Packard Foundation COVID-19 Policy Flexibilities Report – Impacts and Recommendations Related to Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 Telehealth ensured better access to distant and specialized services, especially for those in rural areas and needing services in nearby states, as well as the potential to reduce disparities and address workforce shortages, such as those related to pediatric specialists. Last month the Lucile Packard Foundation released a report on COVID-19 policy flexibilities that focused on impacts and recommendations related to children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN). In addition to analyzing emergency policies, they looked to clinicians, family advocates, and other stakeholders to identify both challenges and opportunities based on their experiences. The number one policy change highlighted by all interviewees was how greater use of telehealth expanded access to care and had significant advantages, particularly for CYSHCN and their families. Telehealth ensured better access to distant and specialized services, especially for those in rural areas and needing services in nearby states, as well as the potential to reduce disparities and address workforce shortages, such as those related to pediatric specialists. Stakeholders also spoke to how telehealth addresses transportation and logistical barriers, mitigating challenges such as traveling long distances, missing work, and bringing other family members along as well as cumbersome medical equipment. The report also noted that the greatest challenges were identified as systemic infrastructure issues affecting broadband access, digital literacy, and lack of interpretation services. Based on their analysis and interviews, the report recommended CMS and state Medicaid programs extend emergency flexibilities on payment parity, audio-only and synchronous reimbursement, as well as remove geographic or rural/urban site restrictions and ease cross-state licensing laws. They also suggested the use of targeted federal funding to reduce disparities and providing grants for telehealth infrastructure and training, as well as increasing flexibility of privacy rules. For state Medicaid programs in particular, they recommended piloting additional modalities for future use such as texting, expanding school-based reimbursement and guidance, and considering reimbursement in childcare settings. The authors heard universally from stakeholders that reimbursement and payment parity requirements were essential to the availability of telehealth. According to their review, 38 states plus DC provided Medicaid payment parity by the end of April 2020, and by September, 17 states enacted laws requiring payment parity from private insurers. In addition, some clinicians reported that telehealth reduced emergency room and inpatient utilization, but because the costs saved were not shared with hospitals, the hospital shut down the program and they are now seeing increased emergency room use and negative health outcomes. For more information, please access the full report at https://www.lpfch.org/sites/default/files/field/publications/covid-19-hma-report_1.pdf. < Previous News Next News >

Mental Health vs. Primary Care: How Americans Are Using Telehealth Robin Gelburd, J.D. April 19. 2022 Social workers and psychiatrists are among the providers Americans are frequently visiting via telehealth, highlighting the pandemic’s continued mental health impact. Ever since the COVID-19 pandemic began, many Americans have been receiving health care via telehealth. The question arises: Who are the health care professionals on the other end of all these video links and phone calls? According to new evidence from private insurance claims data, the top specialty providing telehealth services nationally this past January was social worker. Because the most common telehealth service social workers provide is psychotherapy, this is just one sign of how prevalent the provision of mental health services through telehealth has been, as our country continues to grapple with the pandemic and its impact on many fronts. Tracking Telehealth Month by Month FAIR Health has been tracking telehealth trends on a monthly basis since January 2020 with the Monthly Telehealth Regional Tracker. Drawing on our repository of billions of private health care claims, the Telehealth Tracker documented the rapid rise in telehealth usage in the early months of the pandemic and has followed the evolution of telehealth since then. The Telehealth Tracker is a free, interactive, online map of the four U.S. census regions (Midwest, Northeast, South and West) that allows the user to view an infographic on telehealth for a specific month in the nation as a whole or in individual regions. The Telehealth Tracker itself evolved as the pandemic continued. In the first year, to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telehealth, each month in the pandemic year of 2020 was compared to the corresponding month in the pre-pandemic year of 2019. In 2021, the focus turned to month-over-month rather than year-over-year changes. In 2022, we’ve added new features: the top five telehealth provider specialties rendering telehealth services and the Telehealth Cost Corner, which presents a specific telehealth procedure code and its median costs. Continuing from previous years are the percent change in telehealth’s share of medical claim lines, the top five telehealth procedure codes and the top five telehealth diagnoses. (A claim line is an individual service or procedure listed on an insurance claim.) Provider Specialties In January 2022, social worker was the provider specialty rendering the most telehealth services nationally and in every region but the West. In the West, primary care physician was the leading provider specialty, ahead of social worker by just a tenth of a percentage point in terms of each specialty’s share of telehealth claim lines. In every other region and nationally, primary care physician was in second place behind social worker. Nationally, psychiatrist, psychologist and primary care nonphysician were in third, fourth and fifth place, respectively. Though the regions varied in the order of provider specialty, in all of them – as in the nation as a whole – three of the five top specialties were related to mental health: social worker, psychiatrist and psychologist. The share of telehealth services provided by social workers varied by region. Nationally, social workers accounted for 28.7% of telehealth claim lines. In the Midwest, where their share was greatest, they accounted for 32.2%; in the West, where it was least, they made up 22.4%. Diagnoses Throughout 2021 and into January 2022, mental health conditions constituted the top telehealth diagnostic category nationally and in every region. In January, mental health conditions accounted for 58.9% of telehealth claim lines nationally – up from 55% in December 2021. By comparison, mental health conditions also were No. 1 among telehealth diagnoses in 2020, but accounted for only 44% of telehealth claim lines nationally. Throughout 2021, generalized anxiety disorder was the top telehealth mental health diagnosis nationally and in most regions, though major depressive disorder was No. 1 in the West. From May to July 2021, and again from September to October, substance use disorders emerged as one of the top five telehealth diagnoses nationally. Procedure Codes Throughout 2021, the telehealth procedure code used most often nationally was the code designating one hour of psychotherapy. This remained the nation’s top telehealth procedure code in January 2022, when it accounted for 23.1% of telehealth claim lines. The nation’s top five codes contained two other psychotherapy codes that month: one in fourth place designating 45 minutes of psychotherapy and another in fifth place marking a 30-minute psychotherapy visit with evaluation and management. In three of the four census regions, all three of these codes were in the top five, with one hour of psychotherapy in first place. In the South, however, the top five telehealth codes contained one hour of psychotherapy in first place and 45 minutes of psychotherapy in fifth place, but did not include the code for a 30-minute visit. Services Besides Mental Health Despite the dominant position of mental health services, telehealth also offers a gateway to services and treatments for many other conditions. In January, along with mental health conditions, the top five telehealth diagnostic categories nationally also included acute respiratory diseases and infections, COVID-19, developmental disorders and joint/soft tissue diseases and issues. The Telehealth Cost Corner was created to spotlight the costs of a different telehealth procedure code each month. For January, the spotlight was on the code designating treatment for a speech, language, voice, communication and/or hearing processing disorder. This code is most commonly used by speech-language pathologists to help correct specific speech or language disorders – typically in young children with developmental language delays and/or autism, though sometimes also in older adults after stroke or other debilitating incidents. Provider Specialties In January 2022, social worker was the provider specialty rendering the most telehealth services nationally and in every region but the West. In the West, primary care physician was the leading provider specialty, ahead of social worker by just a tenth of a percentage point in terms of each specialty’s share of telehealth claim lines. In every other region and nationally, primary care physician was in second place behind social worker. Nationally, psychiatrist, psychologist and primary care nonphysician were in third, fourth and fifth place, respectively. Though the regions varied in the order of provider specialty, in all of them – as in the nation as a whole – three of the five top specialties were related to mental health: social worker, psychiatrist and psychologist. The share of telehealth services provided by social workers varied by region. Nationally, social workers accounted for 28.7% of telehealth claim lines. In the Midwest, where their share was greatest, they accounted for 32.2%; in the West, where it was least, they made up 22.4%. Diagnoses Throughout 2021 and into January 2022, mental health conditions constituted the top telehealth diagnostic category nationally and in every region. In January, mental health conditions accounted for 58.9% of telehealth claim lines nationally – up from 55% in December 2021. By comparison, mental health conditions also were No. 1 among telehealth diagnoses in 2020, but accounted for only 44% of telehealth claim lines nationally. Throughout 2021, generalized anxiety disorder was the top telehealth mental health diagnosis nationally and in most regions, though major depressive disorder was No. 1 in the West. From May to July 2021, and again from September to October, substance use disorders emerged as one of the top five telehealth diagnoses nationally. Procedure Codes Throughout 2021, the telehealth procedure code used most often nationally was the code designating one hour of psychotherapy. This remained the nation’s top telehealth procedure code in January 2022, when it accounted for 23.1% of telehealth claim lines. The nation’s top five codes contained two other psychotherapy codes that month: one in fourth place designating 45 minutes of psychotherapy and another in fifth place marking a 30-minute psychotherapy visit with evaluation and management. In three of the four census regions, all three of these codes were in the top five, with one hour of psychotherapy in first place. In the South, however, the top five telehealth codes contained one hour of psychotherapy in first place and 45 minutes of psychotherapy in fifth place, but did not include the code for a 30-minute visit. Services Besides Mental Health Despite the dominant position of mental health services, telehealth also offers a gateway to services and treatments for many other conditions. In January, along with mental health conditions, the top five telehealth diagnostic categories nationally also included acute respiratory diseases and infections, COVID-19, developmental disorders and joint/soft tissue diseases and issues. The Telehealth Cost Corner was created to spotlight the costs of a different telehealth procedure code each month. For January, the spotlight was on the code designating treatment for a speech, language, voice, communication and/or hearing processing disorder. This code is most commonly used by speech-language pathologists to help correct specific speech or language disorders – typically in young children with developmental language delays and/or autism, though sometimes also in older adults after stroke or other debilitating incidents. < Previous News Next News >

