year into the COVID-19 pandemic? Pre-pandemic, telehealth was much more of a novelty than a necessity in the healthcare industry. The idea of contacting your doctor remotely for care was promising, but there were major hurdles — obstacles that would require time, effort, and ingenuity to overcome. Then, COVID-19 created a need for safe, distant medical care and advice. And necessity, like always, is the mother of invention (or in this case, adoption). Suddenly, millions of patients who were once walk-ins became logins, and soon, all that was necessary to get a quality checkup was a stable Wi-Fi connection. SYKES’ March 2020 telehealth survey revealed new insights on what Americans thought about the rise of virtual visits to the doctor and the concept of telehealth in general. At that point, telehealth was still a radical idea, and phrases like “new normal” had yet to overstay their welcome. Research outlined in the SYKES Fall 2020 telehealth apps report made it clear that all kinds of new users had already begun scheduling consultations in cyberspace due to COVID-19. But now, with vaccines being administered all over the world, will this mean a decline in socially distanced telehealth services too? Or will patients still want access to virtual doctor visits even after distance is no longer a factor? To find out, we asked 2,000 Americans in March 2021 how their opinions on telehealth have changed over the past year, what they’ve experienced, and what they think should stick around even after vaccines are widely available. For full story: https://www.sykes.com/resources/reports/how-americans-feel-about-telehealth-now/ < Previous News Next News >

For next steps on telehealth, look to the states By Kat Jercich January 26, 2021 Lawmakers in legislatures nationwide have introduced about 300 bills aimed at expanding access to telemedicine – but not every bill is equally helpful. As the United States approaches its one-year anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic beginning to disrupt normal healthcare operations, a question continues to endure: What's next for telehealth? The answer remains unclear on a federal level, with U.S. lawmakers recently reintroducing legislation that would take at least a few steps toward safeguarding virtual care. In the meantime, though, state legislatures have taken action – and experts say their movement in this regard is unprecedented. "I've been doing this a long time, and I've never seen anything like this," said Claudia Tucker, senior vice president of government affairs at Teladoc, during the third installment of the American Telemedicine Association's EDGE policy conference on Tuesday. HIMSS20 Digital Learn on-demand, earn credit, find products and solutions. Get Started >> As Tucker described it, lawmakers in nearly every state have introduced about 300 bills in the last few months aimed at expanding access to telemedicine. But, she said, not every one of those bills has equal merit. Some, for instance, require providers to see a patient in-person before allowing audio-only appointments – a move that legislators may not realize will have a chilling effect on care. "State policy matters. When you put clinically unnecessary barriers to care [into place] through state policy … they can be a big deal," noted Quinn Shean, managing director at Tusk Ventures/Tusk Strategies. Shean also noted that many of the hundreds of bills being introduced engage with the "who, what, where and when" of telehealth: what types of providers can provide it, and which modality they can use. "We're seeing states catch up based on their experience in the pandemic," she said. Panelists throughout the day pointed to the double-edged sword of telehealth: It can enable patient access, but it can also deepen the digital divide. "The idea that someone living in Appalachia can have access to one of the best oncologists in the country through telehealth is life changing," said Tucker. As Evan Hoffman, director of state and local government relations, pointed out, virtual care can be instrumental in helping keep struggling rural hospitals open. Telehealth tools, he said, "can beam [provider input] in to support rural hospitals and their efforts to engage patients. The flurry of bill volume cannot be understated in telehealth." At the same time, said Shean, "It's going to be on industry and stakeholders to make sure we do use telehealth as a great equalizer." One potential make-or-break issue when it comes to equity is broadband access – whether patients are able to connect with providers at all. "We have seen, especially in our lower-income areas … the disparity in accessibility widen," said New York State Assembly member Pamela Hunter, D-Syracuse. "We need to make sure that those who need accessibility in care – the most vulnerable – are able to utilize this up-and-coming ... technological health-delivery system," continued Hunter. At this point, she said, "it really is not for everyone." Experts also pointed to coverage and reimbursement as pivotal issues for broader access after the COVID-19 pandemic. "We're going to have to talk about parity," said Minnesota Senator Michelle Benson, R-Anoka. "There is some concern that providers are going to have to be held accountable" for potentially inappropriately charging for services. "I