The 13 telehealth platforms physicians use the most Katie Adams March 24, 2022 Telephone and Zoom are the two telehealth platforms physicians use the most, according to survey results released March 23 by the American Medical Association. Between Nov. 1 and Dec. 31, the AMA presented 1,657 physicians with a list of telehealth platforms and asked them to identify which ones they have used. Here are those platforms, along with the number of physicians who use them: 1. Audio-only telephone visits (723) 2. Zoom (600) 3. Doximity Video (439) 4. EHR telehealth module or tools (433) 5. Doxy.me (344) 6. Telehealth vendor (340) 7. FaceTime (269) 8. Patient Portal (234) 9. Microsoft Teams (92) 10. Texting (89) 11. Skype (48) 12. Remote patient monitoring tools (46) 13. Asynchronous messaging app (30) Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy. < Previous News Next News >

States Expand Medicaid Reimbursement of School-Based Telehealth Services Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 49 states currently have policies allowing Medicaid reimbursement of telehealth in schools – 24 had existing policies, 31 recently expanded policies during the pandemic, and at least four states have indicated they may make the changes permanent. The National Academy for State Health Policy released a report last month on how states are increasing Medicaid coverage of school-based telehealth during COVID-19, as well as assessing which services can be effectively delivered via telehealth and how to best support equitable access to services via telehealth for students. The authors found that 49 states currently have policies allowing Medicaid reimbursement of telehealth in schools – 24 had existing policies, 31 recently expanded policies during the pandemic, and at least four states have indicated they may make the changes permanent. As far as services, the brief showed that most states cover audiology and speech-language therapy via telehealth, although behavioral health services had the greatest expansion and providing telemental health they found to be a recognized best practice. Half of all states cover individualized education program (IEP) plan services or Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services as well. The report also suggests that moving forward states should explore federal funding opportunities to expand technology and broadband access for students facing disparities in access to care. < Previous News Next News >

How Amazon, Walmart & 7 Others are Expanding Their Telehealth Business Katie Adams, Becker's Hospital Review July 2021 Companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. It's unclear how widely telehealth services will be used once the pandemic subsides, but companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. Below are updates on how nine companies are expanding their telehealth business, as covered by Becker's Hospital Review during the past three months. UnitedHealth Group subsidiary Optum on April 15 deployed a new telehealth product across all 50 states. The product, dubbed Optum Virtual Care, aims to integrate physical care, virtual care, home care and behavioral care. Amwell on April 28 unveiled its new Converge telehealth platform, which can host and operate digital offerings from Cleveland Clinic, Google Cloud and others. Ro, a direct-to-consumer telehealth app for pharmacy services, inked its first retail collaboration with Walmart April 28. Under the new partnership, Ro will launch its Roman health and wellness products and digital services in more than 4,600 Walmart stores across the country. On May 19, Ro acquired reproductive health company Modern Fertility for more than $225 million. Amazon on May 5 signed its first enterprise client for its telehealth service, Amazon Care. It has since secured multiple companies as clients for the telehealth service, and it is eyeing expansion into rural markets. Walmart Health on May 6 entered an agreement to acquire on-demand, multispecialty telehealth provider MeMD. By acquiring MeMD, Walmart will begin providing virtual care services for urgent, behavioral and primary care to complement its in-person Walmart Health Centers. Telehealth provider Doctor On Demand and clinical navigation platform Grand Rounds completed their merger May 11. On May 26, the combined company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Included Health, a comprehensive healthcare platform for patients who are LGBTQ and BIPOC. Teladoc Health on May 11 launched its new mental healthcare service MyStrength Complete, which offers personalized mental health services to consumers as an integration of Teladoc's virtual platform. On July 14, Teladoc integrated its hospital telehealth platform with Microsoft Teams. The Clinic, a joint digital health venture between Cleveland Clinic and Amwell, on May 18 launched new health offerings as part of its virtual second opinion service. The offering expansion is for patients with brain tumors and prostate cancers, since there are multiple treatment options for these conditions. Membership-based primary care network One Medical on June 7 entered an agreement to acquire Iora Health, a tech-powered primary care provider focusing on serving Medicare patients. The acquisition will allow One Medical to offer 24/7 digital and in-person care, as well as extend the provider into full-risk Medicare reimbursement models. < Previous News Next News >

Congress’ Last Minute Holiday Gift to Telehealth: The Omnibus Budget for FY 2023 Has Passed! CCHP December 23, 2022 Earlier today, Congress passed HR 2617, The Performance Enhancement Reform Act, the omnibus budget for FY 2023. HR 2617 includes several provisions impacting telehealth, including extending some of the telehealth COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities. In the budget bill passed for FY 2022, Congress had included a 151-day extension after the end of the public health emergency (PHE) for some COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities. However, with the passage of HR 2617, these flexibilities will now last until December 31, 2024. The main telehealth provisions in the bill include: For Medicare: Some telehealth flexibilities in Medicare are extended to December 31, 2024. These flexibilities include: temporary suspension of the geographic site requirement, continuing to allow the home as an eligible originating site, allowing certain providers, including FQHCs and RHCs to continue to be eligible telehealth providers during this period, delaying the in-person mental health visit requirement for services that take place when the patient is not in a geographically eligible location or at home that is found in non-pandemic telehealth policies, and continuing to allow audio-only to be used to provide some services. A study on telehealth and Medicare program integrity that will include a medical record review of claims from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. Elements to be examined include the types of services furnished, where they were furnished, and duration of services. For the VA: Development of a strategic plan to ensure effectiveness of telehealth delivered by the VA to their enrollees. Other Items: Extension of safe harbor for absence of deductible for telehealth in health savings accounts for another 2 years (for plans after December 31, 2022 and before January 1, 2025). President Biden is expected to sign the bill which will allow telehealth providers and patients to have a little more clarity on the end date of federal telehealth provisions. For more information read HR 2617 in its entirety. Wishing a wonderful holiday season and a happy new year to all! See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/congress-last-minute-holiday-gift-to-telehealth-the-omnibus-budget-for-fy-2023-has-passed < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine boosts access, decreases inequities in Montana Bill Siwicki October 10, 2022 The University of Montana College of Health has expanded its telehealth offerings across many disciplines to reach more people, especially in tribal communities. Montana has unique challenges in providing healthcare to its widely dispersed population of just over 1 million people. THE PROBLEM Out of 56 counties in Montana, 55 are designated as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), limiting access to both urgent and routine medical visits. The cost of travel and long distances between healthcare providers and patients are commonly cited reasons for patients to delay or avoid medical care. The use of telehealth technology can improve healthcare access for Montanans living in rural and tribal communities by providing access to primary care and specialty services. Montana also is home to a significant Native American population, which makes up about 7% of residents. Tribal members experience significant health disparities due partly to inequitable healthcare access. "These pre-existing strains have left many rural and tribal communities particularly vulnerable to broad-reaching impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic," said Erica Woodahl, director of the L.S. Skaggs Institute for Health Innovation and a professor at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy at the University of Montana. "Rural and tribal populations have a higher burden of chronic disease and comorbidities known to increase the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19," she continued. "Life expectancy of all Americans has decreased during the two years since the pandemic, but no group more than tribal people whose life expectancy has dropped almost seven years." The pandemic also further reduced access to routine care leading to an increase in preventable complications due to chronic conditions, including emergency room visits, hospitalizations and overall healthcare costs, she added. "Additionally, communities without nearby clinics or hospitals have not had adequate access to coronavirus testing or care, leaving rural and tribal patients vulnerable to the spread of COVID-19," she noted. "This increases pre-existing strains on rural healthcare systems due to provider shortages, limited hospital beds and other resource constraints." PROPOSAL In the telemedicine work of the University of Montana College of Health in Missoula, services would be provided through a centralized hub at the university with synchronous and asynchronous telehealth services provided to rural and tribal communities in partnership with clinics, hospitals and pharmacies across the state. The equipment purchased with help from a grant from the FCC telehealth grant program would allow for the expansion of services within UM's College of Health. "While the initial utility of telehealth technologies to improve care for underserved populations focused on immediate provision of clinical services disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, benefits to patients will extend beyond the pandemic to address the challenges of providing healthcare to Montanans," explained Shayna Killam, PharmD, a postdoctoral fellow at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy at the University of Montana. "Telehealth technologies provide clinicians with the tools necessary to bridge the gap in healthcare access and offer quality healthcare to Montana patients," she continued. "Services will specifically target patients living in rural and tribal communities with chronic medical conditions and comorbidities." The organization anticipates a broad reach across Montana, leveraging partnerships with clinical training sites and clinical affiliates to provide centralized telehealth services to a wide range of patients. "Programs in UM's College of Health were awarded $684,593 from the FCC," Killam reported. "Funds were used to purchase telehealth equipment and connected medical devices, providing critical and remote services for patients in Montana." Telehealth equipment will be used by faculty, residents and students affiliated with the University of Montana College of Health. Recipients of funding include the following: Skaggs School of Pharmacy (SSOP). Family Medicine Residency of Western Montana (FMRWM). School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science (UMPT). School of Speech, Language, Hearing and Occupational Sciences (SLHOS). MARKETPLACE There are many vendors of telemedicine technology and services on the health IT market today. Healthcare IT News published a special report highlighting many of these vendors with detailed descriptions of their products. Click here to read the special report. MEETING THE CHALLENGE Pharmacist-driven programs provide services for community-based chronic disease screening, education and management, including management of diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular risk and mental health through point-of-care testing, medication therapy management visits and consultations with telehealth pharmacists. "Connected medical devices and video conferencing hardware will be used to provide routine and urgent care visits with medical residents and providers affiliated with the FMRWM, including diagnostics and monitoring, chronic disease management, prenatal care and mental health services," Woodahl said. "UMPT programs offer home-based visits and services in end-user sites in rural and tribal communities, including remote evaluations enhanced with telehealth technology, such as vestibular function testing and gait monitoring devices, telepresence robots, and video consults with patients and other healthcare professionals," she added. Clinicians and students in SLHOS will conduct telehealth visits via high-quality video and audio equipment, which facilitate effective evaluation and treatment for articulation and voice disorders. USING FCC AWARD FUNDS The University of Montana College of Health was awarded $684,593 from the FCC telehealth grant fund to purchase telemedicine kits to enable critical, remote telehealth services and to provide internet-connected devices for remote patient monitoring services for underserved, rural and tribal populations within the state. "UM's College of Health has used the FCC telehealth award funds to expand telehealth programs offered by the interprofessional disciplines with an overarching goal of increasing healthcare access and addressing inequities in care," Killam explained. "In addition to providing accessible and equitable healthcare, telehealth technologies will be used to train future health professionals," she continued. "Proactive training of our health professions students has the potential to transform the healthcare landscape in Montana and to overcome the challenges presented by traditional models of care." The equipment purchased has empowered physical therapists to engage in remote monitoring of patients as they complete interventions within their home, said Jennifer Bell, PT, clinical associate professor, school of physical therapy and rehabilitation science. "Oftentimes, patients have difficulty with balance and functional mobility within their home," she noted. "By utilizing technology, we are able to see a patient's home environment and support their ability to move around, minimize the risk of falls and complete a home exercise program." Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-boosts-access-decreases-inequities-montana?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=womeninhit < Previous News Next News >

