New SAMHSA Telehealth Guide: Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 Telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and its National Mental Health and Substance Use Policy Laboratory recently released a new evidence-based resource guide titled, Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders, to support implementation of telehealth across diverse mental health and substance use disorder treatment settings. The guide examines the current telehealth landscape, including evidence on effectiveness and examples of programs that have integrated telehealth modalities (live-video, telephone, and web-based applications) for the treatment of serious mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Also included is guidance and resources for evaluating and implementing best practices which are presented across a continuum of services, such as screening and assessment, treatment, medication management, care management, recovery support, and crisis services. The report speaks to how telehealth is known to improve access to care during emergencies and in rural and underserved areas, but stresses that implementation should be expanded outside of such situations and integrated into an organization’s standard practices to improve provider and patient communication, satisfaction, timeliness and continuity of care. The authors highlight how this is increasingly important when it comes to mental health issues, which impact millions of Americans that often face unique treatment gaps and barriers. Ultimately, it is suggested that with the right resources and upfront work, the evidence shows telehealth has the capability to address these barriers, improve health outcomes and care coordination, decrease costs and reduce health disparities. Notable findings related to telehealth use and mental health include: *Telehealth use doubled from 14% to 28% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth visits for mental health increased 556% between March 11 and April 22, 2020 *SUD treatment via telehealth increased from 13.5% to 17.4% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth use increased 425% for mental health appointments among rural Medicare beneficiaries between 2010 and 2017 The guide presents specific strategies to increase patient access and comfort using telehealth, such as providing devices to those that need them and offering trial sessions to address any technological challenges. It is also suggested that providers first screen patients for their willingness and readiness to receive care via telehealth, as it may not be appropriate for some patients. Additionally, telephone should be encouraged when it reduces prior structural and institutional barriers that have made contacting underserved communities difficult. The guide also offers strategies to increase provider comfort using telehealth, such as: *trainings and designating certain staff to support and evaluate its use *how to create a similar environment to that of an in-person visit for patients *addressing organizational infrastructure issues Understanding and knowledge of relevant and ever-evolving regulatory and reimbursement policies is included as an important consideration as well, to which the authors offer a variety of tracking resources, including the policy finder tool on CCHP’s new website. Regardless of where state and federal telehealth policies land, the guide includes a number of telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth. Additional resources can be accessed on the SAMHSA website. For more information read the full SAMHSA resource guide- https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/SAMHSA_Digital_Download/PEP21-06-02-001.pdf < Previous News Next News >

House reps advocate for audio-only telehealth extensions for opioid treatments Jeff Lagasse October 21, 2022 The lawmakers describe the future of audio-only telehealth coverage as "unpredictable" and say a consistent policy should be established. Two Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives have penned a letter to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Drug Enforcement Agency, imploring the agencies to extend flexibilities for audio-based telehealth so physicians may continue prescribing medication-assisted treatments to address opioid use disorder. Representatives Ann McLane Kuster, D-N.H., and Lori Trahan, D-Mass., said they're advocates for the development of a long-term policy regarding telehealth flexibilities, particularly, when it comes to administering buprenorphine to patients, a medication that helps prevent overdose death. They cited research from the National Library of Medicine suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic introduced increased barriers to accessing treatment for those with opioid use disorder. Drug overdoses are increasing and disparities have been worsening over the last several years, with opioid-related overdose deaths reaching an all-time high in 2021. Kuster and Trahan noted that the Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule regarding coverage of audio-only telehealth for buprenorphine initiation depends on if "buprenorphine is authorized by the DEA and SAMHSA at the time the service is furnished." Since payment for services is dependent on Drug Enforcement Agency and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration guidance, the House members encouraged the agencies to release the public guidance quickly, and to include policies, such as telehealth, that increase access to OUD treatment. WHAT'S THE IMPACT? Audio-only telehealth is an important tool for clinicians in responding to the addiction crisis, the lawmakers said. A 2021 study from the National Library of Medicine backs this up, finding that audio-only telehealth, as a "low-threshold" approach to medication-assisted treatment, was associated with better retention in care. Previous studies also show that providers treating patients with OUD think that telemedicine, including audio-only options, should be offered in some form beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, regulations permitting. The American Society for Addiction Medicine recently released their policy statement on telehealth, saying it's a viable tool to increase access to buprenorphine as part of OUD treatment "and that there is ample opportunity moving forward to study the role that audio-only care can play in responding to the opioid crisis," the lawmakers wrote. Calling the future of audio-only telehealth coverage "unpredictable," the representatives requested that SAMHSA and the DEA grant telehealth flexibilities along with the declaration of a public health emergency for the opioid crisis; evaluate long-term policy for flexibilities based on the utilization and effectiveness of audio-only telehealth in relation to medication-assisted treatment; and detail a projected timeline regarding rulemaking for audio-only telecommunications for the initiation of buprenorphine for treatment of OUD. THE LARGER TREND Overdose deaths were rising prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but in 2020, there was a significant increase in overdose deaths. According to provisional CDC data, overdose deaths increased more than 30% in 2020, leading to more than 93,000 deaths. This increase was driven by the use of synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl and stimulants, such as methamphetamine and cocaine, or combinations of substances. Pandemic restrictions intended to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have unfortunately also made it harder for individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) to receive treatment and support services. Providing funding for harm-reduction services is one pillar of a four-pillar approach being implemented at the federal level. Evidence-based harm-reduction strategies minimize the negative consequences of drug use, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. The other three pillars of the administration's opioid mitigation strategy are primary prevention, focusing on the root causes and predictors of SUDs, evidence-based treatment and recovery support. A December 2021 report from the Office of the Inspector General found that while more than 1 million Medicare beneficiaries had a diagnosis of OUD in 2020, less than 16% of those beneficiaries received medication to treat their conditions. They accounted for fewer than 1 in 6 of all Medicare beneficiaries with OUD. Twitter: @JELagasse Email the writer: jeff.lagasse@himssmedia.com See original article: https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/house-reps-advocate-audio-only-telehealth-extensions-opioid-treatments < Previous News Next News >

Finding Our Way Out of the Pandemic Haze: What Telehealth Tools Are Medicare Providers Allowed to Keep, and Which Must They Leave Behind? Amy J. Dilcher, Kara Du November 30, 2022 During the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare coverage expanded to include a vast arsenal of tools that help patients access medical services while keeping patients and practitioners safe. Many of these tools involve telehealth services and were made possible by the COVID-19 emergency blanket waivers, which went into effect when the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) declared a Public Health Emergency (the “PHE”). Some of these tools: Permitted providers to furnish distant site telehealth services; Expanded the use of audio-only telehealth to behavioral health counseling services; and Facilitated the conducting of telehealth appointments by practitioners from their homes while billing from their currently enrolled locations. As a result of these efforts, the use of telehealth and telemedicine exploded in 2020 according to an HHS Study. This growth was no surprise given the unparalleled advantages of conducting a variety of medical appointments from remote locations in a time where limiting one’s exposure to the COVID-19 virus was paramount. Despite the current trend towards relaxing previously stringent regulations on exposure and contact, many providers and patients prefer telehealth services as the primary method of treatment. This post provides an overview of recent developments in the adoption of telehealth tools by providers, the status of Medicare coverage for telemedicine services, the regulatory vision for the ascent out of the PHE, and fraud, waste and abuse considerations as we begin to make our way out of the pandemic haze. When does the PHE current expire? The blanket waivers that expand Medicare coverage of certain telehealth technology are in effect so long as the Secretary of HHS has declared a COVID-19 public health emergency. The first PHE was declared in 2020 and has been renewed every 90 days since then. The latest HHS extension for the PHE is effective through January 11, 2023. The PHE status is very likely to continue to be extended beyond next January given a possible surge in COVID-19 infections in the United States this winter, according to two Biden administration officials. Moreover, in a letter to the state governors, HHS has indicated that they will provide at least a 60-day notice before the current PHE ends (i.e., on or before November 11, 2022) in the event that it does not intend to issue an extension. To date, the agency has not provided that notice. Updates on the status of HHS declarations of public health emergencies are available via the federal government’s PHE tracker. Adoption of Telehealth Tools by Providers Looking towards the future, many providers anticipate keeping some COVID era telehealth tools in their arsenal after the PHE has ended. According to a recent study by the American Medical Association, tele-visit tools ranked highest in provider enthusiasm, provider adoption and improved patient outcomes in comparison to other digital health tools. The vast majority of physicians who have not yet incorporated these tools are seeking to utilize them in the next three years. The Regulatory Vision For the Ascent Out of the PHE CMS has outlined their strategy for assessing which blanket waivers should stay in effect after the last PHE extension expires. The strategy consists of three concurrent phases: Phase1: Evaluating blanket waivers based on the current stage of the PHE as compared to when the waivers were first issued. Phase 2: Keeping tools in place which would be the most helpful in future PHEs, to ensure a rapid response both locally and nationally. Phase 3: Continuing coverage of flexibilities that are aimed at producing high-quality care and health equity. CMS is working with the healthcare industry to holistically prepare our health care system for future PHEs. Medicare Coverage in Advance of Expiration of the PHE Effective as of January 1, 2022, CMS finalized a rule as part of the FY22 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule that expanded Medicare coverage of telehealth for behavioral health services to facilitate greater access and equitable services for those who may not have access to mental health services providers. Most recently, on November 1, 2022, CMS issued the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) 2023 Final Rule (the “2023 Final Rule”), which includes policy revisions and guidance regarding Medicare telehealth services. For example, several services that are temporarily available as telehealth services for the PHE were made available through CY 2023 in order to allow additional time for the collection of data that may support their inclusion as permanent additions to the Medicare Telehealth Services List. CMS also confirmed its intention to implement provisions such as allowing telehealth services to be furnished in any geographic area and in any originating site setting via program instruction or other sub-regulatory guidance to ensure a smooth transition after the end of the PHE. Proposed Legislation to Continue and Expand Medicare Coverage of Telehealth Services The American Hospital Association is one of many groups that urged Congress to expand and make permanent the regulatory flexibilities granted to Medicare telehealth services during the PHE. This strong support in favor of extending and expanding Medicare coverage of telehealth flexibilities was repeated again in a letter sent by 375 organizations to Senate leaders on September 13, 2022. The letter indicates several specific telehealth tools, such as lifting in-person requirements for tele-mental health and waiver of location limitations, that have been among the most integral to bringing needed care to patients in the age of technology. To that end, there are currently several bills in the Senate and House, which would codify much of the progress in telehealth service coverage that providers and industry organizations are seeking. In the Senate, the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act was introduced in February of 2022. The bill proposes an extension of and modification to Medicare coverage of four specific telehealth tools. This expansion would continue for two years after the PHE expires. Representatives in the House introduced the Ensuring Telehealth Expansion Act of 2021 in January of 2021. This bill would make Medicare coverage of telehealth flexibilities permanent outside of the PHE. Recently, the Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2022 was passed by the House and is now being reviewed by the Senate. This bill modifies the extension of certain Medicare telehealth flexibilities and provides that some of them continue to apply until December 31, 2024, in the event that the PHE ends before that date. For example, the bill allows beneficiaries to continue to receive telehealth services at any site, regardless of type or location (e.g., the beneficiary’s home), occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech-language pathologists, and audiologists to continue to furnish telehealth services, and federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics to continue to serve as the distant site (i.e., the location of the health care practitioner) for telehealth services. Fraud, Waste and Abuse of Telehealth Services The COVID-19 emergency blanket waivers have been a useful tool for healthcare providers, but the expansion of Medicare coverage of telehealth during the PHE has also presented the opportunity for fraud, waste and abuse. In a recent report (the “Report”) the HHS Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”), identified 1,714 out of 742,000 providers as “high risk” for fraud, waste, or abuse with respect to their billing practices for telehealth services. OIG identified several billing practices that may be indicative of providers it considers to be “high risk” of engaging in Medicare fraud, waste or abuse: Facility fees and telehealth fees are billed for the same visit; The highest, most expensive level of telehealth services is billed every time; Telehealth services are billed for a high number of days in any given year; Medicare fee-for-service and a Medicare Advantage plan are billed for the same service for a high proportion of services; A high average number of hours of telehealth services are billed per visit; Telehealth services are billed for a high number of beneficiaries; and Telehealth services and ordering medical equipment are billed for a high proportion of beneficiaries. Although the “high risk” providers submitted only a small percentage of the total number of claims for telehealth services, the amount of claims associated with these providers represented $127.7 million in Medicare fee-for-service payments. The Report also found that over half of the “high risk” providers were connected with at least one other “high risk” provider. The OIG provided several recommendations to CMS: Strengthen monitoring and targeted oversight of telehealth services; Conduct additional education outreach to providers including training sessions, educational materials, and webinars on appropriate telehealth billing practices; Establish billing modifiers to help providers identify circumstances in which non-physician clinical staff primarily render telehealth services under the supervision of a physician; Identify telehealth companies that bill Medicare by updating the Medicare provider enrollment application or working with the National Uniform Claim Committee to add a taxonomy code that identifies telehealth companies; and Conduct targeted reviews of the “high risk” providers identified in the Report. Final Thoughts The importance of telehealth services cannot be understated. Under the current PHE, providers have had the opportunity to deploy these tools in the emergency context, and at the same time have been able to demonstrate their efficacy and reliability in providing quality medical care to patients who would not otherwise have access to either because of coverage or geographic limitations. Nevertheless, given the rapid growth of the industry in recent years and the amount of Medicare dollars spent on telehealth services, it is prudent for healthcare providers to proactively review their telehealth billing practices and supporting documentation. Doing so will reduce the potential for billing errors and minimize compliance risks while improving quality control and financially protecting their organizations. See original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/finding-our-way-out-pandemic-haze-what-telehealth-tools-are-medicare-providers < Previous News Next News >