don't know how that looks in statute," Benson admitted. "I hate it when legislators are overly prescriptive," she continued, but maintained that some regulation would undoubtedly be necessary. When it comes to policy progress over the next 100 days, Tucker advised, "follow the money." "There's a huge focus on money, reimbursement, health plans," she said. "It's all about: 'Where does the money go?'" Telehealth, she argued, begets access, quality of care, and savings. "Let's not forget that third one," she emphasized. "The flurry of bill volume cannot be understated in telehealth," noted Hoffman. "It speaks to the tremendous opportunity before us." Shean added that the industry is, for the most part, past the need to simply prove the merits of telehealth. Instead, she said, "We should be using this time of telehealth advancement to be rethinking … to really think bigger." Kat Jercich is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Twitter: @kjercich Email: kjercich@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. < Previous News Next News >

New Study Pitches Telehealth as Safer Than the Doctor’s Office Eric Wicklund, mhealthintelligence August 2021 In a nod to the value of telehealth in primary care, researchers have found that a person visiting the doctor's office shortly after a visit from someone with the flu has a much higher chance of getting the flu as well. A new study makes a strong case for telehealth as an alternative to the doctor’s office, particularly during flu season. Researchers from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School and the university’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health and athenahealth have found that people who visit their doctor’s office after someone infected with the flu has visited that office are much more likely to come down with the flu themselves. That same increase wasn’t seen in people seeking treatment for issues like urinary tract infections. The study, published this month in Health Affairs, suggests that primary care providers embrace virtual visits as a means of reducing that chance of infection. “It’s a widely accepted fact that patients can acquire infections in hospital settings, but we show that infection transmission can happen when you visit your doctor’s office, too,” Hannah Neprash, an assistant professor at UM’s School of Public Health and one of the study’s authors, said in a news release issued by the university. “Our findings highlight the importance of infection control practices and continued access to telemedicine services, as health care begins to return to pre-pandemic patterns,” she added. "In-person outpatient care for influenza may promote nontrivial transmission of these viruses. This may be true for other endemic respiratory illnesses too, including COVID-19, but more research is needed." The study, which tracked office visits from a national sample of insurance claims and EHR data compiled by athenahealth, is reportedly the first to connect the dots between office visits and the progression of a flu outbreak. According to that data, patients visits their primary care provider were almost 32 percent more likely to contract the flu within two weeks if that PCP had seen someone with the flu within the previous two weeks. In addition, that office would then serve as an incubator for the flu, infecting more patients over time. Neprash and her fellow researchers say their study supports the need for “triage to telemedicine” policies in clinics and medical offices when a patient shows signs of a contagious viral infection like the flu. “Given that upper respiratory symptoms are among the most common reasons for any patient to see a physician, these results highlight the importance of protocols to mitigate the risk for transmission,” the study notes. “Clinically, many of these patients will be at low risk for complications with telemedicine evaluation.” It also suggests that care providers develop “strict infection control practices” whenever a patient showing signs of the flu or a similar virus need to be seen in person. This would include mask-wearing, hand hygiene and putting patients in separate exam rooms that can be decontaminated after a visit. Finally, the study makes a case for continued support for telehealth coverage at a rate equal to in-person care. “Lawmakers in Congress are actively debating the future of telemedicine policy and how it should be reimbursed after the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic recedes,” the study notes. “It is possible that telemedicine reimbursement after the pandemic will be restricted to certain specialties or diagnoses or reimbursed at a rate low enough that many clinicians decide to forgo telemedicine as a mechanism for care delivery. Our results argue that clinically, for infection control, telemedicine should remain a financially viable option for clinicians to provide care for viral respiratory symptoms. < Previous News Next News >