Federal Broadband Funding Negotiations Continue Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 As the administration and Senate Democrats attempt to come to a bipartisan infrastructure deal over the next month, they have since presented a counter offer of $1.7 trillion, $65 billion of which would expand broadband funding. President Biden’s American Jobs Plan originally totaled $2.3 trillion, $100 billion of which was designated to broadband. As noted in recent CNBC articles, as the administration and Senate Democrats attempt to come to a bipartisan infrastructure deal over the next month, they have since presented a counter offer of $1.7 trillion, $65 billion of which would expand broadband funding. While Senate Republicans then put forward a $928 billion counteroffer, there appears to be agreement on both sides with the piece of the proposal designating $65 billion to broadband. Nevertheless, discussions on other issues remain far apart and it is possible to pass the bill without Republican support in the evenly split Senate, therefore Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently expressed his desire to continue the process with or without Republicans to get comprehensive jobs and infrastructure legislation done this summer. For more information read the American Jobs Plan in its entirety - https://www.whitehouse.gov/american-jobs-plan/. < Previous News Next News >

Zoom's Head of Healthcare Talks the Future of Telemedicine Bill Siwicki, Healthcare IT News August 2021 Heidi West discusses telehealth/hybrid in-person care, the communities that could suffer without virtual care and the remaining obstacles to mainstreaming telemedicine. Telehealth continues to be a priority for the healthcare industry. It has proven itself throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Recent Zoom research found that in the U.S., 72% of survey respondents want to attend healthcare appointments both virtually and in-person post-pandemic, demonstrating the clear need for telehealth as an option for this hybrid approach to healthcare. Despite the success of telehealth during the last year and a half, some have questioned its broader use as healthcare returns to in-person office visits. However, this reversal could put certain communities and demographic populations at a disadvantage, such as those in rural areas or ones without reliable transportation. Healthcare IT News sat down with Heidi West, head of healthcare at Zoom, to discuss telemedicine's future, hybrid in-person/telehealth care, communities that could be hurt without virtual care, and challenges to telemedicine becoming fully mainstream. Q. Telemedicine visits have tapered off some since their pandemic peak in 2020. Will telemedicine remain popular? If so, what will drive its continued popularity? A. During a year full of stay-at-home mandates and concerns about public safety, it makes sense as to why we saw such a sharp increase in the use of telemedicine solutions – virtual care offerings made it possible for us to get the help we needed while largely staying out of harm's way, and protecting ourselves and loved ones. Yes, there will always be a need to provide in-person care – surgical procedures, imaging and specific hands-on care still will require actual office visits. However, the opportunity for telemedicine is tremendous, and physicians should consider a virtual-first mentality to support the convenience and safety of the patient. Some forms of medical care can easily be managed over virtual platforms, and by continuing to be available virtually, providers can reach new audiences, regularly track existing ones and even grow stronger patient-provider relationships than before. One area that is particularly well-suited for this is psychiatry and psychotherapy. With online therapy, providers can meet with patients far from their physical office space, opening up opportunities to take on new business outside of the immediate neighborhood, as well as meet with patients at different times, since travelling will not need to be taken into consideration. There also is untapped potential for video communications and telehealth platforms to help aid and enhance group therapy experiences. Studies have already shown higher demand for online group therapy and fewer no-shows among the participants who sign up for sessions. We also will see some medical practitioners such as nutritionists and dermatologists continue to use telehealth solutions in their practices. There are many cases in which doctors in these fields can provide expertise and recommendations to patients via video conferencing in the same way they would in person. Telemedicine will continue to bring a level of flexibility and accessibility to the patients that need it in these realms, and it will only continue to grow as we become an even more digitally connected society. Q. In your recent study, the clear majority of consumers want both virtual and in-person care. This seems to show a need for telehealth as an option for a hybrid approach to healthcare. What will this hybrid look like, more specifically? A. We will see this hybrid approach combine the best of both the physical and digital worlds to offer an incredible experience. Generally, we'll see more primary consultations conducted via virtual platforms, with providers then asking patients to come in or engage with a specialist either remotely or in person as needed. This provides a greater number of patients with a greater level of convenience. Because of the pandemic, there also has been a heightened awareness and preference to manage post-acute care and chronic conditions at home. Providing accessibility to care in the home will be one of the greatest growth areas for telehealth. We'll likely see more outpatient care or physical rehab programs conducted over video calls for patients who have recently undergone surgery and are resting at home. New hybrid experiences also will improve information sharing and precision among doctors in their respective fields. Rather than waiting for hours across time zones for emails to be read and sent about a specific case, videoconferencing can allow doctors that are physically in a room examining a patient to digitally share information with consultants or experienced professionals outside of the room – or even in other parts of the world – in real time. Additionally, no longer do smaller hospitals or doctor's offices have to solely rely on experts in or near the local community – the talent pool for a given procedure or evaluation vastly expands when video conferencing is a part of the equation. Q. While telehealth has indeed been very successful amid the pandemic, some experts have questioned its broader use as the industry returns to in-person care. You've said this reversal could put certain communities and demographic populations at a disadvantage, such as patients in rural areas or without reliable transportation. Please elaborate. A. Yes, a great deal of the population lacks the accessibility to healthcare in the same ways that people in affluent and urban areas often have. Urban dwellers generally come across a greater number of doctors' offices, specialized care facilities and treatment options, whereas those on the outskirts or those without reliable transportation have limited choices in when and who they see as medical issues arise. The evolution of telehealth and its swift adoption during the pandemic gave many communities access to doctors and other medical professionals that they normally wouldn't be able to see. As an example, before committing to buying an expensive plane ticket and hotel room in order to see a specialist in a city far away, a patient in a more rural area can join a video conference to discuss any issues with the specialist ahead of time and determine if the trip is truly needed. This saves both parties time, money and peace of mind. Certain demographic populations also have seen the positive effects of virtual care in a way that wasn't as prevalent before the pandemic. For example, minority race groups and people of color oftentimes have difficulty finding therapists or psychiatrists that understand or align with their cultural beliefs. However, the proliferation of online therapy sessions during the pandemic has drastically changed this. Virtual health services have allowed patients to find and connect with the mental health professionals that have academic, personal and professional backgrounds that align with their existing values and beliefs, even if the practitioner lives outside the immediate region of the patient. For the first time, many marginalized groups are getting the care they need from people they trust and connect with on a deeper level. Removing telehealth as an option for care also removes a great deal of accessibility for people in similar situations to the above, or those who previously were not able to nor offered an opportunity to get the care they needed. Losing these options could mean driving a greater divide between socioeconomic groups and regions throughout the U.S. Lastly, and conversely, many physicians need to consider the increased competition threatening their patient population by not prioritizing digital health solutions. Between direct-to-consumer telehealth apps being developed daily, and retail health becoming more prevalent, there is a significant risk to not offering virtual care. Doctors and other providers could lose their patients to other companies and practices that are ahead of the curve. Q. What are remaining challenges to telemedicine being fully mainstream, including permanent reimbursement? How will healthcare provider organizations overcome these challenges? A. There are a couple of challenges that come to mind. The first that inhibits a large portion of the global population from widely leveraging telemedicine is lack of Internet connection. Without broadband and easy access to the web, telemedicine is nearly impossible. In time and with strong partnerships with Internet service providers and telecommunications organizations, the two industries will be able to offer greater accessibility to consumers and potential new patients. The second is the issue of reimbursement. There still is a lengthy discussion to be had about if payers should be required to reimburse for a telehealth appointment or service the same as they would for an in-office one. Some view a virtual care experience as less valuable and therefore, financially, worth less, as well. Providers and payers must work with legislators to combat this notion, and instead recognize the importance of telehealth, focusing on the needs of the consumer and potential to actualize value-based care. Virtual healthcare services will only continue to proliferate due to consumer demand and market competition. Regardless of reimbursement structure, the requirements and advancements in telehealth will dictate continued interest and opportunities. < Previous News Next News >