The Future of Telehealth: Informatics, Scalability and Interoperability Bill Siwicki, Healthcare IT News July 2021 A Philips executive describes what's happening now with virtual care – and what needs to happen to ensure a solid future for telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. The COVID-19 pandemic pushed telehealth into the spotlight with exponential adoption, helping to prove its value. The healthcare industry learned that, with the right solutions, care can extend outside hospital walls and be conducted anywhere. Further, CIOs and other health IT leaders reinvented systems and processes, and clinicians gained an improved understanding of the invaluable impact of integrated informatics on digital transformations and the quality and efficiency of care. Even while the pandemic continues, healthcare provider organizations have begun to stabilize these infrastructures and revisit the technologies and workflows deployed earlier in the crisis and turn them into standard practices. On this note, Karsten Russell-Wood, portfolio leader for post-acute and home at Philips, shares his viewpoints with Healthcare IT News on the biggest priorities to ensure telehealth is sustained long term. Q. How can telehealth and remote patient monitoring technologies help support chronic and acute care anywhere? A. With the right tools, extending care outside the hospital is not only feasible, but in many cases preferred. The Philips Future Health Index 2021 Report, which surveyed nearly 3,000 healthcare leaders across 14 countries, found that healthcare leaders expect an average of 23% of routine care to take place outside of the hospital walls within three years. This new frontier will undoubtedly include extending real-time care to those with both acute needs and chronic conditions who benefit from consistent communication with doctors. For these patient populations in particular, COVID-19 spurred an interest in becoming a more active participant in care plans, bringing them new levels of convenience and personalization. To meet these needs, providers must continuously work to tailor care toward the consumer, just as we're seeing happen in the banking and retail industries, and [to] advance care models from brick and mortar to "clicks and mortar." Even if the home can't be the hospital, community spaces and retail locations can fill in as connected care stations for underserved communities or patients [who] don't have an ideal setup at home. This is only possible through the use of data-driven, connected care solutions that feed into cloud-based software and allow clinicians to maintain visibility into their patients' conditions from afar. Beyond wellness checks, remote patient monitoring enables doctors to view critical patient data on a consistent basis, helping them cater care to a patient's unique needs, as well as activate timely interventions before health deteriorates. Traditionally, acute patients need an inpatient admission to the hospital and require continuous rounding by a physician. Approaching this patient population with a 360-degree model – monitoring them at home from pre-admission through post-discharge – could help track the different phases of acute care from outside the hospital. The benefits here include freeing clinicians from the bedside, helping them better allocate hospital resources according to risk, and, above all, keeping patients in a more convenient, lower-cost setting. Hospital-grade wearables equipped with secure data integration, for example, can help guide relevant, timely decisions from care teams regarding whether a patient needs to be hospitalized immediately, or can receive treatment elsewhere and remain outside the hospital for the time being. Care teams can view daily and weekly trends via continuous biometric devices, showing everything from skin temperature, respiratory rate at rest and coughing frequency, and be notified if symptoms are worsening. There are similar advantages of using connected devices when managing patients with chronic conditions. In the comfort of their own home, patients can remain connected to their providers in a convenient, passive manner, which can motivate them to adhere to their treatments. Until recently, patients have traveled to their doctors to receive care. However, that doesn't mean hospitals have always been the most accessible means of delivering that care, people just didn't have a choice. The industry now has the means to deliver that same level of care in a much more accessible way, bringing it to patients wherever they may be. For example, those with diabetes or congestive heart failure who may wish to avoid in-person visits can potentially avoid an unnecessary hospitalization if their doctors detect a change in their condition in time. Patients with cardiac arrhythmias can remain home while being continuously monitored. Doctors can detect arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation as they occur and intervene if necessary. Telehealth solutions can also help clinicians monitor whether a chronic condition is becoming acute. Q. With telehealth and remote patient monitoring comes the need for interoperability and security. How does a healthcare provider organization ensure data can be accessed and shared seamlessly across settings, and that solutions are interoperable? A. As hospitals evolve to extend care beyond their walls, telehealth and remote patient monitoring enable a hybrid continuum of care that brings an increased amount of health data. This requires secure, robust data-sharing infrastructures and a standard for technologies to work together across platforms and locations. The Future Health Index 2021 report found that two of the biggest barriers to the adoption of digital health technologies were difficulties with data management (44%) and lack of interoperability and data standards across technology platforms (37%). Providers need to rely on a longitudinal health record to activate the right care anytime and anywhere. For example, for remote care for patients in ICU settings, known as tele-ICUs, where integrated systems are particularly important: Without a strong backbone for smooth data integration, intensivists can only see what is happening in front of them, instead of making informed decisions based on a holistic view of a patient's health. To ensure data can be accessed and that solutions are interoperable, secure flows of data must be activated. Solutions that are designed to work in tandem are better organized and more secure from malicious attacks. By safeguarding technologies to make sure they're interoperable across platforms and geographic locations, health systems can better protect the data that flows throughout their system and provide increased security. Using a cloud-based platform approach will help achieve this, as well as standardize the current disparate IT landscape and allow data to be accessed anywhere. Leveraging open APIs and approved standards like IHE-HL7 can help facilitate data exchange across multiple sources and vendors across the continuum of care with minimal friction. With the rise in cloud-based applications, software-as-a-service and virtual care solutions enabling data sharing, organizations must work to ensure systems and processes mature at the rate they are evolving. Providers should assess their current infrastructure and their performance metrics such as ROI, quality, scalability and satisfaction, which will help them develop IT models accordingly that support these emerging care pathways. New types of executive roles will also grow in necessity to support building beyond hospital walls, such as chief digital officer and virtual health leadership supporting the informatics department. Further, to ensure confidentiality, integrity and availability of critical data and the systems that house that data, security plans should span across organizations and industries. While updating IT systems all at once may not be realistic, health systems can start by rigorously assessing third-party vendor capabilities, only using 510k cleared medical devices and implementing policies for data protection. Hospitals should prioritize partnerships with organizations that take a proactive approach to protecting health information across devices, systems and settings, so administrators, healthcare providers and patients have confidence about how care is delivered. By connecting devices, unlocking data and fostering collaboration, we will empower new forms of engagement, actionable insights and better health outcomes. Q. You have said that virtual care strategies cannot be a bandage on top of existing or new piecemeal solutions that work in silos, that a much-needed technology infrastructure must be established that not only enables faster and easier adoption of new capabilities, but also creates a transparent total cost of ownership. Please elaborate. A. Implementing telehealth solutions during the pandemic to supplement in-person care was like building a plane while flying it. Now healthcare organizations can be strategic, stabilize these infrastructures and revisit the technologies deployed in times of crisis and transform them into standard practices. Our world moving forward is one that embraces the best solutions available, leveraging both traditional care models as well as virtualization to provide quality care. This change isn't one that any one organization can do alone, and relies on partnerships with technology companies that enable and foster clinical creativity through co-creation and embrace the subscription economy. Healthcare organizations are increasingly partnering with those with proven track records in implementing foundational technology infrastructures and who can serve as consultants to drive their digital transformation. The ability to co-create has never been more important in driving outcomes. Working side by side with partners in the technology sector will help hospitals and health systems develop solutions from the ground up. There is value in disintermediated partners in this case, as they allow providers, vendors and patients to take collaboration to the next level. And health systems should be given flexibility when it comes to implementing and exploring virtual tools that are right for them. Rather than making a big capital investment upfront, they should be able to adopt solutions in a stepwise fashion, and scale up or down in real time. Today's healthcare organizations care more about access than they do about ownership. They want customized experiences and flexible payment options. That's why healthcare organizations are increasingly turning to subscription services, with a shift from buying a physical product to leveraging a holistic solution that provides ongoing value and engagement. By adopting these new business models, it not only enables faster and easier adoption of new capabilities, but also creates a transparent total cost of ownership. We've seen success with software-as-a-service models as a predictive, usage-based model that allows for faster innovation, but also reduces the demand for IT maintenance, standardizes service levels and usage, and helps providers quickly scale according to need. < Previous News Next News >