Common Wealth Fund Analyzes State COVID-19 Telehealth Changes Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 Recommending Longer Term Expansion Data to Determine Permanent Policies The Commonwealth Fund recently released an issue brief titled, States’ Actions to Expand Telemedicine Access During COVID-19 and Future Policy Considerations, to help inform future policy considerations for telehealth post-pandemic. Focusing on private insurance coverage, the authors reviewed pre-pandemic state telehealth statutes as well as state emergency actions related to telehealth between March 2020 and March 2021. The study found that 22 states made telehealth policy changes, mostly in regard to audio-only coverage, cost-sharing requirements, and reimbursement parity. Audio-only coverage and reimbursement parity were the most popular changes made to ensure expanded access to telehealth. Notable pre-pandemic findings include: -35 states required private insurance telehealth coverage -25 states required insurers to limit cost-sharing -15 states required private payer reimbursement parity -3 states explicitly required audio-only coverage Notable policy expansions during the pandemic included: -5 additional states required telehealth coverage -4 new states eliminated cost-sharing for services via telehealth -10 states added a requirement for private payer reimbursement parity -18 states moved to require audio-only coverage The report also looked at methods of emergency telehealth expansion by states, finding that policy changes came in a combination of legislation, executive orders, and other agency actions such as bulletins and notices. The study found 8 states passed legislation, but that the primary method was administrative action, given its ability to be made quickly. Administrative changes also appeared to often hinge on existing statutory authority or executive orders creating such authority. As part of the study’s methodology, the authors additionally interviewed insurance regulators in 10 states that had made telehealth expansions. Regulators highlighted the importance of audio-only coverage, both for older patients and their ease of use, as well as patients with behavioral health conditions that find it more comfortable. While some regulators expressed concerns related to increased costs with audio-only coverage, others highlighted billing parameters and how insurers have the ability to determine which audio-only visits qualify for reimbursement. The regulators also noted that almost all insurers were supportive of the temporary expansions, but that they’d likely oppose long-term payment parity requirements, even though one regulator commented how the work may be the same for a visit via telehealth as in-person. Interviews also revealed an insurer desire to pay lower rates for their third-party corporate telehealth providers, which regulators said may be less costly but also may fragment care, which can result in lower quality care and higher health care costs. The report also covers existing research around the benefits of telehealth and suggests the need to address insurance and audio-only coverage long-term to reduce access issues and stabilize the coverage landscape for providers to continue investing in telehealth use. The study concludes with the recommendation that maintaining telehealth expansions may benefit payers and consumers if telehealth can be shown to reduce health care costs. This will require access to longer-term information to monitor its use, including stakeholder workgroups and formal data collection mechanisms. Of course, longer-term data requires longer-term expansions, which could trend states toward temporary extensions in the short-term, such as those recently enacted in Connecticut and proposed in California. As policymakers continue the call for telehealth data, the primary response from researchers seems to be the same call. In addition to telehealth expansion impacts on health care costs, the issue of improved access to care must remain a primary focus of data collection and evaluation as well to truly result in equitable policy adoption. For more information on the actions states took to expand telehealth during COVID-19, read the Commonwealth Fund’s issue brief in its entirety - https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2021/jun/states-actions-expand-telemedicine-access-covid-19. CCHP’s Policy Finder tool can also be used to look up COVID telehealth policy documents by state. New Mexico policy finder - https://www.cchpca.org/new-mexico/. < Previous News Next News >

Telemental Health Collaborative Care Medication Management: Implementation and Outcomes Smita Das, Jane Wang, Shih-Yin Chen, and Connie E. Chen Dec. 22, 2021 Introduction: Access to quality mental health medication management (MM) in the United States is limited, even among those with employment-based health insurance. This implementation, feasibility, and outcome study sought to design and evaluate an evidence-based telemental health MM service using a collaborative care model (CoCM). Abstract Introduction: Access to quality mental health medication management (MM) in the United States is limited, even among those with employment-based health insurance. This implementation, feasibility, and outcome study sought to design and evaluate an evidence-based telemental health MM service using a collaborative care model (CoCM). Materials and Methods: CoCM MM was available to adult employees/dependents through their employer benefits, in addition to therapy. Outcomes included Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) collected at baseline and throughout