TELEHEALTH: THE JOURNEY FROM VIDEO VISITS TO STRATEGIC BUSINESS TOOL By Mandy Roth at HealthLeaders April 6, 2021 New approaches to telehealth can help organizations meet their key objectives. KEY TAKEAWAYS: *Asynchronous communication increases provider efficiency and provides a way to address physician shortages. *Virtual hospitals reduce healthcare costs and support the transition to value-based care. *A cloud-based platform enables 24/7 personalized care, moving care upstream to improve outcomes and reduce the cost of care. 2020 was a remarkable year for healthcare innovation, and telehealth finally achieved scale across the industry. Driven by a need to deliver healthcare at a distance, hospitals and health systems stood up new services seemingly overnight, fanned the flames under languishing programs, or found new uses for thriving virtual care initiatives. Now that telehealth has become a fixture in the healthcare delivery firmament, it's time to examine what comes next. While current use predominantly focuses on televisits between providers and patients, and mysteries remain about reimbursement and licensure issues after COVID-19, forward-thinking healthcare executives are using the technology to enable new models of care. Health systems are employing telehealth to transform healthcare delivery in ways that address strategic business objectives: improve outcomes, reduce provider burden, enhance patient experience, improve access, and ameliorate workforce labor issues. HealthLeaders spoke to visionary leaders and digital healthcare experts who shared their insights and perspectives about what organizations should focus on now, next, and in the future to unlock the potential of telehealth. Coverage includes case studies about asynchronous care, remote monitoring, and a futuristic cloud-based platform fueled by artificial intelligence. Health systems shared details about how these initiatives work and how they evaluated the return on investment. These new approaches to telehealth can help organizations meet their strategic objectives and provide information to inspire other organizations on their own telehealth journeys. WHAT'S NOW: PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES ENHANCES EFFICIENCY WITH ASYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATION Strategic Objectives: *Increase provider efficiency and address physician shortages *Reduce costs per patient encounter *Reduce ER and urgent care utilization At the beginning of 2020, physicians and consumers had not yet fully embraced the concept of virtual video visits; many were skeptical about the ability to deliver care effectively in this manner. Yet after the pandemic forced the adoption of virtual visits, their reputation and usage forever changed. Today, asynchronous communication faces the same hurdles. Providers and patients don't understand how it works and question its value. "It's a technology whose time has not yet come," says Oliver Lignell, vice president of virtual health at health system consultancy AVIA, which helps members accelerate their digital transformation initiatives. "It's not yet mainstream, but it should be." Presbyterian Healthcare Services, an Albuquerque, New Mexico–based nonprofit integrated healthcare delivery system, began investigating this approach to healthcare four years ago. "It's been incredibly effective," says Ries Robinson, MD, senior vice president and chief innovation officer. Between the system's nine hospitals and a health plan it offers, the organization serves a third of the state's residents. With a shortage of practitioners in New Mexico, and 70% of the care it provides covered by capitated contracts, Presbyterian needed to find a way to operate more efficiently. Asynchronous communication worked. Last year, a designated group of employed urgent care physicians handled 50,000 asynchronous visits for low-acuity care, and spent an average of two minutes on each encounter—far less than the 15–18 minutes it takes to conduct a typical video call. This form of care does not occur in real time. Depending on the platform used, a patient completes and submits an online form via secure email, text, or an app, detailing his or her complaint and relevant history. A physician receives the information, processes it, and sends a response back to the patient with instructions and prescriptions, if necessary. Presbyterian physicians usually respond within 15 minutes; some health systems using asynchronous communication allow up to 24 hours. There is no direct audio or video exchange with the patient unless the physician thinks it is warranted and escalates the encounter. Asynchronous communication offers some distinct advantages to health systems, say the experts. Synchronous care, which includes video, audio, and in-person visits, comes with an Achilles' heel: Regardless of venue, the physician spends about the same amount of one-to-one time with the patient, says digital medicine expert Ashish Atreja, MD, MPH, chief information and digital health officer at UC Davis Health in Sacramento, California. "The real growth you're going to see in value," he says, "is the ability to deliver one-to-many care." Asynchronous communication is a step in that direction. "One of the most important things asynchronous communication does is help scale response," says Ann Mond Johnson, MBA, MHA, CEO of the American Telemedicine Association. In addition, because patients can use it with a phone or the internet, it can address issues of access, she says. Robinson says the SmartExam™ platform Presbyterian is using, made by Bright.md, includes features that appeal to its physicians. It automatically enters chart-ready SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) notes into the electronic medical record (EMR), creates billing files, and manages patient follow-up communications. "It's extremely elegant," says Robinson. SmartExam's design, which asks patients questions in an interview-style exchange, and advanced logic has earned the trust of the physicians who use it, he says. "I remember the first time [physicians] said, 'I trust it'; I thought that was kind of a funny term to use," Robinson recalls. When he asked the doctors what they meant, they explained that the tool is thorough and consistent in a way humans cannot replicate. "That's what the providers really like." Even the best medical assistant, he says, may vary in how they ask questions of patients, forget to include certain details, or package assessments differently. While Robinson says the health system has detailed financial models that justify the cost of the platform, he declines to disclose the figures, but notes, "It hasn't been an astronomical investment by any stretch of the imagination." Expenses include a one-time cost for EMR integration, ongoing charges for using the platform on a per-patient per-use basis, and marketing and promotion. He also provides formulas to calculate estimated cost savings. They include: *Better utilization of providers' time and related staffing expenses, by reducing each of 50,000 encounters from 15–18 minutes for a video encounter to two minutes for an asynchronous visit. *More appropriate ER usage. Out of 50,000 patients, 8% were redirected away from the ER. This figure is based on patient survey responses indicating they would have visited the ER had the platform not been available. With an average ER visit costing more than $500, says Robinson, "there's a significant savings." *Reduced workload at urgent care facilities. "Just assume 20,000 [of these patients] would have gone to an urgent care that we own," he says. The time and expense of urgent care staffing is used to calculate the savings. Patients also save money, says AVIA's Lignell. Nationally, he says the typical cost for an asynchronous visit is about $20, and many health systems offer these visits for free. This compares to a national average cost of $50 for a video visit and $125 for an in-person visit. There is one additional element that has contributed to the success of asynchronous visits for Presbyterian: a digital front door. Patients visit the pres.today webpage, enter their condition and insurance information, and are automatically directed to the appropriate level of care, one of which includes the option for online visits (using asynchronous care). Because of the asynchronous initiative's success, the health system is expanding its use beyond low-acuity care. Future plans involve developing new uses for the platform, capturing symptoms and history to create greater efficiencies for video visits and even in-person care. "We have gotten religion around the idea of capturing as much information as you can in a sophisticated manner before the visit," says Robinson. "You maximize the quality of care and the efficiency of the visit. We're taking that idea and pushing it forward in multiple avenues of care here at Presbyterian." Value-based care will drive further adoption of these models, says Lignell. "The advantages from a total cost of care standpoint are huge," he says. "It's much less expensive to deliver care this way." While the bulk of growth has been in low-acuity primary care, he says asynchronous care is now being explored in specialty and higher-acuity care, as well as in e-consults between providers. "The asynchronous model is proving to be incredibly efficient for health systems," says Lignell. "That's one of the reasons why it has so much promise." WHAT'S NEXT: ATRIUM HEALTH LAUNCHES A VIRTUAL HOSPITAL Strategic Objectives: *Increase bed capacity, limit staff and patient exposure to COVID-19, and conserve PPE *Reduce costs and support the transition to value-based care *Improve patient satisfaction and experience "Remote patient management is widening the aperture from the episodic-based healthcare reality that we've known for decades towards a 24/7, always-on ubiquitous reality," says Rasu Shrestha, MD, MBA, executive vice president and chief strategy and transformation officer at Atrium Health. Long before COVID-19 hit American shores, health systems began launching remote monitoring programs, particularly to manage chronic diseases. Hospital at home initiatives, or virtual hospitals, are a robust manifestation of this endeavor. While these models have demonstrated cost savings, adoption has been slow due to reimbursement issues. The pandemic offered a trifecta of motivating factors to accelerate adoption of the virtual hospital model: bed capacity issues, a need to limit staff and patient exposure, and dwindling supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE). With these issues in mind, during March 2020 a handful of clinicians approached Atrium Health administrators, suggesting that the 42-hospital Charlotte, North Carolina–based nonprofit health system consider launching a hospital at home initiative. Two weeks later it was operational, says Scott Rissmiller, MD, executive vice president and chief physician executive. In the first 10 months, the virtual hospital admitted 51,000 patients. "We are able to keep patients in their homes, protect our teammates from infection, and also protect patients," Rissmiller says. "It freed up a good bit of capacity in our acute facility," enabling the health system to reserve that space for its more acute COVID-19 patients. The virtual hospital maintains two "floors." The first floor functions as an observation unit; the second floor is reserved for patients requiring more intensive care, says Rissmiller. Any COVID-19-positive patient is admitted to the first floor of the virtual hospital and receives digital tools to monitor temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen levels. These devices deliver data via Bluetooth® to a smartphone app developed by the health system's IT department. That data feeds into the patient's EMR, fully integrating into the patient's continuum of care, Rissmiller explains. In a bunker back at Atrium Health's call center, a team of clinicians monitors data and checks in with first-floor patients daily. Second-floor virtual patients have the same home monitoring tools, but receive "much more intensive management" and frequent check-ins, he says. In addition, community-based paramedics visit homes to administer IV fluids, IV antibiotics, breathing treatments, EKGs, and other interventions. This arrangement created additional opportunities to reduce hospital bed capacity. "We were one of the first in the nation to get in-home remdesivir, one of the COVID treatments," says Rissmiller. "To receive remdesivir, you have to be on oxygen therapy, so these patients are sick." In a 10-month period, Atrium Health administered about 150 therapeutic rounds of the drug, he says, which saved about 500 hospital days that would have been required if those patients had been hospitalized. "From a quality standpoint, we do not view this any differently than if these patients were within the walls of our hospital," says Rissmiller. All measures, including length of stay as well as readmission, transfer, and mortality rates, have been almost identical to inpatient stats, and patient satisfaction has been "extremely high," he says. "Patients really would rather be in their home surrounded by their loved ones and support system." The hospital at home initiative has been a "costly endeavor," says Rissmiller. "When we realized this pandemic was going to be significant, our CEO [and President Eugene Woods, MBA, MHA, FACHE] called me and said, 'Scott, whatever you need to care for our patients and communities—do it. We'll figure out the costs later.' It freed us up to be able to do things like this." As it turned out, costs have been offset by funds from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), which enable Atrium Health to bill for many of the services provided. The organization also is one of a handful of healthcare systems that are doing a pilot with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which views virtual beds as real hospital beds. "The reimbursement is similar because of the level of service we're providing," says Rissmiller. Initially, though, "it was all upfront costs for us, but the return was in bed days." A focus on reimbursement continues "as we are now maturing the program," he says. "Our concern is that the reimbursement will go away once those [pandemic] emergency orders expire. We're working with the state, our payers, Medicare, and others to make sure that this continues to be reimbursed at a level that allows us to continue to grow it and cover our costs." "Out of necessity, COVID ultimately accelerated health systems' desire to think through their digital strategies and determine how digital fits into their overall care and business models," says Brian Kalis, MBA, managing director of digital health and innovation in consulting firm Accenture's health practice. "New models are starting to pop up, and care is shifting to the home." Strategic goals include producing outcomes that equal or exceed inpatient care, while also improving labor productivity, Kalis says. "A majority of health systems coming out of COVID are putting care at home as a key strategic focus. That requires a collection of new models to deliver care, putting different care team compositions in place, and [utilizing] technology to help a broad range of conditions for pre-acute, acute, and post-acute care." Atrium's virtual hospital has already expanded beyond COVID-19 patients. Once the surge diminished in July, Rissmiller "challenged the team to look at [the initiative] through the lens of a non-COVID world. Can this become a new way of caring for patients that makes sense to the patient and to us as a healthcare system?" There is now a list of 10 diagnoses to be considered for hospital at home care, and congestive heart failure patients have already been admitted into the virtual facility. "We're starting to branch out," he says. "We're also starting to focus on different communities to make sure that we're doing this in a way that helps with our underserved populations and gives them the resources they need to manage care at home rather than coming through the emergency department." While Atrium Health rolled out its program in two weeks, Rissmiller says, "this is something that would be incredibly hard to start up on your own if you hadn't had the 10 years of virtual experience that we've had building these capabilities, but also the confidence to be able to deliver these kinds of services at home. It takes a while for clinicians to understand that care can be delivered safely virtually. We also have a culture at Atrium Health that really enables our clinical leaders to lead and their voices to be heard. That, more than anything, is the secret sauce that's allowed for innovations like hospital at home." WHAT'S IN THE FUTURE: HIGHMARK HEALTH DEVELOPS PLATFORM TO DRIVE 24/7 CARE Strategic Objectives: *Move care upstream to improve outcomes *Reduce cost of care, patient traffic, and volume *Enable 24/7 personalized care Unleashing the potential of virtual care requires strategic innovation fueled by imagination. Highmark Health is one organization traveling along this path. To understand the power of an initiative now underway at the Pittsburgh-based payer-provider system, one must imagine the potential to do something that is currently not possible. For example, take the hypothetical case of an individual living independently at home with six medical conditions. What if real-time data alerts her care team that her health status has subtly changed? What if this alert takes the complexity of her medical history into account and offers decision-support tools to accelerate clinical action before her health deteriorates? The Living Health Model, fueled by the Living Health Dynamic Platform—a Google Cloud–based technology infused with artificial intelligence and advanced analytics—could be the missing link that will enable care to move upstream. The concept revolutionizes the current perception of telehealth and enables 24/7 care. It aims to connect the provider, patient, and payer in novel ways to improve health outcomes, reduce clinician administrative burdens, enhance patient engagement, and reduce costs, says Karen Hanlon, executive vice president and chief operating officer at Highmark Health. "We believe that we have the capabilities and resources to pull it together," says Tony Farah, MD, FACC, FSCAI, Highmark Health's executive vice president and chief medical and clinical transformation officer, who is also a practicing cardiologist. The platform will amplify the impact of remote monitoring tools, which many health systems already use for chronic disease management. By adding sophisticated data analytics, machine learning, decision support, and patient education tools, the system will support comprehensive care rather than managing diseases in silos, Farah says. "Our partnership with Google Cloud is going to not only accelerate our strategy, but also help us scale it." Data will be constantly mined to determine the "next best action" required to proactively care for a patient and formulate a personalized care plan that delivers a "curated" experience based on the patient's personal needs, says Hanlon. For patients with no apparent health conditions, the system may focus on wellness. While full realization of this concept may be years down the road, Hanlon says the first iteration of the platform will be functional at the end of 2021. Accenture cloud expert Geoff Schmidt, managing director, global lead—life sciences technology, says Highmark Health's plans align with what he's seeing in the life sciences sector. Health leaders should not think of the cloud as a capability or an IT initiative, he says; "think of it as a business transformation enabler." Cloud technology is accelerating companies' three- to five-year strategic plans, compressing those timelines down to 12 to 18 months. "We're seeing dramatic transformations and acceleration of CEO agendas because of the capability that the cloud can provide." Partnering with an outside player is a smart move for health systems that want to expedite their transformation initiatives, says Schmidt. "Major technology partners are innovating at a scale that is, just frankly, hard for payers or providers to keep up with." Prior to its partnership with Google Cloud, Highmark Health piloted "analog" proofs of concept, according to Farah. These pilots involved addressing healthcare for several patient populations, including high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities as well as individual chronic conditions like COPD, heart failure, diabetes, and hypertension. Physicians were asked to improve health outcomes in 12 months. "The patient experience went through the roof, and in almost every case—with the exception of diabetes—the total cost of care came down," says Farah. "I would say physician engagement was our secret sauce." "Consumer engagement is also a key component," says Hanlon. "There are a lot of solutions out there. They're very siloed and they're not integrated. We can have the best solutions in the world, but if the consumer and the clinician are not using them, they will have no impact." While Highmark Health does not disclose the company's investment in this platform, "you can guess that it is a fair amount," says Hanlon. In addition to activating the initiative at Allegheny Health Network, a nonprofit health system that Highmark owns and operates, "at the same time we're a health plan serving 5.6 million members," she says. "The ability to interact with all of those members is incredibly important to us. When you look across our book of business, we're probably managing somewhere in the neighborhood of $26 billion in healthcare costs a year. When we look at the investments that are needed to support that base of membership and that level of healthcare spend, we feel it's appropriate and we can justify the investment." Being both a payer and a provider imbues Highmark Health with the motivation and influence to transform healthcare delivery in this way, Hanlon says. The company is a Blue Cross Blue Shield–affiliated payer operating in three states, and also functions as a provider through the Allegheny Health Network. "By having both of those assets in the portfolio," says Hanlon, "it's easier for us to align on the path forward and the economic model." But to characterize this venture merely as a mechanism to save money misses the point, she says. The model is designed to improve patient outcomes by moving care upstream, explains Farah. "Conditions that exist today will be prevented from deteriorating, and conditions that haven't developed will be prevented—or, at a minimum, be delayed in development. That's the primary goal, and it results in a reduction in total cost of care. It flips the equation from focusing on finances to focusing on health." In addition, for the Living Health Model to be effective, it must work with entities outside of the facilities owned by the Highmark Health system, which provides health plans in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and West Virginia. Allegheny Health Network operates facilities in 29 Pennsylvania counties and portions of New York, Ohio, and West Virginia. "We're looking to have impact across all of the markets that we serve as our insurance company, not just where we own a provider asset," says Hanlon. "The progression of value-based care has been a slow march. I think this platform will be a tool to enable providers to continue down that path. Part of our focus is developing other tools we believe will be necessary for the providers to succeed in a value-based environment. We recognize that we're going to have to be a leader in helping others to move down that path." A FRAMEWORK FOR MOVING FORWARD Planning for the future of telehealth requires rethinking the present. "If the only way that you look at telehealth is as a way to replace one-to-one physical visits with a telehealth visit, you're not changing the world; you're just creating a little bit more convenience," says Roy Schoenberg, MD, MPH, president and CEO of Amwell, a Boston-based technology company that provides telehealth technology to health systems. "If you look at telehealth as a product, you're going to end up behind the competitive landscape curve. If you look at telehealth as an operating system, [it becomes a] mechanism for the digital distribution of care." Transforming the way healthcare is delivered requires changing, from the ground up, the way health systems think about their relationships with patients, Schoenberg says. Telehealth can alter dynamics related to patient traffic and volume, patient flow, transitions of care, and assumption of risk. "When you equip yourself with telehealth capabilities," Schoenberg says, "you should ask yourself, 'Does the system that I buy allow me to create new applications for telehealth that the vendor didn't think about?' [You] should imagine plans for patients that incorporate and take advantage of telehealth. The result of that is a completely different beast." This article appears in the March/April 2021 edition of HealthLeaders magazine. - https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/telehealth/telehealth-journey-video-visits-strategic-business-tool < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine & Telehealth: For Allied Health Professionals, Too Faith Lane April 20, 2022 With more and more people using telehealth applications since the pandemic, one education expert asked how to expand training to include Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists According to a recent study, one in five adults polled about health care during the coronavirus pandemic said that they or someone in their household delayed receiving medical care or were unable to get care, due to office closures or shutdowns. Although the pollsters focused questions about doctor or dental appointments, providers across the board experienced disruption in their specialty areas, including Peggy Stein, OTD, OTR/L, CHT, an Occupational Therapist in Oregon. Occupational therapy, or OT, focuses on how people perform activities that are most important to their daily lives, so for people who need it, missing out affects quality of life, according to Stein. “OT is important to assess the ability of people to participate in usual activities. Work is important and many people equate occupation with work. However, life involves more than work. Participating in life includes taking care of ourselves, our family and friends, pets, home, yard, or attending to community. These are all ‘occupations’,” Stein said. “The state did halt therapy for a few weeks, and many providers had upheaval for several months,” she said. And while Stein eventually returned to her practice, the buzz surrounding providing telehealth continued in the medical and therapeutic communities. “Back in March 2020, we hosted a webinar. We had numerous occupational therapists, physical therapists (PTs) and speech language pathologists (SLPs) in attendance; more than we have previously seen attending our telemedicine training programs,” said Melanie Esher-Blair, MAdm, Distance Education & Event Coordinator for the Southwest Telehealth Resource Center (SWTRC) and the Arizona Telemedicine Program (ATP). “They wanted more information on how to put the ‘tele’ into their scope of practice to maintain continuity of care for their clients,” said Esher-Blair. She said she knew the SWTRC and the ATP had the experts for developing a program. Both OT and PT national associations have information regarding how telehealth fits into the scope of practice, so attendees of the March webinar agreed creating a training around telehealth was important. An interdisciplinary team worked together to come up with the Occupational and Physical Therapy Webinar Series. For full post and access to video: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/telemedicine-telehealth-allied-health-professionals-too < Previous News Next News >

