Medicare Telehealth Services for 2023 – CMS Proposes Substantial Changes The National Law Review August 6, 2022 - Volume XII, Number 218 On July 7, 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rule. The rule, if enacted as proposed, will: 1. Create three new permanent telehealth codes for prolonged E/M services; 2. Discontinue reimbursement of telephone (audio-only) E/M services; 3. Discontinue the use of virtual direct supervision; 4. Postpone the effective date of the telemental health six-month rule until 151 days after the PHE ends; 5. Extend coverage of the temporary telehealth codes until 151 days after the PHE ends; and 6. Add 54 codes to the Category 3 telehealth list. Reading between the lines, the nature of CMS’ comments and the changes it proposed (and refused to propose) suggest that CMS rulemakers anticipate the Public Health Emergency (PHE), and associated PHE waivers, will expire no later than the first half of 2023. Three New Telehealth Codes for Prolonged E/M Services: This year, CMS rejected all stakeholder requests to permanently add codes to the Medicare Telehealth Services List. Following its standard evaluation process for such requests, CMS considered whether they met appropriate categories. Category 1 services must be “similar to professional consultations, office visits, and/or office psychiatry services that are currently on the Medicare Telehealth Services List.” Category 2 services require “evidence of clinical benefit if provided as telehealth” and all necessary elements of the service must be able to be performed remotely. CMS rejected this year’s requests because none of the proposed services (e.g., therapy, electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter, adaptive behavior treatment and behavior identification assessment codes) met the requirements of Category 1 or 2 services. Interested stakeholders can collect and submit better evidence to persuade CMS to add these codes on a Category 1 or 2 basis next year (submissions are due by February 10, 2023). Although it rejected stakeholder-submitted codes, CMS itself proposed three new codes to be added to the Medicare Telehealth Services list on a permanent basis: • GXXX1 (Prolonged hospital inpatient or observation care evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99223, 99233, and 99236 for hospital inpatient or observation care evaluation and management services). • GXXX2 (Prolonged nursing facility evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99306, 99310 for nursing facility evaluation and management services). • GXXX3 (Prolonged home or residence evaluation and management service(s) beyond the total time for the primary service (when the primary service has been selected using time on the date of the primary service); each additional 15 minutes by the physician or qualified healthcare professional, with or without direct patient contact (list separately in addition to CPT codes 99345, 99350 for home or residence evaluation and management services). CMS added these codes because they are similar to current CPT codes 99356 and CPT 99357 and HCPCS code G2212, all listed on a permanent basis. Discontinue Reimbursement of Telephone (Audio-Only) E/M Services Under PHE waivers, CMS allowed separate reimbursement of telephone (audio-only) E/M services (CPT codes 99441-99443), something that was embraced by a sizeable cohort of practitioners and patients, particularly in rural areas or patients without suitable broadband access for audio-video. CMS rejected requests to permanently add these services to the Medicare Telehealth Services List. With the exception of certain telemental health services, CMS stated two-way interactive audio-video telecommunications technology will continue to be the Medicare requirement for telehealth services following the PHE. This is because Section 1834(m)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act requires telehealth services be analogous to in-person care by being capable of serving as a substitute for the face-to-face encounter. In CMS’ own language, “We believe that the statute requires that telehealth services be so analogous to in-person care such that the telehealth service is essentially a substitute for a face-to-face encounter.” As audio-only telephone is inherently non-face-to-face, CMS determined, that modality fails to meet the statutory standard. Therefore, 151 days after the PHE expires, audio-only telephone E/M services will revert to their pre-PHE “bundled” status under Medicare (i.e., covered but not separately payable). Practitioners will no longer receive separate reimbursement for these services. Discontinue the Use of Virtual Direct Supervision Under Medicare Part B, certain types of services (e.g., many diagnostic tests, services incident to physicians’ or practitioners’ professional services) must be furnished under the direct supervision of a physician or practitioner. For Medicare purposes, direct supervision requires the supervising professional to be physically present in the same office suite as the supervisee, and immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure. The supervising professional need not be present in the same room during the service, but the “immediate availability” requirement means in-person, physical - not virtual - availability. In connection with PHE waivers, CMS temporarily changed the direct supervision rules to allow the supervising professional to be remote and use real-time, interactive audio-video technology. That change did not require the professional’s real-time presence at, or live observation of, the service via interactive audio-video technology throughout the performance of the procedure. This change was temporary because CMS was concerned widespread direct supervision through virtual presence may not be safe for some clinical situations. In its proposed PFS rule, CMS rejected requests to make virtual direct supervision a permanent feature in Medicare. CMS is considering whether or not it should make virtual direct supervision a permanent feature of Medicare at some point in the future. Interested stakeholders with data are invited to submit comments and information to CMS on this topic. If the proposed rule is finalized, virtual direct supervision will expire at the end of the calendar year in which the PHE ends. If the PHE ends in October 2022, the supervision waiver will end December 31, 2022. If the PHE ends in January 2023, the supervision waiver will end December 31, 2023. Postpone the Effective Date of the Telemental Health Six-Month Rule Until 151 Days After PHE Ends In 2020, Congress imposed new conditions on telemental health coverage under Medicare, creating an in-person exam requirement alongside coverage of telemental health services when the patient is located at home. Under the rule, Medicare will cover a telehealth service delivered while the patient is located at home if the following conditions are met: The practitioner conducts an in-person exam of the patient within the six months before the initial telehealth service; The telehealth service is furnished for purposes of diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a mental health disorder (other than for treatment of a diagnosed substance use disorder (SUD) or co-occurring mental health disorder); and The practitioner conducts at least one in-person service every 12 months of each follow-up telehealth service. For a full understanding of the rule, read the frequently asked questions and what it means for practitioners at Medicare Telehealth Mental Health FAQs. This rule was originally scheduled to take effect the day after the PHE expires. Following an amendment to the rule, it is now set to take effect 151 days after the PHE expires. Extend Coverage of the Temporary Telehealth Codes Until 151 Days After the PHE Ends Temporary telehealth codes are those services added to the Medicare Telehealth Services List during the PHE on a temporary basis, but which were not placed into Category 1, 2, or 3. Coverage of those temporary telehealth codes had been scheduled to end when the PHE expires. In its proposed PFS rule, CMS states it will extend coverage of those temporary telehealth codes until 151 days after the PHE ends. CMS is doing so for consistency with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (CAA). CMS stated this extension may simplify the post-PHE transition by applying the same coverage end date to all the various waiver-related telehealth codes in a hope to reduce billing errors. Note, the Category 3 codes are set to expire December 31, 2023, while the other temporary telehealth codes are set to expire 151 days after the PHE ends. This means, under the proposed rule, if the PHE ends after August 2023, the Category 3 codes would expire before the temporary telehealth codes. If finalized, health care providers would need to keep a careful eye on the calendar to ensure billing practices keep up with the various sunset dates. Add 54 Codes to the Category 3 Telehealth List CMS’ Category 3 list contains services that likely have a clinical benefit when furnished via telehealth, but lack sufficient evidence to justify permanent coverage. CMS proposed adding 54 codes to that Category 3 list. The services fall into nine categories: (1) therapy; (2) electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter; (3) adaptive behavior treatment and behavior identification assessment; (4) behavioral health; (5) ophthalmologic; (6) cognition; (7) ventilator management; (8) speech therapy; and (9) audiologic. The complete list can be found at this link. Keep in mind, these codes will expire December 31, 2023.Category 3 codes were originally slated to expire at the end of the year in which the PHE ends, but CMS extended coverage of those codes through December 31, 2023. In this year’s proposed PFS rule, CMS declined any further extension, so all Category 3 codes will expire at the end of 2023. In the event the PHE extends well into 2023, CMS said it will consider a further extension of the Category 3 codes at that time. What to Do Next? Providers, facilities, technology companies, and virtual care entrepreneurs interested in changes to the telehealth codes for 2023 should consider providing comments to the proposed rule. CMS is soliciting comments on the proposed rule until 5:00 p.m. ET on September 6, 2022. Anyone may submit comments – anonymously or otherwise – via electronic submission at this link. Alternatively, commenters may submit comments by mail to: Regular Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1770-P, P.O. Box 8016, Baltimore, MD 21244-8016. Express Overnight Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1770-P, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 If submitting via mail, please be sure to allow time for comments to be received before the closing date. For original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/medicare-telehealth-services-2023-cms-proposes-substantial-changes < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth's importance grows amid coronavirus pandemic Rick Ruggles March 12, 2022 The coronavirus compelled doctors to see patients in new ways, and one of those is through a computer monitor, miles away from the patient. The pandemic placed greater emphasis on telehealth, which has been around for years but was put to use urgently when the coronavirus spread in early 2020. Officials with Medicare, the government-sponsored insurance for senior citizens, also increased the number of the occasions in which telehealth could be covered during the pandemic. Whether vast telehealth use and broad insurance coverage for it will continue isn’t certain, those who know the benefits of telehealth say it has proved itself and is here to stay. “It’s become part of life,” said Sharon V. Nir, administrative director of strategic operations with Albuquerque-based Lovelace Medical Group. “I do think it’s the new world.” Lovelace created an extensive program in March 2020, with the arrival of the coronavirus, to make remote visits available to patients and doctors through laptop computers, iPads, cellphones and desktops with cameras and microphones. Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center, University of New Mexico Health, La Familia Medical Center and most other medical systems also increased their use of telehealth. Santa Fe Preparatory School teacher Brad Fairbanks went head over handlebars on his bicycle last month, breaking a collarbone and three ribs. He spent time in an emergency room, but his follow-up visits with his family physician, Dr. Carl Friedrichs of Presbyterian Medical Group, were done remotely. Fairbanks, 61, said the follow-up appointments and pain medication assessments were as effective by videoconference as they would have been in person. “This was the first time I’d done telehealth,” said Fairbanks, the performing arts chairman at his school. “Yes, it worked great.” He said the accident happened at a bad time, with his students preparing to put on the show 9 to 5 The Musical. He missed four days of work and two rehearsals and had to participate in two other rehearsals by Zoom technology. Friedrichs said there is plenty that can be accomplished in a telehealth appointment. “The patient has the choice,” he said. “It’s an extra tool for patients.” In a big state like New Mexico with vast rural expanses, it makes sense to lean on telehealth, he said. “This is a state that has limited medical resources.” Videoconferencing can’t be used for everything, of course. Annual physicals and diagnoses requiring the doctor to lay hands on the patient must be done in person. Blood draws for lab work require a visit, although the result of that lab work can be covered in a virtual appointment. And some patients aren’t at ease with the technology. But telehealth gives patients in rural areas and those who struggle to find transportation the chance to get some of their services done by videoconference. And when the highly contagious coronavirus roared through the world, patients who were reluctant to visit the doctor’s office had an alternative. Christine and Ed Shestak of Albuquerque have had about four videoconference appointments apiece through Lovelace since the start of the pandemic. “For routine things, it just kind of minimizes the risk of picking up anything anybody else might have” in the doctor’s office, said Christine Shestak, 69. She recalled when she took her children to the pediatrician many years ago, kids would cough, noses would run and children would share toys in the waiting room. Telehealth is a solution, she said, and if she has the flu, she doesn’t have to carry it into the clinic and possibly infect others. Ed Shestak, who will soon be 70, said he has hearing aids and sometimes struggles to absorb everything if there is background noise in the doctor’s office. At home, he puts on headphones for his virtual visits. “I can hear and understand better,” he said. Naturally, insurance coverage of telehealth is complicated. Before the pandemic, Medicare coverage for telehealth generally favored rural patients and also included some specific conditions such as end-stage renal disease and strokes. But when the coronavirus forced patients to work from home and limit travel, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expanded coverage on an emergency basis to patients in cities, to a wider variety of medical practitioners and for a broader set of reasons. Telehealth used by primary care doctors boomed. Specialists in psychology, the digestive tract, lungs and heart also saw increased use of telehealth. The federal government reported in December that Medicare-covered telehealth visits leaped from 840,000 in 2019 to 52.7 million in 2020. Presbyterian spokeswoman Amanda Schoenberg said scheduled telehealth visits with Presbyterian Medical Group went up by 100 times from 2019 through 2021. Medicare will continue to cover many of those services at least through 2023 while officials evaluate the system. Tennessee-based Baker Donelson law firm says on its website new Medicare provisions also permanently removed geographic restrictions on telehealth for diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of mental health disorders. Stetson Berg, chairman of the New Mexico Telehealth Alliance, said Congress will have to pass laws to cement much of the coverage that was added on an emergency basis during the pandemic. Berg said state law in New Mexico has provided some of the most progressive private insurance coverage of telehealth and has served as a “shining star” in the field for close to 10 years. New Mexico was ahead of the game in part because it is so rural, he said. Other states are catching up. In the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers reported last month that analysis of 38 studies showed videoconferencing “generally results in similar clinical effectiveness, health care use, patient satisfaction, and quality of life as usual care for areas studied.” Those studies were limited to “patients seeking care for a limited set of purposes,” the report added. Christus spokesman Arturo Delgado wrote in a text message that virtual visits “are appropriate for most evaluations. Conditions that can be evaluated include anything from a cough or a cold to more complicated conditions like diabetes or heart disease.” Jasmin Milz Holmstrup, a spokeswoman for La Familia Medical Center in Santa Fe, said the use of telehealth increased considerably at her institution from 2020 to 2021. “It’s an effective way to see patients who have non-urgent needs,” she said. University of New Mexico Health said the institution “utilized all available options to continue to provide patient care, including telehealth. This was a successful way to ensure patients continued to receive care and access to a provider.” Prep teacher Fairbanks said his students prepared for the play while he was “in my recliner, all banged up.” The shows took place March 3 to March 6 and the medical appointments by telehealth and attendance of rehearsals by Zoom didn’t pose a problem. His students came through. “It worked out,” he said. “And the kids stepped up.” < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine and diagnosis Adriana Albini September 27, 2022 The adoption of telemedicine and its range of applications grew exponentially in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the general consensus now is that it is here to stay, albeit perhaps with a more hybrid bias of in-person and remote visits. Telediagnosis, or TeleDx, i.e., the identification of a disease at a site remote from the patient, has expanded to include primary care, revolutionising the way in which patients and doctors communicate with each other and establish rapport. It is still early days to fully evaluate the effect of virtual vs in-person visit on diagnostic error, but there are guidelines for health professionals to conduct effective virtual examinations, and many best practice examples, both in terms of ways to gather information from the patient (from wording of questionnaires to digital records, home environment, and so on) and technological innovations. In cancer care, pathology plays a central role in the final diagnosis upon which clinicians will develop treatment for their patient, and remote pathology can offer many advantages, such as easier access to pathology experts, consultation among specialists, timely and secure availability of images, and so on. Up until the 1990s, pathologists worked almost entirely within the constraints of the analogue world, with physical glass slides and microscopes. Some attempts were made at capturing virtual images of slides through a tiling method, which was time consuming and prone to error, as it required accurate placing and extensive stitching together of images. But at the end of that decade, engineer Dirk G. Soenksen (founder, and CEO of Aperio) devised a much more efficient system based on a linear scanner, the ScanScope, that allowed for tightly focussed and fast slide image capture, opening a new era for the practice of pathology. Whole slide imaging, or WSI, was first employed in education and research but in recent years, with the improvement of its technology, it has received regulatory approval by the FDA and around the world for diagnostic use as well. The potential for feeding AI algorithms to provide diagnostical support is massive, as virtual slides are accumulating fast and standardised databases are being built. “Telemedicine in Cancer Care Continuum: implementation and integration”, was an online conference developed by the SPCC in collaboration with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), which took place on 6-7 May 2022. In his presentation, Liron Pantanowitz, Professor of Pathology, and Director of Anatomical Pathology at the University of Michigan, talked about telepathology in both its non-acute and acute settings, focussing more extensively on the latter. The term ‘telepathology’ was coined by Ronald S. Weinstein in 1986, after he organised the first public event of satellite-enabled dynamic-robotic distant pathology, but the very first live telepathology ever performed dates as far back as to 1968. Massachusetts General Hospital set up a two-way television link with Boston’s Logan Airport that enabled doctors at the hospital to remotely study blood smears, urine samples and X-rays for patients at the airport, and even listen to their heartbeat with an electronic stethoscope. However, as in the case of telehealth in general, the adoption of digital pathology had to wait until the Covid-19 pandemic to be widely implemented. To facilitate continuity of healthcare while social distancing, certain restrictions were lifted, such as CLIA in the US, allowing pathologists to work from home and sign out cases. The first use of telepathology Prof. Pantanowitz looked at was for frozen section consultation. There are several challenges when a pathologist is asked to provide an intraoperative consultation. The pathology specimen is fresh, not easy to cut. The frozen section itself is difficult to prepare and is often filled with artifacts. These artifacts not only make it hard to read the glass slides but can compound the problem when using digital images. The turnaround time needs to be rapid. Usually, pathologists strive for less than 20 minutes to provide the surgeon with an answer. And they are under serious diagnostic pressure because if they get it wrong, it is difficult to reverse the surgical decision that has been made based on their diagnosis. Over the past 54 years different modes of practising telepathology have been developed. A pathologist on site can take static images, which is easy but too time-consuming. There is also video microscopy, live streaming from one pathologist to another. If there is no pathologist present on site to read the slides, there are systems such as robotic microscopy, where the pathologist can remotely take control of the functions on a microscope, such as navigation and focus. And there is also Whole Slide Imaging, which is the entire digitization of a slide to be remotely reviewed. Thanks to advancements in technology, hybrid devices are now available from many vendors with robotics and Whole Slide Imaging functions in one scanner. See full article: https://cancerworld.net/telemedicine-and-diagnosis/ < Previous News Next News >