Amazon's telehealth arm quietly expands to 21 more states By Katherine Khashimova Long March 8, 2021 An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector. An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector.The service, Amazon Care, launched a year ago as an app providing on-demand chat and video consultations with medical professionals for Amazon's then-54,000 Puget Sound employees. Users can also book in-person visits at their home or office with clinicians. Payment for the service routes through Amazon.com. In recent weeks Amazon Care has incorporated in Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Wyoming, according to records filed with state agencies. The online health magazine Stat was first to report Amazon Care's expansion. Amazon did not respond to questions about whether access to the newly expanded service will continue to be limited to Amazon employees. But there are indications that Amazon may begin offering the service to a broader audience. In December, Business Insider reported that Amazon had pitched other companies, including Seattle-based Zillow, on the health care app. Amazon has been hiring health care practitioners, research scientists and product managers for the app around the country—including in California, Georgia and Texas, according to Stat. And with a nationwide group of home health care providers, Amazon Care on Wednesday announced it would begin lobbying lawmakers to ease regulations on what kind of health services can be performed outside of a doctor's office—potentially widening the services Amazon Care can provide. Amazon has not yet received professional licenses that would allow it to operate facilities like medical testing labs in the 21 states it has filed to do business. However, that paperwork may be coming down the line: In its Georgia business registration, Amazon indicated it planned to start doing business in the state this July. Amazon began nosing around the lucrative field of health care in 2017, when it made several high-profile hires from the sector. Former One Medical Vice President Christine Henningsgaard joined Amazon, as did Missy Krasner, from the digital health-records management company Box.Henningsgaard, who left Amazon in 2019 to start the maternity-focused health care venture Quilted Health, refers to herself on her LinkedIn profile as part of the "founding team" of Amazon Care, which she described as "bringing customer obsession, advanced technology, and last mile logistics to health care." Around the same time, the company formed an ill-starred health care consortium with Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase. The organization, later dubbed Haven, had a stated goal of offering better service and rates from health care providers on behalf of the triumvirate's nearly 1.2 million employees; Haven dissolved last month. Amazon purchased online drugstore Pillpack for $753 million in mid-2018; the next year, the company won landmark approval allowing its voice-activated artificial intelligence, Alexa, to transmit private patient information. When the coronavirus began infecting Amazon's hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers last summer, the company built hundreds of its own on-site laboratories to test employees. In November, Amazon launched an online pharmaceutical delivery service, sending drugstore share prices tumbling. Just weeks later, Amazon's cloud-computing division unveiled a health data management service for doctors and hospitals that complies with patient confidentiality regulations. Amazon Care has likely been in the works since at least early 2018, when Amazon hired Seattle geriatrician Dr. Martin Levine. Amazon Care clinicians are employed by Care Medical, formerly Oasis Medical, a company Levine founded shortly after he joined Amazon, according to business records. Amazon replaced Levine early last year with Dr. Sunita Mishra, a former executive at Providence St. Joseph, where she led the development of the health system's mobile app for on-demand medical care. Levine is now chief medical officer at The Polyclinic health system, which operates 14 sites around the Puget Sound region. Weeks after Mishra joined Amazon, the company expanded access to Amazon Care to all of its now-80,000 Washington state workers. < Previous News Next News >

Out-of-State Telehealth Aided Rural Residents Amid the Pandemic Mark Melchionna September 22, 2022 New research shows that several Medicare beneficiaries benefited from expanding out-of-state telehealth services, including rural residents and cancer survivors. September 22, 2022 - A study published in JAMA Health Forum found that many Medicare beneficiaries benefitted from the elimination of restrictions on out-of-state telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily those with cancer, rural residents, and those residing nearby state borders. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 95 percent of health centers used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This sharp uptake has prompted researchers to explore the effects of telehealth and the populations that use it the most. This study examined out-of-state telehealth data from January to June 2021. They selected this time period because it followed the abrupt onset of the pandemic and included vaccine distribution efforts. Further, state-based licensing flexibilities were still in effect during the study period, enabling out-of-state telemedicine. Most flexibilities were eliminated by mid-2021, after which pre-pandemic state licensing laws were reinstated. Overall, 8.3 million Medicare beneficiaries participated in a telehealth visit between January and June 2021. Of these, 422,547 (5 percent) had one or more out-of-state telehealth visits. Through geographical analysis, researchers determined that 57.2 percent of all out-of-state telehealth visits involved patients who lived near a state border, defined as within 15 miles of a border. Upon analyzing out-of-state visits, researchers found that 64.3 percent included a primary care or mental health clinician, and 62.6 percent were preceded by an in-person visit between March 2019 and the telehealth visit involving the same patient and provider. Researchers also found that rural residents were more likely to receive telehealth from an out-of-state location, with 33.8 percent of out-of-state visits involving a rural resident versus 21 percent of within-state telemedicine visits. Also, 9.8 percent of out-of-state telehealth visits were for cancer care, the highest rate among all specialties. Based on this data, researchers concluded that Medicare beneficiaries living in rural areas, seeking cancer care, and living nearby state borders were the most likely to obtain telehealth from an out-of-state clinician. The study results also imply that these populations are highly affected by restrictions that limit out-of-state telehealth. Researchers noted a few limitations within their study, including the potential bias associated with data from the traditional Medicare population and the use of home addresses to determine the state in which a patient resides. Various studies have collected data that reveal the difficulties some patients may face when obtaining care. Highlighting the care disparities between urban and rural residents, research from June found that Native American patients often faced difficulties when accessing cancer care. This was largely due to the large geographic distance between the areas in which American Indian and Alaska Native patients reside and the locations of clinics. Due to the high prevalence of access disparities, organizations often push for regulatory expansions related to telehealth. In September, 375 stakeholders signed a letter sent to the US Senate that requested the solidification of telehealth access for two years after the COVID-19 public health emergency has ended. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/out-of-state-telehealth-aided-rural-residents-amid-the-pandemic < Previous News Next News >

The future of telemedicine: purpose-built, integrated platforms Zoll Data Systems March 1, 2022 Integrated telemedicine solutions can address current pain points. By: Businessperson with tablet pointing to AI and data graphics Maximizing provider returns with big data Stethoscope and calculator on graphs How Emergency Medicine Physicians Can Increase Revenue in 2021 with Medicare PFS Cuts Looming person holding an insurance card. Billing Medicare and Private Payers for Telehealth Visits: What to Expect Post-Public Health Emergency Doctor talking to mother and daughter at reception desk Insurance Verification Technology Prevents Errors that Cause Costly Denials SPONSORED Global Edition Telehealth The future of telemedicine: purpose-built, integrated platforms Integrated telemedicine solutions can address current pain points. By: March 01, 2022 10:27 AM Photo Credit: adamkaz/Getty Images Propelled into mainstream use by the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine is becoming standard practice for many healthcare providers. According to David Ernst, MD, president of telemedicine innovator EPOWERdoc, these solutions will transform access to care and continue to drive more cost-effective delivery models, particularly at the EMS and emergency medicine level. Telemedicine’s technological pain points While telemedicine has undoubtedly come a long way, it still has significant limitations. One of the biggest limitations is provider usability. Often, telemedicine “platforms” are actually several disparate solutions cobbled together. These may include a video conferencing app, patient registration portal for demographic and insurance information, EMR, e-prescription app and discharge system. Consequently, providers must toggle between separate software programs to review and enter patient data for a single encounter. This inefficient approach can introduce errors, create frustration for patients and providers, and jeopardize the continuity of care. There is hope, however: Telemedicine technology is making rapid advancements through purpose-built platforms. Read full article here: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/future-telemedicine-purpose-built-integrated-platforms < Previous News Next News >