The challenges of telemental health, and how they can be overcome Bill Siwicki June 14, 2022 Mental healthcare may be among the more intuitive specialties to deliver via telemedicine – but privacy demands, technology difficulties and the need for safe places deter some from taking advantage. Of all the medical specialties impacted by telemedicine during the course of the pandemic, perhaps the one with the most wholesale and lasting effects is behavioral and mental health. Mental health appointments do not typically involve any collection of vitals or specimens, nor do they absolutely require a face-to-face meeting, although therapists can observe physical cues from the whole body in person. Just talking via video, or even just audio, is enough. We talked with Dr. Janice Johnston, chief medical officer and cofounder of Redirect Health, a telehealth technology and services company, to get her expert observations regarding: The biggest ways telehealth is changing America's treatment of mental health. What impact increased telehealth accessibility has had on mental health treatment. The challenges telehealth presents in treating mental health. The improvements that can be made to telehealth for the treatment of mental health. Q. What are the biggest ways telehealth is changing the U.S.'s treatment of mental health issues? A. Before COVID-19 and historically in the U.S., there has been a negative stigma around receiving mental healthcare. While there have been a lot of movements and campaigns attempting to try and stamp out the stigma, many people have been deterred from seeking professional help due to a lack of coverage in healthcare plans, high copays and fear. As telehealth widens, the availability of mental health services continues to grow and is more accessible than ever. Gone are the days of driving to appointments and sitting in a waiting room, with the feeling that all eyes are on you. Social networks also have created a platform for mental health activists and we are seeing, in real time, an increase in people looking for treatment or routine mental care. COVID-19 accelerated the need for more access and new ways of treating mental health, such as telehealth. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we also have seen many major insurance companies offer permanent or temporary plan benefits that include mental health services. Telehealth has made it easier for insurers to include these benefits in their plans with less out-of-pocket costs for patients. In many cases, insurance providers even waived the entire cost for visits when using telehealth. While most people don't want to be thought of or treated differently because they choose to seek mental health treatment, the stigma around it can make them feel judged, and they avoid choosing care. Telehealth has made it possible for people to now access care from the privacy of their homes, making the decision to seek care much easier and more comfortable. Being able to speak with a mental health professional from home has provided patients the ability to choose a setting that provides the most comfort, making the process of opening up and sharing concerns with a new person much easier. Q. What impact has increased telehealth accessibility had on mental health treatment in the U.S.? A. The COVID-19 pandemic forced changes for Americans across the country that have affected mental wellbeing, such as working from home, quarantine enforcements, lack of spending time with friends and family, and feeling isolated. This led to a surge in mental health issues with most non-emergency medical treatments shut down due to safety concerns and quarantine enforcements. Telehealth was a necessity we didn't see coming, and the pandemic accelerated this service due to the timely needs that were arising. With the higher demand for mental healthcare, telehealth has been the answer for many. People living in rural communities or underserved areas, specifically, experience limited access to specialty healthcare services, especially mental health. One of the key impacts of increased telehealth accessibility is that these communities have been able to turn to telehealth as an option when they may not have had an alternative. Different from rural or underserved communities, many urban populations see that finding in-person care isn't the difficult part, but affording it and getting to their appointment can be. Another key impact of increased accessibility is that telehealth tends to be a much more cost-effective option, as in-person care can regularly be more than double the cost. Think of all the money and time wasted having to take off work, which can result in lost wages, needing to hire a babysitter, or paying for gas when commuting to and from appointments. With telehealth, patients are able to afford their scheduled appointment at a time that is convenient and works for them. Additionally, while most offices provide services in standard office hours, many telemental health services provide care before and after work hours as well, so patients have more scheduling flexibility. There also are a lot of cultural barriers and health inequities that many minority communities experience that may deter them from seeking mental healthcare. During the pandemic, these communities experienced a rise in telemental health usage. While there are several reasons why this rise has occurred, we have seen that telehealth has been able to combat some of the barriers these groups have had to overcome. For one, telehealth affordability has made services much more accessible to minority groups or lower income individuals, enabling them to include mental healthcare into their budgets. Additionally, minority groups have experienced higher rates of depression and anxiety, only exacerbated by the pandemic, so the demand from these communities, along with the decrease in negative stigma around mental care through telehealth, has driven them to these options. Lastly, telehealth allows those with language barriers in the U.S. to have access to a broader group of mental health professionals who can provide a better understanding of their cultural backgrounds, partnered with the ability to speak in their preferred language. Q. What are some of the challenges telehealth presents in treating mental health issues, and instances when in-person care must be sought? A. While telehealth has expanded access to mental healthcare for so many across the country, there are still limitations that may lead some to favor in-person care. First, privacy. While many patients prefer telehealth so they can have their appointment in the privacy of their homes, there are situations where people may not have that same privacy in their home. Some people may live in multi-generational homes where others are home and in earshot, or they could share a room with others with privacy not immediately available. This may leave patients taking their calls from their car, which is not always comfortable or preferred. As a result, people in these settings may prefer care in person. Second, safe places. While some people prefer their care virtual for a variety of reasons, others feel that virtual mental healthcare is cold and distant, and favor in-person care in order to feel more engaged with their mental health provider. Sometimes being removed from their normal home setting can help create a safe place for the patient to discuss their mental health concerns. This is especially a factor with live support groups, which can be more engaging and easier in person than virtually. Many times, live support groups are used for people looking to overcoming addictions, and being able to separate them from their traditional setting can be helpful for pulling them out of their environment, even momentarily. And third, technology. Some individuals may not understand the technology behind apps or websites that provide mental health services. They may not know how to access video links or use their phone to connect to a provider, which could result in a sub-par session, where they do not feel comfortable or at ease. Patients also do not want to see time consumed or wasted during their appointment because of technical struggles and may prefer to see their providers in person to avoid the hassle of these situations. Q. What improvements can be made to telehealth specifically for the treatment of mental health issues? A. We can look to the current challenges of the telehealth space to find where to start with improving the telehealth experience for everyone. For starters, creating wider access to the internet allows telehealth to reach more people who may not have any options available to them today. In fact, the Biden administration recently secured commitments from 20 leading internet service providers to either reduce prices or increase speeds to serve low-income households. This is a great step in the right direction. Better cellular and internet speeds allow for more telemental health experiences to be held over video, and not telephonically, where mental health professionals can better assess their patient through both verbal and nonverbal cues. With all the advancements and changes we have seen in technology in just the last few decades, there is a lot for patients and providers to keep up with. Education is key to making sure telehealth sticks around and continues to rise in its availability. Many providers are willing to learn new technology, but need to be trained by the people that thoroughly understand the ins and outs of these systems. As new standards of care are set by technological advancements, providers and patients alike need to be provided the education to keep up with these evolving standards. It is important for those implementing new systems to deliver the proper education providers need to learn the technology, as well as assist their patients. Another thing to consider is how to assist patients with disabilities through telehealth. There are laws in place in the U.S. to ensure equality in care for those with and without disabilities, and therefore considerations need to be made in telehealth situations as well, such as providing additional instructions or scheduling longer appointment times. Sometimes added support or modifications need to be made to technology systems in order to support these patients as well. Telehealth systems should meet accessibility requirements and should provide resources that are available in multiple formats, like audio recordings or large text sizes. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. For more information: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/challenges-telemental-health-and-how-they-can-be-improved < Previous News Next News >