Making Telemedicine Feasible for Everyone – Especially Those With Physical Challenges Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center August 2021 In the context of healthcare, nondiscrimination on the basis of disability means equal access to available health care services, whether those services are provided in-person or via telehealth. Telemedicine has for years been touted as providing access to healthcare for everyone, anywhere, anytime and it has been quite successful in doing so in many respects but disparities still exist among a number of patient populations. In particular, those who traditionally have challenges accessing healthcare due to physical challenges often experience similar or even greater challenges with telemedicine. Think about for a minute. Telemedicine is predominantly provided using audio and/or video-based telecommunications technologies. This fundamental fact of how telemedicine visits occur can actually exacerbate digital disparities. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), an individual with a disability is defined as: 1. a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major activities; or 2. a person who has a history or record of such an impairment; or 3. a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment Under Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from the participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any services, programs, or activities of the covered entity (e.g., healthcare providers). In the context of healthcare, nondiscrimination on the basis of disability means equal access to available health care services, whether those services are provided in-person or via telehealth. Some basic facts highlight the problem. About 15% of American adults (37.5 million) over 18 report some trouble hearing, 2 to 3 per 1,000 US children are born with detectable hearing loss in one or both ears and overall 1 in 8 people (13%) 12 years or older has hearing loss in both ears. Interestingly, non-Hispanic white adults are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups to have hearing loss and non-Hispanic black adults have the lowest prevalence among adults aged 20-69. Rates increase with age. The statistics for vision impairments are equally high. About 12 million people over 40 years have a vision impairment, with 1 million who are blind and 6.8% of children younger than 18 have a diagnosed eye and vision condition. The annual economic impact of major vision problems for those over 40 is over $145 billion! For blindness, access to healthcare is especially critical as 90% of blindness caused by diabetes is preventable and early detection and treatment of conditions such as diabetic retinopathy is efficacious and cost effective. So what can we do in the telemedicine community to help ameliorate these disparities? The National Consortium of Telehealth Resource Centers has developed a fact sheet to help providers. Some of the key recommendations are actually fairly easy to carry out. Inventory products, services, and factors required to provide effective telehealth services to patients and ensure they meet basic accessibility requirements for people with disabilities. Consider compatibility of assistive technology (e.g., alternative keyboards) and whether they can work effectively with your chosen telehealth modality. Learn about and incorporate accessibility features (e.g., close-captioning) of software programs you use. Be sure to include the patient’s caregiver, family member, or home health aide during telehealth visits. Increase your knowledge and awareness on cultural competency and linguistic sensitivity. The easiest thing to do ask patients with disabilities about their accessibility requirements! Some additional aids to consider may take a little more effort but are worth it. For those with hearing loss consider: qualified sign language interpreter, qualified cued-speech interpreter, qualified tactile interpreter, real-time captioning or communication access real-time translation (CART), video remote interpreting (VRI), use written materials, ensure the patient has access to headphones or a headset, confirm participants are wearing their hearing aids or amplification device, and use video whenever possible to allow lip reading and provide visual clues like gestures. For those with vision loss consider: a qualified reader, information in large print, Braille, or electronically for use with a computer screen-reading program, have an audio recording of printed information, be aware of your background - there needs to be contrast between you and your background and blurring the background may make it challenging for the patient, ensure lighting is bright enough for patients to clearly see your face, use simplified and enlarged text, ensure patients have a computer-screen reading program for transmission of electronic information and try providing an audio recording of printed information provided during the appointment. Additional ideas and tips can be found on the Health & Human Services (HHS) website There is also good news in terms of funding. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced that under the National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP), also called “iCanConnect,” may provide up to $10 million annually from the interstate telecommunications relay service fund (TRS Fund) to support local programs that distribute equipment to eligible low-income individuals who are deafblind to access telecommunications service, Internet access service, and advanced communications services. This is clearly a boon for telemedicine applications. The announcement includes a state-by-state list of the initial allocations for the 56 covered jurisdictions. Hearing and vision loss are just two common challenges deal with. Other physical, mental and behavioral challenges are very common as well, and many of the tips above can be adapted to these patients as well, especially simply reaching out and asking them what their needs are and how you can help meet them as well as involving the patient’s caregiver, family member, or home health aide during telehealth visits. Basically telemedicine must be available to any patient and programs should make it a priority to develop strategies and tools to empower all patients no matter what their resources and capabilities to access safe, effective and efficient care. < Previous News Next News >

Amazon's telehealth arm quietly expands to 21 more states By Katherine Khashimova Long March 8, 2021 An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector. An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector.The service, Amazon Care, launched a year ago as an app providing on-demand chat and video consultations with medical professionals for Amazon's then-54,000 Puget Sound employees. Users can also book in-person visits at their home or office with clinicians. Payment for the service routes through Amazon.com. In recent weeks Amazon Care has incorporated in Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Wyoming, according to records filed with state agencies. The online health magazine Stat was first to report Amazon Care's expansion. Amazon did not respond to questions about whether access to the newly expanded service will continue to be limited to Amazon employees. But there are indications that Amazon may begin offering the service to a broader audience. In December, Business Insider reported that Amazon had pitched other companies, including Seattle-based Zillow, on the health care app. Amazon has been hiring health care practitioners, research scientists and product managers for the app around the country—including in California, Georgia and Texas, according to Stat. And with a nationwide group of home health care providers, Amazon Care on Wednesday announced it would begin lobbying lawmakers to ease regulations on what kind of health services can be performed outside of a doctor's office—potentially widening the services Amazon Care can provide. Amazon has not yet received professional licenses that would allow it to operate facilities like medical testing labs in the 21 states it has filed to do business. However, that paperwork may be coming down the line: In its Georgia business registration, Amazon indicated it planned to start doing business in the state this July. Amazon began nosing around the lucrative field of health care in 2017, when it made several high-profile hires from the sector. Former One Medical Vice President Christine Henningsgaard joined Amazon, as did Missy Krasner, from the digital health-records management company Box.Henningsgaard, who left Amazon in 2019 to start the maternity-focused health care venture Quilted Health, refers to herself on her LinkedIn profile as part of the "founding team" of Amazon Care, which she described as "bringing customer obsession, advanced technology, and last mile logistics to health care." Around the same time, the company formed an ill-starred health care consortium with Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase. The organization, later dubbed Haven, had a stated goal of offering better service and rates from health care providers on behalf of the triumvirate's nearly 1.2 million employees; Haven dissolved last month. Amazon purchased online drugstore Pillpack for $753 million in mid-2018; the next year, the company won landmark approval allowing its voice-activated artificial intelligence, Alexa, to transmit private patient information. When the coronavirus began infecting Amazon's hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers last summer, the company built hundreds of its own on-site laboratories to test employees. In November, Amazon launched an online pharmaceutical delivery service, sending drugstore share prices tumbling. Just weeks later, Amazon's cloud-computing division unveiled a health data management service for doctors and hospitals that complies with patient confidentiality regulations. Amazon Care has likely been in the works since at least early 2018, when Amazon hired Seattle geriatrician Dr. Martin Levine. Amazon Care clinicians are employed by Care Medical, formerly Oasis Medical, a company Levine founded shortly after he joined Amazon, according to business records. Amazon replaced Levine early last year with Dr. Sunita Mishra, a former executive at Providence St. Joseph, where she led the development of the health system's mobile app for on-demand medical care. Levine is now chief medical officer at The Polyclinic health system, which operates 14 sites around the Puget Sound region. Weeks after Mishra joined Amazon, the company expanded access to Amazon Care to all of its now-80,000 Washington state workers. < Previous News Next News >