Expanded Medicare Telehealth Coverage for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Services Furnished by Opioid Treatment Programs Sunny J. Levine Hannah E. Zaitlin Nathaniel M. Lacktman November 09, 2022 Starting January 1, 2023, Medicare will cover telehealth-based treatment services delivered by federally-accredited opioid treatment programs (OTPs), commonly referred to as “methadone clinics.” This new reimbursement is intended to further the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) objectives in its 2022 Behavioral Health Strategy, with a particular focus on improving access to substance use disorder (SUD) prevention, treatment, and recovery services. To this end, CMS added several expansion opportunities for OTPs, including telehealth coverage. However, these flexibilities do not extend to SUD treatment provided outside an OTP, such as office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) services. Details of the new coverage rules are contained in the 2023 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule (Final Rule), and summarized below. Background and History of Medicare Telehealth Coverage of SUD Treatment Prior to the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), to initiate treatment with buprenorphine at an OTP, a practitioner needed to perform a complete in-person physical evaluation. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrating (SAMHSA) waived this requirement for the duration of the PHE, allowing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) practitioners to initiate treatment with buprenorphine via audio-video telehealth and/or audio-only telephone communications without an initial in-person evaluation (subject to state law restrictions). This temporary exemption only applies to OTP patients treated with buprenorphine; it does not apply to new patients treated with methadone. CMS also extended coverage for SUD treatment services provided via telehealth. While Medicare telehealth services fall under Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, which generally limits payment for telehealth services to patients located in specific types of medical settings (originating sites) in mostly rural areas, the SUPPORT Act amended Section 1834(m), by removing the originating site and geographic limitation for telehealth services provided to individuals with a diagnosed or co-occurring mental health disorder (including a SUD) delivered on or after July 1, 2019. In 2020, CMS established a new Part B benefit category for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provided by OTPs. The covered benefit includes MAT for patients with OUD, a leading treatment modality that combines prescribing FDA-approved medication (e.g., methadone and buprenorphine) with counseling and other behavioral therapy, to provide a whole person approach. Subsequently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA) permanently removed the geographic restrictions and added the patient’s home as a qualifying originating site for telehealth services provided for the diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a mental health disorder. Under the CY 2022 PFS final rule, CMS revised the definition of “interactive telecommunication system” to allow the use of audio-only communications technology for telemental health services under certain conditions when the beneficiary is located at their home. New Changes to Medicare OTP Telehealth Services Under the Final Rule, CMS made the following changes relating to OTP telehealth services: 1. OTPs can use the OTP intake add-on code to bill for the initiation of buprenorphine treatment through two-way interactive audio-video communication technology, as clinically appropriate, and in compliance with all applicable requirements (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). 2. Audio-only telephone calls can be used to initiate buprenorphine treatment at OTPs when two-way audio-video communications technology is not available to the beneficiary, and all other requirements are met. 1. CMS interprets “not available to the beneficiary” to include “circumstances in which the beneficiary is not capable of or has not consented to the use of devices that permit a two-way, audio/video interaction because in each of these instances audio/video communication technology is not able to be used in furnishing services to the beneficiary.” 3. After the initiation of buprenorphine treatment, OTPs can continue to use audio-only telephone calls to perform periodic patient assessments when two-way audio-video is not available (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). This flexibility will be in place until the end of CY 2023. CMS Recognized Broad Stakeholder Support for Telehealth SUD Treatment In comments to the new rules, stakeholders lauded the benefits of two-way audio-video communications technology used to initiate treatment with buprenorphine. CMS concurred, noting it is “of critical importance to individuals who have limited ability to attend in-person appointments or who are disincentivized to do so due to perceived stigma and fear.” CMS also acknowledged that audio-only flexibilities “further promote equity for individuals who are economically disadvantaged, live in rural areas, are racial and ethnic minorities, lack access to reliable broadband or internet access, or do not possess devices with video functions.” CMS declined to address comments relating to issues outside the scope of the final rule, including: 1) comments related to allowing prescribers to initiate buprenorphine treatment for SUDs without an in-person evaluation in other settings (outside of OTPs); 2) coordinating with DEA to create a special registration for telehealth providers under the Ryan Haight Act; and 3) developing an add-on code for Contingency Management. While the final rule does not extend coverage to OBOT treatment – which has proven a successful treatment option during the COVID-19 PHE – it evidences CMS’s view of technology as a viable way to provide life-saving SUD treatment to vulnerable beneficiaries. © 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 313 See original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/expanded-medicare-telehealth-coverage-opioid-use-disorder-treatment-services < Previous News Next News >