Leveraging Telehealth Platforms to Enhance Provider Workflows, Adoption eVisit December 28, 2022 Implementing a telehealth platform can positively impact provider workflows in numerous ways, including easing administrative burdens, thereby leading to greater provider adoption and satisfaction. The pandemic drove telehealth use to new heights. Even though usage appears to be stabilizing, healthcare stakeholders largely agree that telehealth is here to stay, and they are making virtual care a vital part of their care delivery model. Polls conducted by the American Medical Association show that 80 percent of physicians said they were using telehealth tools in 2022, up from 28 percent in 2019 and only 14 percent in 2016. Further, in 2022, about 75 percent of physicians said being able to offer remote care was an important reason to use digital health tools, up from 60 percent in 2016. From the patient perspective, the benefits of telehealth, such as improved healthcare quality and patient experience, have become increasingly apparent. Epic conducted a research study analyzing 35 million telehealth visits between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022. They found that "in nearly every specialty studied, most patients who had a telehealth visit did not require an in-person follow-up appointment in that specialty in the next three months." Only two of the 31 specialties — fertility and obstetrics — saw in-person follow-up rates above 50 percent, while genetics, nutrition, endocrinology, and mental health/psychiatry had in-person follow-up rates of 15 percent or less. But, as telehealth is integrated alongside in-person care, provider organizations must ensure they are selecting the right platform for their facility's unique needs and implementing them in a way that addresses — rather than adds to — clinician workflow challenges. KEY TELEHEALTH CAPABILITIES TO IMPROVE PROVIDER WORKFLOWS Amid the rapid rise in the adoption and use of telehealth during the pandemic, providers have faced several challenges in setting up telehealth programs. One of the most significant difficulties is related to the technology available, notes Eric Thrailkill, Venture Partner, Founder of the Telehealth Academy, and Chairman of Project Healthcare at the Nashville Entrepreneur Center. "While these solutions 'worked' per se, they were not designed to help health systems facilitate a hybrid care model with a goal to provide personalized care, regardless of location," he says. "During the shutdowns, almost all provider organizations were completely dedicated to supporting COVID-related patients and/or working through the backlog of previously scheduled appointments. Telehealth, due to the relaxation of certain federal and state regulatory requirements, consisted of phone-based services and two-way video technologies — speed to deploy was the operating mantra." Provider organizations succeeded in rapidly deploying new technologies, but they did not have time to optimize their workflows to account for certain processes — like documentation and revenue cycle — and support overarching population health and chronic care goals. During the pandemic, 'offering telehealth' could simply mean offering a two-way video solution. But now, with a couple of years of experience and data to pull from, providers are able to build robust telehealth programs to pair with in-person care. In short, a telehealth program looks at creating both a personal and efficient experience for the provider and patient before, during, and after the visit. Two-way video technology is just one piece of the puzzle. "Telehealth platforms should contain a virtual triage where location and assignment of a provider could occur," Thrailkill says. "This would also enable an appropriate assessment to ensure higher acuity visits are prioritized over lower acuity visits." For effective triage, relevant care teams must be able to easily coordinate their team and the patients in the virtual waiting room, chat with the patient ahead of, during, and post-visit, access the appointment, and interact with the patients while accurately documenting the encounter in their EHR and scheduling follow-up appointments. The digital experience should be smooth and the UI/UX strong to support adoption and satisfaction. Anything captured by the telehealth platform, say an image or an attachment, must have bidirectional clinical data flows enabled with the EHR to ensure the complete patient picture is captured for the patient's health record and billing and reporting purposes. Additionally, Thrailkill notes that as provider organizations become increasingly focused on addressing social determinants of health needs, they should consider telehealth platforms that can ingest data from multiple sources. Having this data at their fingertips at the point of care can help clinicians provide wraparound care services, including connecting patients with social services and community resources. Not only is a platform's ability to gather data from various sources essential to the success of hybrid care models, but so is seamless data exchange, which helps ensure continuity of care. "Continuity of care is the set of processes whereby the patient and his/her physician-led care team are involved and cooperating over time to achieve the highest level of quality of care," Thrailkill says. "This is difficult, if not impossible, given the fragmentation and healthcare data silos that exist today — both outside and inside provider organizations and health systems." Thus, telehealth platforms should have integration capabilities that provide clinicians with data from prior visits and information from facilities outside the organization where the patient has received care. But Thrailkill also cautions that providers should keep in mind patient rights regarding consent, privacy, and security when developing hybrid care models that leverage telehealth. IMPROVING WORKFLOWS ENHANCES PROVIDER SATISFACTION Selecting the right platform can help healthcare organizations optimize provider workflows, thereby boosting provider adoption and satisfaction. Providers at every level want to practice at "the top of their license," that is, utilize the highest level of their education and experience to deliver care, Thrailkill notes. For physicians, the health system's most expensive clinician, tasks like documentation and prior authorization processes can get in the way of this goal. Prior authorization, in particular, is a critical pain point, as some healthcare payers have complex processes that require much time and effort. "All of these administrative burdens are no doubt contributing to workforce challenges present today across essentially every professional level," Thrailkill says. But by using telehealth platforms with integration capabilities and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based application programming interface structures, provider organizations can reduce administrative burdens like prior authorization processes through automation and enable them to lean on their medical assistants during the triage process of the telehealth visit. This increases the time available for patient care and optimizes capacity for the clinical team, he adds. Further, when implementing telehealth into hybrid care models, healthcare organizations should take a long-term view rather than regard telemedicine as a replacement for in-person care. "This will challenge the organization to think about the role of medical assistants, nurses, and specialty consult providers — not as follow-on activity, but incorporated into the visit," Thrailkill says. "This will ultimately lead to operational efficiencies and reduce the amount of administrative burden existing in early deployments of telehealth." As noted above, reducing administrative burdens and improving care delivery processes can lead to higher provider satisfaction, engagement levels, and adoption of virtual care across the health system. Incorporating telehealth is not a passing phase, and demand will likely grow in the years ahead. But to ensure its success, provider organizations must select technology that enhances provider workflows, thereby improving satisfaction and adoption. About eVisit eVisit is an enterprise virtual care delivery platform built for health systems and hospitals. It delivers innovative virtual experiences in care navigation, care delivery, and care engagement, improving margins at scale without sacrificing quality or patient and provider satisfaction. eVisit works seamlessly across enterprise service lines and departments to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and boost revenue. Based in Phoenix, Ariz., eVisit helps healthcare organizations innovate and succeed in today’s changing healthcare market. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/leveraging-telehealth-platforms-to-enhance-provider-workflows-adoption < Previous News Next News >