participation. This analysis was not deemed to be human subjects research by the Western Institutional Review Board. Results: Over 17 months, 212 people enrolled and completed >2 assessments; the enrollees were 58.96% female with average age of 32.00 years (standard deviation [SD] = 7.38). In people with moderate to severe depression or anxiety, PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores reduced by an average of 7.27 (SD = 4.80) and 6.71 (SD = 5.18) points after at least 12 ± 4 weeks in the program. At 24 ± 4 weeks, the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 reductions were on average 7.17 (SD = 5.00) and 6.03 (SD = 5.37), respectively. Approximately 65.88% of participants with either baseline depression or anxiety had a response on either the PHQ-9 or GAD-7 at 12 ± 4 weeks and 44.71% of participants experienced remission; at 24 ± 4 weeks, 56.41% had response and 41.03% experienced remission. Conclusions: An evidence-based CoCM telemedicine service within an employee behavioral health benefit is feasible and effective in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms when using measurement-based care. Widespread implementation of a benefit like this could expand access to evidence-based mental health MM. Read more here: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/tmj.2021.0401 < Previous News Next News >

OIG Looking Closely at Telehealth as it Weighs Future Enforcement Mike Miliard, Healthcare IT News August 2021 In a HIMSS21 session with updates on the HHS inspector general's oversight and compliance efforts, officials said they plan to ensure virtual care is provided with integrity, and will take aim at telehealth fraud schemes. The Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services works to ensure the integrity of federal healthcare programs and to safeguard the health and welfare of those programs' beneficiaries. In a session at HIMSS21 on Tuesday, two HHS OIG leaders offered a look at the enforcement priorities the agency has in mind these days, and some hints about the compliance responsibilities healthcare organizations should be prioritizing in the coming months. OIG claims to recover three taxpayer dollars for every dollar it spends, and recoups billions in misspent money every year. Speaking via webcam, Lisa Re, assistant inspector general of legal affairs at OIG, offered an update on some of the legal liabilities and risk areas in the health IT space, related to the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. She recounted some of the agency's enforcement actions in recent years, with companies such as athenahealth, CareCloud, eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion required to pay millions to settle cases. Andrew Vanlandingham, senior counselor for Medicaid Policy and acting health IT lead at OIG, called attention to recent revisions to safe harbors under the Anti-Kickback Statute and Civil Monetary Penalty Rules around coordinated care. He also highlighted a major new priority at OIG: telehealth. "As policymakers, we want to look at what telehealth might look like after the pandemic," said Vanlandingham. "All of those questions are centered around where do they plan on taking this? How will this impact their expenditures for healthcare programs? How to make sure that patients are getting good quality care from telehealth? And I think it's important for us to recognize that we don't know a whole lot right now." He said the OIG is guided by a philosophy summed up in a quote from HHS Principal Deputy Inspector General Christi A. Grimm: "It is important that new policies and technologies with potential to improve care and enhance convenience achieve these goals and are not compromised by fraud, abuse or misuse." When new technologies such as telehealth – with huge upside, but also potential risks – become more commonplace, "it's up to OIG and other healthcare stakeholders to make sure they do live up to that promise and aren't compromised by fraud, abuse or misuse," said Vanlandingham. "And we recognize that a lot of folks in the audience are doing just that: implementing telehealth so it works for patients, for the providers, and is a good tool to enhance care." He said OIG is "working hard to assess how telehealth utilization changed during the pandemic – what that means for corporate integrity, what that means for access, what that means for health equity. We have roughly eight audits and studies ongoing right now that we hope will really be the first down payment for OIG to be part of the broader conversation about what telehealth will look like after the pandemic." The goal is to "help the health technology community and providers as they continue to refine their development of telehealth and enhance virtual care," he said. "This is going to be a whole-of-government and whole-of-industry approach," he added. "It's really up to us to make sure that, since we are at this early stage of implementation of telehealth, that we can avoid issues to make sure that this works as intended, and really ensure that it drives the efficiency and effectiveness and really improves healthcare for all Americans." There have already been some ripe areas for enforcement, said Vanlandingham. "We've had several large-scale national takedown actions involving telefraud