A staffing expert shows how telehealth is stepping in to fill the staffing shortage Bill Siwicki December 19, 2022 "As clinicians are passionate about patients receiving quality healthcare delivered in a timely manner, I see telehealth programs being the key to improving patient outcomes and the overall healthcare experience," he says. The staffing shortage is a huge challenge in healthcare today. Another challenge is finding a solution to this vexing problem. But telehealth may be becoming an emerging strategy to help fill in gaps within hospitals and health systems, contended Chris Franklin, president of LocumTenens.com, a self-service job board and a full-service physician and advanced practice recruitment agency working in high-demand medical specialties. Healthcare IT News sat down with Franklin to discuss changes occurring in healthcare staffing, what he calls hybrid staffing strategies, and the results of a new LocumTenens.com survey. Q. Overall, what changes are you seeing occurring in healthcare staffing? A. The changes we've seen in the broader economy regarding contingent employment over the past three years are incredibly impactful on healthcare staffing. There are a few key numbers that tell the story. There currently are 3.5 million fewer workers in the U.S. than there were two years ago. Since February 2020, job openings have gone up by 50%, while total employment in the U.S. has gone slightly down. Because demand is outpacing the available supply, workers are demanding not just increases in pay, but also more choice and control over when, how and where they work. This is incredibly true in healthcare, based on every indicator we watch. New data shows more than 300,000 healthcare workers dropped out of the workforce in the last two years. Physicians report they are choosing early retirement or leaving the full-time practice of medicine for other kinds of work, in and outside of our industry. Nurses on the frontline have made the news due to the difficulties they have experienced, and also because of the freedoms they are newly experiencing due to the uptick in travel nursing. According to a 2021 study from Health Affairs, nearly 100,000 nurses exited the profession last year – most of them under the age of 50. Another 32% of nurses have said they may leave the profession. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates we'll need to fill nearly 200,000 nurse vacancies a year until 2030. Patients are sicker than they have ever been. Over the past year, nearly every hospital has seen increases in patient acuity, largely driven by care that was delayed during the [COVID-19] pandemic. And chronic disease and obesity continue to be primary drivers of healthcare consumption in the U.S. Even though it's been on the horizon for years, the impact of a big population of aging baby boomers – the oldest turned 75 this year – is finally here, and demand for healthcare is about to increase dramatically as a result. Burnout also is at an all-time high. A recent survey from MGMA and Jackson Physician Search highlights a sobering pair of statistics: Nearly two-thirds of physicians (65%) report they are experiencing burnout in 2022, up four percentage points from the 2021 study. Of those experiencing burnout, more than one in three physicians (35%) said their levels of burnout significantly increased in 2022. All of this points to a big, industrywide shake-up, and we are seeing first-hand that traditional workforce staffing models are no longer working, especially in healthcare. What's emerging is something very different – hybrid models that anticipate both permanent and contingent workers, an uptick in models that combine site-based care with a robust telehealth presence, an increase in APP staffing overall, and in general, a growing commitment to giving providers access to the kind of work-life balance they are desperately seeking. Q. You say you are seeing a hybrid staffing strategy that includes elements of locum tenens, more advanced practice providers and more telehealth coverage. Please elaborate on this. A. Healthcare leaders are looking for new and creative solutions now more than ever – and all amidst this backdrop of healthcare workforce shortages. We have seen first-hand the impact the gig economy is directly having on the healthcare workforce and know the biggest concerns for healthcare facilities are attracting talent, retaining talent, and avoiding or mitigating burnout. To help clinicians' desire to achieve a more viable work-life balance, healthcare leaders are evolving their hiring models to reflect a new appreciation for the flexibility that hybrid staffing models represent. Solely relying on traditional staffing models and solutions just won't work anymore. Through staffing innovation, hospitals and healthcare organizations are actively seeking options to improve access to care with more sustainable models. Healthcare staffing is complex and there's never a one-size-fits-all solution, but we are seeing an increase in interest in alternative models of staffing, including a growing use of locum tenens staff and improving patient access to care with advanced practice providers (APPs) and telehealth expansion. Awareness of and interest in locum tenens are at an all-time high for both healthcare organizations and clinicians. People are actually taking their own well-being into account in terms of their employment, opting into contingent work as a way to manage their levels of stress and burnout. We had a locum tenens physician tell an audience at a recent conference: "If you have burnout in locums, you are not doing it right." There's no doubt flexibility of locum tenens offers a desirable outcome on what physicians are wanting out of life. According to the recent survey: Nearly 90% of healthcare facilities already use locum tenens staffing. Nearly 57% of facilities that have not used locum tenens staffing in the past are planning to use it in the next year. According to a recent survey we conducted on innovation and flexibility in staffing, when most administrators consider locum tenens, they most commonly think about onsite physician care. Data shows hospitals utilize onsite locum tenens more than three times as often as telehealth, but that is starting to change. Facilities that were previously reliant on onsite are now embracing telehealth. COVID-19 expedited this adoption, as hospitals looked beyond traditional models to meet their patients' needs. In some cases, hospitals are taking a flexible, hybrid approach that integrates telehealth and onsite care, providing the best of both worlds and delivering value to patients. Additionally, the use of APPs in combination with physicians as a strategy is growing, with 73.9% affirmatively responding to the question, "Do you plan to expand APP coverage?" Q. Your company recently did a survey of hospital administrators to get a clearer view of the challenges in today's landscape. What did you learn as it relates to telehealth? A. Our recent survey results – which are detailed in the Innovation & Flexibility: Journey to Sustainable Healthcare Report – revealed that hospital administrators have strong feedback when it comes to managing today's challenging landscape. With regard to how it relates to telehealth, more facilities are using telehealth than ever before. COVID-19 expedited this adoption, but over the coming year, most hospitals expect to expand their use of telehealth even further – there is no turning back. Patients across the board now are more comfortable using telehealth as the COVID-19 pandemic drove a surge in virtual visits, including those who have historically hesitated to use technology. Traditionally, psychiatric services dominated locum tenens telehealth services, with behavioral health accounting for 79% of telehealth services for LocumTenens.com. However, utilization has started to shift as hospitals look at other specialties, including oncology, cardiology and physiatry. By expanding telehealth offerings, facilities can expand access to care and reach more patients in new locations. Over the past year, many facilities have been able to deliver a higher level of specialty care to satellite or remote locations through telehealth. Going forward, better reconciling reimbursements to align with the level of care provided in a telehealth setting will lead to broader adoption. Q. Where do you see the telehealth component of staffing in five years? A. The feedback we have gotten shows that more than half (60%) of those surveyed plan to expand telehealth. Through innovation, healthcare providers will continue to adapt to flexibility and improved access to care. These flexible solutions create a more sustainable model to provide quality care to patients and their communities. As clinicians are passionate about patients receiving quality healthcare delivered in a timely manner, I see telehealth programs being the key to improving patient outcomes and the overall healthcare experience. The beauty of telehealth is that it provides access to a qualified provider at any time. For example, we have a client that provides psychiatric services across the country. During a busy day, a patient presented who was experiencing domestic violence trauma, and she wasn't comfortable talking with a male doctor. The problem was there were only male psychiatrists on call at her presenting hospital. The hospital contacted our team, and we in turn reached out to two privileged and credentialed female providers that weren't on-call that day. Although one was heading out to attend a wedding, she accepted the assignment to immediately provide care for this patient. So, even though this psychiatrist worked five states away from the hospital, she was able to provide care because of the access to telehealth. The result: The patient received the "right care" that she needed at the right time with an experienced provider. Follow Bill's HIT coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Siwicki Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/staffing-expert-shows-how-telehealth-stepping-fill-staffing-shortage < Previous News Next News >