Increased Access to Care Via Telehealth in CHCs: NACHC Survey on Audio-Only Telehealth and Health Centers Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 The concern from CHCs about possibly losing the ability to utilize telehealth was significant, with over 90% of respondents saying that without the extension of existing flexibilities it will be difficult to reach vulnerable populations, and over 80% stating that it will lead to worse outcomes for patients with behavioral health needs. Temporary telehealth policies during the pandemic, particularly those related to audio-only, highlighted the capacity of community health centers (CHCs) to increase patient access to care in underserved communities. The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) recently released a report on their survey of CHCs to assess their telehealth experiences over the course of the public health emergency and determine what the effects would be upon termination of temporary policies, and how that would impact their providers and patients. The concern from CHCs about possibly losing the ability to utilize telehealth was significant, with over 90% of respondents saying that without the extension of existing flexibilities it will be difficult to reach vulnerable populations, and over 80% stating that it will lead to worse outcomes for patients with behavioral health needs. Overall, the report suggested that losing audio-only coverage would likely exacerbate existing health disparities. Prior to the pandemic, health centers faced numerous federal restrictions that limited their ability to use telehealth. According to the report, previously only around 40% had used telehealth and audio-only modalities. Once allowed during the pandemic, however, nearly all CHCs utilized telehealth and delivered critical health care services to 30 million patients. Urban health centers and those serving low-income populations were also found to have higher rates of providing services via telehealth and audio-only, and 92% of health centers said audio-only improved patient access to care. To continue to provide this expanded access to care post-pandemic via telehealth the report discussed the need for Congressional action to permanently remove restrictions around use of audio-only and originating/distant site limitations, as well as ensuring reimbursement parity. In addition, as many states struggle to determine their post-pandemic policies related to telehealth, it has become apparent that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) must also clarify whether states can continue to allow audio-only coverage under Medicaid and still receive federal matching funds. The value and necessity of audio-only was stressed throughout the survey. Benefits of audio-only telehealth included: *Reduced no-show rates *Improved patient/provider relationships *Better coordination of care amongst providers and families *Improved chronic care management The report concludes that without continued telehealth coverage for CHCs, all of the stated benefits will disappear, create a barrier to the provision of quality health care, and negate the ability for health centers to bring equity and access to underserved communities that would otherwise likely go without needed services. The authors urge the federal government to act and preserve access to care via telehealth in health centers across the country. Currently, there is active legislation federally and in many states that seeks to expand and extend telehealth and audio-only policies, including those for health centers. The fate of these bills remains unknown, but it is clear that the ideal resolution would need both federal direction and state engagement. A small but limited step was taken with CMS’s newly proposed physician fee schedule (PFS) for 2022. CMS is proposing to expand the definition of a “mental health visit” for CHCs by including mental health services provided through “interactive, real-time telecommunications technology”, including audio-only if the patient is not capable or does not consent to the use of live video. Additionally, the rate paid for eligible services would be at parity. This proposal is still rather narrow, but many of the existing restrictions, as mentioned previously, live in federal statute and must first be addressed by Congress. < Previous News Next News >

KFF Report on Telehealth - Medicare Use Offers Future Policy Implications Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 Given the limitations around Medicare telehealth coverage pre-pandemic, many of these individuals had little experience with telehealth previously, offering an important perspective to inform ongoing telehealth policy considerations. More work will need to be done to further education around telehealth and ensure its availability to all communities. A Kaiser Family Foundation brief presents new information and analysis of Medicare beneficiaries’ utilization of telehealth using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) survey data from between summer and fall of 2020 while CMS emergency telehealth expansions were in effect. Given the limitations around Medicare telehealth coverage pre-pandemic, many of these individuals had little experience with telehealth previously, offering an important perspective to inform ongoing telehealth policy considerations. For instance, while 64% of beneficiaries said their provider currently offers telehealth appointments, only 18% said their provider offered telehealth prior to the pandemic. However, nearly a quarter of beneficiaries said they don’t know if their provider offers telehealth appointments, with the percentage even larger among rural beneficiaries. Therefore, while expanded policies appear to have increased access to services via telehealth, more work will need to be done to further education around telehealth and ensure its availability to all communities. Additional findings from the study include: -Over 1 in 4 (27% or 15 million) of Medicare beneficiaries had a telehealth visit between the summer and fall of 2020 -The majority of Medicare beneficiaries (56%) used telephone only *Video was 28% *Both video and telephone was 16% -The share of Medicare beneficiaries who had a telehealth visit using telephone only was higher among: *Those age 75 and older (65%) *Hispanic beneficiaries (61%) *Those living in rural areas (65%) *Those enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid (67%) The report also found that rural Medicare beneficiaries were less likely than urban beneficiaries to have a telehealth visit with a doctor or other health professional (21% vs. 28%, respectively). However, among Medicare beneficiaries with a usual source of care and whose usual provider offers telehealth, they found no significant difference between the share of rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries who had a telehealth visit (43% and 45%, respectively). They note this difference is likely driven by the fact that rural Medicare beneficiaries were more likely than urban Medicare beneficiaries to say they do not know if their usual provider offers telehealth (30% vs. 21%, respectively). Similarly, among Medicare beneficiaries with a usual source of care whose usual provider offers telehealth, they found that a larger share of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries had a telehealth visit compared to White beneficiaries (52%, 52%, and 43%). However, among the total Medicare population, the difference in the share of Black and White beneficiaries who reported having a telehealth visit was not statistically significant (30% vs. 26%), while a larger share of Hispanic beneficiaries than White beneficiaries had a telehealth visit (33% vs. 26%). They note that for Black Medicare beneficiaries, this result is likely related to the fact that nearly a quarter of Black beneficiaries overall (23%) say their usual provider does not offer telehealth appointments, compared to 12% of White beneficiaries and 15% of Hispanic beneficiaries. Looking forward, the authors suggest that since they found greater usage of telehealth amongst those with disabilities, low incomes, and in communities of color, the temporary expansions of coverage may be helping more disadvantaged populations access care. In addition, since most services are being provided via audio-only, they state going back to requiring two-way video could be a barrier for many subgroups of the Medicare population. As policymakers continue to request data on telehealth and consider making certain emergency policies permanent, many are looking to Medicare to lead the way, and this information further confirms the importance of maintaining access to all telehealth modalities in all communities, or risk potentially exacerbating existing disparities even further post-pandemic. Additional expansion and education of telehealth availability will continue to remain necessary as well. More information on the survey and analysis can be found in the full issue brief - https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-and-telehealth-coverage-and-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-options-for-the-future/. < Previous News Next News >

HHS-OIG Reports on Pandemic Medicare Telehealth Trends to Inform Permanent Policies Center for Connected Health Policy Nov. 2, 2021 The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) released a telehealth report on October 18th that looked at the relationship between providers and Medicare patients utilizing telehealth between March and December 2020. Specifically, HHS-OIG examined encounter claims data to determine the presence of pre-existing relationships, dates of any prior visits, and the types of services provided. The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) released a telehealth report on October 18th that looked at the relationship between providers and Medicare patients utilizing telehealth between March and December 2020. Specifically, HHS-OIG examined encounter claims data to determine the presence of pre-existing relationships, dates of any prior visits, and the types of services provided. Interestingly, it was found that though pre-pandemic requirements limiting telehealth visits to established patients were waived, 84% of visits still occurred within those parameters. In addition, as policymakers consider making some telehealth pandemic policies permanent, some stakeholders have suggested a need to require an in-person visit within a certain period of time in order to be eligible for a telehealth visit. However, the data collected by HHS-OIG shows such requirements may not be necessary, as Medicare patients were found to already have had an in-person visit on average within four months prior to the telehealth visit without such a requirement. Additional findings included: Beneficiaries most commonly received e-visits, virtual check-ins, and telephone evaluation and management services via telehealth from providers with whom they had an established relationship Beneficiaries received about 45.5 million office visits delivered via telehealth, which accounted for nearly half of all telehealth services 86% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries received a telehealth service from providers with whom they had an established relationship, compared to 81% of Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries who received home visits via telehealth, which represented only 1% of all services provided via telehealth, were the least likely to have an established relationship with their providers The average amount of time between beneficiaries’ in-person visits and their first telehealth services varied by type of service Beneficiaries who received home visits via telehealth had an in-person visit with their providers at an average of around 9 months prior to first telehealth service Beneficiaries who received nursing home visits and assisted living visits via telehealth had an in-person visit at an average of 2 months prior to their first telehealth service HHS-OIG notes that the provision of this data seeks to inform policymakers looking at long-term telehealth policy and making certain pandemic expansions permanent, especially in light of concerns around telehealth fraud and abuse. For instance, it could help in examining the necessity of one of the most controversial, and confusing, permanent federal changes made thus far as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which post-PHE will require an initial in-person visit within 6-months of a tele-behavioral health visit for purposes of Medicare reimbursement. However, the requirement only applies if the service is not provided in a geographically rural area and at a qualifying medical facility. There is also an exception for treatment of substance use disorder and co-occurring mental health treatment. In addition, CMS is proposing to make the 6-month in-person visit a requirement for subsequent visits in the proposed calendar year 2022 physician fee schedule. For non-behavioral health visits, the 6-month requirement wouldn’t apply, however patients would need to be located in a rural area and eligible facility type to qualify for Medicare reimbursement. Some Medicaid programs are considering limiting telehealth use to established patients, occasionally also applying restrictions to specific modalities and services. However, the HHS-OIG findings may suggest that it is unnecessary to limit telehealth to certain patients and services to prevent fraud and abuse as standard practice may already be providing sufficient guardrails in those respects. In addition, the study findings could indicate that the issue may be more related to general standard of care concerns that apply across all services, not just those delivered via telehealth. The balance may then include looking at how to manage health care fraud generally, which elsewhere HHS-OIG has clarified that most fraud is not telehealth specific. The issue could then boil down to how much autonomy to provide clinicians when making medical determinations, including when a telehealth visit is appropriate. Typically oversight in that respect has been under the purview of clinical licensing boards, not governed by general laws, but as we shift outside of the pandemic it is possible we may see additional shifts in terms of these policy approaches. As policymakers balance these multiple findings, perspectives and concerns, it remains to be seen how such data will be applied or used to justify permanent policies. It will also be important to continue to weigh these factors against general access to care issues so as to not inadvertently limit telehealth as a means of ensuring patients can receive necessary medical services. Additional information on the HHS-OIG study can be found by viewing the brief and complete report. < Previous News Next News >