2022 In Review: State Telehealth Policy Legislative Roundup CCHP December 06, 2022 LEGISLATIVE ROUNDUP As the year winds down, the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) is providing its annual State Legislation Roundup. Enacted state telehealth bills in the 2022 legislative session followed trends forged in the previous 2021 legislative cycle, although at a slightly lesser volume. While 2020 was largely focused on scrambling to meet the needs of the population during the COVID pandemic through temporary telehealth waivers and flexibilities, both 2021 and 2022 challenged states to decide how to translate their temporary COVID policies into permanent telehealth policies, and in many cases making adjustments to their previously passed laws concerning telehealth. There was also a proliferation of legislation that addressed cross-state licensing issues in earnest through registration processes, targeted licensing exceptions and compacts. Among 41 states and DC, 180 legislative bills tracked by CCHP passed in the 2022 legislative session. While this is down from the 201 legislative bills enacted in 47 states in 2021, it’s still significantly higher than the bills passed in 2020 (104 bills). The number of bills in each individual topic area CCHP tracks varied from previous years. For example, while bills addressing private payer reimbursement, Medicaid reimbursement and regulatory requirements were lower this cycle than 2021 levels, bills addressing cross-state licensing were significantly up, while bills addressing online prescribing, and demonstrations, studies and reports were also somewhat higher than in 2021. Note that CCHP began tracking Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands legislation in September 2022 for the first time. However, no enacted bills were found related to telehealth in either of the territories during the 2022 session. See full article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/2022-in-review-state-telehealth-policy-legislative-roundup < Previous News Next News >

The changing landscape of telehealth: 4 federal legislative developments Naomi Diaz May 24, 2022 Federal lawmakers have introduced four bills that look to update, continue, renew and expand telehealth access for patients and providers. Below are recent federal developments for policy, regulatory and legal changes related to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to JD Supra: HHS' $16.3 million for Title X family planning program: On May 10, HHS announced it will release $16.3 million in grants for family planning groups to expand telehealth services and infrastructure. The funds will be made available through the American Rescue Plan and will be awarded to 31 Title X family planning programs and facilities. Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act: The bill, introduced May 6, would provide grants to schools and emergency departments to scale up or expand pediatric mental health telehealth access. Women's Health Protection Act: Introduced May 4, this bill would protect a provider's ability to provide abortion services via telehealth. Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act: This bill, introduced April 26, would extend telehealth flexibilities enabled by Medicare for two years following the COVID-19 pandemic. < Previous News Next News >

Athena Health Telehealth Adoption Report Center for Connected Health Policy May 2021 How providers are taking advantage of virtual care and their perceived benefits Athena Health began conducting research in 2020 on de-identified data from across their healthcare network (which spans the nation) to understand how providers are feeling about the increased adoption of telehealth. With the onset of COVID-19, the use of telehealth has skyrocketed, and beyond understanding the increased utilization numbers, it’s also important to understand provider adoption rates, their attitudes toward telehealth, which specialties and what services telehealth is being used in the most. An interactive infographic tool on their website can be utilized to identify the amount of care across their system that has gone virtual by specialty (primary care, mental health, cardiology, pediatrics, OB/GYN or all specialties). Users can also view by specialty how providers are taking advantage of virtual care and their perceived benefits (for example, virtual appointments are more convenient), and the reasons why providers are turning to telehealth to keep their practices running. For a complete breakdown of their findings, visit Athena Health’s interactive webpage: https://www.athenahealth.com/knowledge-hub/clinical-trends/the-athenahealth-telehealth-insights-dashboard. < Previous News Next News >

Pandemic broadens NMDOT’s outlook to lay groundwork for a connected future By NMDOT February 8, 2021 “The pandemic forced New Mexico to rely heavily on internet access, making broadband even more essential,” SANTA FE – The New Mexico Department of Transportation is committed to helping build out the information highways in New Mexico to connect rural communities to vital digital resources while enhancing mobility and safety on state highways. “The pandemic forced New Mexico to rely heavily on internet access, making broadband even more essential,” said Transportation Secretary Mike Sandoval. “Digital expansion has been a passion project of the department for a while, but the urgent need for telecommuting, distance learning and telemedicine has fueled the drive to make internet access for every New Mexican a reality.” The DOT is looking ahead at what it would take to piggyback fiber optic infrastructure with current and future road construction projects to achieve dig once practices and help make future broadband expansion projects more welcoming for industry partners. Additional fiber infrastructure would also enhance the department’s Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) which allows DOT to install additional digital message boards, cameras, and weather sensors, to provide real-time road condition information through the NMRoads application. “As existing roads are reconstructed, there’s an opportunity to install fiber conduit while the road is torn up, so you’re not digging twice, which minimizes the impact on the environment,” said Sandoval. “Building both literal and digital highways will provide innovative, sustainable infrastructure that serves the entire state.” NMDOT is also partnering with the New Mexico Economic Development Department (NMEDD) to conduct a stratospheric broadband infrastructure assessment which will not only evaluate the connectivity opportunities for rural New Mexico, but also identify the same prospects for the state’s transportation needs. “We have a long way to go, but the department is gathering data and taking the necessary steps to ensure DOT plays a significant role in broadband accessibility,” adds Sandoval. < Previous News Next News >

ATA: What's ahead for telehealth policy after the pandemic Andrea Fox September 23, 2022 Federal and state advocacy team members discussed the status of telehealth policy as the public health emergency deadline looms and the industry questions, 'Is the pandemic over?' The American Telehealth Association is working with Congress and several federal agencies to shape the fate of policies and payments for telehealth services that experienced a rapid uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic. WHY IT MATTERS Now that President Joe Biden has declared the COVID-19 pandemic over, the ATA's Telehealth Awareness Week policy update webinar explored how federal and state telehealth policies may be affected as Congress decides whether or not to end the public health emergency (PHE). Federal priorities for telehealth have evolved with the pandemic with restrictions lifted by a Congress deciding if the limiting of certain restrictions should be lifted permanently. The PHE must be reviewed every 90 days, so Congress will have to revisit the renewal by mid-October, according to policy experts presenting during Wednesday's online event. "As we know, [President] Biden has said in recent days that the pandemic is over, so it's possible that the technical public health emergency might expire sometime in the very near future," said Megan Herber, director at Faegre Drinker who advises ATA and ATA Action on all things Federal policy. Telehealth payments and provider practices are highly regulated on the Federal level, said Quinn Shean, strategic advisor at Tusk Ventures and the state policy advisor for ATA and ATA Action. But even if providers do not serve Medicare populations, "Medicare policy trickles down," added Herber. For example, before the pandemic, patients had to be in a rural area in a hospital or clinical setting to receive reimbursement for telehealth. "That is the current status quo right now – as long as the COVID-19 public health emergency is in place," Herber explained. But in about five months, "all of those waivers go away automatically unless Congress does something." Approaches to policy can be different in different contexts, noted moderator Alexis Gilroy, co-leader of the healthcare and life sciences practice at Jones Day. "Where do you come at it based on the particular lane it sits in?" In terms of state-level telehealth policy, there are multiple state priorities because states differ in their approaches to telehealth coverage requirements for public and private health plans, reimbursement for services provided via telehealth, and eligibility to deliver reimbursable services. States also differ in how they regulate synchronous and asynchronous telehealth and remote patient monitoring. They vary on which types of providers can deliver telehealth, what establishes a valid patient/provider relationship and if out-of-state practitioners can treat patients in the state remotely without a license, explained Shean. "We have a patchwork of 50 different state requirements here," she said. The ATA has been focused on developing a consistent regulatory framework so telehealth can be deployed across states and fully leveraged. "The ATA is committed to modality-neutral policies," instead of dictating which tools clinicians choose to use to deliver telehealth, she said. ATA is pushing for fair payment for telehealth and home health as well as licensure flexibility across state lines. "It's really aligning our state frameworks with the 21st Century care model," and the states are moving quickly, she said. There have been hundreds of pieces of legislation to update state telehealth policies. The organization is also working with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and Congress to address the future of online prescribing of controlled substances. Many of the barriers to telehealth policy have been based on perceptions that telehealth is somehow substandard and that romanticizes in-patient care, but telehealth has often delivered care where there was no prior access to healthcare, said Shean. "We need to recognize the access gaps that telehealth can fill" and recognize the guardrails that are in place with telehealth as they are with other care settings, said Shean. As more retail providers like CVS, Amazon and others enter the space through mergers and acquisitions, they will also have an impact on the direction of telehealth policy, including how to protect the patient data these companies will have more access to. But with more stakeholders pushing for telehealth on the state level, "having a broader tent now helps show the different patient populations that can be served here and brings more focus," Shean pointed out. THE LARGER TREND Under the CARES Act, Congress granted the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services authority to waive certain restrictions for Medicare coverage of telehealth. The agency was able to remove geographic restrictions, expand care at home, increase the amount of Medicare-covered services via telehealth and more. Additional legislative proposals, including the Telehealth Benefit Expnasion for Workers Act, Telehealth Extension Act and others, suggest broadening access to telehealth. "Throughout the pandemic, telehealth has proven to be a vital tool for Americans to receive timely and quality care from their own home," said Tim Walberg, R-Mich, during the bill's introduction at the Capitol in March. "For rural communities in particular, telemedicine has helped remove barriers to care, expand access to specialists and improve health outcomes." ON THE RECORD "There is urgency [for Congress] to act – don't wait until four months and 20 days after the pandemic ends; we need some stability," said Herber. "We'd love to make it permanent, and a lot of these policies we have been asking for since before the pandemic, so it's not really new," she concluded. Andrea Fox is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Email: afox@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/ata-whats-ahead-telehealth-policy-after-pandemic < Previous News Next News >