What you need to know about standing up a virtual nursing unit Bill Siwicki February 15, 2022 Jennifer Ball, RN, director of virtual care at Saint Luke's Health System of Kansas City, describes the workings and many benefits of the telehealth approach. The U.S. nursing shortage has reached critical levels during the pandemic battle, paired with an aging population. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects the need for 1.1 million new RNs for expansion and replacement of retirees. To serve its inpatient population and overcome the nursing shortage, St. Luke's Health System of Kansas City has developed an innovative approach leveraging virtual care. The organization created and implemented one of the nation's first virtual nursing units to reduce the burden on bedside nurses and much more. In her HIMSS22 educational session entitled "Lessons Learned from Launching a Virtual Nursing Unit," Jennifer Ball, RN, director of virtual care at Saint Luke's Health System of Kansas City will offer attendees next month a deep dive into the workings of the virtual nursing unit. She has been a nurse for 35 years, with a clinical background in ICU, trauma and ED, and has 25 years of experience in nursing management. To read the full article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-you-need-know-about-standing-virtual-nursing-unit < Previous News Next News >

Social Determinants of Health Continue to Limit Access to Care via Telehealth Center for Connected Health Policy April 2021 A study published in JAMA Network Open found that over 27% of visits were conducted virtually in socially advantaged neighborhoods, compared to nearly 20% in disadvantaged areas. While telehealth increased care delivery during COVID-19, social determinants of health continue to limit access and highlight existing disparities related to the digital divide. A study published in JAMA Network Open found that over 27% of visits were conducted virtually in socially advantaged neighborhoods, compared to nearly 20% in disadvantaged areas. Meanwhile 24% of visits in urban areas were virtual compared to 14% in rural areas. The study also found that virtual care occurred more frequently for mental health visits than medical, that higher age and number of chronic diseases also correlated with higher telehealth utilization, and that increased use of telehealth was seen in areas with “COVID-19 hot spots” as well. The researchers stated that they hope these findings guide policymakers when looking to address ensuring access to care for all populations via telehealth moving forward. JAMA Network Study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2777779 < Previous News Next News >

Medicare Telehealth: Actions Needed to Strengthen Oversight and Help Providers Educate Patients on Privacy and Security Risks U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) September 26, 2022 To help patients access care during the pandemic, Medicare temporarily waived restrictions on telehealth—health care services delivered via phone or video. The use of telehealth services rose tenfold: 53 million telehealth visits in Apr.-Dec. 2020 vs. 5 million during the same period in 2019. But Medicare hasn't comprehensively assessed the quality of care patients received, and lacks data on telehealth services delivered in patients' homes or via phone. Patients may also be unaware that their private health information could be overheard or inappropriately disclosed during their video appointment. Our recommendations address these issues. Highlights What GAO Found In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) temporarily waived certain Medicare restrictions on telehealth—the delivery of some services via audio-only or video technology. Use of telehealth services increased from about 5 million services pre-waiver (April to December 2019) to more than 53 million services post-waiver (April to December 2020). Total utilization of all Medicare services declined by about 14 percent post-waiver due to a 25 percent drop in in-person service use. GAO also found that, post-waiver, telehealth services increased across all provider specialties, and 5 percent of providers delivered over 40 percent of services. Urban providers delivered a greater percentage of their services via telehealth compared to rural providers; office visits and psychotherapy were the most common services. See full article: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104454 < Previous News Next News >

CMS-Supported Telehealth Will Continue To Be A Driving Force – But Watch for Greater OIG Enforcement The National Law Review March 3, 2022 As mindsets pivoted to a post-pandemic life, telehealth advocates petitioned CMS to embrace telehealth as a permanent care option, and CMS responded with regulatory action at the end of 2021. During the Covid-19 Pandemic, telehealth usage surged as patients and providers turned to it as a safer care alternative. McKinsey estimated telehealth claim volumes reached 80 times pre-pandemic levels at its peak, ultimately stabilizing at 38 times pre-pandemic levels by early 2021.1 This increase was mostly driven by CMS’ waivers and relaxation of regulatory constraints for telehealth reimbursement. But, the temporary nature of both left questions regarding telehealth’s future. In December 2021, CMS issued new regulations which, collectively, steer telehealth toward becoming a part of the telebehavioral health toolkit accepted by Medicare post-pandemic. In the CY2021 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule2 , further discussed here, CMS broadly expanded access to telebehavioral health services. Specifically, Medicare permanently authorized payment for telehealth services furnished “for purposes of diagnosis, evaluation or treatment of a mental health disorder” under the following relaxed criteria:3. Read full article here: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/cms-supported-telehealth-will-continue-to-be-driving-force-watch-greater-oig < Previous News Next News >

Trends in Telehealth Prescription Laws Kirin Goff, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center July 2021 New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. States across the country are proposing or enacting legislation that supports making the increased access to telehealth that occurred during the pandemic permanent. However, many states seem to struggle with how to appropriately regulate remote prescribing requirements as there is wide variation in approaches and priorities emerging in these proposed and new laws. The most common approach is to carve separate requirements for controlled substances, and then clarify if and under what circumstances they can be prescribed via telehealth. Notably, concerns about addiction and access to mental healthcare are becoming increasing prevalent in telehealth legislation. Some states are attempting to address the latter by specifically expanding telehealth to meet these needs, including allowances for remote prescriptions. The Worsening Drug Epidemic As the COVID-19 pandemic took center stage, substance use also increased. Preliminary estimates indicate that in the first eight months of 2020, drug overdose deaths increased by 48.1% in Arizona and 46.8% in Colorado, compared to same period in 2019. In the U.S. as a whole, drug overdoses increased by 27% between September 2019 and August 2020, compared to the previous twelve months (all data are based on Commonwealth Fund examination of provisional data from CDC’s National Vital Statistics System). As more Americans become personally impacted by the opioid epidemic, opinions about drug policy seem to be shifting. In lieu of strict regulatory measures, harm reduction is becoming more mainstream, and approaches seem to increasingly favor policies that improve access to care for substance use disorders. For example, the American Medical Association put out an issue brief supporting policies that employ evidence-based harm reduction policies and “remove existing barriers for patients with pain to obtain necessary medications…[including] arbitrary dose, quantity and refill restrictions on controlled substances.” Controlled Substance Prescription Arizona has addressed this issue most directly and comprehensively by enacting HB 2454. This law allows providers to prescribe Schedule II drugs, which are defined as drugs with high potential for abuse, such as Vicodin, methadone, and OxyContin, via audio-visual examination and delegates review for more detailed requirements to a newly created Telehealth Advisory Committee. The committee will “review national and other standards for telehealth best practices and relevant peer-reviewed literature” and establish best practices for providers to follow. This committee must include several experts in behavioral health and substance use, indicating that optimal ways to regulate prescribing controlled substances are a high priority. In other Southwestern states, the majority of recent bills on the topic focus on cannabis. For example, New Mexico’s medical marijuana law (HB 2) allows providers to determine medical marijuana qualification via telehealth. Likewise, Utah recently passed a bill (SB 170) allowing for medical marijuana renewal via telehealth examination, although it still requires in-person exams for initial recommendations. Research and Access to Care Healthcare access issues are also of primary concern, and telehealth is seen as a potential solution, particularly in rural areas. For example, New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. Likewise, Utah attempted (HB 36) to extend the term of a grant for research about how telehealth can improve access to mental health care, particularly for underserved populations. The range of proposed and enacted laws reflects a lack of evidence as well as differing ideologies among legislators. It is unusual for such substantial changes to the legal framework to occur so quickly – without more incremental steps and without a significant body of experience and precedent to glean from other jurisdictions. Arizona’s HB 2454 provides an innovative approach to remote prescribing by providing both access and data, which will be key to watch as states continue to pass telehealth legislation. < Previous News Next News >