Is telemedicine an answer to physician burnout and staffing shortages? Bill Siwicki May 24, 2022 A physician who works full time via telehealth – and in brick-and-mortar ERs on the side – discusses the benefits to herself and the industry. With the huge initial swell in the use of virtual care in the rearview mirror, many industry experts – from health plans to big tech and practicing clinicians – are considering whether a doubling down on telehealth is just what the doctor ordered for the future of patient care. Many clinicians are hungry for new opportunities that allow them to continue to serve patients without dealing with long-standing administrative burdens and the aftermath of burnout from COVID-19 in their hospitals, health systems and doctor's offices. With too many clinicians continuing to stress that they've lost passion in their careers and considering quitting their jobs altogether, experts say change is needed. The healthcare industry can't afford to lose these highly skilled clinical workers to other industries. On this note, Healthcare IT News interviewed Dr. Pooja Aysola, a practicing emergency department clinician in Boston and senior director of clinical operations at Wheel, a virtual care company. She talks about physicians' newfound familiarity with telehealth and what it means for the future, the possibility of physicians working full time in telemedicine, and how virtual care can help with staffing shortages in healthcare. Q. With the massive uptake in telemedicine during the past two years of the pandemic, clinicians have grown accustomed to delivering care virtually. What do you think this familiarity means for clinicians moving forward? A. I hadn't ever considered a career in virtual care until a few months into the pandemic. I was working in an emergency room in Boston when my shifts were cut after the hospital rolled back elective procedures. I started working in telemedicine as a temporary solution, but I ended up loving the flexibility to see patients at home and on my own schedule. I also quickly realized I didn't have to be in the same room as my patients to deliver great care. I can treat conditions such as UTIs through a screen and provide immediate value to my patients. I'm not alone in my sudden pivot from virtual-care skeptic to virtual-care advocate. Two in three clinicians now say treating patients in virtual only or hybrid care settings best fits their lifestyle, despite a significant lack of interest in telehealth before the pandemic. I'm hopeful this new trend will allow more clinicians to create career paths that work for them, rather than against them. Clinicians should have the flexibility to decide when they want to work, where they want to work, and how they want to work. If we're moving toward a hybrid care model, then we should enable clinicians to adopt hybrid careers, if that's what works best for them. In medical school, we're taught there's only one track you can follow: in-person care. But that's not the case anymore. I want every doctor and nurse to feel empowered to follow the career path that works best for them. Q. You seem to suggest that physicians looking for a change, perhaps due to burnout, can switch to telehealth full time. What would a move to virtual care look like for a physician? A. The past few years have been incredibly tough for clinicians. Burnout, frustration and fatigue are some of the many challenges facing clinicians today. Recent data shows more than half of clinicians have lost passion for their careers because of stress – and close to half believe burnout is the biggest threat to patient care today. Working in virtual care was a less-than-traditional career path before the pandemic. But now, many clinicians are considering working in virtual care to help combat burnout and increase flexibility. A move to virtual care will look different for everyone. For example, some clinicians enjoy having a set schedule each week to see patients. Others enjoy having more flexibility, where they can easily sign on after dropping their kids off at school, sign off before running an errand, or even split their time between virtual and in-person care. At Wheel, more than half of clinicians still work in a brick-and-mortar setting. One of our clinicians currently is driving around the country with her partner in an RV. She customizes her schedule based on her travel plans that day. She can see patients in the morning and go for a hike in the afternoon, or spend a few hours on the road before pulling over and seeing patients in the afternoon. Clinicians interested in telehealth should look for opportunities that prioritize and personalize their experience as clinicians. Some specific factors to consider include: What kind of electronic health record does the company use? And was the EHR created with your experience in mind? Do they offer ongoing training? And provide resources on important topics, such as "webside" manner and guidance on managing state licenses? Do they have a robust clinical quality program in place? How do they provide feedback on quality of care? Q. How can telehealth help with the staffing shortage in healthcare? A. Our current clinician staffing shortage is a national crisis. And it's only expected to get worse. According to an Elsevier study, almost half of U.S. clinicians plan to leave their jobs within the next few years. I've seen firsthand the impact shortages are having on clinician burnout and patient care. And I firmly believe this is a crisis that the entire industry must address. Ensuring clinicians feel encouraged to explore careers in virtual care, if that's what works best for them, is one of many steps to take. Another way for telehealth to help address staffing shortages is by powering the transition to what we call "virtual-first care." With virtual-first care, patients can start their care journey with telemedicine. By leaning on technology, healthcare organizations can more easily triage the patient's care needs and determine the best care setting – virtual, in-person or hybrid care. This is a more efficient way to approach care delivery while simultaneously increasing access to care. While telehealth alone is not the only solution, it is one of many steps we can take to help address staffing shortages and help ensure timely patient access to care. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-answer-physician-burnout-and-staffing-shortages < Previous News Next News >

AHA Statement Stresses Importance of Telehealth in CVD Care Yael L. Maxwell November 16, 2022 With ongoing challenges related to reimbursement, access, and acceptance, the writing committee offers potential solutions. Stressing the importance of telehealth in cardiovascular care, especially given its increased prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new scientific statement from the American Heart Association (AHA) outlines the current barriers to this type of care and offers some strategies for continued access. As in-person visits were shut down in the spring of 2020, many clinicians and patients turned to telehealth, with subsequent studies and surveys showing related gains in heart failure and nonemergent cardiovascular care. Other research showed that patients who were more likely to use telehealth tended to be younger and privately insured, have more comorbidities, and be from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. As the pandemic has waned, however, reimbursement for telephone and video visits has been a larger concern. Earlier this month, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2023 Physician Fee Schedule, which includes continued coverage for telehealth, but only for 5 months following the end of the public health emergency, which some say is not long enough for clinicians to make long-term plans and invest in necessary infrastructure. “This paper in a way summarizes the importance of telehealth and the benefits of telehealth in patient care,” writing committee chair Edwin A. Takahashi, MD (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), told TCTMD. “Payment parity is so important in sustaining telehealth. So I hope that CMS and insurance companies will see the importance highlighted in this paper and reconsider their reimbursement plans with it.” What Is Telehealth? The statement, published online this week in Circulation, begins by defining the concept of telehealth, breaking it down into clinician-to-patient visits and clinician-to-clinician consults. The former includes real-time virtual visits, either video or audio, as well as digital communication, called eVisits, initiated by either the physician or patient. The latter includes both real-time virtual consults, which may also include the patient, as well as digital exchange of low-complexity medical information between clinicians, called eConsults, or second opinions on more-complex concerns. A final hybrid category includes remote monitoring for patients and predictive analysis for clinicians—both machine initiated. Takahashi and colleagues point out some commonly used telehealth tools for cardiovascular home monitoring, including machines for monitoring risk factors like blood pressure, weight, smoking, and diet; medication tracking apps and smart pillboxes for managing medication adherence; and tools like home EGC, pulse oximeter, and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring devices. While there are an undefined number of ways in which telehealth can be useful within cardiovascular care, Takahashi said it’s most effective in tracking disease progression for heart failure and CAD, improving stroke outcomes by decreasing time to diagnosis, and monitoring PAD progression, as well as preventing ulcers and tracking patients postoperatively. The paper outlines advances in telestroke, teleradiology, and telehealth in PAD management. Challenges and Potential Solutions Many challenges remain in order for telehealth to flourish in a nonpandemic era. In his experience, Takahashi said, the biggest barrier to using telehealth relates to “having patients accept it as a replacement for inpatient visits.” But overall, challenges like infrastructure—including broadband internet and hardware for patients—to complete telehealth visits as well as reimbursement stand in the way of telehealth use more generally, he said. “In order for people to adopt and use telehealth, people need to be able to bill for using it. Otherwise, it just is not sustainable.” The statement also stresses the importance that clinician attitude, biases, and acceptance play in the success of telehealth. Difficult to use technological platforms hindered by HIPAA-compliant encryption can also make it more difficult for clinicians to access telehealth appointments. Beyond increases in reimbursement for telehealth, the authors propose a few strategies for continued success. They advocate for government programs to improve broadband internet access across the country, more research to elucidate the specific benefits telehealth can have across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease care, and increased standardization for methods in assessing telehealth quality. “The COVID-19 pandemic improved the telehealth infrastructure through necessity but also uncovered systemic weakness, limitations, and inequities,” they conclude. “Further research into barriers for telehealth implementation and equitable execution are important to ensure the delivery of high-quality care for patients.” Yael L. Maxwell by Yael L. Maxwell Editor, Fellows Forum Yael L. Maxwell is Senior Medical Journalist for TCTMD and Section Editor of TCTMD's Fellows Forum. She served as the inaugural… Read Full Bio See original article: https://www.tctmd.com/news/aha-statement-stresses-importance-telehealth-cvd-care < Previous News Next News >