schemes with sham or fake telehealth companies," he said. (One of them occurred just this week.) "No one is billing for those telehealth visits fraudulently. They're not submitting a telehealth claim to Medicare. Instead, sophisticated criminal organizations are partnering with telemarketing companies and sometimes unscrupulous doctors to essentially cold call Medicare beneficiaries, get them online with a doctor. And the doctor [asks] a few questions, and then will forge or prescribe expensive equipment that Medicare will pay for durable medical equipment like back braces, or even genetic testing that beneficiaries don't need." DME fraud has been around since Medicare started reimbursing for it, of course. "But for these schemes, what used to be, let's say, $30 or $40 million dollars, maybe $100 million dollars, you've really seen an explosion of exploiting this virtual care model to really bill for a large amount of fraud," said Vanlandingham. "One scheme went for $1.6 billion, with a B, of alleged fraud. So that's obviously very alarming." No one quite knows yet what "telehealth 2.0" will look like, he said. "But I think it is a good example that, as we expand telehealth, there are likely to be instances of large-scale criminal activity that takes advantage of this. And it's up to OIG to assess those risks, and inform policymakers and stakeholders of those risks, and then from those policymakers and stakeholders to adjust." OIG's job now, he said, is to decide "how we can better increase oversight and enforcement to make sure that whatever Congress, CMS and others should decide about how telehealth should be used as providers continue to adopt it, that we've got safeguards to maximize the benefit of telehealth for patients and providers." < Previous News Next News >

Principal Deputy Inspector General Grimm on Telehealth By Christi A. Grimm, HHS-OIG Principal Deputy Inspector General February 26, 2021 It has been just over a year into the COVID-19 pandemic and we remember the over 500,000 Americans who have lost their lives due to COVID-19. That figure is a stark reminder of the critical mission of the Department of Health and Human Services. Challenges in responding to the pandemic have been many, thorny and unprecedented. Consequential decisions often were made quickly to respond to the emergency and provide relief in the way of funding, supplies, and reductions in regulatory and procedural burden. This quick response and scope of relief make oversight, enforcement, transparency, program integrity, and accountability all the more important. It has been just over a year into the COVID-19 pandemic and we remember the over 500,000 Americans who have lost their lives due to COVID-19. That figure is a stark reminder of the critical mission of the Department of Health and Human Services. Challenges in responding to the pandemic have been many, thorny and unprecedented. Consequential decisions often were made quickly to respond to the emergency and provide relief in the way of funding, supplies, and reductions in regulatory and procedural burden. This quick response and scope of relief make oversight, enforcement, transparency, program integrity, and accountability all the more important. Early in the pandemic, OIG, along with many others, recognized the value of expanding options for accessing health care services. Telehealth is a prime example. Where telehealth and other remote access technologies were once a matter of convenience, the public health emergency made them a matter of safety for many beneficiaries. In some cases, health care providers needed regulatory flexibility to provide safe and effective care remotely during the ongoing pandemic. In March 2020, we issued policy statements and FAQs in support of increased telehealth flexibilities. A year later, there is a robust national conversation about expanding coverage for telehealth services based on the experience providers and patients have had during the pandemic. For most, telehealth expansion is viewed positively, offering opportunities to increase access to services, decrease burdens for both patients and providers, and enable better care, including enhanced mental health care. A 2019 OIG study found that telehealth can be an important tool to improve patient access to behavioral health services. And as we observed in recent rulemaking, OIG recognizes the promise that telehealth and other digital health technologies have for improving care coordination and health outcomes. It is important that new policies and technologies with potential to improve care and enhance convenience achieve these goals and are not compromised by fraud, abuse, or misuse. OIG is conducting significant oversight work assessing telehealth services during the public health emergency. Once complete, these reviews will provide objective findings and recommendations that can further inform policymakers and other stakeholders considering what telehealth flexibilities should be permanent. This work can help ensure the potential benefits of telehealth are realized for patients, providers, and HHS programs. We anticipate the first work products to be published later this year. We are aware of concerns raised regarding enforcement actions related to "telefraud" schemes, and it is important to distinguish those schemes