Patients prefer telehealth for common illnesses, study shows Bill Siwicki November 23, 2022 But more than half are concerned about the quality of care they're receiving, according to the Software Advice survey. One of the firm's analysts dives into the results. Telemedicine has, at long last, become very popular. But lingering concerns remain on its effectiveness for certain diagnoses and treatments. Software Advice's 2022 State of Telemedicine Survey finds that while a majority of people prefer virtual appointments for common illnesses, more than half of patients still are concerned about the quality of care they're receiving. Software Advice, a Gartner company, polled more than 1,000 patients on telemedicine usage after the worst of the pandemic – regarding whether they intend to keep using it and improvements that can be made. We interviewed Lisa Hedges, associate principal analyst at Software Advice, to discuss the findings of the study and talk about the future of telemedicine. Q. What is the overarching message healthcare CIOs and other health IT leaders should take from your study? A. That failure to invest in telemedicine is downright foolish at this point. It's been around for a long time and fully took off during the pandemic. It isn't going anywhere now that so many patients have experienced the convenience it offers. This also means if you are one of the healthcare organizations that adopted telehealth during the pandemic and plan to eliminate those tools in the near future, you're making a mistake. The bottom line here is that telemedicine is a valuable tool for patients, and providers who offer remote care services for certain conditions and symptoms are going to have the edge over providers who don't. Q. About 86% of patients rate their telemedicine experience as positive; 91% are more likely to choose a provider that offers telemedicine. Why do you think this is, and what does it mean for healthcare provider organizations? A. Convenience and ease of use are top reasons patients like telemedicine, and that certainly makes sense when you consider the time it saves. Patients don't have to drive to a physical office, find parking, spend time in a waiting room (where they may be exposed to other contagions), and then drive back home once the appointment is over. All of that is hassle enough even without considering the fact that most people going to see doctors don't feel great, so their baseline before doing any of that is discomfort. What this means for providers is they're looking at a great opportunity. We're all well aware of the current shortage of qualified healthcare workers, and we know that the working conditions for healthcare staff have been particularly brutal during the pandemic. With so many employees quitting, it's left a lot of extra work behind for those who have stayed on, which leads to more burnout and even more turnover. If practices can find a way to alleviate that burden, though, they're going to make life better for their employees. Telemedicine can do this by shortening the average exam time, nearly eliminating patient wait times, reducing the average number of no-shows, and saving money by cutting down on operational costs. All of these things can directly or indirectly impact the quality of life for healthcare workers and for patients. Q. Only 49% prefer telemedicine visits for mental health treatment, despite it being one of the more remote-ready specialties. What does this finding say for the future of telepsychiatry? A. This is a great question that a lot of people are puzzling over. Mental healthcare does seem to be an ideal match for telemedicine, specifically the use of video conferencing to conduct therapy sessions. So, I was a little surprised that more patients in our survey didn't indicate a preference for telemedicine. But there are a couple of things to consider here. First, we didn't collect data on patient history, so not every participant in our survey has experience seeking mental health treatment. That could be a factor in this dataset. Second, 19% indicated no preference between telehealth and in-person appointments for mental health treatment when we asked this question, which means only 32% prefer in-person mental health appointments. So, it's still the majority of patients saying telehealth is their favorite option for mental healthcare. As far as what this means for the future of teletherapy, I don't think it's any huge concern. It could simply be that some patients are still warming up to the idea of having intimate conversations with a therapist through a computer screen. It could be an age thing. It could be something else. Regardless, I suspect that if we were to run this survey annually for the next few years, that 49% would increase every time. Q. One-third of patients worry that an in-person exam, lab work or other testing is critical to properly diagnose and treat patients. How can telemedicine jump this hurdle? A. I'm not convinced telemedicine needs to jump this hurdle to prove itself valuable. Sure, there are incredible advancements being made in remote patient monitoring tools and other wearable devices that can help diagnose patients from a distance, but I think it's equally worth noting that telemedicine is a tool to be used in the right circumstances – it's not a one-size-fits-all approach to medicine. Yes, for a lot of medical conditions, doctors actually have to see the patient to perform physical tests. Those situations aren't ideal for telemedicine, and we shouldn't be thinking of them as hurdles – or even failures. If, instead, we reframe our thinking so that we recognize the situations that are ideal for telemedicine appointments – those that don't require physical tests for diagnosis, such as mental healthcare or common ailments like upper respiratory infection – we can see that telemedicine is a deeply valuable tool as it stands. So, to answer your question, the real hurdle for telemedicine here is teaching patients when it is best used instead of needing to find ways to provide lab work or physical exams remotely. In essence: It's a messaging problem instead of a technology problem. The good news is patients seem to be recognizing this on their own. If you look at patient preferences for in-person appointments versus telemedicine appointments broken down by symptom in our report, you see that patients intuitively understand which symptoms are best treated remotely and which are more likely to need physical exams. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/patients-prefer-telehealth-common-illnesses-study-shows < Previous News Next News >