Opportunity Knocking — Empanelment, COVID-19 and Telehealth By Trudy Bearden, PA-C, MPAS February 17, 2021 Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment. Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment is a foundational component of primary care and is essential in population health management. In 2019, the People-Centered Integrated Care collaborative, participants from 10 countries developed an overview of empanelment and a comprehensive definition: Empanelment is a continuous, iterative set of processes that identify and assign populations to facilities, care teams, or providers who have a responsibility to know their assigned population and to proactively deliver coordinated primary health care. That definition is accurate and comprehensive, but we must appreciate the recent, succinct statement by my Empanelment Learning Exchange colleague Elizabeth Wala, Global Advisor, Health and Nutrition at Aga Khan Foundation: “Empanelment is grouping patients under providers.” Opportunity. As a primary care clinician and health care consultant, I have been thinking hard since April 2020 about the importance of empanelment, telehealth and the COVID-19 pandemic. Just to be clear, I’m using the term telehealth as defined by the discrete set of services described by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) List of Telehealth Services. Similarly, there are amazing opportunities for other remote services, including chronic and principal care management, remote patient monitoring, virtual check-ins and more that lend themselves to applying empanelment to improve health and well-being. Maybe for another blog … Most clinicians use electronic health records (EHRs) these days and can run or request reports on their patient panels to identify which patients may need health care services. Empanelment provides each clinician with a list of names of their patients along with additional information such as age, date last seen, diagnoses, preventive and chronic care that is due and more. Here are some of the ways we can leverage empanelment and telehealth to keep people safe, expand access and capture revenue. Check in on the unseen and unknown. Empanelment is not just about those who seek health care services from us, although that’s often how it starts. The beauty of empanelment is that there should be no people on a clinician’s panel who are “unseen and unknown.” However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 41% of U.S. adults have delayed or avoided medical care during the pandemic because of concerns about COVID-19, which presents us with an opportunity. Identify who hasn’t been seen in the past 6-12 months for each clinician’s panel. Have clinicians go through the list and identify who should receive a check-in call and who should be scheduled for a telehealth visit. There may not be reimbursement for those check-in calls; although there are service codes and reimbursement for virtual check-ins, those check-ins are technically supposed to be initiated by the patient. Conduct advance care planning. If ever there was a time! And it can be accomplished by telehealth — using codes 99497 (~$85) and 99498 (~$74) — with decent reimbursement. Start with all individuals 65 and older in your panel. Ensure high-risk patients know about telehealth. Now more than ever, know who your top 5-10% highest risk patients are, including those at highest risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. These patients will benefit from having telehealth as an option perhaps more than any other population in your practice. Conduct targeted outreach to the top 5-10% high-risk patients to schedule a telehealth visit, if needed or to let them know about telehealth as an option. Address chronic and preventive gaps in care. As people delay care and as team-based care and pre-visit planning workflows seem to fall by the wayside, I am concerned that missed and delayed diagnoses will soar, which is both terrible for individuals and families, but is also one of the most common reasons for malpractice claims. Use panel data to identify who’s due for what: Chronic conditions, e.g., office visits, tests, vaccines, prescription renewals Preventive services, e.g., well-child visits, colorectal cancer screening (CRC), vaccinations Advise patients about the services that are due by phone, text or letter and schedule those for telehealth visits, if needed. Consider this a call to action for primary care practices! If you’re not already leveraging empanelment to optimize telehealth, expand access, make sure people are doing okay and keep people safe, what can you do by next Tuesday to up your game? < Previous News Next News >

How Telemedicine and Digital Therapeutics can Improve Orthopedic Care and PT Bill Siwicki October 11, 2022 A physical therapist and telehealth expert shows how the technologies can help patients, especially in disadvantaged populations, access the care they need and stick to a care plan. Minority and lower-income populations are less likely to have orthopedic surgery – and more likely to experience poor outcomes when they do. Untreated musculoskeletal conditions can result in sedentary behavior that leads to or worsens co-morbidities, including diabetes, obesity, depression and opioid misuse. Access challenges are partly to blame. Disadvantaged populations face many barriers to care, including low referral rates, lack of Medicaid acceptance and transportation difficulties. Telehealth experts say that offering remote education and physical therapy to patients can improve access for vulnerable populations, including: ● Patients in rural communities who live far away from brick-and-mortar care facilities. ● Patients who cannot afford copays for doctor or outpatient PT appointments. ● Patients in urban communities whose mobility issues make leaving home difficult. ● Patients whose inability to take time off work or secure childcare limits in-person visits. ● Patients who speak English as a second language. Healthcare IT News interviewed physical therapist Bronwyn Spira, founder and CEO of Force Therapeutics, to discuss the challenges and opportunities surrounding this area of virtual care. Q. Why are minority and lower-income populations less likely to have orthopedic surgery – and more likely to experience poor outcomes when they do? A. Musculoskeletal disorders are extremely common in our country. At least 60% of American adults are affected by a musculoskeletal disorder, and more than 75% of those 65 and older are living with at least one musculoskeletal condition, which ranges from tendonitis to arthritis, degenerative disc disease, and chronic lower back pain. Lower-income and minority populations face multiple barriers to accessing the right healthcare and are typically less likely to utilize orthopedic care, which can result in significant functional impairment. Untreated musculoskeletal conditions also can result in sedentary behaviors that lead to or worsen comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity and depression. In one study of more than 7,000 individuals with arthritis, the incidence rates of developing disabilities in activities of daily living (ADL) over a six-year period were significantly higher for Blacks (28%) and Spanish-speaking Hispanics (28.5%) as compared to whites (16.2%). As I mentioned, disadvantaged populations often lack sufficient access to care, which can manifest in a few different ways. Many cannot afford the financial burden of co-pays, childcare, transportation, time off work or the out-of-pocket cost of receiving care when uninsured. The Commonwealth Fund found that 50% of low-income adults in the U.S. skipped at least one medical visit, test, treatment or prescription per year due to its cost. Patients with state-funded Medicaid and federally funded Medicare plans also encounter logistical barriers to securing musculoskeletal care, including lower referral rates to orthopedic surgeons. Orthopedic specialists are 13% less likely to accept new Medicaid patients than they are Medicare patients or those with commercial insurance plans. Lastly, more than a third of Americans (36%) have low health literacy, which can be defined as the degree to which individuals can obtain, process and understand health information. Older age, minority membership and low socioeconomic status are disproportionately correlated with poor functional health literacy in both urban and rural populations. Language barriers also impact care utilization and success rates, as individuals who cannot fully understand the directions they are given will not be able to adhere to a care plan. One study on healthcare utilization among Hispanic adults found that limited English proficiency contributes to the underuse of medical services. For all of these reasons, members of disadvantaged populations are far less likely to have orthopedic surgery to correct their musculoskeletal conditions. The data also indicates stark disparities in orthopedic care utilization among racial and ethnic minority groups. Researchers have found that even after adjustments are made for age, sex and income, Black patients are 30% less likely to receive a total hip or knee replacement than white patients. A systematic review of the literature reveals that members of minority populations who do have joint replacement surgery also are at a higher risk for early complications within the first 90 days, leading to higher hospital readmission rates. While there is no consensus as to the cause of these disparities, research suggests that multiple comorbidities, lower income, poor health literacy, provider bias and insufficient interventions are contributing factors. Q. How does offering remote education and remote physical therapy to patients improve access for vulnerable populations? A. First and foremost, remote education and physical therapy platforms reduce the need for patients to attend appointments in person. When hospitals, health systems and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) implement care management and remote monitoring tools, they set the stage for achieving greater health equity by removing some of the physical barriers to care. At the start of a surgical episode, for example, replacing preoperative in-person appointments with virtual education classes means that patients can get all the information they need to prepare for surgery without leaving the house. Educating patients about what they can expect for their surgery – including what outcomes are typical, and how long their healing will take – helps them set appropriate goals for their recovery. All remote education content must be tailored to the patient and their condition, and ideally should reflect their comorbidities, medication and social determinants of health, as these factors influence how a patient is likely to respond to treatment. Content should be delivered in the patient's native language, and should feature clear and easily understood directions. Engaging a care partner who can support the patient's recovery journey also can be extremely beneficial. Many patients find it helpful to return to valuable content as questions arise, and care partners can assist by reinforcing the care team's instructions along the way. Content also should be easily digestible and should arrive at the appropriate point in the patient's journey, so as not to overwhelm patients with too much information. For example, before surgery, patients need information about how long they will be out of commission and how to prepare their space for moving around with an assistive device. A few days after surgery, they need information on how to manage their swelling and control their pain. Many hospitals and ASCs also are offering patients the option of virtual PT to supplement or replace traditional outpatient PT, as remote therapy delivers similar results at a much lower opportunity cost for the patient. Randomized trials have shown that virtual PT produces similar outcomes to outpatient PT after total knee and hip arthroplasty procedures, as long as the virtual program is prescribed by the treating clinical team. In addition to the time savings involved, replacing traditional PT with remote PT can save patients hundreds of dollars in copays and convenience, as patients can complete the rehab in their own home at a convenient time. Q. How does telehealth technology serve as a digital bridge to, for example, patients who cannot afford copays for doctor or outpatient PT appointments, patients in urban communities whose mobility issues make leaving home difficult, patients whose inability to take time off work or secure childcare limits in-person visits, and patients who speak English as a second language? A. Digital therapeutics can help orthopedic teams build stronger relationships with their patients, especially those who are members of disadvantaged populations and who are likely to need additional support. Standardizing patient access to preoperative and postoperative education through remote technology can help practices correct against implicit bias and ensure consistent communication with all patient populations, including the 13% of Americans who speak Spanish at home. For patients living in rural communities, telehealth tools can close the access gap imposed by geography. For patients in urban areas, who may struggle to use public transportation or navigate the stairs in a fifth-floor walk-up, telehealth tools can mean the difference between skipping necessary appointments and following their care plan. Ideally, telehealth technology can serve as a digital bridge to connect vulnerable patients to their care teams. However, the infrastructure of any such tool must support all patient populations, including the 43% of lower-income adults without broadband services at home. In many low-income communities, insufficient access to a computer also hinders the use of digital care management and remote monitoring solutions. Applications must compensate for the digital divide in their system design to ensure content does not require internet access, which can be poor or non-existent in certain areas. Patients should be able to access their care plans via mobile device with a secure login. According to the Pew Research Center, 27% of adults living in households earning less than $30,000 a year are smartphone-only internet users. As disadvantaged populations are far less likely to own a tablet, laptop or desktop computer, telehealth tools must be mobile-friendly and SMS-enabled. Two-way text messaging between patients and clinicians is a proven health intervention tool, as patients are much more likely to read and respond to a text than an email. Direct messaging via telehealth platforms also can improve outcomes for disadvantaged populations. When postoperative patients have a question about their pain levels, they can text their care team for answers instead of making an unnecessary trip to urgent care or the ER – or simply ignoring the problem until later, when interventions are less likely to be successful. Research shows that providing a care management platform with direct messaging decreases readmission rates across musculoskeletal procedures. Q. On a personal note, how does telehealth help you, the provider, with all these challenges? A. Early on in my career as a physical therapist, I managed and founded a number of orthopedics and sports medicine clinics in New York. My colleagues and I were constantly frustrated by how basic patient challenges – from inadequate healthcare access to poor health literacy and a lack of motivation – impacted our patients' outcomes. Similarly, we had very little or no visibility into how patients were managing at home, and whether the patients were achieving the outcomes that mattered to them. There wasn't a reliable closed-loop connection that provided the data we needed to make the right care decisions. Many patients would drop out of a treatment regimen due to access or cost challenges. There often were protracted gaps in care, and by the time the patient returned for treatment, they had often regressed or developed complications. That period led me to believe that evidence-based remote therapy and education could play a pivotal role in helping disadvantaged populations follow their postoperative care plan. In the traditional system, clinicians spend much of their valuable time in preoperative education visits, repeating the same things over and over to patients who are not likely to retain the bulk of this information. After surgery, nurses and care coordinators then work overtime to return patients' phone calls and fill in the knowledge gaps for patients. Digital care management systems allow orthopedic practices to scale valuable in-person time by automating low-touch interactions, while identifying the patients who need targeted one-to-one intervention. With the benefit of technology, practices can create high-value, repeatable workflows to fully prepare patients for surgery by giving patients what they need to know as they need to know it. This phased, segmented approach to education has been proven to correct for the retention gap of in-person education. The addition of patient messaging and remote monitoring tools enables the delivery of patient-reported outcomes data and care plan progression feedback to be returned in real time to the care team, who then can intervene as necessary. Orthopedic practices are much less likely to miss a patient who has stalled in their recovery and is at a high risk of developing complications. When digital therapeutics are designed to be inclusive of all patient populations, they can transform the way we practice orthopedics to improve health equity. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/how-telemedicine-and-digital-therapeutics-can-improve-orthopedic-care-and-pt < Previous News Next News >