Opportunity Knocking — Empanelment, COVID-19 and Telehealth By Trudy Bearden, PA-C, MPAS February 17, 2021 Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment. Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment is a foundational component of primary care and is essential in population health management. In 2019, the People-Centered Integrated Care collaborative, participants from 10 countries developed an overview of empanelment and a comprehensive definition: Empanelment is a continuous, iterative set of processes that identify and assign populations to facilities, care teams, or providers who have a responsibility to know their assigned population and to proactively deliver coordinated primary health care. That definition is accurate and comprehensive, but we must appreciate the recent, succinct statement by my Empanelment Learning Exchange colleague Elizabeth Wala, Global Advisor, Health and Nutrition at Aga Khan Foundation: “Empanelment is grouping patients under providers.” Opportunity. As a primary care clinician and health care consultant, I have been thinking hard since April 2020 about the importance of empanelment, telehealth and the COVID-19 pandemic. Just to be clear, I’m using the term telehealth as defined by the discrete set of services described by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) List of Telehealth Services. Similarly, there are amazing opportunities for other remote services, including chronic and principal care management, remote patient monitoring, virtual check-ins and more that lend themselves to applying empanelment to improve health and well-being. Maybe for another blog … Most clinicians use electronic health records (EHRs) these days and can run or request reports on their patient panels to identify which patients may need health care services. Empanelment provides each clinician with a list of names of their patients along with additional information such as age, date last seen, diagnoses, preventive and chronic care that is due and more. Here are some of the ways we can leverage empanelment and telehealth to keep people safe, expand access and capture revenue. Check in on the unseen and unknown. Empanelment is not just about those who seek health care services from us, although that’s often how it starts. The beauty of empanelment is that there should be no people on a clinician’s panel who are “unseen and unknown.” However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 41% of U.S. adults have delayed or avoided medical care during the pandemic because of concerns about COVID-19, which presents us with an opportunity. Identify who hasn’t been seen in the past 6-12 months for each clinician’s panel. Have clinicians go through the list and identify who should receive a check-in call and who should be scheduled for a telehealth visit. There may not be reimbursement for those check-in calls; although there are service codes and reimbursement for virtual check-ins, those check-ins are technically supposed to be initiated by the patient. Conduct advance care planning. If ever there was a time! And it can be accomplished by telehealth — using codes 99497 (~$85) and 99498 (~$74) — with decent reimbursement. Start with all individuals 65 and older in your panel. Ensure high-risk patients know about telehealth. Now more than ever, know who your top 5-10% highest risk patients are, including those at highest risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. These patients will benefit from having telehealth as an option perhaps more than any other population in your practice. Conduct targeted outreach to the top 5-10% high-risk patients to schedule a telehealth visit, if needed or to let them know about telehealth as an option. Address chronic and preventive gaps in care. As people delay care and as team-based care and pre-visit planning workflows seem to fall by the wayside, I am concerned that missed and delayed diagnoses will soar, which is both terrible for individuals and families, but is also one of the most common reasons for malpractice claims. Use panel data to identify who’s due for what: Chronic conditions, e.g., office visits, tests, vaccines, prescription renewals Preventive services, e.g., well-child visits, colorectal cancer screening (CRC), vaccinations Advise patients about the services that are due by phone, text or letter and schedule those for telehealth visits, if needed. Consider this a call to action for primary care practices! If you’re not already leveraging empanelment to optimize telehealth, expand access, make sure people are doing okay and keep people safe, what can you do by next Tuesday to up your game? < Previous News Next News >

The 13 telehealth platforms physicians use the most Katie Adams March 24, 2022 Telephone and Zoom are the two telehealth platforms physicians use the most, according to survey results released March 23 by the American Medical Association. Between Nov. 1 and Dec. 31, the AMA presented 1,657 physicians with a list of telehealth platforms and asked them to identify which ones they have used. Here are those platforms, along with the number of physicians who use them: 1. Audio-only telephone visits (723) 2. Zoom (600) 3. Doximity Video (439) 4. EHR telehealth module or tools (433) 5. Doxy.me (344) 6. Telehealth vendor (340) 7. FaceTime (269) 8. Patient Portal (234) 9. Microsoft Teams (92) 10. Texting (89) 11. Skype (48) 12. Remote patient monitoring tools (46) 13. Asynchronous messaging app (30) Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy. < Previous News Next News >