Majority of Americans Value the Convenience Associated with Telehealth Mark Melchionna December 07, 2022 New survey results released by AHIP showed that most Americans highly value the simplicity and convenience associated with telehealth and support making pre-deductible telehealth coverage permanent. America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) described survey results indicating that Americans value the convenience associated with telehealth, with 69 percent saying they prefer it over in-person care for this reason. As the COVID-19 pandemic became increasingly severe, many patients and providers began to use telehealth at a higher frequency. This was supported by federal and state governments allowing flexibilities that removed barriers to this type of care, leading to improved patient access. The high level of telehealth use has continued during the pandemic, even following the drop in COVID-19 severity as vaccines and treatments became widely available. According to the FAIR Health Monthly Telehealth Regional tracker, telehealth use increased by 10.2 percent in May. A survey released by AHIP aimed to gather information regarding Americans' opinions on telehealth. Conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago and using the AmeriSpeak panel, the survey polled 1,000 Americans, 498 of whom have employer-provided or individual market coverage, regarding telehealth use within one year prior. The survey was fielded in October. Among the portion of survey respondents who were commercially insured, 40 percent claimed to have used telehealth within a year prior, and 53 percent claimed to have used it between two and five times within a year prior. About 69 percent of commercially insured telehealth users said they used telehealth due to the associated high level of convenience compared to in-person care, 78 percent stated that telehealth made the process of seeking out healthcare easier, and 85 percent said there is an adequate number of providers available via telehealth for their subjective needs. Also, 73 percent of commercial telehealth users stated that Congress should make permanent arrangements that allow for the coverage of telehealth services prior to paying their full deductible. Further, female telehealth users were almost four times as likely than men to say they participated in a telehealth appointment because they lacked childcare or eldercare, the survey shows. “Patients and providers accept – and often prefer – digital technologies as an essential part of health care delivery,” said Jeanette Thornton, executive vice president of policy and strategy at AHIP, in a press release. “Telehealth can be just as effective as in-person care for many conditions and allows patients to receive more services ‘where they are.’ That’s why health insurance providers are committed to strengthening and improving both access and use for the millions of Americans who use telehealth for their health care needs.” A report from July found similar patient opinions of telehealth. Released by CVS Health, the 2022 Health Care Insights Study reported survey results from two separate questionnaires. Around 92 percent of respondents stated that convenience is a critical factor when selecting a primary care provider. The surveys also reported that many consumers find virtual appointments more convenient than in-person visits because they didn’t have to leave home (41 percent), they didn't have to pay for transportation (37 percent), and they saved time (37 percent). See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/majority-of-americans-value-the-convenience-associated-with-telehealth < Previous News Next News >

GAO Reports on Telehealth and COVID-19 Flexibility Findings Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 While the GAO reported telehealth flexibilities as critical to reducing obstacles of care, they also stressed considering its potential to increase program expenditures and stated that the quality of telehealth services has still not been fully analyzed. The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) released testimony May 19th regarding their ongoing assessment of COVID-19 flexibilities within the Medicare and Medicaid programs, as required under federal pandemic response oversight provisions included the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Provided before the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, the GAO focused its summarized findings around the effects of program flexibilities and preliminary observations related to telehealth waivers of certain federal requirements, as well as considerations regarding ongoing use. Telehealth waivers included allowing services to be provided remotely in all areas and settings, as well as expanding the types of providers and technologies that could be used, such as audio-only modalities. While the GAO reported telehealth flexibilities as critical to reducing obstacles of care, they also stressed considering its potential to increase program expenditures and stated that the quality of telehealth services has still not been fully analyzed. GAO testimony highlighted Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data on recent telehealth utilization: -Medicare telehealth services increased from 325,000 services in mid-March to 1.9 million in late-April; then decreased to 1.3 million by June as it continued to steadily drop -Nearly 40% of beneficiaries received office visits through telehealth; nearly 60% received mental health services via telehealth -Internists and family practitioners were the primary provider specialties using telehealth, through which they delivered one-quarter of their services -89 of the 146 newly available types of telehealth services could be furnished via landline phones -More beneficiaries under age 65 received services via telehealth than those over age 65 -More beneficiaries in urban areas received services via telehealth than those in rural areas -Similar proportions of beneficiaries across all racial and ethnic groups received services via telehealth When highlighting potential considerations moving forward, the GAO added that preliminary observations show that due to lack of broadband and digital literacy, access to services via live video telehealth continues to be limited among those with low socioeconomic status, those over age 85, and those in communities of color. Given that CMS information indicated that telehealth services have continued as in-person visits have been able to increase, the GAO also suggested considering the potential for increased spending if payment parity requirements related to telehealth are maintained post-pandemic. In relation to fraud and program integrity, the GAO discussed the inability of CMS to determine many aspects of telehealth services, such as type of modality and specific location data, as well as the suspension of security rules that raise potential medical information privacy issues. In regard to quality of care via telehealth considerations, the GAO cited a study specific to Direct-to-Consumer telehealth companies potentially overprescribing antibiotics as their primary example, adding that CMS is still exploring how to measure quality related to services provided via telehealth. GAO information was based upon interviews of federal and state officials and provider and patient groups regarding their telehealth experiences, in addition to reviews of federal laws and CMS guidance. Additional GAO data and reports can be found on their website. < Previous News Next News >

Apply Now: $250 M in Telehealth Grants National Council for Behavioral Health April 30, 2021 Telehealth Grants - Apply Now Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opened its second phase of the COVID-19 Telehealth Program with an additional $250 million available to eligible providers, including community mental health and substance use organizations. Organizations are strongly encouraged to apply for the grants that may be used to fund technology and equipment to bolster service delivery via telehealth. The application will close at 12:00pm ET on May 6, 2021. Read more and reach out here with any specific questions on the application process. COVID-19 Telehealth Program Application Resources: https://www.usac.org/about/covid-19-telehealth-program/covid-19-telehealth-program-application-resources/?mkt_tok=NzczLU1KRi0zNzkAAAF8wn-qjbshy_rZnI19Utm_szbXLRtL_Em1obbBZMPGjL8UcKptxsAQkufy8_qpLAJ8F7YLbidFX_B4uUKtfjz1Xqfb00kuVsv-2qjkBEx3 COVID-19 Telehealth Program (Invoices & Reimbursements): https://www.fcc.gov/covid-19-telehealth-program-invoices-reimbursements?mkt_tok=NzczLU1KRi0zNzkAAAF8wn-qjeRoIRGRmJOwVOAO8DxtchsnKpit1UbNY_hCbZZVDnK6jxX-VTendryRdaw0BeLxWnFcR90xotZs6ikzMrcjjvHZgcWX3tpv1reh Questions: Round2TelehealthApplicationSupport@usac.org < Previous News Next News >