New Coding Modifier Offers Opportunity To Investigate Audio-Only Telehealth Alexander Beschloss, Ryan Van Ramshorst, Chethan Bachireddy, Christopher Chen, Andrey Ostrovsky November 18, 2022 Prior to the pandemic, Medicaid program coverage of audio-only telehealth services was limited. During the early stages of the pandemic, Medicaid beneficiaries were significantly less likely to complete telehealth visits compared to commercially insured patients. This was likely due to a series of obstacles, including: lack of access to high-quality broadband, a device with video capability, requisite digital skills, and private space to conduct the visit. For example, in 2019, roughly one in four Medicaid enrollees lived in a home without internet or with limited computer access. That said, Medicaid beneficiaries do not have significantly less access to devices with video capability (such as smartphones) than other patient populations, suggesting network connectivity poses more of a barrier than device access. Even further, nearly 50 percent of low-income patients in the US may not have requisite digital health literacy to use virtual telehealth. However, considering that 86 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries own a smartphone, it may be inferred that many more have sufficient digital literacy to engage in audio-only care rather than audio-visual telehealth. Network connectivity and low rates of digital literacy are two barriers that highlight the importance of creating the infrastructure to deliver and measure audio-only visits is of increased necessity. It was in this context that, once the pandemic struck, Medicaid agencies changed policies to augment access to telehealth services. For example, 17 state Medicaid agencies expanded reimbursement to include multiple modalities of telehealth, including audio-only. These changes particularly supported patient populations who had transportation, childcare, employment, or income barriers that prevent in-person care—challenges that are more prevalent in the Medicaid population. These policy innovations narrowed the reimbursement gap among in-person, audio-only, and audio-visual visits. In fact, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently investigated differences in patient populations who receive telehealth audio-only versus audiovisual use in 2021. For telehealth visits, Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely to use audio-only care than were privately insured patients (35.1 percent versus 45.5 percent). They discovered that compared to White patients, who used audio-only care for 38.1 percent of their telehealth visits, Latino, Black, and Asian patients did so at rates of 49.3 percent, 46.4 percent, and 48.7 percent, respectively. Patients with less than a high school education used it at 61.9 percent of their telehealth visits, compared to those with greater than a bachelor’s degree, who did such at a rate of only 32.6 percent. Across income brackets, there is an inverse relationship between household income and audio-only telehealth use. As the use of audio-only telehealth became more widespread among Medicaid beneficiaries, state Medicaid leaders needed a mechanism to measure clinical outcomes, health care costs, and patient experiences related to audio-only telehealth. Providers also needed a dedicated billing construct that could be used across public and private payers to streamline billing processes. Until recently, such mechanisms simply did not exist. And so, due to these insufficient coding constructs, several Medicaid medical directors spearheaded an application to the American Medical Association (AMA) to create a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) modifier that would specifically designate audio-only services. In September 2021, the AMA CPT Editorial Panel accepted the addition of the CPT Modifier 93 code for synchronous audio-only telehealth, and the code became active on January 1, 2022. This article provides an overview of the rationale for and process of creating the CPT Modifier 93 code. Potential Benefits Of Audio-Only CPT Modifier Why was the creation of a new audio-only modifier necessary? Several reasons: data collection, policy implementation, health care equity, widespread need, and service specificity. The CPT 93 modifier permits differentiation among audio-only, audiovisual, and in-person care at the administrative level, which subsequently allows health service researchers to monitor and evaluate the use and clinical efficacy among these methods of care delivery. Prior to the introduction of this modifier, such high-quality analyses were impossible to do at scale. Along with the increase in all modalities of telehealth use since the COVID-19 public health emergency (63 fold increase year over year between 2019 and 2020), a survey performed by HHS (across all 50 states and the District of Columbia) discovered that 45.5 percent of all telehealth usage amongst Medicaid beneficiaries was audio-only. Taking things one step farther, several state legislatures including Washington, Connecticut, and New York have recently passed laws mandating or allowing coverage for audio-only services. Audio-only telehealth is being highly used, therefore having a mechanism to collect related data is vital. Implementing this modifier will serve as a tool for policy makers to make informed adjustments in policy around patients who use audio-only services. Implementation of this modifier will also enable claims-based research to monitor for disparities between audiovisual and audio-only care to ensure that all modalities of telehealth are provided in a sustainable, equitable, and high-quality fashion. Additionally, because different states have implemented varying strategies to cover audio-only services during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), the CPT 93 modifier will help health services researchers and policy makers discern the differences between coverage approaches, information that will be crucial in standardizing telehealth data collection/storage across states. From a coding perspective, adding an audio-only modifier to existing and widely used CPT codes is a far more feasible option than alternatives such as individual payers developing their own coding modifiers. That approach would become unreasonably burdensome on providers who would subsequently have to learn and bill using the system established by each payer. Previous Codes Did Not Suffice While CPT codes for services provided through telephone exist, they do not specify the enormous range of behavioral health services, therapies, maternity-related care, post-operative guidance, and other services that have been successfully delivered via audio-only technology since the COVID-19 PHE. For example, CPT code 99441 represents a “telephone evaluation and management service; 5–10 minutes of medical discussion,” which gives no specificity regarding what type of care was delivered. In comparison, the CPT 93 modifier can be attached to theoretically any billing code that is permitted under law, thus allowing for more precise tracking and more useful follow-up research. Prior to the introduction of the CPT 93 modifier, there were seldom CPT codes that could be used to represent audio-only telehealth for specific services. Even though audio-only telehealth has been delivered at high rates, states have only been able to use temporary or workaround solutions to bill for audio-only services. For example, the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Level II code for crisis response (CR) has been used by some states to support audio-only services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the two and a half years since the pandemic began, however, the use of audio-only to provide health services has become normalized and may in fact now be expected by Medicaid providers and beneficiaries—a reality for which the CR code, and its temporary application, was not designed. The CPT 93 solves this challenge on a national scale. Another prior attempt to capture audio-only telehealth was the CPT modifier 95 that only indicated a telehealth service and did not differentiate between audio-only and audio-visual care. HCPCS Level II code “G0” has also been used; however, it indicates a telehealth service for diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment specific to symptoms of an acute stroke. Furthermore, CPT code 99401 can be used to reflect counseling services that may be provided via audio-only care; however, this code failed to capture all the nuance of the amount of time of care was delivered. At the end of the COVID-19 PHE, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) plans to add the “FQ” modifier on claims for HCPCS code G2080 for counseling and therapy provided using audio-only telecommunications. The HCPCS G2080 code refers to when one provides therapy services that largely exceed the amount listed in the patient’s individualized treatment plan for medication assisted treatment for opioid use disorder. This modifier exists solely for CMS’s Opioid Treatment Program and fails to account for other indications for audio-only telehealth. Creating a CPT modifier that is applicable to all service types simplifies the codification and measurement of audio-only care across all payer types. Conduct More Research On Audio-Only Telehealth Researchers, provider organizations, and policy makers must investigate and ensure that audio-only telehealth drives strong clinical outcomes. Telephone-focused care has been an important part of primary care; however, much of it was after hours, unmeasured, and not reimbursed. There is strong evidence on audio-only telehealth’s efficacy in prenatal visits and insomnia, for example. A randomized clinical control trial in a patient population of the Kaiser Permanente Washington system received audio-only cognitive behavioral therapy through the telephone demonstrated a significant benefit in improving sleep, fatigue, and osteoarthritis-associated pain. A cohort study amongst pregnant women in the Parkland Health System in Texas found that audio-only perinatal visits were not associated with changes in perinatal outcomes when compared to in-person visits in a vulnerable population. While these data are encouraging, they are sparse. Measurement of a CPT modifier may streamline the research methods used in these studies. Researchers must continue to investigate the efficacy of specific therapies when delivered via audio-only modalities. While audio-only telehealth solves several problems in health care, there are also several risks such as its potential use for inappropriate clinical indications and the risk that some may see an opportunity to overbill. An audio-only modifier—and therefore a more granular characterization of telehealth modalities—may help assuage concerns about fraud, waste, and abuse, removing existing ambiguity about the impact of different telehealth modalities on outcomes. We also know that the quality and value of these delivery modalities may vary according to the different demographics being served, including factors such as age, insurance status, payer, income, and region, among many others. Such modalities will likely vary between acuity of patient’s indication for care. Only by studying these differences amongst modalities and the populations served, can we ensure that the care delivered is equitable and valuable. Implementing the 93 modifier is a vital step toward enabling health services researchers to urgently pursue research questions that inform evidence-based policy about the best use of audio-only telehealth—especially amongst the Medicaid population. It is also essential to ensuring that the growth of audio-only health care does not create a two-tiered system between private insurance and Medicaid. For example, audio-only care may in fact be lower quality or lower value compared to audiovisual care or in-person care—although, further investigation is necessary to understand these differences. Considering that audio-only care helps remove barriers to care for underresourced patient populations, inappropriate use of audio-only care may further exacerbate the already large inequities in health care—a concern raised by both clinicians and patients. This reliance on audio-only care may also hamstring innovations that can improve the quality and access to audiovisual telehealth or in-person care. Clearly, there are legitimate concerns about the equity of audio-only health. To resolve them, more precise data and extensive investigations are necessary: Both of which will be enabled by the implementation of the CPT 93 modifier. An Opportunity For Action The new audio-only CPT 93 modifier provides meaningful potential benefits to combat barriers to care that were compounded during the COVID-19 pandemic. The new code creates a potent opportunity for conducting rigorous research into audio-only telehealth to inform federal- and state-level policy around equitable telehealth delivery. But to make the most of this opportunity, regulators, payers, providers, and researchers must take steps to increase adoption and evaluation of the audio-only modifier. To catalyze this work, large health systems should consider leading the adoption of the CPT 93 modifier while also encouraging local private providers to do the same. Payers and purchasers should consider requiring modifier submission, a step that would also facilitate further research into the field with minimal additional administrative burden on providers. Federal health agencies have a role as well. For example, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) may increase awareness of the modifiers amongst affiliated researchers or those who use AHRQ databases while the Health Resources and Services Agency may require community health centers they fund to use the new modifier. Authors’ Note The authors would like to thank Dr. John Morgan and Amanda Brodt for their contributions to preparing this paper. Dr. Ostrovsky is an investor in the following companies, some of which provide telehealth services: https://www.socialinnovationventures.com . However, there are no direct conflicts of interest. See original article: https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/new-coding-modifier-offers-opportunity-investigate-audio-only-telehealth#.Y3feKa9vXhA.twitter < Previous News Next News >