CHOP Study Explores the Use of Telemedicine in Child Neurology in Largest Study to Date Children's Hospital of Philadelphia September 16, 2022 -- Certain patients were more likely to use telemedicine even with the reopening of in-person appointments, while barriers to telemedicine remained for some families -- PHILADELPHIA, Sept. 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Researchers from the Epilepsy Neurogenetics Initiative (ENGIN) at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) found that across nearly 50,000 visits, patients continued to use telemedicine effectively even with the reopening of outpatient clinics a year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, prominent barriers for socially vulnerable families and racial and ethnic minorities persist, suggesting more work is required to reach a wider population with telemedicine. The findings, which represent the largest study of telemedicine in child neurology to date, were published today by the journal Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid and unprecedented conversion of outpatient clinical care from in-person visits to remote telehealth visits. While telemedicine had been used to deliver care for specific adult patient populations prior to the pandemic, the effectiveness of telemedicine in child neurology as a novel method of care had not been systematically explored. In a prior study published by Neurology in 2020, CHOP researchers found that patients and clinicians had a high rate of satisfaction with telemedicine and many on both sides were interested in using telemedicine for future visits. To that end, the study team wanted to determine the long-term impact of telemedicine on child neurology care during the COVID-19 pandemic, factoring in the reopening of outpatient clinics. The observational study was based on a cohort of 34,837 in-person visits and 14,820 telemedicine outpatient visits between October 2019 and April 2021 across a total of 26,399 child neurology patients. "In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of telemedicine visits, but now that telemedicine visits have been established as part of the care we are able to deliver, we had the opportunity to compare them more thoroughly to in-person visits," said the study's first author Michael Kaufman, MS, a data scientist with ENGIN at CHOP. "With data on nearly 15,000 telemedicine visits, we were able to identify trends in how telemedicine was being used by individuals of different demographic backgrounds, neurological conditions and other variables." The researchers found that telemedicine was a viable option for many patients and was utilized more often than in-person visits for certain patients, such as those with epilepsy and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Other patients, such as those with certain neuromuscular and movement disorders, younger patients, and those needing specific procedures were less likely to receive care by telemedicine. Additionally, the researchers found that self-reported racial and ethnic minority populations in the study as well as those with the highest social vulnerability – a measure of community resilience to stressors on human health – were less likely to participate in telemedicine visits. Two novel metrics were developed to determine access to telemedicine and track delayed care, which revealed further disparities. Some of the most vulnerable individuals were less likely to activate their online patient portals and were more likely to receive delayed care, compared to less vulnerable individuals. "Our group has studied telemedicine extensively, and our findings demonstrate how telemedicine has become a standard component of child neurology care for many patients," said Ingo Helbig, MD, a pediatric neurologist at CHOP, director of the genomic and data science core of CHOP's Epilepsy Neurogenetics Initiative (ENGIN) and senior author on this study. "Increased use of telemedicine was prompted by a public health emergency, and so we need to make sure, as these new tools for patient care remain prevalent, that we're continuing to learn about and address disparities in care and optimize access for socially vulnerable families, so that they have the tools necessary should another similar public health crisis occur." This study was supported by The Hartwell Foundation through an Individual Biomedical Research Award; the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke grants K02 NS112600 and K23 NS102521; the Center Without Walls on ion channel function in epilepsy "Channelopathy-associated Research Center" grant U54 NS108874; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania grant U54 HD086984; intramural funds of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia through the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN); and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health through the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics' (ITMAT) Transdisciplinary Program in Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania grant UL1TR001878. Kaufman et al, "Child neurology telemedicine: analyzing 14 820 patient encounters during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic." Dev Med Child Neurol. Online September 16, 2022. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15406. About Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: A non-profit, charitable organization, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was founded in 1855 as the nation's first pediatric hospital. Through its long-standing commitment to providing exceptional patient care, training new generations of pediatric healthcare professionals, and pioneering major research initiatives, the 595-bed hospital has fostered many discoveries that have benefited children worldwide. Its pediatric research program is among the largest in the country. The institution has a well-established history of providing advanced pediatric care close to home through its CHOP Care Network, which includes more than 50 primary care practices, specialty care and surgical centers, urgent care centers, and community hospital alliances throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey, as well as a new inpatient hospital with a dedicated pediatric emergency department in King of Prussia. In addition, its unique family-centered care and public service programs have brought Children's Hospital of Philadelphia recognition as a leading advocate for children and adolescents. For more information, visit http://www.chop.edu . Contact: Ben Leach Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (609) 634-7906 Leachb@email.chop.edu See original article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chop-study-explores-telemedicine-child-154000001.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr < Previous News Next News >

What an eventual end to the PHE would mean for telehealth Andrea Fox October 17, 2022 Among other impacts, ending the PHE would represent access challenges and a loss of Medicaid coverage for millions, and would end medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder without an in-person exam. Since the COVID-19 public health emergency was declared in 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services has renewed the legislation every 90 days. Close to the end of the most recent expiration date, October 13, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra again signed a renewal determination and it was posted without announcement late in the day. There had been no official news, but a lot of hearsay that the PHE would be renewed once more, because the Biden Administration indicated it would give two months' notice before its expiration. There is also the matter that open enrollment begins on November 1, and without the relaxed enrollment provisions for Medicaid that the PHE provides, the national uninsured rate along with health premium costs would certainly rise. But by definition an "emergency" can't last forever. The inevitable end of the PHE could result in the loss of Medicaid to millions when states review enrollee eligibility and in other impacts to healthcare operations. Questions regarding what will happen to telehealth benefits and the continuum of care in the absence of the PHE loom large. There has been extensive support for making the changes that have launched telehealth and provided the opportunity to serve more patients, but some people want to halt the prescribing of controlled substances via telehealth for mental health and substance abuse disorders and see the Ryan Haight Act – the online pharmacy consumer protection act of 2008 – reinstated. What's at stake Despite the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, which provides a 151-day extension on some flexibilities granted during the COVID-19 public health emergency once the PHE ends, providers and other healthcare professionals engaged in telehealth are eager to prepare for the expiration date. There has been mounting pressure from the Republican Party, including a September 19 letter from Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., with numerous questions about ending emergency powers after President Joe Biden remarked during his September 60 Minutes appearance that "the pandemic is over." "Without a clear plan to wind down pandemic-era policies, the deficit will continue to balloon and the effectiveness of public health measures will wane as the American people continue to be confused by mixed messages and distrust of federal officials," wrote Burr. Despite economic concerns, ending the legal waivers afforded under the PHE could ricochet, hammering against gains made in increased patient access. Dr. Adrienne Boissy, Qualtrics chief medical officer (and former Cleveland Clinic chief experience officer), notes that patients continue to rely on expanded digital access as mental health effects from the pandemic linger. She says that a reversal would limit digital health access, which an overly burdened and understaffed industry has come to rely on. "The ease and convenience telehealth provides are consistent sources of positive patient experiences, as well as decreased total costs of care and less time away from the workplace," she said in a statement to Healthcare IT News. "Comparing 2016 to 2022, clinicians also report better health outcomes for patients, efficiency and less stress/burnout as major drivers for adopting digital tools, including telehealth," she said. "With the PHE, we saw the industry put patients and their access to care first – no longer hindered by location or demographics. "To revert back to reimbursement models that only support in-person care unravels the gains of meeting people where they are – physically and emotionally," said Boissy. "We can’t turn back now," Boissy said. Brad Kittredge, CEO and cofounder of Brightside Health, adds that the country will be short of psychiatrists – by 14,280 to 31,109 – in just a few years. Ending the PHE presents a reduced ability to serve the growing number of patients in need of or seeking mental healthcare, he said. "While there’s no silver bullet solution, telehealth offers the best and most immediate solution to this growing challenge by increasing patient access to mental health specialists without being limited to geographic regions or facilities," Kittredge explained in a statement sent to HITN. "More significantly, telehealth enables us to use technology and data to help clinicians be more efficient and effective at treating their patients, maximizing the impact they can make," he said. Telehealth in legislative limbo During a recent American Telemedicine Association policy update, the ATA's federal and state-level telehealth policy experts described efforts to develop a consistent regulatory framework so telehealth can be deployed across states, be fully leveraged and address the patchwork of 50 different state requirements. Legislators have also proposed broadening access to telehealth through the Telehealth Benefit Expansion for Workers Act, the Telehealth Extension Act and the Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2021, which was passed by the House of Representatives in July, received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance, where it sits. Also at play are a number of loosened restrictions that opened the gateway to online treatment of certain conditions when uptake surged and access to in-person medical care was restricted. Healthcare organizations and retailers entering the space through mergers and acquisitions with healthcare providers have urged the U.S. Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Agency to revise telehealth controlled substance rules. The bill H.R. 7666 – the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 – introduced by Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., which was passed in the House, aims to address this hot-button issue for mental telehealth providers. The bill would permanently eliminate the X waiver, currently not required under the PHE. To qualify for the waiver to dispense buprenorphine for maintenance or detoxification treatment, the practitioner must take an eight-hour training and may only treat up to 30 opioid use disorder patients. Dr. Kristin Mack, a physician in Ticonderoga, N.Y., told MedPage Today that she would like to see the X waiver eliminated permanently. According to the story, rural communities are some of the hardest hit by the opiate epidemic. "We work really hard with community resources to provide counseling and things like that. But if I were to tell somebody, 'Oh, you have to go an hour away to a city to get care for this,' and then they need to be seen monthly, it's just not an option," she said. The Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 was received in the Senate and was referred to its Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions at the time of reporting. Treating opioid use disorders via telehealth It has been more than 10 years since the Ryan Haight Act mandated that DEA establish a rule ensuring that healthcare providers can successfully prescribe controlled substances via telehealth, but there has been no rule set forward. The SUPPORT Act again mandated the DEA issue rulemaking by October 2019 and the fiscal year 2021 final appropriations report requested that the agency establish these rules, according to the website of Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. This past year he urged the Biden Administration to finalize regulations that allow doctors to prescribe controlled substances through telehealth. "In practice, the DEA’s failure to address this issue means that a vast majority of healthcare providers that use telehealth to prescribe controlled substances to and otherwise treat their patients have been deterred in getting them the quality care they need. These restrictions have been temporarily waived during the COVID-19 public health emergency, and I welcome that, but patients and providers need a more permanent and long-term solution to this long-delayed rulemaking," Warner wrote in May 2021. Under the PHE, several virtual behavioral health startups focused on medication-assisted treatment for substance abuse disorder received investment rounds, according to Chris Larson at Behavioral Health Business. According to the story, Doug Nemecek, the chief medical officer of behavioral health for Evernorth, said that not enough people are accessing MAT, and that overdose rates have reached historic highs. "If regulations come back that prevent those companies from being able to deliver care in that way, we’re concerned that it’s going to have a negative impact on patients and our ability to make sure that people have access to the MAT that we want them to have access to," Nemecek said. Evernorth, part of Cigna Corp., is connected to digital MAT companies like Quit Genius. The cofounder of Quit Genius, Dr. Maroof Ahmed, explained in an email to Healthcare IT News that telehealth has filled a void that existed before the PHE. "Telehealth flexibilities and ePrescribing waivers have been crucial in enabling providers to care for patients during the pandemic and have greatly expanded access to care in situations where patients were unable or unwilling to travel to a physical location," he insists. Reinstating Ryan Haight Act requirements also has support Amending the Ryan Haight Act law is an effort largely supported in the healthcare and mental health space. However, Dr. Mimi Winsberg, CMO and the other cofounder of Brightside Health, shared another point of view regarding the dubious practice of prescribing controlled substances without an initial in-person visit. "To count on a public health emergency temporary lifting of laws in order to stimulate growth of your business is perhaps a questionable practice," she told Healthcare IT News, noting that Brightside adhered to not prescribing controlled substances over telemedicine despite the legal waivers. "While a lot of medical visits moved to tele during this sort of difficult part of the pandemic, that now in most specialties, they have gone back to in-person, but what we are seeing in mental health is about 80% have stayed remote," she added. "And so patients are continuing to get their mental healthcare largely through telemedicine." Winsberg entertained the question out loud: "Will they be resistant to in-person appointments if they need certain kinds of prescriptions?" "I don't think they will because we have seen that they're willing to go back to the doctor for other reasons," she added. The net growth of prescription drugs issued – stimulants and other controlled substances – grew during the pandemic, and she says she questions if the growth was largely driven by online practices "that were taking advantage of the lifting of the Ryan Haight Act." Winsberg did acknowledge, however, that an inability to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth for substance abuse disorder, "is potentially an issue," she said. "These laws exist for a reason, and what we have to balance in medicine is the willingness to help people with the do no harm principle." Establishing systematic monitoring of controlled-substance prescribing via telehealth could be achievable, Winsberg said. "But, we'd like to move towards appropriate prescriptions of controlled substances, and if we can find a way to meaningfully regulate that online, then great," she concluded. Equal treatment for mental health disorders In January, Dr. Robert Field and doctoral candidate Kimberly Williams at Drexel University published a commentary on the National Academy of Medicine website on the long overdue policy update needed to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth. The authors say that those who need treatment for opioid use disorder should have the same level of telehealth access as others who receive treatment for other medical concerns. They also noted that the DEA has not created a registration process through the online pharmacy consumer protection act, despite Congressional requests and statutory actions. "Doing so would not only ensure increased access to treatment but also set the stage for systematic monitoring of telemedicine and telephone services to confirm they meet the same rigorous standards of care as in-person services. "Such quality assurance efforts could promote the development of best practice guidelines and reduce variations in care as usage of these modalities increases," they argue. For the mental telehealth provider community wondering if the ability to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth fades away in five months – if the Biden Administration does not intervene and extend the PHE, Congress does not pass legislation and the DEA does not create a registration process for prescribing controlled substances for opioid use disorder via telehealth – the U.S. may face even higher overdose rates. Andrea Fox is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Email: afox@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-eventual-end-phe-would-mean-telehealth < Previous News Next News >