Health Care Disparities and Access to Video Visits Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Patient Survey in Primary Care Emily C. Webber, Brock D. McMillen, and Deanna R. Willis May 11, 2022 Abstract Background:In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement structure was relaxed to aid in the rapid adoption nationally of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to limited access to internet service, cellular phone data, and appropriate devices, many patients may be excluded from telemedicine services. Methods:In this study, we present the findings of a survey of patients at an urban primary care clinic regarding their access to the tools needed for telemedicine before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients provided information about their access to internet services, phone and data plans, and their perceived access to and interest in telemedicine. The survey was conducted in 2019 and then again in September of 2020 after expansion of telemedicine services. Results:In 2019, 168 patients were surveyed; and in 2020, 99 patients participated. In both surveys, 30% of respondents had limited phone data, no data, or no phone at all. In 2019, the patient responses showed a statistically significant difference in phone plan types between patients with different insurance plans (p < 0.10), with a higher proportion (39%) of patients with Medicaid or Medicaid waiver having a prepaid phone or no phone at all compared with patients with commercial insurance (26%). The overall awareness rate increased from 17% to 43% in the 2020 survey. Conclusions:This survey illustrated that not all patients had access to devices, cellular data, and internet service, which are all needed to conduct telemedicine. In this survey, patients with Medicaid or Medicaid waiver insurance were less likely to have these tools than those with a commercial payor. Finally, patients' access to these telemedicine tools correlated with their interest in using telemedicine visits. Providing equitable telemedicine care requires attention to and mitigation strategies for these gaps in access. Introduction Telemedicine and virtual care expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. Fueled by necessity among health care providers and systems to deliver patient care, adoption was also driven by removal of barriers and expanded Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement models. In March 2020, CMS authorized Medicare beneficiaries to receive telehealth at any location, including their homes.1 Subsequent waivers increased the scope of Medicare telehealth services, including a wider array of practitioners. Finally, the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights announced that it would waive penalties for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violations against health care providers who were using everyday communication technologies to provide telehealth services.2 These combined changes resulted in millions of additional telehealth visits. CMS data from March and June of 2020 showed an increase from 13,000 beneficiaries using telehealth before the public health emergency to 1.7 million in the last week of April 2020.3 These CMS expansions were made permanent in January 2021.4 Despite these expansions, not all patients are positioned to take advantage of the adoption of telemedicine and virtual care. The digital divide or lack of access to reliable high-speed internet is a well-described gap, made worse in 2020, as many entities turned to virtual solutions to work, study, and conduct business as usual. Nearly 42 million people in the United States may not have the ability to purchase broadband internet as of February 2020,5 disproportionately impacting communities of color as well as low socioeconomic status.6 Finally, according to BroadbandNow, an estimated 1.35 million (20%) residents in Indiana are unserved by broadband internet providers at their home address.7 At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, precautions such as stay-at-home orders and business, municipal, and school shutdowns eliminated public options for internet access. Addressing these gaps is a critical step in preventing worsening inequities in access to care.8 In this study, we surveyed patients in an urban primary care clinic to determine their access to internet and devices, readiness, and barriers to utilizing telemedicine and virtual health care. Methods In August 2019, patients from a primary care clinic located in central Indianapolis, Indiana, participated in a 10-question quality improvement survey. The Institutional Review Board reviewed and determined the survey to be exempt. Each patient arriving at the clinic over a 2-day period was given the chance to participate. The paper survey included questions about home internet and device access, phone plan and phone data adequacy, and interest in virtual visits (see Supplementary Data for full survey). The patient's insurance coverage information was captured on the paper survey form by the staff before handing the form to the patient. The results were assessed using chi-square tests to determine differences between payor groups. A linear regression model was utilized to analyze the association of phone plan data adequacy with interest in video visits. Following the results of the first survey, efforts to improve adoption of virtual visits were undertaken, including office signage promoting virtual visits, offering a virtual visit follow-up at checkout, visual cues to prompt providers to schedule virtual follow-ups, and scripting for appointment schedulers to include offering virtual visits at the time of scheduling. In September 2020, the same quality improvement survey was repeated from the same clinic during an active time period of COVID-19 to see if additional quality improvement efforts were warranted. One additional question was added to the 2020 survey: “How has your ability to do a video visit changed since the onset of COVID-19?” The results were assessed using chi-square tests between payor groups. A linear regression model was utilized to analyze the association of phone plan data adequacy with interest in video visits. Scheduled appointments were tracked weekly by type and audited for completion throughout the study period. Video visits that could not be completed using video were converted to telephone visits and counted as telephone visits. For FULL article: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/tmj.2021.0126 Published Online:11 May 2022https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0126 < Previous News Next News >

Memorial Hermann to provide school-based pediatric telehealth Naomi Diaz October 18, 2022 Houston-based Children's Memorial Hermann has partnered with telehealth company Hazel Health to provide outpatient pediatric care to K-12 students in Houston. Under the partnership, schools that have agreements with Hazel will be able to offer their students access to health services via virtual telehealth sessions, according to an Oct. 17 press release. Children's Memorial Hermann pediatricians or specialists will connect with the students through the program for follow-up or long-term care management. The aim of the partnership is to increase access to pediatric care in schools across 12 counties in southeast Texas. See original article: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/telehealth/memorial-hermann-to-provide-school-based-pediatric-telehealth.html < Previous News Next News >

Are Amazon, Walmart, CVS & Dollar Store Taking Over Healthcare? Dr. Maheu, Telehealth.org August 2021 Amazon, Walmart, CVS, and Dollar General are making notable strides toward increasing their healthcare footprints, positioning themselves to create a seismic shift in healthcare. Telehealth.org has been reporting such efforts for the last several years, and this week offers you an update on the latest developments on amazon care, Walmart care clinic, CVS health, and Dollar General. Amazon Care Introduced in 2019, Amazon Care launched a pilot study for employees in Seattle, quickly followed by an expansion into Washington State. Amazon Care is now expanding nationwide. In addition to developing connections with other companies, the service appears most focused on expanding into underserved rural areas. The pivotal issue to consider as Amazon grows its healthcare footprint is that Amazon currently dominates two digital areas lacking in the industry: optimizing the delivery of digital customer experiences and excelling at the automation of services. Walmart Care Clinic In 2019, Walmart announced the first of its many health centers, called Walmart Care Clinic, with these offerings: primary care, labs, X-ray and EKG, counseling, dental, optical, hearing, community health (nutritional services, fitness), and health insurance education as well as enrollment, in a growing number of their facilities. Walmart has since been keeping itself involved in telehealth developments through mergers and acquisitions. Walmart, the largest in-person retail company in the United States, recently purchased MeMD, described as an “on-demand, multispecialty telehealth provider.” As a complementary addition to the already existing Walmart health centers, MeMD will enable Walmart to provide digital behavioral, primary, and urgent care services. Walmart has also begun a collaboration with Ro, a pharmacy services telehealth app. The relationship will also Ro to sell its health and wellness products in Walmart locations while further increasing Walmart’s digital service offerings. CVS Health Although CVS and Walmart had previously worked together to deliver care through Walmart’s pharmacies, CVS Health announced in January 2019 that Walmart opted to leave the CVS Caremark pharmacy benefit management commercial and Managed Medicaid retail pharmacy networks. That same year, CVS purchased Aetna for $69 billion in cash and stock. The merger brought one of the largest providers of pharmacy services together with the third-largest US-based health insurer. The successful merger formed a healthcare giant with more than $245 billion in annual revenue. Since then, CVS Health has steadily grown its healthcare footprint and, just last week launched a new health care benefit called Aetna Virtual Primary Care. The announcement reads: Offered through the CVS Health Aetna medical insurance subsidiary, Aetna Virtual Primary Care offers members access to a diverse panel of board-certified physicians and coordinated care from a consistent team of specialists based on their health needs. Members will have a continuous relationship with a virtual care physician, beginning from their first 30-45 minute comprehensive primary care visit and extending to every visit thereafter. Existing Aetna virtual care offerings include mental health counseling, dermatology services, and 24/7 urgent care. Dan Finke, executive VP, CVS Health, and President, Aetna, explained, “The future of digital health solutions is rapidly unfolding.” He added, “Aetna Virtual Primary Care is a first-of-its-kind health care solution that provides a simple, affordable, convenient way for eligible members to receive quality primary care from a physician-led care team that knows them and is accessible from virtually anywhere.” As described in his profile, Mr. Finke “is passionate about addressing mental health stigma. He is also deeply committed to attaining health equity for all Americans by engaging public and private stakeholders to address social determinants of health through analytics-based approaches that offer new insight and opportunities into health care disparities.” Dollar General Dollar General is a smaller company, but it has an enviable foothold in rural America. Their stores are well known and trusted. Therefore, they can offer care to patients who live in areas where primary care, behavioral and other specialists are difficult to access. While analysts doubt that Dollar General would follow Walmart’s lead and build primary-care clinics, telehealth solutions are easily within their reach. Dollar General differs from Amazon due to limited floor space, small parking lots, leased rather than owned retail space, and a lack of infrastructure for filling prescriptions. However, these limited abilities did not prevent Dollar General from serving as a site for COVID-19 testing in some states. Dollar General has already partnered with Higi, a blood-pressure machine company that can be seen in some Dollar general stores. Babylon Health is a telehealth provider that has invested in Higi. Given its rural presence, Dollar General may be positioning itself for acquisition by one of the larger publicly traded telehealth companies. In July 2021, the company issued a press released stating: With 75% of the U.S. population living within approximately five miles of one of Dollar General’s 17,000+ stores, the Company recognizes the unique access it provides to rural communities often underserved by other retailers as well as the existing healthcare ecosystem. The Company’s commitment to expanding its health offerings is underpinned by its existing infrastructure, robust supply chain, and current complementary health and nutrition assortment. < Previous News Next News >