Celebrating 2021 National Rural Health Day Southwest Telehealth Resource Center Dec. 1, 2021 Since 2010 the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health has designated the 3rd Thursday in November as National Rural Health Day to celebrate the rural leaders and champions in rural communities. This year the Arizona Telemedicine Program and the SWTRC joined with the Arizona Rural Health Association and the Arizona State Office of Rural Health to kick it off in Arizona with a “2021 Mid-Year Rural Health Policy Roundup” webinar by Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association. Since 2010 the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health has designated the 3rd Thursday in November as National Rural Health Day to celebrate the rural leaders and champions in rural communities. This year the Arizona Telemedicine Program and the SWTRC joined with the Arizona Rural Health Association and the Arizona State Office of Rural Health to kick it off in Arizona with a “2021 Mid-Year Rural Health Policy Roundup” webinar by Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association. This webinar streamed live to a national audience on November 15th and the recording and presentation slides are available at: https://telemedicine.arizona.edu/webinars/previous for on-demand playback. Each year the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health selects a Community Star from each of the 50 states. The 2021 Community Star report, https://en.calameo.com/read/0045723395dc12ef8ac48, includes stories of how each Community Star is working to improve life in their rural community. Congratulations to all of the 2021 Community Stars! Matthew Probst, PA-C Chief Quality Officer and Medical Director El Centro Family Health Mathew Probst is the Chief Quality Officer and Medical Director for a Federally Qualified Health Center located Northeast of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Under his leadership, Mr. Probst was able to implement initiatives at the start of the pandemic which resulted in his county having one of the lowest fatality rates and one of the highest vaccination rates in the county. Read more about why Mr. Probst was featured in an award-winning documentary named The Providers: https://en.calameo.com/read/0045723395dc12ef8ac48 < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth's ‘great opportunity’ at community health centers Emily Olsen June 14, 2022 Ray Lowe, senior vice president and CIO at AltaMed Health Services, discusses his organization's move to virtual care at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and how such care can evolve. See original video: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/video/telehealths-great-opportunity-community-health-centers < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine Holds Potential to Help Climate Change Center for Connected Health Policy May 4, 2021 MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. The recent article highlights that the United States healthcare industry is a big contributor to carbon emissions, and although telemedicine doesn’t solve the problem, its increased use does lead the industry in the right direction. This has been proven in two research studies conducted on this very subject. The first study, published in the journal, PLoS One explores the carbon footprint of telemedicine and found that replacing in-person visits with telemedicine resulted in 40-70 times decrease in carbon emissions. They note in their conclusion that for telemedicine to make a significant difference, a paradigm shift is necessary where telemedicine is regarded as an ordinary part of health care rather than exclusively for those who lack access due to geography. The second study, conducted by the University of California Davis Health System, examined travel-related and environmental savings as a result of use of telemedicine appointments for outpatient specialty consultations at the university. They found that telemedicine consultations resulted in significant savings of total emissions and that their telemedicine program had a positive impact on environmental pollutants. CCHP also previously published a catalogue of environmental impacts studies, which included several international studies looking at this same issue and coming to the same conclusion regarding telemedicine’s positive impact on carbon emissions in the healthcare sector. As telehealth has become more widespread due to the COVID-19 public health emergency its not hard to imagine that telehealth will cement its place as a mainstream tool in healthcare as the authors in the PLoS study suggest. However, policy barriers have historically interrupted the growth of telehealth, and it is yet to be seen whether the end of COVID-19 will bring telehealth’s progress to a halt. In a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change, researchers found that as a whole, the temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during COVID-19 saw a decrease by as much as -26% on average, but note that the impact of 2020 annual emissions depends on government actions and economic incentives post-pandemic, which will shape the path forward for decades. It will be important as entities such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the congressional budget office, state governments and others conduct their analyses on cost estimates for telehealth that they factor in savings to travel costs incurred through the use of telehealth and the implications for the environment. To learn more, see the full mobihealth news article featuring this important issue. Mobile Health News: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/telemedicine-came-rescue-during-covid-19-could-it-help-climate-change-too < Previous News Next News >