from telehealth fraud. In the last few years, OIG has conducted several large investigations of fraud schemes that inappropriately leveraged the reach of telemarketing schemes in combination with unscrupulous doctors conducting sham remote visits to increase the size and scale of the perpetrator's criminal operations. In many cases, the criminals did not bill for the sham telehealth visit. Instead, the perpetrators billed fraudulently for other items or services, like durable medical equipment or genetic tests. We will continue to vigilantly pursue these "telefraud" schemes and monitor the evolution of scams that may relate to telehealth. As our work and the national conversation continues, OIG believes there is a shared goal: ensuring that telehealth delivers quality, convenient care for patients and is not compromised by fraud. As we continue our COVID-19 oversight and enforcement work, we look forward to providing objective, independent information to stakeholders and policymakers. < Previous News Next News >

Board of Directors BOARD A message from the Chair: Stetson Berg Thanks to our work at the Alliance and a terrific Legislature, New Mexico enjoys one of the most progressive telehealth statutes in the country. That doesn’t mean our work is done. The New Mexico Telehealth Alliance exists to support New Mexico telehealth capabilities by continuing to advocate for needed policy changes, providing useful resources in a variety of formats, and creating mechanisms for convening and sharing. We offer educational webinars, online forums, links to resources, and networking opportunities. Connect with us and participate in strengthening New Mexico's access and capacity to provide care across our vast State by bringing a telehealth-related problem you need help solving, joining a committee, participating in our webinars, or sharing your expertise as a speaker. Stetson Berg, MHA CVS HEALTH Chair Executive Committee Member Alex Carter, DMS, PA-C OCHSNER HEALTH Vice Chair Executive Committee Member Jennifer Sandoval, MHA MOLINA HEALTHCARE NEW MEXICO Secretary Executive Committee Member Maggie McCowen, LISW, MBA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO Treasurer Executive Committee Member Jerry Harrison, PhD NEW MEXICO HEALTH RESOURCES Executive Committee Member Beth Landon, MBA, MHA LANDON & ASSOCIATES Immediate Past Chair Executive Committee Member Robert Longstreet NEW MEXICO PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION Executive Committee Member Dale Alverson, MD UNM, PROFESSOR EMERITUS TOUCH-TSC, LLC Gisela Bartolome, MBA SYNCRONYS Kate Berg, RN UNM PROJECT ACCESS Christine David, MBA PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES Maggie Gunter, PhD SYNCRONYS TOUCH-TSC, LLC Annie Jung, MD NEW MEXICO MEDICAL SOCIETY Monica Marthell, DHA BLUE CROSS / BLUE SHIELD OF NEW MEXICO Niles McCall, MLS, CHCP NEW MEXICO MEDICAL SOCIETY Anneke Stienstra, MPH UNITED HEALTHCARE COMMUNITY AND STATE Joy Thompson ALLIANCE FOR NAVAJO BROADBAND SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, LLC

Medicare Telehealth Services for 2023 – CMS Proposes Substantial Changes The National Law Review August 6, 2022 - Volume XII, Number 218 On July 7, 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rule. The rule, if enacted as proposed, will: 1. Create three new permanent telehealth codes for prolonged E/M services; 2. Discontinue reimbursement of telephone (audio-only) E/M services; 3. Discontinue the use of virtual direct supervision; 4. Postpone the effective date of the telemental health six-month rule until 151 days after the PHE ends; 5. Extend coverage of the temporary telehealth codes until 151 days after the PHE ends; and 6. Add 54 codes to the Category 3 telehealth list. Reading between the lines, the nature of CMS’ comments and the changes it proposed (and refused to propose) suggest that CMS rulemakers anticipate the Public Health Emergency (PHE), and associated PHE waivers, will expire no later than the first half of 2023. Three New Telehealth Codes for Prolonged E/M Services: This year, CMS rejected all stakeholder requests to permanently add codes to the Medicare Telehealth Services List. Following its standard evaluation process for such requests, CMS considered whether they met appropriate categories. Category 1 services must be “similar to professional consultations, office visits, and/or office psychiatry services that are currently on the Medicare Telehealth Services List.” Category 2 services require “evidence of clinical benefit if provided as telehealth” and all necessary elements of the service must be able to be performed remotely. CMS rejected this year’s requests because none of the proposed services (e.g., therapy, electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter, adaptive behavior treatment and behavior identification assessment codes) met the requirements of Category 1 or 2 services. Interested stakeholders can collect and submit better evidence to persuade CMS to add these codes on a Category 1 or 2 basis next year (submissions are due by February 10, 2023). Although it rejected stakeholder-submitted codes, CMS itself proposed three new codes to be added to the Medicare Telehealth Services list on a permanent basis: • GXXX1 (Prolonged hospital inpatient or observation care evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99223, 99233, and 99236 for hospital inpatient or observation care evaluation and management services). • GXXX2 (Prolonged nursing facility evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99306, 99310 for nursing facility evaluation and management services). • GXXX3 (Prolonged home or residence evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99345, 99350 for home or residence evaluation and management services). CMS added these codes because they are similar to current CPT codes 99356 and CPT 99357 and HCPCS code G2212, all listed on a permanent basis. Discontinue Reimbursement of Telephone (Audio-Only) E/M Services Under PHE waivers, CMS allowed separate reimbursement of telephone (audio-only) E/M services (CPT codes 99441-99443), something that was embraced by a sizeable cohort of practitioners and patients, particularly in rural areas or patients without suitable broadband access for audio-video. CMS rejected requests to permanently add these services to the Medicare Telehealth Services List. With the exception of certain telemental health services, CMS stated two-way interactive audio-video telecommunications technology will continue to be the Medicare requirement for telehealth services following the PHE. This is because Section 1834(m)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act requires telehealth services be analogous to in-person care by being capable of serving as a substitute for the face-to-face encounter. In CMS’ own language, “We believe that the statute requires that telehealth services be so analogous to in-person care such that the telehealth service is essentially a substitute for a face-to-face encounter.” As audio-only telephone is inherently non-face-to-face, CMS determined, that modality fails to meet the statutory standard. Therefore, 151 days after the PHE expires, audio-only telephone E/M services will revert to their pre-PHE “bundled” status under Medicare (i.e., covered but not separately payable). Practitioners will no longer receive separate reimbursement for these services. Discontinue the Use of Virtual Direct Supervision Under Medicare Part B, certain types of services (e.g., many diagnostic tests, services incident to physicians’ or practitioners’ professional services) must be furnished under the direct supervision of a physician or practitioner. For Medicare purposes, direct supervision requires the supervising professional to be physically present in the same office suite as the supervisee, and immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure. The supervising professional need not be present in the same room during the service, but the “immediate availability” requirement means in-person, physical - not virtual - availability. In connection with PHE waivers, CMS temporarily changed the direct supervision rules to allow the supervising professional to be remote and use real-time, interactive audio-video technology. That change did not require the professional’s real-time presence at, or live observation of, the service via interactive audio-video technology throughout the performance of the procedure. This change was temporary because CMS was concerned widespread direct supervision through virtual presence may not be safe for some clinical situations. In its proposed PFS rule, CMS rejected requests to make virtual direct supervision a permanent feature in Medicare. CMS is considering whether or not it should make virtual direct supervision a permanent feature of Medicare at some point in the future. Interested stakeholders with data are invited to submit comments and information to CMS on this topic. If the proposed rule is finalized, virtual direct supervision will expire at the end of the calendar year in which the PHE ends. If the PHE ends in October 2022, the supervision waiver will end December 31, 2022. If the PHE ends in January 2023, the supervision waiver will end December 31, 2023. Postpone the Effective Date of the Telemental Health Six-Month Rule Until 151 Days After PHE Ends In 2020, Congress imposed new conditions on telemental health coverage under Medicare, creating an in-person exam requirement alongside coverage of telemental health services when the patient is located at home. Under the rule, Medicare will cover a telehealth service delivered while the patient is located at home if the following conditions are met: The practitioner conducts an in-person exam of the patient within the six months before the initial telehealth service; The telehealth service is furnished for purposes of diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a mental health disorder (other than for treatment of a diagnosed substance use disorder (SUD) or co-occurring mental health disorder); and The practitioner conducts at least one in-person service every 12 months of each follow-up telehealth service. For a full understanding of the rule, read the frequently asked questions and what it means for practitioners at Medicare Telehealth Mental Health FAQs. This rule was originally scheduled to take effect the day after the PHE expires. Following an amendment to the rule, it is now set to take effect 151 days after the PHE expires. Extend Coverage of the Temporary Telehealth Codes Until 151 Days After the PHE Ends Temporary