Policy & Legislation New Mexico: A Leader in Telehealth Laws New Mexico has one of the most progressive telehealth statutes in the entire U.S. New Mexico Legislation Federal Resources NEW MEXICO LEGISLATION Telehealth NMSA § 13-7-14 "Healthcare Purchasing Act" NMSA § 59A-22-49.3 "Health Insurance Contracts " NMSA § 59A-23-7.12 "Group and Blanket Health Insurance Contracts " NMSA § 59A-46-50.3 "Health Maintenance Organizations " NMSA § 59A-47-45.3 "Nonprofit Healthcare Plans " (see also S.B.354 (2019) "Coverage for Telemedicine Services" ) Broadband NMSA § 63-9J-1 thru 63-9J-4 "The Broadband Access and Expansion Act" ( see also S.B.93 (2021) "Broadband Access and Expansion Act" ) New Mexico Federal FEDERAL RESOURCES Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) Find up-to-date information for Medicare, Medicaid, Federal Employee Plans, and more... CCHP, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, has been the federally designated National Telehealth Policy Resource Center since 2012. CCHP provides technical assistance to twelve regional Telehealth Resource Centers (TRCs), state and federal policy makers, national organizations, health systems, providers, and the public. CCHP - Federa l CCHP - New Mexico

Southwest Telehealth News

The value of telehealth and the move to digitally enabled care — 3 insights Becker's Hospital Review In Collaboration with American Medical Association Nov. 1, 2021 During the pandemic, healthcare organizations embraced telehealth to ensure they could provide access and high quality care to their patients. Now, nearly two years later, organizations are contemplating how best to move forward, including how to safeguard and optimize opportunities to move towards digitally enabled care. During the pandemic, healthcare organizations embraced telehealth to ensure they could provide access and high quality care to their patients. Now, nearly two years later, organizations are contemplating how best to move forward, including how to safeguard and optimize opportunities to move towards digitally enabled care. During Becker's 6th Annual Health IT + Revenue Cycle Virtual Conference, the American Medical Association sponsored a roundtable discussion on this topic. The AMA's Lori Prestesater, Vice President of Health Solutions, and Meg Barron, Vice President of Digital Health Innovations, talked with healthcare executives from around the country about their digital health successes and challenges. Three insights: 1. Providers want virtual care to continue as long as their key concerns are addressed. "Physicians are enthusiastic about digital health technologies," Ms. Barron said. "However, that enthusiasm is directly tied to a solution's ability to help them take better care of patients or reduce their administrative burdens." Four key concerns consistently expressed by physicians when evaluating digital solutions are whether a solution works and has an evidence base, how providers will be compensated, what liability and privacy issues exist, and how implementation and change management will occur. 2. One of the major advantages of telehealth is improved access. Access can be widely defined; virtual technology has made significant inroads in improving access in multiple ways: COVID-19 access. The department chair of a hospital in the Northeast noted that telehealth helped them provide quick access and treatment to patients during the pandemic. "It worked extremely well in this emergency situation," he said. "Patients would call in and report symptoms, and we could make decisions about their care. We provided pulse oximeters and followed up via telehealth." Specialty access. A CMO from a Midwestern health network — who is the father of a daughter with a chronic illness — shared his personal experience with specialty care from multiple systems. "I can't imagine how my daughter could receive specialty care without telehealth. Care that was previously siloed can now be accessed nationally, if not internationally." Behavioral health access. A chief population health officer from a health system in the Midwest said telehealth access to mental health services was a big success. "Patients found the pandemic very rough, and many needed some behavioral health services, but they didn't necessarily want to try to see somebody because of the stigma associated with it," she said. "Being able to offer telebehavioral health services to our patients, and frankly, even to our employees, was a great success." 3. Challenges such as patient hesitancy, bandwidth issues and measurement of value remain. Although patients are generally positive about telehealth, some have found it difficult to onboard to telehealth platforms. One provider in the Northeast said younger patients love the ability to text and connect virtually, but elderly patients often prefer in-person visits for the human connection. Also, many healthcare organizations have faced connection issues. A West Coast CMO explained, "We have 24 hospitals, and many of them are in rural areas. We really struggled with bandwidth." Finally, measuring the value of these technologies remains a challenge. Ms. Prestesater pointed out that it can be a "many-year equation to evaluate the value for a chronically ill patient." AMA has a recently released Return on Health value framework that can help an organization quantify the comprehensive value of virtual care. Although some participants warned that virtual care may not be less expensive, it can be hard to quantify savings from things like avoiding emergency care. A Midwest hospital executive said, "Home-based care has led to a substantial reduction in visits to the emergency room and days in the hospital for us. The problem in the whole equation is it's hard to measure something that doesn't happen." < Previous News Next News >

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Licensure & Telehealth Mei Wa Kwong, JD September 12, 2022 This video addresses the most frequently asked questions CCHP receives regarding licensure and telehealth for example: (1) What does the law says if your patient is going on vacation to another state, but still needs your services? (2) Do you really need a license in another state if you’re just consulting with a provider who is already licensed in that state? (3) ….and many more! View the PPT for this video here. See original video: https://www.cchpca.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions-regarding-licensure-telehealth/ < Previous News Next News >

