Expanded Medicare Telehealth Coverage for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Services Furnished by Opioid Treatment Programs Sunny J. Levine Hannah E. Zaitlin Nathaniel M. Lacktman November 09, 2022 Starting January 1, 2023, Medicare will cover telehealth-based treatment services delivered by federally-accredited opioid treatment programs (OTPs), commonly referred to as “methadone clinics.” This new reimbursement is intended to further the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) objectives in its 2022 Behavioral Health Strategy, with a particular focus on improving access to substance use disorder (SUD) prevention, treatment, and recovery services. To this end, CMS added several expansion opportunities for OTPs, including telehealth coverage. However, these flexibilities do not extend to SUD treatment provided outside an OTP, such as office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) services. Details of the new coverage rules are contained in the 2023 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule (Final Rule), and summarized below. Background and History of Medicare Telehealth Coverage of SUD Treatment Prior to the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), to initiate treatment with buprenorphine at an OTP, a practitioner needed to perform a complete in-person physical evaluation. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrating (SAMHSA) waived this requirement for the duration of the PHE, allowing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) practitioners to initiate treatment with buprenorphine via audio-video telehealth and/or audio-only telephone communications without an initial in-person evaluation (subject to state law restrictions). This temporary exemption only applies to OTP patients treated with buprenorphine; it does not apply to new patients treated with methadone. CMS also extended coverage for SUD treatment services provided via telehealth. While Medicare telehealth services fall under Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, which generally limits payment for telehealth services to patients located in specific types of medical settings (originating sites) in mostly rural areas, the SUPPORT Act amended Section 1834(m), by removing the originating site and geographic limitation for telehealth services provided to individuals with a diagnosed or co-occurring mental health disorder (including a SUD) delivered on or after July 1, 2019. In 2020, CMS established a new Part B benefit category for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provided by OTPs. The covered benefit includes MAT for patients with OUD, a leading treatment modality that combines prescribing FDA-approved medication (e.g., methadone and buprenorphine) with counseling and other behavioral therapy, to provide a whole person approach. Subsequently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA) permanently removed the geographic restrictions and added the patient’s home as a qualifying originating site for telehealth services provided for the diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a mental health disorder. Under the CY 2022 PFS final rule, CMS revised the definition of “interactive telecommunication system” to allow the use of audio-only communications technology for telemental health services under certain conditions when the beneficiary is located at their home. New Changes to Medicare OTP Telehealth Services Under the Final Rule, CMS made the following changes relating to OTP telehealth services: 1. OTPs can use the OTP intake add-on code to bill for the initiation of buprenorphine treatment through two-way interactive audio-video communication technology, as clinically appropriate, and in compliance with all applicable requirements (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). 2. Audio-only telephone calls can be used to initiate buprenorphine treatment at OTPs when two-way audio-video communications technology is not available to the beneficiary, and all other requirements are met. 1. CMS interprets “not available to the beneficiary” to include “circumstances in which the beneficiary is not capable of or has not consented to the use of devices that permit a two-way, audio/video interaction because in each of these instances audio/video communication technology is not able to be used in furnishing services to the beneficiary.” 3. After the initiation of buprenorphine treatment, OTPs can continue to use audio-only telephone calls to perform periodic patient assessments when two-way audio-video is not available (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). This flexibility will be in place until the end of CY 2023. CMS Recognized Broad Stakeholder Support for Telehealth SUD Treatment In comments to the new rules, stakeholders lauded the benefits of two-way audio-video communications technology used to initiate treatment with buprenorphine. CMS concurred, noting it is “of critical importance to individuals who have limited ability to attend in-person appointments or who are disincentivized to do so due to perceived stigma and fear.” CMS also acknowledged that audio-only flexibilities “further promote equity for individuals who are economically disadvantaged, live in rural areas, are racial and ethnic minorities, lack access to reliable broadband or internet access, or do not possess devices with video functions.” CMS declined to address comments relating to issues outside the scope of the final rule, including: 1) comments related to allowing prescribers to initiate buprenorphine treatment for SUDs without an in-person evaluation in other settings (outside of OTPs); 2) coordinating with DEA to create a special registration for telehealth providers under the Ryan Haight Act; and 3) developing an add-on code for Contingency Management. While the final rule does not extend coverage to OBOT treatment – which has proven a successful treatment option during the COVID-19 PHE – it evidences CMS’s view of technology as a viable way to provide life-saving SUD treatment to vulnerable beneficiaries. © 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 313 See original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/expanded-medicare-telehealth-coverage-opioid-use-disorder-treatment-services < Previous News Next News >