What You Need to Know About the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act Dr. Maheu February 24, 2022 The Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act was introduced on February 7, 2022, to ensure a continuation of public access to telehealth after the end of a public health emergency. If passed, it will allow time to gather data concerning virtual care utilization and prevent a sudden drop-off in access to care, also known as the telehealth cliff. What is the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act? The Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act establishes a two-year extension for certain coronavirus-related telehealth waivers. It will extend geographic and site restrictions waivers and allow Medicare beneficiaries to access telehealth from various locations. It also provides flexibility for prescribing drugs via telehealth and extends flexible Medicare payment plans for Rural Health Centers (RHCs), Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs). The bill follows an advocacy letter signed by 336 organizations, co-led by the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) and others, urging Congressional leaders to continue the current telehealth waivers and pass permanent, evidence-based telehealth legislation for implementation in 2024. Key Takeaways for the Telehealth Industry The telehealth industry should be aware of the critical points of the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act. Extension of Medicare Payment for Telehealth Services. The CARES ACT allowed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to waive specific Medicare coverage and payment limitations, allowing Medicare beneficiaries to receive telehealth care at home. If the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation passes, it will extend certain telehealth coverage waivers on originating site and geographic location limitations, expand the list of telehealth providers, and increase the availability of audio-only telehealth services to Medicare beneficiaries for two years after the public health emergency ends. Telemedicine Drug Prescribing. The Ryan Haight Act prohibits the prescribing of medicine without an in-person visit. Federal law allowed DEA registered practitioners to prescribe to patients without in-person visits during the pandemic. See TBHI’s previous article Telehealth Opioids, and Ryan Haight Act Update, for more information. The proposed legislation would extend this flexibility two years after the public health emergency. Extension of FQHCs and RHCs. Before the pandemic, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) could only provide telehealth services to patients near their locations. The CARES Act allowed these facilities to provide care to patients in distant areas, a practice the legislation would continue for two years after the public health emergency expires. Extension for CAHs. The 2020 Hospitals Without Walls program allowed hospitals to provide telehealth care during a public health emergency. The proposed legislation would add Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) as distant site providers of telehealth services to continue offering off-site care. Restrictions for Certain DMEs and Lab Tests. The legislation would require an ordering physician to conduct an in-person examination of a patient no more than 12 months before ordering specific high-cost lab tests and Durable Medical Equipment (DME) products via telehealth. It would also instruct Medicare Administrative Contractors to audit practitioners and clinicians who do 90% or more of their orders of DME and lab tests via telehealth. This would continue for two years after the health emergency ends. It is meant to reduce instances of fraud and abuse. NPI Number for Telehealth Billing. Healthcare providers need a national provider identifier (NPI) number to bill Medicare directly. Under certain conditions, Medicare pays for services billed by physicians but performed by non-physician staff acting under the physician’s supervision. This practice is known as “incident to” billing. The proposed legislation requires all practitioners to obtain an NPI number to receive Medicare payment for telehealth services two years after the public health emergency. Your Advocacy Is Needed The pandemic has caused an increased reliance on the telehealth industry. If passed, the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act will ensure that patients can continue to access the virtual care they need. Contact your elected officials at the federal level to ask them to support this crucial bill. https://telehealth.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-telehealth-extension-and-evaluation-act/?smclient=f760e669-8538-11ec-83c8-18cf24ce389f&smconv=5bc4c379-a4c1-484f-a411-33ec93777504&smlid=9&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default < Previous News Next News >

State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies Report, Fall 2021 Center for Connected Health Policy October 2021 Today the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) is releasing its bi-annual summary of state telehealth policy changes for Fall 2021. Our semi-annual report has gone digital Historically, our twice-yearly updates to the “State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies” report have been published as a PDF document, and included the telehealth policies for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Earlier this year, we transitioned exclusively to our new and improved online Policy Finder. This online database allows the CCHP team to easily update each state’s information whenever there is a change, instead of waiting for the spring and fall to roll out the report. Now, you can look up (or download a PDF) of the most up-to-date information on each state from that state’s page. We hope this transition will result in more timely policy information that is easier for you to navigate and understand. Read the Executive Summary We will continue to produce bi-annual summary reports of the status of telehealth policies across the United States to provide a snapshot of the progress made in the past six months. The information for this summary report covers updates in state telehealth policy made between June and September 2021. DOWNLOAD SUMMARY This report is for informational purposes only, and is not intended as a comprehensive statement of the law on this topic, nor to be relied upon as authoritative. Always consult with counsel or appropriate program administrators. Introduction The Center for Connected Health Policy’s (CCHP) Fall 2021 analysis and summary of telehealth policies is based on its online Policy Finder database tool. It highlights the changes that have taken place in state telehealth policy between the initial release of CCHP’s Policy Finder in Spring 2021, and Fall 2021. The research for this Fall 2021 executive summary was conducted between June and September 2021. This summary offers policymakers, health advocates, and other interested health care professionals an overview of telehealth policy trends throughout the nation. For detailed information by state, see CCHP’s telehealth Policy Finder tool which breaks down policy for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Please note that many states continue to keep their temporary telehealth COVID-19 emergency policies siloed from their permanent telehealth policies. These temporary policies are not included in this executive summary, although they are listed under each state in the online Policy Finder under the COVID-19 category. In instances where the state has made policies permanent, or extended policies for multiple years, CCHP has incorporated those policies into this report. DOWNLOAD INFOGRAPH WITH KEY FINDINGS Methodology CCHP examined state law, state administrative codes, and Medicaid provider manuals as the primary resources for the online telehealth policy database tool, from which the findings in this summary are taken. Additionally, other potential sources such as releases from a state’s executive office, Medicaid notices, transmittals or Agency newsletters were also examined for relevant information. In some cases, CCHP directly contacted state Medicaid personnel in order to clarify specific policy issues. Most of the information contained in the database tool specifically focuses on fee-for-service; however, information on managed care plans has also been included if available from the utilized sources. Every effort was made to capture the most recent policy language in each state at the time it was reviewed between the months of June and September 2021. In some cases, after a state was reviewed, they passed a significant piece of legislation. In order to incorporate those significant changes, CCHP conducted a scan for these instances in late September and incorporated language from those enacted bills where appropriate. It should be noted that even if a state has enacted telehealth policies in statute, these policies may not have been incorporated into its Medicaid program. For purposes of this summary, CCHP only counts states as reimbursing for a specific modality or removing a restriction if there is documentation to show that the Medicaid program has implemented a statutory requirement for that policy. Requirements in newly passed legislation will be incorporated into the findings section of future editions of CCHP’s summary report once they are implemented in the Medicaid program, and CCHP has located official documentation confirming this. This survey focused on three primary areas for telehealth policy including Medicaid reimbursement, private payer laws and professional requirements. Within each category, information is organized into various topic and subtopic areas. These topic areas include: Medicaid Reimbursement Definition of the term telemedicine/telehealth Reimbursement for live video Reimbursement for store-and-forward Reimbursement for remote patient monitoring (RPM) Reimbursement for email/phone/fax Consent issues Out-of-state providers Private Payer Laws Definitions Requirements Parity (service and payment) Professional Regulation Definitions Consent Online Prescribing Cross-State Licensing Licensure Compacts Professional Boards Standards Key Findings No two states are alike in how telehealth is defined and regulated. While there are some similarities in language, perhaps indicating states may have utilized existing verbiage from other states, noticeable differences exist. The main areas where changes were made over the past six months fall in the three buckets that CCHP uses to categorize information within its policy finder: Medicaid policy, private payer policy, and regulation of health professionals. Changes were also highly influenced by temporary expansions made during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some states took approaches to extend their pandemic policies multiple years into the future, while others made policies (or portions of their COVID policies) permanent. Still others have not adopted their more lenient COVID policies at all. Connecticut, for example, passed a new temporary law (active until June 30, 2023) which not only requires Medicaid to reimburse for synchronous, asynchronous store-and-forward transfers, remote patient monitoring and audio-only modalities if the provider is in-network, but also places similar requirements on private payers as well. In Medicaid, it was common for states to make slight adjustments to their telehealth policies to add or clarify the services that can be delivered via telehealth, types of professionals that can deliver care through telehealth or the types of settings a patient could be in during a telehealth interaction. For example, Iowa clarified that an intern psychologist can provide telehealth services to Medicaid members. Mississippi clarified federally qualified health centers (FQHC) and rural health clinics (RHC) could be distant site providers, and added the home as an originating site. And, Arkansas now specifies that both the home is an eligible patient site and that group meetings may be performed via telemedicine. Although reimbursement for audio-only telephone has become pretty standard during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), less than half of state Medicaid programs explicitly are reimbursing for the modality permanently, and many that are have placed restrictive parameters around its reimbursement. It was also common for states to make modifications to their telehealth private payer reimbursement law language to alter the definition of telehealth/ telemedicine. This typically included an expansion of the definition to be broader in scope so that it entails more than just live video, although often with some caveats. For example, Arkansas’ private payer law now stipulates that telemedicine does not include audio-only communication, unless the audio-only communication is real-time, interactive, and substantially meets the requirements for a healthcare service that would otherwise be covered by the health benefit plan. Iowa revised their law to include ‘real-time interactive electronic media’, but still excludes audio-only telephone from the definition of telehealth. Requirements around payment parity were also a common change, with eight states passing a law requiring the reimbursement amount is the same whether a service is provided via telehealth or in-person since Spring 2021. Illinois, for example, now requires reimbursement parity for in-network or tiered network health care professionals or facilities, including services provided via audio-only. Iowa is another example of a state requiring reimbursement of covered services is made on the same basis and same rate as in-person mental health services. Finally, there is a noticeable shift in telehealth policy towards tightening of professional requirements around the use of telehealth by providers. For example, Michigan passed new consent requirements for social work, athletic trainers, massage therapists, acupuncturists and veterinary medicine. Texas is another state that added practice standards (including a consent requirement and prescribing rules) for teledentistry specifically. West Virginia adopted emergency telehealth practice standard regulations to implement a previous law that passed (W. VA Code 30-1-26(b)) for five professions, including dentistry, nursing, osteopathic medicine, social work and medicine. While many states have had these types of standards for several years, the rate at which new telehealth standards are being adopted has increased significantly within the last six months. Additional findings include: Fifty states and Washington DC provide reimbursement for some form of live video in Medicaid fee-for-service. Twenty-two state Medicaid programs reimburse for store-and-forward. However, three states (NC, OH, VT) solely reimburse store-and-forward as a part of CTBS, which is limited to specific codes and reimbursement amounts. Michigan is the only state to add reimbursement for store-and-forward since Spring 2021. Additionally, three jurisdictions (MS, NH, and NJ) have laws requiring Medicaid reimburse for store-and-forward but as of the creation of this edition, don’t have any official Medicaid policy indicating this is occurring. Twenty-nine state Medicaid programs provide reimbursement for RPM. States that added RPM since Spring 2021 included Washington, Michigan and California. As is the case for store-and-forward, three Medicaid programs (NH, HI and NJ) have laws requiring Medicaid reimburse for RPM but at the time this report was written, did not have any official Medicaid policy. Additionally, two of the states (OH and CA) only reimburse the remote physiologic monitoring codes CMS does. Twenty-two states reimburse for audio-only telephone in some capacity (often limitations apply); however, Michigan only reimburses for it when used for provider to- provider electronic consultations. Eleven state Medicaid programs including Arizona, California, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, reimburse for all four modalities, although certain limitations apply. While this Executive Summary provides an overview of findings, it must be stressed that there are nuances in many of the telehealth policies. To fully understand a specific policy and all its intricacies, the full language of it must be read utilizing CCHP’s telehealth Policy Finder. Below are summarized key findings in each category area contained in the Policy Finder as of September 2021. Read more: https://www.cchpca.org/resources/state-telehealth-laws-and-reimbursement-policies-report-fall-2021/ < Previous News Next News >