telehealth codes are those services added to the Medicare Telehealth Services List during the PHE on a temporary basis, but which were not placed into Category 1, 2, or 3. Coverage of those temporary telehealth codes had been scheduled to end when the PHE expires. In its proposed PFS rule, CMS states it will extend coverage of those temporary telehealth codes until 151 days after the PHE ends. CMS is doing so for consistency with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (CAA). CMS stated this extension may simplify the post-PHE transition by applying the same coverage end date to all the various waiver-related telehealth codes in a hope to reduce billing errors. Note, the Category 3 codes are set to expire December 31, 2023, while the other temporary telehealth codes are set to expire 151 days after the PHE ends. This means, under the proposed rule, if the PHE ends after August 2023, the Category 3 codes would expire before the temporary telehealth codes. If finalized, health care providers would need to keep a careful eye on the calendar to ensure billing practices keep up with the various sunset dates. Add 54 Codes to the Category 3 Telehealth List CMS’ Category 3 list contains services that likely have a clinical benefit when furnished via telehealth, but lack sufficient evidence to justify permanent coverage. CMS proposed adding 54 codes to that Category 3 list. The services fall into nine categories: (1) therapy; (2) electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter; (3) adaptive behavior treatment and behavior identification assessment; (4) behavioral health; (5) ophthalmologic; (6) cognition; (7) ventilator management; (8) speech therapy; and (9) audiologic. The complete list can be found at this link. Keep in mind, these codes will expire December 31, 2023.Category 3 codes were originally slated to expire at the end of the year in which the PHE ends, but CMS extended coverage of those codes through December 31, 2023. In this year’s proposed PFS rule, CMS declined any further extension, so all Category 3 codes will expire at the end of 2023. In the event the PHE extends well into 2023, CMS said it will consider a further extension of the Category 3 codes at that time. What to Do Next? Providers, facilities, technology companies, and virtual care entrepreneurs interested in changes to the telehealth codes for 2023 should consider providing comments to the proposed rule. CMS is soliciting comments on the proposed rule until 5:00 p.m. ET on September 6, 2022. Anyone may submit comments – anonymously or otherwise – via electronic submission at this link. Alternatively, commenters may submit comments by mail to: Regular Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1770-P, P.O. Box 8016, Baltimore, MD 21244-8016. Express Overnight Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1770-P, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 If submitting via mail, please be sure to allow time for comments to be received before the closing date. For original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/medicare-telehealth-services-2023-cms-proposes-substantial-changes < Previous News Next News >

HIMSSCast: How emerging tech is opening new avenues in telehealth, RPM Mike Miliard October 28, 2022 Virtual therapeutics, voice recognition and fast-evolving artificial intelligence tools are transforming home-based care, says Robin Farmanfarmaian, co-author of the new book How AI Can Democratize Healthcare. Remote patient monitoring and other forms of virtual care are fast finding footholds in healthcare as patients get acquainted with these new care modalities, and as health systems learn to appreciate the cost efficiencies they offer. But telehealth and RPM are still in their early days, and fast-changing as they're augmented with other new and emerging digital health and artificial intelligence technologies. Robin Farmanfarmaian, a longtime Silicon Valley entrepreneur and co-author of the new book, How AI Can Democratize Healthcare, joined us recently to discuss how the growing momentum toward home-based care is being impacted by leading-edge innovations such as natural language processing, digital therapeutics and more. leading-edge-technologies-are-transforming-telehealth-and-rpm (1).mp3 Talking points: Where remote patient monitoring is now, and where it's headed How AI is changing how virtual care is delivered New approaches to patient engagement and experience What's next for digital therapeutics and other app-based interventions Innovative use cases for NLP and machine learning models More about this episode: The intersection of remote patient monitoring and AI How remote patient monitoring is moving into the mainstream AI-powered telehealth improves PT care at Essen Health Care Mayo Clinic working with Memora Health on virtual postpartum care AI-powered RPM can help address the rural neonatal care crisis How remote patient monitoring improves care, saves money AI and IoT device connects with concierge platform for RPM Twitter: @MikeMiliardHITN Email the writer: mike.miliard@himssmedia.com Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original podcast: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/himsscast-how-emerging-tech-opening-new-avenues-telehealth-rpm < Previous News Next News >