CMS Warns Providers to Bill Correctly Center for Connected Health Policy May 2021 OIG is currently conducting several audits on telehealth In mid-April, CMS sent out a Medicare Learning Network (MLN) Connects Newsletter with a reminder to providers to bill correctly for telehealth services. In the short section in their newsletter, CMS cites a 2018 Office of Inspector General (OIG) report that found that there was a significant amount of telehealth claims that were improperly paid, and thus not billed correctly. As the OIG is currently conducting several audits on telehealth, it is possible that they may come to a similar conclusion again. The section also refers providers to several resources to ensure they are billing correctly, including the: Telehealth Services MLN booklet: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/TelehealthSrvcsfctsht.pdf Medicare Claims Processing Manual: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Downloads/clm104c12.pdf Telehealth Payment Eligibility Analyzer https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/medicare/telehealth List of Covered Telehealth Services https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/Telehealth/Telehealth-Codes For policies specific to the public health emergency (PHE), CCHP also recommends providers review the CMS resources listed in the Federal COVID-19 section in CCHP’s Policy Finder, as there are several telehealth flexibilities currently in place as a result of the PHE. CCHP's Policy Finder: https://www.cchpca.org/federal/?category=covid-19&topic=originating-site < Previous News Next News >

New Wave of Federal Bipartisan Bills to Expand Telehealth Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 A good majority of the recently introduced bills focus on increasing telehealth reimbursement, however a few look to increase funding for telehealth services and infrastructure. At present, CCHP is tracking over 100 pieces of telehealth legislation in the current federal legislative session. This month we have seen a number of bipartisan bills introduced, continuing the federal push to expand telehealth availability and codify flexibilities allowed during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE). A good majority of the recently introduced bills focus on increasing telehealth reimbursement, however a few look to increase funding for telehealth services and infrastructure. It is notable the significant amount of support from both sides of the aisle for telehealth. For instance, representatives Dan Newhouse (R-WA) and Tom O’Halleran (D-AZ) introduced the Rural Remote Monitoring Patient Act (HR 4008) that would establish a pilot grant program to support the use of remote patient monitoring in rural areas. Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) introduced as part of a package of telehealth bills a reintroduction of a bill similar to legislation from 2020 titled the Telehealth Health Savings Account (HSA) Act (S 2097). The Telehealth HSA Act would allow employers to offer high-deductible health plans that include telehealth services without limiting employees’ ability to use health savings accounts. According to Kennedy’s press release, “a current IRS regulation stops employees from making or receiving contributions to HSAs if they hold a high-deductible health plan that waives the deductible for telehealth services, meaning employees holding high-deductible health plans often need to pay out of pocket for telehealth services. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act (HR 748) temporarily waived this regulation, but S 2110 would make the waiver permanent.” We have also seen a few of the recent bills look at audio-only and codifying pandemic telehealth flexibilities. The Protecting Rural Telehealth Access Act (S 1988) by Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and also sponsored by Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), would: *Allow payment parity for audio-only telehealth services *Make permanent the ability for patients to be treated at home *Let rural health clinics (RHCs) and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) serve as distant sites for telehealth services The Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2021 by Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), introduced with Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI), makes the following permanent changes: *Removes originating site and geographical limitations *Maintains telehealth flexibilities for RHCs/FQHCs *Expands coverage for audio-only services *Removes restrictions that limit clinicians’ ability to remotely monitor and track patient health and provide them access to innovative digital devices Additionally, we have seen bipartisan support around broadband legislation, such as from Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Angus King (I-Maine), and Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who recently introduced legislation which seeks to address the digital divide. Their Broadband Reform and Investment to Drive Growth in the Economy (BRIDGE) Act of 2021 would allow states to deploy “future-proof” networks able to meet communities’ broadband needs, including supporting local initiatives on affordability, adoption, and inclusion. According to Bennet’s press release, The BRIDGE Act would: *Provide $40 billion to States, Tribal Governments, and U.S. Territories for affordable, high- speed broadband *Prioritize unserved, underserved, and high-cost areas with investments in “future proof” networks *Encourage gigabit-level internet wherever possible while raising the minimum speeds for new broadband networks to at least 100/100 Mbps, with flexibility for areas where