New Study Finds Telehealth Outperforms In-Person Care in HEDIS Measures Eric Wicklund October 06, 2022 Researchers have found that telehealth performed better than in-person care in 11 of 16 HEDIS quality performance measures, but that doesn't mean virtual care is superior to the office visit. KEY TAKEAWAYS A recent study of more than 526,000 patients receiveing care at Wellspan Health sites in 2020 and 2021 found that telehealth outperformed in-person care in 11 of 16 HEDIS quality improvement measures for primary care. The research indicated in-person care was better in medication-based measures, while telehealth scored higher in testing and counseling measures. Researchers stressed that the results show a need for health systems to integrate telehealth with in-person care, enabling patients and providers to select the venue that most suits them and the treatment. New research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) finds that telehealth was superior to in-person care in 11 of 16 quality performance measures for primary care. The study, conducted by researchers at the Robert Graham Center in Washington DC and Pennsylvania-based Wellspan Health, focused on more than 526,000 patients receiving healthcare services at roughly 200 Wellspan Health outpatient sites between March 1, 2020, and November 30, 2021, and used HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) measurements. The researchers, led by Derek Baughman, MD, of the Robert Graham Center and Wellspan Good Samaritan Hospital in Lebanon, Pennsylvania, and Yalda Jabbarpour, MD, and John Westfall, MD, MPH, both of the Robert Graham Center, said the results don't mean that health systems should close their clinics and focus on virtual care. Rather, they should offer telehealth as a part of the overall care plan, particularly for those who face barriers to accessing in-person care. The study noted that in-person care showed better results for all medication-based measures, while telehealth offered better results in testing and counselling measures, such as vaccinations, chronic disease testing, and cancer and depression screenings. "Notwithstanding the statistical significance, the clinical relevance of these findings is perhaps more meaningful at the population health level for evaluating the outcomes of adding telemedicine as a care venue," Baughman and his colleagues noted. "Moreover, telemedicine exposure (especially blended office and telemedicine care) likely simulates a likely real-life scenario for the health consumer." "Practically, these findings provide reassurance for health entities seeking to add telemedicine to their care capacity without reducing quality of care," they added. "And as we found, embracing telemedicine for enhancing certain aspects of care might be an avenue for enhancing quality performance in primary care." Baughman and his team said it wasn't clear why telehealth outperformed in-person care, though they noted that a telehealth platform offers better opportunities for care providers to reach out multiple times to patients to "engage in quality measure-promoting intervention." They also noted that some treatments, such as the initiation of a lifelong or life-changing medication program, are best begun in person, and perhaps shifted to virtual platforms for follow-up. "Future studies could provide more granularity on optimizing the specific role of telemedicine in clinical scenarios, eg, understanding whether there is an association between stages of hypertension and effect modification attributable to the management venue or an association between venue and number of blood pressure medications," they wrote. "This would provide insight on where to invest in health care infrastructure and what clinical venue would be most valuable. This could also guide venue selection for patients initiating antihypertensive therapy vs patients requiring a third antihypertensive. Such insight would promote win-win environments to increase value: improved health outcomes for patients and incentive for clinicians and health systems operating in value-based care models." Eric Wicklund is the Innovation and Technology Editor for HealthLeaders. See original article: https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/telehealth/new-study-finds-telehealth-outperforms-person-care-hedis-measures < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth now serves unmet needs, says athenahealth Andrea Fox October 04, 2022 Virtual care is playing a more significant role in filling gaps in delivery, having evolved from pandemic-era visit replacement, according to a new study from the cloud IT developer. Increased telehealth utilization points to wider use as a diagnostic and triage tool, particularly among those with chronic conditions. WHY IT MATTERS New research, based on a Dynata survey of 2,000 U.S. adults that was commissioned by athenahealth conducted in June and July of this year, and data on booked and completed appointments through the athenahealth electronic health record suggest telehealth is now integrated across the care continuum. "Our data shows that after the height of the pandemic, many physicians continue to rely on telehealth, as they see the tremendous value it can provide," said Jessica Sweeney-Platt, vice president of research and editorial strategy at athenahealth, in a statement. The use of telehealth is especially evident among those with chronic conditions. While 24% of those surveyed say their health concern didn't warrant an in-person visit, 23% of respondents indicated their telehealth visits were scheduled check-ins related to chronic conditions, and 9% used telehealth as well for ad hoc care for their conditions. The respondents with chronic conditions reported using telehealth in place of as well as between visits to help manage their conditions, suggesting telehealth is serving a previously unmet need for proactive healthcare. Telehealth has also increased the willingness of patients to seek mental healthcare, with 25% of survey respondents indicating they opted for telehealth sessions to address new mental health conditions. Twenty-three percent shared that they were more likely to ask for mental health support because telehealth was available to them. The findings also revealed patterns of use based on gender and race. The EHR data from January 1, 2019, through April 30, 2022, evaluated in the study showed that in 2021, male providers had 24% lower odds of providing a telehealth visit than their female counterparts. Provider gender also affected patient adoption of telehealth. Patients who worked with a single male provider had 60% lower odds of adoption compared to patients with only a female provider. "Additionally, previous research has shown that female clinicians tend to spend more time with patients, which could further explain higher provider adoption of telehealth among females compared to males, with female providers using telehealth as an additional tool for connecting with patients," said Sweeney-Platt. The research also showed Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to use telehealth services, but less likely to do so with one dedicated provider, suggesting improved access to care but not improved continuity of care. THE LARGER TREND A previous study of 40.7 million commercially-insured adults in the United States – a study of a nationally representative population – published earlier this year found that patients with acute clinical conditions who first sought care via telehealth were more likely to follow up at the emergency room or be admitted to the hospital that those who sought care in person. However, when it came to chronic conditions, follow-up was less likely for those with an initial telehealth visit, finding telehealth comparable to in-person care. The researchers from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, along with collaborators from Blue Health Intelligence and the Digital Medicine Society compared telehealth and in-person encounters by looking at factors associated with changing patterns of telehealth use beyond the initial months of the pandemic. ON THE RECORD "Our research brings to light the vital role telehealth can play in patient care. Not only does it increase access to care, but it can drive better patient outcomes when used as an extension of in-person visits to provide continuity of care," said Sweeney-Platt in announcing the findings. "Telehealth is now a core tenet of healthcare delivery in the U.S.," said Greg Carey, director of regulatory and government affairs at athenahealth, according to a prepared statement about telehealth fulfilling its promise on the company's website. Correction: The original version of the article indicated that the Dynata survey was of athenaOne network patients. Andrea Fox is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Email: afox@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-now-serves-unmet-needs-says-athenahealth < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine & Telehealth: For Allied Health Professionals, Too Faith Lane April 20, 2022 With more and more people using telehealth applications since the pandemic, one education expert asked how to expand training to include Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists According to a recent study, one in five adults polled about health care during the coronavirus pandemic said that they or someone in their household delayed receiving medical care or were unable to get care, due to office closures or shutdowns. Although the pollsters focused questions about doctor or dental appointments, providers across the board experienced disruption in their specialty areas, including Peggy Stein, OTD, OTR/L, CHT, an Occupational Therapist in Oregon. Occupational therapy, or OT, focuses on how people perform activities that are most important to their daily lives, so for people who need it, missing out affects quality of life, according to Stein. “OT is important to assess the ability of people to participate in usual activities. Work is important and many people equate occupation with work. However, life involves more than work. Participating in life includes taking care of ourselves, our family and friends, pets, home, yard, or attending to community. These are all ‘occupations’,” Stein said. “The state did halt therapy for a few weeks, and many providers had upheaval for several months,” she said. And while Stein eventually returned to her practice, the buzz surrounding providing telehealth continued in the medical and therapeutic communities. “Back in March 2020, we hosted a webinar. We had numerous occupational therapists, physical therapists (PTs) and speech language pathologists (SLPs) in attendance; more than we have previously seen attending our telemedicine training programs,” said Melanie Esher-Blair, MAdm, Distance Education & Event Coordinator for the Southwest Telehealth Resource Center (SWTRC) and the Arizona Telemedicine Program (ATP). “They wanted more information on how to put the ‘tele’ into their scope of practice to maintain continuity of care for their clients,” said Esher-Blair. She said she knew the SWTRC and the ATP had the experts for developing a program. Both OT and PT national associations have information regarding how telehealth fits into the scope of practice, so attendees of the March webinar agreed creating a training around telehealth was important. An interdisciplinary team worked together to come up with the Occupational and Physical Therapy Webinar Series. For full post and access to video: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/telemedicine-telehealth-allied-health-professionals-too < Previous News Next News >