Audio-Only Telemedicine Services Special Announcement NMTHA's communication with the New Mexico Office of the Superintendent of Insurance about billing for AUDIO-ONLY telemedicine services February 2022 Update: New Mexico Audio-Only Telemedicine Services The New Mexico Telehealth Alliance (NMTHA) works hard to ensure telehealth is sustainable and meets healthcare needs in our State. The NMTHA has been instrumental in ensuring New Mexico has one of the leading telehealth laws in the country. Looking at the NM Telehealth Act, last amended in 2019, the New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance (OSI) has put out the following information around the continued ability to bill for telephonic services. What you need to know: The telemedicine definition allows the use of audio-only telemedicine services. The NM Telehealth Act: The New Mexico Telehealth Act, which was last amended in 2007, defines telehealth as “the use of electronic information, imaging and communication technologies, including interactive audio, video, data communications as well as store-and-forward technologies, to provide and support health care delivery, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, transfer of medical data and education.” § 24-25-3(C) NMSA. This definition clearly incorporates audio-only services, particularly as “the purpose of the New Mexico Telehealth Act is to provide a framework for health care providers to follow in providing telehealth services to New Mexico citizens in a manner that provides efficient and effective access to quality health services.” § 24-25-2(B) NMSA. What insurance this affects: This is only for fully-insured health plans regulated by the NM OSI, and for NM State employee, public school, and retiree health plans. It does not apply to Medicaid, Medicare, other federal health plans, or self-insured health plans. Access the final text of S.B.354 (2019) and chaptered statutes HERE . See the email communication from the NM OSI HERE . Sincerely, New Mexico Telehealth Alliance

Improving digital engagement — patients say, 'Show me you know me' Beckers Hospital Review February 1, 2022 Patients are consumers. The best brand experiences, whether online or in person, influence consumers’ expectations about healthcare encounters. Today's patients want the healthcare journey to be user-friendly and tailored to their needs. Becker's Hospital Review recently spoke with Zak Pines, vice president of partnerships at Formstack, about digital engagement in healthcare and how health systems can use technology to create patient experiences that are safe, accessible and personalized. 'Show me you know me' Patients expect providers to know them. Mr. Pines recounted a personal experience that illustrates what the patient journey shouldn't look like. "Not too long ago, I scheduled a minor medical procedure. I received a package of paper forms that I had to fill out by hand and mail back to the hospital," he said. "I didn't put enough postage on the envelope, so it was returned to me. It was a nightmare scenario." Instead of an impersonal, paper-based process, the ideal would have been web-based forms with much of the information prefilled based on the provider's knowledge of the patient. "The key is that the healthcare organization shows that it knows who I am," Mr. Pines said. "They're cognizant of the information that patients have supplied to them in the past. With that data, it's possible to offer a 'review, verify and update' experience, rather than constantly asking people for the same information in a disconnected way." Read full article here: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/improving-digital-engagement-patients-say-show-me-you-know-me.html < Previous News Next News >

San Juan Regional Medical Center gets CARES Act funding to expand telehealth services By Hannah Grover, Farmington Daily Times February 15, 2021 AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. The pandemic changed things. San Juan Regional Medical Center and San Juan Health Partners worked quickly to expand telehealth offerings. Now the hospital is receiving CARES Act funding to help improve its technology and better provide that service. "Demand (for telehealth) was immediate and has continued to grow," Miliffe said. San Juan Regional Medical Center will receive $1.25 million in CARES Act funding to supply emergency generators as well as to make upgrades in the IT network, according to a press release from the office of Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-NM. IT upgrades, new generators on the way These technology upgrades will support telehealth and field hospital operation projects that have been implemented in an effort to bolster the hospital's response to COVID-19. The grant funding will be matched with $617,000 in local funds. All locations except for San Juan Health Partners Urgent Care began offering a mixture of telephone and video visits in an effort to comply with public health orders, sustain the services offered and prevent the spread of the coronavirus, according to Barbara Charles, administrative director for San Juan Health Partners. The medical center's network infrastructure wasn't designed to service the high demands of video consultations and Miliffe said the IT team has had to push the current capabilities. "However, significant upgrades to the wired and wireless infrastructure is needed to sustain and improve the existing experience, and allow for the continued growth in telehealth demands driven by the pandemic," he said. "This funding will make a fundamental difference in our ability to serve our community’s needs." Your stories live here. Fuel your hometown passion and plug into the stories that define it. Create Account COVID: State health department closes Home Depot over COVID-19 cases One of the barriers that the center has seen is the remote nature of the community. Many patients can only connect through phone due to limited internet connectivity or cell service that can't support video. "The inability to consistently connect by audio and video is an ongoing barrier," Charles said. This funding is part of more than $2.24 million of CARES Act money that will be coming to northwest New Mexico to address healthcare and economic needs. In addition to San Juan Regional Medical Center, the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments, which is based in Gallup, has been awarded $990,000 to address economic development needs of small businesses and entrepreneurs that have been harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments serves Cibola, McKinley and San Juan counties. According to the press release, the council of governments hopes to create 100 jobs and retain 100 jobs through a revolving loan fund that this funding will assist in creating. Legislative session:New Mexico lawmakers work to address economic impact of COVID-19 U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich Heinrich said in a press release that he has been "moved by the resiliency and grit" of rural New Mexico communities as they have faced a variety of public health and economic challenges related to the pandemic. "That is why I fought so hard to include funding in the CARES Act to help New Mexico’s rural health care systems, small businesses, and entrepreneurs to weather this storm," he said. "This funding is long-overdue and I will continue working for federal resources that New Mexico’s rural communities need to take on the COVID-19 pandemic and rebuild our economy in a way that supports everyone." Heinrich as well as Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-NM, and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-NM, announced $2.24 million of CARES Act funding for northwest New Mexico on Feb. 12. San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois Hospital: Telehealth is here to stay San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois thanked the lawmakers for the funding in the press release and emphasized that the hospital provides essential healthcare services for the Four Corners area. "This funding will ensure that we can meet the diverse needs of our patients and community and improve care for those we are privileged to serve," he said. While the pandemic jump started the demand for telehealth in the community, Miliffe said the San Juan Regional Medical Center does not anticipate it fading away. "Looking ahead to post-pandemic times, we see a long term and stable need for these services in our community as patients look to receive their healthcare in more of a consumer fashion, with services and offerings tailored around them as the individual," Charles, of San Juan Health Partners, said. "It is expected that the need or demand for telemedicine will continue long term. Many patients with health needs that may not require an in-person or face-to-face visit may find this option more flexible and convenient. Additionally, given the unknowns of the pandemic – this remains a safe alternative to in-person visits for patient to seek as needed or routine healthcare needs." Charles said telehealth also plays a key role in the COVID to Home program, which allows COVID-19 patients to receive close monitoring while in self-isolation at their own houses. "Because of this program’s close monitoring through telehealth visits, many patients have been able to stay out of the hospital and manage their care at home through the telephone or video calls. In other cases, caregivers have been able to intervene to coordinate a higher level of care for patients who needed it," she said. "To date, the COVID to Home program has helped more than 1,200 patients manage their care at home, something that would not have been possible without telehealth." Hannah Grover covers government for The Daily Times. She can be reached at 505-564-4652 or via email at hgrover@daily-times.com . This story has been modified to correct the attribution on some quotes. < Previous News Next News >

Using Telemedicine When it Makes Sense Adam Ang October 11, 2022 Patients worldwide prefer a mix of in-person and virtual care moving forward from the pandemic. During the pandemic, organisations across private and public healthcare systems have been rethinking their care delivery models. This is one of the major trends Ronald L. Emerson, Global Healthcare Lead at Zoom, shared virtually in the keynote session, "The Rise of Digital First and Decentralized Healthcare," at the HIMSS22 APAC conference. He was joined by Benjamin Lim, Zoom's APAC Leader for ISV Platform Business, who moderated the discussion in person. Recently commissioned research by Zoom found that patients who have used telehealth once prefer a hybrid mode of care post-COVID-19. This has given rise to digital-first healthcare, which does not mean "digital only." "What it does mean is that many healthcare systems, public and private, are developing virtual care models or hybrid models of care," Emerson said. "They thought to let the interaction or the clinical situation dictate the level of care that is needed… If they can handle [visits] over telemedicine and take care of the patient, the patient doesn't need more expensive care. They don't have to come to the emergency room or the hospital or the physician's office. And so we're seeing a large shift in that area and it's decreasing the entry point into the healthcare system," he noted. Rather than an all-digital model of care, a care model that makes sense to a patient's situation is ideal to bridge the gap in healthcare access. "I think our goal with telemedicine is how we utilise it when it makes sense. I am not for an all-digital care model, an all-video model, an all-virtual care model; I'm all for a model that makes sense based on the actual clinical application that can lower the threshold and increase access when people need the care [so] then we can make a better decision on the clinical disposition of the patient," Emerson shared. Telemedicine adoption Another key trend is the rise of video-assisted virtual visits during the pandemic. Care providers are now getting their money's worth in using cost-efficient virtual care technologies. In taking on a vendor's telemedicine platform, care providers usually consider the following: patient acceptability, clinical efficacy, and cost and sustainability. "We're actually seeing the return on investment and sustainability of the project. Vendors and organizations like Zoom have really lowered the price point where these projects are sustainable," Emerson said. Zoom has found its success in integrating as few workflows as possible in an organisation's existing centralised platform. "Healthcare professionals do not want any more platforms to manage. They wanna use their sort of centralized platform if they have electronic medical records," he mentioned. Decentralised healthcare Finally, Emerson noted how organisations are making efforts to reach out to patients across the continuum of care and work to provide the same levels of care they would receive in an in-hospital setting. This trend of decentralised healthcare is happening, he claimed, because health systems now are not just focusing on sickness but also on the ability to keep people healthy through wellness and prevention, education, and better discharge planning – all of which require virtual technology and communication. "We expect to see more and more of this [in] other places," he quipped. Virtual health as a strategic goal For organisations looking to develop their own digitally-enabled care delivery models, Emerson shared that the way to success is by making virtual health a strategic goal in their care provision. "That means the doctors are on board, it's written in their job descriptions. [It's going to be a] part of the delivery system of how we take care of people," he said. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/asia/using-telemedicine-when-it-makes-sense < Previous News Next News >