this is technologically or financially impracticable *Emphasize affordability and inclusion by requiring at least one affordable option *Increase choice and competition by empowering local and state decision-making, lifting bans against municipal broadband networks, and allowing more entities to compete for funding Lastly, additional information was just released regarding Cures 2.0 – another bipartisan bill, which creates the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), a President Biden budget request proposal. According to a discussion draft and section-by-section summary, Cures 2.0 will address a variety of areas, including telehealth access, while incorporating and building upon several additional bipartisan bills, such as the Telehealth Improvement for Kids’ Essential Services (TIKES) Act (H.R. 1397 / S. 1798) and Telehealth Modernization Act (H.R. 1332 / S. 368). The telehealth provisions proposed in Cures 2.0 include: *Review the impact of telehealth on patient health and encourage better collaboration *Provide guidance and strategies to states on effectively integrating telehealth into their Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) *Make many of the COVID-19 PHE flexibilities post-pandemic permanent, such as: -Removing the geographic and originating site restrictions -Expanding the range of health care providers that can be reimbursed by Medicare for furnishing telehealth services to any health care professional eligible to bill Medicare -Enhancing telehealth services for use by FQHCs, RHCs, hospices, and for home dialysis The authors anticipate that the Cures 2.0 bill will be introduced in the coming weeks and hope to see it signed in the fall. While the fate of these telehealth bills is yet to be seen, it does seem to highlight strong federal support for expanding access to telehealth post PHE with such a large amount of bipartisanship support behind them. Given Medicare’s historically conservative approach in regard to telehealth pre-PHE, any additional shift would be significant. CCHP will continue to update its tracking tools and monitor the ever evolving telehealth landscape as we continue to move through the current federal legislative session. < Previous News Next News >

Using Telemedicine When it Makes Sense Adam Ang October 11, 2022 Patients worldwide prefer a mix of in-person and virtual care moving forward from the pandemic. During the pandemic, organisations across private and public healthcare systems have been rethinking their care delivery models. This is one of the major trends Ronald L. Emerson, Global Healthcare Lead at Zoom, shared virtually in the keynote session, "The Rise of Digital First and Decentralized Healthcare," at the HIMSS22 APAC conference. He was joined by Benjamin Lim, Zoom's APAC Leader for ISV Platform Business, who moderated the discussion in person. Recently commissioned research by Zoom found that patients who have used telehealth once prefer a hybrid mode of care post-COVID-19. This has given rise to digital-first healthcare, which does not mean "digital only." "What it does mean is that many healthcare systems, public and private, are developing virtual care models or hybrid models of care," Emerson said. "They thought to let the interaction or the clinical situation dictate the level of care that is needed… If they can handle [visits] over telemedicine and take care of the patient, the patient doesn't need more expensive care. They don't have to come to the emergency room or the hospital or the physician's office. And so we're seeing a large shift in that area and it's decreasing the entry point into the healthcare system," he noted. Rather than an all-digital model of care, a care model that makes sense to a patient's situation is ideal to bridge the gap in healthcare access. "I think our goal with telemedicine is how we utilise it when it makes sense. I am not for an all-digital care model, an all-video model, an all-virtual care model; I'm all for a model that makes sense based on the actual clinical application that can lower the threshold and increase access when people need the care [so] then we can make a better decision on the clinical disposition of the patient," Emerson shared. Telemedicine adoption Another key trend is the rise of video-assisted virtual visits during the pandemic. Care providers are now getting their money's worth in using cost-efficient virtual care technologies. In taking on a vendor's telemedicine platform, care providers usually consider the following: patient acceptability, clinical efficacy, and cost and sustainability. "We're actually seeing the return on investment and sustainability of the project. Vendors and organizations like Zoom have really lowered the price point where these projects are sustainable," Emerson said. Zoom has found its success in integrating as few workflows as possible in an organisation's existing centralised platform. "Healthcare professionals do not want any more platforms to manage. They wanna use their sort of centralized platform if they have electronic medical records," he mentioned. Decentralised healthcare Finally, Emerson noted how organisations are making efforts to reach out to patients across the continuum of care and work to provide the same levels of care they would receive in an in-hospital setting. This trend of decentralised healthcare is happening, he claimed, because health systems now are not just focusing on sickness but also on the ability to keep people healthy through wellness and prevention, education, and better discharge planning – all of which require virtual technology and communication. "We expect to see more and more of this [in] other places," he quipped. Virtual health as a strategic goal For organisations looking to develop their own digitally-enabled care delivery models, Emerson shared that the way to success is by making virtual health a strategic goal in their care provision. "That means the doctors are on board, it's written in their job descriptions. [It's going to be a] part of the delivery system of how we take care of people," he said. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/asia/using-telemedicine-when-it-makes-sense < Previous News Next News >