2021 National Telemedicine Summit World Conference Forum, LLC Sept. 13, 2021 Key Strategies to Revolutionize & Transform Healthcare Delivery, Optimize Quality Patient Care & Outcomes, Increase Accessibility, Enhance Data Analytics, and Reduce Costs! September 13 – 14, 2021 • The Ritz-Carlton, South Beach • Miami, FL Today, telemedicine is one of the fastest growing sectors in healthcare. Specifically, COVID-19 has enhanced and accelerated the role that telemedicine plays within our healthcare system. It is reshaping the landscape of healthcare delivery in the United States, and is being recognized as the future of global healthcare. Telehealth addresses and achieves the basic tenants of Healthcare Reform: providing the population with access to improved and convenient, high quality patient centric care, enhancing outcomes, while reducing per capita expenditures. Today, more than 70 percent of hospitals throughout the United States are engaged in telehealth programs. Studies have shown that the benefits of telehealth include significantly improved outcomes, efficient care delivery as well as reduction in mortality rates, hospitalizations, length of stay, readmissions and healthcare costs. Telehealth has greatly enhanced access to quality care in rural areas and patient satisfaction has increased due to its convenience and patient centric approach. We have created an exciting, high level forum featuring knowledgeable leaders and executives from the nation's leading Hospitals and Health Systems who will share their perspectives, valuable insights and expertise on how to be best equipped for the rapidly evolving and exciting landscape of telehealth. This exclusive event targets senior level executives in order to maximize educational and networking opportunities. By attending the 2021 National Telemedicine Summit, you will learn what highly regarded Hospitals and Health Systems are doing to be prepared for the challenges that lie ahead in 2021 and beyond! We look forward to greeting you in Miami! Link: https://www.wcforum.com/conferences/telemedicine < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth helps stop suicidal ideation for many patients, study finds Bill Siwicki December 29, 2022 One person dies from suicide every 11 minutes in the U.S. A new study shows that telemedicine can be used to treat more severe mental illness – contrary to previous thought. Recently, the Journal of Medical Internet Research published some significant data highlighting the efficacy of psychiatric care delivered through telehealth: Those in the treatment group were 4.3 times more likely to have suicidal ideation remission. This is noteworthy because telehealth has not traditionally been equipped to treat those with the most severe symptoms of mental health due to the oversight necessary to actually provide safe, effective treatment, said Dr. Mimi Winsberg, chief medical officer at Brightside Health, which led the study. We spoke with Winsberg to get an in-depth look at this study and what the results mean for the future of telehealth and mental healthcare. Q. Please talk about your new study that examines the impact of telepsychiatry on reduction in suicidal ideation over time. Who was involved? What kind of care did they receive? What role did technology play? A. The study, which was published in JMIR Formative Research, sought to determine if Brightside Health's telehealth platform, which is equipped with precision prescribing clinical decision support, could successfully reduce suicidal ideation among enrolled patients, versus a control group who tracked their symptoms on the platform without receiving care. Another goal of the study was to describe the symptom clusters of patients who present with suicidal ideation in order to better understand the psychiatric symptoms associated with suicidal feelings. The study was large scale including participants of diverse geography and social demographics. It included a total of 8,581 people who completed a digital intake on the Brightside platform. Of those, 8,366 elected to receive psychiatric care from Brightside, while 215 tracked their symptoms on the platform without receiving care. Those who elected to receive psychiatric care through Brightside received a minimum of 12 weeks of treatment that included video visits with their providers, asynchronous messaging, and a prescription of at least one psychiatric medication. Brightside's technology platform was used to deliver clinically validated measures of depression and anxiety, as well as questions about clinical presentation, medical history and demographics. The proprietary precision-prescribing platform embedded in the tech platform analyzes these data points using an empirically derived algorithm to provide real-time care guidelines and clinical decision support to its providers using a computerized symptom cluster analysis. Q. The study led to some very promising outcomes. Please describe them and the success you achieved with telemedicine. A. The study found that patients enrolled in Brightside Health's telehealth platform had reduced suicidal ideation after 12 weeks of treatment. Patients who received treatment via Brightside Health were also 4.3 times more likely to have remission of their suicidal ideation than the control group who were monitored on the platform but did not receive care. The results demonstrated that a telehealth platform equipped with clinical decision support was an effective intervention for the symptom of suicidal ideation. In addition, we found that suicidal ideation had higher correlations with cognitive symptoms of hopelessness and poor feelings of self-worth, than with the physical symptoms of depression such as disrupted sleep and low energy. Q. Telehealth hasn't traditionally been equipped to treat these kinds of patients. What made the difference here? A. Historically, we have not relied on telehealth solutions to address more serious symptoms of depression. Clinicians are hesitant to treat individuals with suicidal ideation over telehealth because of the perceived risks. However, the results of this study are significant because they demonstrate effectiveness in treating these symptoms through a telehealth platform with clinical decision support, which may help alleviate concerns about the use of telehealth in addressing suicidal ideation. Telehealth can involve more than simply connecting a provider and patient via video camera. The telehealth platform used for the study was equipped with novel features such as remote patient monitoring and clinical decision support. A sophisticated telehealth intervention can assiduously track symptom presentation and outcomes with measurement-based care and offer real-time interventions along with machine learning and algorithmically based clinical decision support to select the best treatment. Q. What does all of this mean for the future of telemedicine and mental health? A. The future of mental health via telemedicine promises more widespread adoption of solutions for the majority of behavioral health conditions, even those with increasing severity of symptoms. We may see telehealth deployed for more serious mental illness, particularly when the telehealth platform can incorporate novel technologies to optimize care delivery. Additionally, as payers and providers collaborate to deliver more effective care, telehealth will likely become more than a means to deliver care, but also a way to enhance care delivery and provide highly effective care to those who need it most with expediency. At Brightside Health, we will continue to research the impact of telehealth treatment across the spectrum of mental health conditions, including those on the higher end of the severity axis. To that end, we are launching Crisis Care, a first of its kind program delivered nationally and over telehealth to treat patients with active suicidal ideation. The program is grounded in the evidence-based Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) framework. This study in JMIR Formative Research laid the foundation for this program, and we are seeing an obvious need for such a national program in the U.S., where one person dies from suicide every 11 minutes. We look forward to furthering this important – and life-saving – work. Follow Bill's HIT coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Siwicki Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-helps-stop-suicidal-ideation-many-patients-study-finds < Previous News Next News >