Interstate Telehealth Use By Medicare Beneficiaries Before And After COVID-19 Licensure Waivers, 2017–20 Juan J. Andino, Ziwei Zhu, Mihir Surapaneni, Rodney L. Dunn, and Chad Ellimoottil Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, all fifty states and Washington, D.C., passed licensure waivers that allowed patients to participate in telehealth visits with out-of-state clinicians (that is, interstate telehealth). Because many of these temporary flexibilities have expired or are set to expire, we analyzed trends in interstate telehealth use by Medicare beneficiaries during 2017–20, which covers the period both directly before and during the first year of the pandemic. Although the volume of interstate telehealth use increased in 2020, out-of-state telehealth made up a small share of all outpatient visits (0.8 percent) and of all telehealth visits (5 percent) overall. For individual states, out-of-state telehealth made up between 0.2 percent and 9.3 percent of all outpatient visits. We found that most out-of-state telehealth use was for established patient care and that a higher percentage of out-of-state telehealth users lived in rural areas compared with beneficiaries who did not receive care outside of their state (28 percent versus 23 percent). Our collective findings suggest that the elimination of pandemic licensure flexibilities will affect different states to varying degrees and will also affect the delivery of care for both established patients and rural patients. View Full Article: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01825?journalCode=hlthaff < Previous News Next News >

A Decade of Telehealth Policy: A New Report From CCHP Mei Kwong- Center for Connected Health Policy August 2022 Ten years ago, in the early months of 2012, the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) faced a decision of potentially great significance. The U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORPH) Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT) had released a Funding Opportunity Announcement for their Telehealth Resource Center Grant Program and the incumbent contractor for the National Telehealth Resource Center for Policy (NTRC-P) contract would not be reapplying. After weighing the pros and cons of acting as the NTRC-P, CCHP decided to take the plunge and applied. On September 1, 2012, CCHP officially started its work as the federally designated National Telehealth Policy Resource Center and have been serving that role for the past decade. To mark CCHP’s ten-year anniversary as the NTRC-P, we are releasing a look back on telehealth policy in the United States. For the past decade, CCHP has tracked and followed policy development for all 51 jurisdictions in the United States (District of Columbia included) as well as at the federal level providing us with the unique opportunity to observe and study the development of telehealth policy in the United States on both the state and federal levels. This past decade also happens to be the period that encompasses some of the most significant telehealth policy developments seen thus far in the United States. The report is not intended to be an in-depth study on telehealth policy development and history as that could easily be an entire novel given the complexities and nuances that would need to be considered. The National Telehealth Resource Center for Policy Ten-Year Anniversary Report is intended to capture some of the highlights, significant changes, and environmental factors that have had an impact on telehealth policy development in the nation. Considering the increased interest in telehealth policy, CCHP believes this report also will be useful to provide context on how telehealth policy came to be where it is today, particularly for those who may be newer to the field. Additionally, the report is meant to be a celebration of the time CCHP has spent as the NTRC-P including the contributions the organization has made to the telehealth field. This report is dedicated to the memory of Mario Gutierrez, CCHP Executive Director from 2011-2017. Mario was the original visionary who decided in 2012 that CCHP should apply for the project. A special thank you must also be extended to CCHP staff, both past and present, who have truly been the engine that continues to drive the work of the organization forward. Special acknowledgment must be made of Laura Stanworth, Deputy Director, and Christine Calouro, Senior Policy Associate, both who have been with CCHP from the beginning of its role as the NTRC-P and who, along with myself, have seen this past decade of telehealth policy development, including producing all information and navigating CCHP through those first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope you will enjoy this report and find the information useful. CCHP looks forward to continuing on the ever evolving telehealth policy journey with all of you. See full report: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/a-decade-of-telehealth-policy-our-10-year-anniversary-report < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth Waivers Wind Down, Restricting Some Providers From Delivering Care Across State Lines Hailey Mensik August 2021 States allowed medical professionals licensed elsewhere to hold virtual visits with their residents during the pandemic. Some are making the rollbacks permanent, but others are reversing again. State lawmakers temporarily scrapped hundreds of regulations early in the COVID-19 pandemic to help businesses and consumers deal with widespread shutdowns, giving patients greater access to telehealth and helping spur an explosion in use of virtual care. A number of states allowed medical professionals licensed elsewhere to hold telehealth visits with residents of their state during the pandemic, and some already have or are looking to make the rollbacks permanent. Exact numbers are difficult to track because some policies overlap and are organized differently in different states, but as of July 28, 17 states and the District of Columbia still had some type of telehealth waivers in place, according to the Federation of State Medical Boards. Other states like New York, Minnesota, Florida and Alaska are among those that have pulled back emergency waivers. Alaska is going back to its old ways after its governor's emergency order ended. Patients there can only visit telehealth providers licensed in the state now after about a year without that rule. The same goes for Florida after its emergency declaration expired on June 26. Meanwhile, Arizona lawmakers passed sweeping legislation in May making the state's pandemic-related telehealth waivers permanent, including requiring insurers to cover audio-only visits and allowing out-of-state medical professionals to conduct telehealth visits with patients in the state. Advocates for allowing providers to permanently deliver virtual care across state lines say it would help ease staffing shortages, help patients and doctors maintain existing relationships and benefit patients in isolated communities by making faraway specialists more accessible. But as long as medical licensing is regulated at the state level, the broad access to services and providers that existed during the pandemic won’t continue for everyone. Patients in rural areas are often far away from a doctor's office, and in states like Alaska where flexibilities expired, can be even further from providers practicing certain specialties, such as a pediatric intensivist or certain oncologists, said Mei Kwong, executive director for the Center for Connected Health Policy. "Maybe there aren't enough of those cases in those particular states to make it worth a provider's while to go and move there, but there's still a need because they may still have people who need those services," Kwong said. The patchwork of red tape could also pose a challenge for providers who have pivoted to delivering more virtual care over the past year. Mia Finkelston, a family medicine physician in Maryland, made the switch to telehealth nearly a decade ago and has been practicing with Amwell ever since. She's currently licensed in 29 states, and said the process to get her licenses varied widely. "It's not standard as far as fees, it's not standard as far as what documents you need to give them. It really is based on those state medical boards and what they decide is important to them," Finkelston said. As more states' waivers expire and others' rules change, one option for providers who want to continue delivering care across state lines is through the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, which currently includes 30 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Similar to the nurse licensure compact, it allows eligible physicians to practice in other compact states. It’s worth noting, however, that the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact does not issue a compact license or a nationally recognized medical license for physicians, but rather streamlines the process for them to receive multiple licenses from individual state medical boards. Physicians pay an initial $700 compact fee, then an additional cost for each license in any compact state they want to practice in. States must pass legislation to join the compacts. "No two states are totally alike in their legal and regulatory framework for the practice of medicine, which of course, affects telehealth, which is just one aspect of the overall US healthcare system," Kyle Zebley, director of public policy at the American Telehealth Association, a coalition with a board that includes representatives from hospitals like HCA and payers like CVS, said. "Therefore a way to be consistent with our federal system, consistent with the way that the practice of medicine has been done in this country for so long, we've come up with this great model of compact, which is a way to be consistent with all that while still allowing for care across state lines," Zebley said. As lawmakers try to facilitate continued access to telemedicine for those who need it most, licensure reforms will be key, the authors of a February article in the New England Journal of Medicine argue. "The growth of large national and regional health systems and the increased use of telemedicine have expanded the scope of health care markets beyond state borders," the authors said. They agree that a federal medical licensing system is the loftiest reform option and strengthening existing compacts is the way to go, suggesting Congress pass legislation to encourage holdout states to join the Interstate Medical Compact. Other options include encouraging states to practice reciprocity, where they automatically recognize an out-of-state license, as the Department of Veterans Affairs does with physicians in its system. Source: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/telehealth-waivers-wind-down-restricting-some-providers-from-delivering-ca/603169/#:~:text=Healthcare%20Dive-,Telehealth%20waivers%20wind%20down%2C%20restricting%20some%20providers%20from%20delivering%20care,but%20others%20are%20reversing%20again. < Previous News Next News >

Geisinger's journey to greatly expanded telehealth Bill Siwicki April 19, 2022 The prolific health system is now able to offer telemedicine appointments to patients for primary care, urgent care and more than 70 specialties. More than 8% of total outpatient visits now are conducted virtually. Rural Pennsylvania is bigger than the states of New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont combined. Some 75%, or 33,394 square miles, of Pennsylvania are considered rural. The geography is diverse, from rugged mountainous terrain to large stretches of farmland. High-profile health system Geisinger and its affiliated entities serve 45 predominantly rural counties throughout central and northeastern Pennsylvania, 31 of which are a part of Appalachia, a unique region of the Appalachian Mountains that cuts through the western part of the state. THE PROBLEM "Access to specialty care for many of our communities is scarce; these communities already are faced with primary care shortages, and for those who need to seek specialists and sub-specialists, long travels often are a costly and time-consuming reality," said Tejal A. Raichura, director of the center for telehealth at Geisinger. "Surveys show that rural Pennsylvanians are not taking care of themselves as well as their urban counterparts," she continued. "Fewer rural residents than their urban counterparts get the recommended exercise. Rural residents have higher rates of obesity, with almost two-thirds at risk for chronic diseases based on their sedentary lifestyle." Rural residents are in poorer physical condition, have more health risks and are more likely to lack health insurance, she added. The wage gap between urban and rural Pennsylvanians is getting wider. In fact, it has doubled in the last 30 years. Improving the quality of healthcare while lowering costs and increasing access in rural Pennsylvania counties is challenging, she said. "In 2018, Geisinger leadership committed to expanding our telehealth program and invested in a platform that could cover various elements of virtual care, including video visits to the home and our clinics, tele-stroke visits at our various inpatient units and emergency rooms, and video visits to non-Geisinger organizations, including other hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, correctional facilities, et cetera," Raichura recalled. PROPOSAL The business plan requested support for an expanded telemedicine program, one that would connect distantly located expert physicians trained in several specialties – including neurology, stroke/intensive care, pediatrics, primary care, geriatrics, psychiatry, endocrinology, rheumatology, podiatry and several others – with rural and underserved communities, allowing residents to access specialty care where they live and work. For Full Article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/geisingers-journey-greatly-expanded-telehealth < Previous News Next News >