Nation's 1st telehealth chair on changing culture Georgina Gonzalez February 17, 2022 Sarah Rush, MD, serves as the chief medical information officer of Akron (Ohio) Children's Hospital, and in May 2020, she became what is believed to be the first endowed chair of telehealth in the nation. She spoke to Becker's about the creation of the role and what it has meant for the hospital. The chair position, made possible by a $1 million donation from philanthropist Marci Matthews, was spurred by the telehealth boom brought on by the pandemic. In 2019, Akron Children's had just 275 telehealth appointments, but in 2020 had completed over 55,000 virtual visits. Also, in spite of the general national decline in telehealth usage, Akron completed around 45,000 telehealth visits in 2021. Despite the hospital's previous efforts to integrate telehealth into behavioral and emergency department care, Dr. Rush said it was the pandemic that caused the change. "I think, conceptually, people had not been able to really wrap their brains around what telehealth could do," she said. "I think organically through the process of doing and seeing and both sides of it, the providers learning how to do it, the patient learning how to do it, it just sort of naturally happened. Now I think it's become really ingrained in a way that I don't think it would have had we not been put into that situation of having to do it." Read full article here: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/telehealth/nation-s-1st-telehealth-chair-on-changing-culture.html?origin=CIOE&utm_source=CIOE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter&oly_enc_id=1372I2146745E8F < Previous News Next News >

How Does a Telemedicine Pain Program Work in Rural American with Multi-Vulnerable Patient Populations? Dax Trujillo, MD July 20, 2022 In April 2017 Summit Healthcare started a multi-disciplinary program to treat patients with chronic and acute pain in the White Mountains of Arizona. Our patient service area is HRSA-designated as having a shortage of providers and medically underserved. The area is the size of Rhode Island and includes Native American reservations and other vulnerable populations. Many of our patients live in a high poverty area which makes access to care challenging. In order to provide multi-disciplinary services that include interventional procedures, monitored medication management and cognitive behavior therapy, we needed to create a hybrid program. Our program incorporates in-person, video/audio and telephone visits. By using three different modes of care delivery we were able to reach and follow more patients with better outcomes. Since April 1, 2017 we have had over 900 patients participate in our telemedicine pain program. The visits include virtual appointments for medical management, behavioral therapy, and general wellness checks after an in-person visit; virtual check-ins for procedure or testing follow-ups and eVisits via email communication to answer questions and/or review prescription issues or re-ordering. Due to the rurality of the service area we estimate that patients were saved from having to travel 66,144 miles to a physician’s office. This was a significant relief to patients with limited means to transportation, knowing that their weekly, monthly in-patient visits were reduced to quarterly in-patient visits. Patient satisfaction has been high due to the reduction of travel time and costs. Simultaneously, the patient perceived they were being more closely monitored and their pain issues addressed in a timely manner. Another benefit is that more than one professional can join a telemedicine visit with the patient which allows a more holistic and comprehensive visit for better value based care of the patient. By providing virtual visits as part of the entire treatment program, we have saved thousands of dollars in chronic pain treatment costs. Through evidence-based research we know that patients are achieving better healthcare outcomes in this hybrid program by incorporating telemedicine technology. Our program has had overall success with addressing pain but there are some risks involved that must be addressed within your institution to provide a platform that is HIPPA compliant and protects critical sensitive health information. Providing a secure platform must be a top priority when delivering pain treatment virtually due to the sensitive nature of the disease/treatments with this patient population. While most patients do well with the hybrid program we do have patients for whom it is not appropriate. Due to our location, a subset of patients do not have access to broadband internet service so we cannot perform visits via video or sometimes audio. Other patients have expressed a preference for in-person visits while another group prefers all visits to be virtual. Patients needing neuraxial interventions or surgeries will need to be seen in-person. Each patient has their own unique circumstances so having a hybrid pain treatment program with various care delivery options allows us to reach more patients previously not being treated for their chronic pain issues. In the future we will purchase a remote patient monitoring platform/equipment that can be used with our chronic pain patients to better track their vitals, physical and mental health. This will also allow us to manage medications and behavioral issues related to pain and opioid addiction, both of which are prevalent in our service area. Our hospital system is also developing a hospital at home program which will incorporate the telemedicine pain program for patients with co-morbidities. The future of healthcare access is using hybrid delivery of care systems that include telemedicine, to improve accessibility and outcomes for chronic pain patients. For original article: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/how-does-telemedicine-pain-program-work-rural-american-multi-vulnerable-patient < Previous News Next News >