Audio-Only Telehealth Visits During Pandemic Draw GAO Scrutiny Scott Mace October 03, 2022 The federal oversight agency recommends CMS adopt new coding procedures to compare care quality to in-person visits. With pandemic-fueled temporary waivers on telehealth leading to a surge in telehealth visits in 2020, especially on audio-only platforms, the practice is overdue for its own exam for effectiveness and privacy, according to a new Government Accounting Office (GAO) report. The use of telehealth services topped 53 million visits in the period between April and December 2020. During the same period in 2019, only 5 million such visits occurred. Many of those were conducted by phone or non-video telehealth, which was rarely allowed prior to the pandemic. [See also: CMS Proposes to Cut Audio_only Telehealth Coverage.] The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has monitored some risks to program integrity related to these telehealth waivers, but the GAO report found that CMS "lacks complete data on the use of audio-only technology and telehealth visits furnished in beneficiaries' homes," in part because no billing mechanism exists to identify all these telehealth visits. "Providers are not required to use available codes to identify all instances of audio-only visits," the GAO reported. "Moreover, providers are not required to use available codes to identify visits furnished in beneficiaries' homes." The GAO said this coding is important to monitor the quality of these telehealth services as compared to equivalent in-person services. "CMS has not comprehensively assessed the quality of telehealth services delivered under the waivers and has no plans to do so, which is inconsistent with CMS' quality strategy," the GAO said. "Without an assessment of the quality of telehealth services, CMS may not be able to fully ensure that services lead to improved health outcomes." The GAO offered three recommendations for CMS going forward: 1. Develop a new billing modifier or make clearer how to bill audio-only office visits for better tracking; 2. Require providers to use existing site of service codes when beneficiaries receive Medicare telehealth services at home; and 3. Assess the quality of telehealth services delivered during the public health emergency. Finally, the GAO urged the Health and Human Services Department's Office of Civil Rights to offer additional education, outreach, and other resources to providers to help them explain risks to privacy and security that patients may face during telehealth visits. Scott Mace is a contributing writer for HealthLeaders. See original article: https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/technology/audio-only-telehealth-visits-during-pandemic-draw-gao-scrutiny < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth, physical therapy and the pandemic: Lessons for all Bill Siwicki February 14, 2022 A University of Washington clinical instructor explains the benefits and challenges of therapy and technology. For vulnerable patient populations – and for those who just prefer the convenience of care at home – telemedicine has been a success. But it still has its limitations. For example, the precise movements and exercises involved in physical therapy rehab are hard for a patient to accomplish remotely. A provider on a video call may seem about as valuable as a YouTube video. But there are new technologies and strategies that link patients, safely, to at-home physical therapy care that balances telemedicine with in-person visits. Many experts say this is the future of telemedicine: a hybrid of in-person and virtual care. To read the entire article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-physical-therapy-and-pandemic-lessons-all < Previous News Next News >

NMTHA Webinars Available on Website New Mexico Telehealth Alliance Dec. 14, 2021 Did you miss one of our webinars this year? Did you know you can access them on the NMTHA website and view them at your leisure? Topics include HIPAA compliance, expanding telemed services, billing and coding and more. Did you miss one of our webinars this year? Did you know you can access them on the NMTHA website and view them at your leisure? Topics include HIPAA compliance, expanding telemed services, billing and coding and more. < Previous News Next News >

Spending Bill to Extend Telehealth, Hospital-at-Home Waivers for 2 Years Anuja Vaidya December 20, 2022 The year-end package includes two-year extensions for Medicare telehealth flexibilities enacted during the pandemic and the Acute Hospital Care at Home Program. The year-end $1.7 trillion spending bill includes provisions to extend pandemic-era telehealth and hospital-at-home waivers for two years. The legislation, released Tuesday, aims to avert a government shutdown and includes several healthcare provisions, including reducing the 2023 Medicare payment cuts to 2 percent from 4.5 percent. In a win for telehealth proponents, the sweeping bill also includes a two-year extension of telehealth-related regulatory flexibilities for Medicare beneficiaries put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic. A previous bill extended these flexibilities for five months after the public health emergency expires. Now, the waivers will remain in place through Dec. 31, 2024, if the legislation passes both the House and Senate and is enacted into law. The flexibilities include eliminating geographic restrictions on originating sites for telehealth services, enabling Medicare beneficiaries to receive services from any location, and allowing federally qualified health centers and rural health centers to continue providing telehealth services. Further, the waivers lift the initial in-person care requirements for those receiving mental healthcare through telehealth and allow for continued coverage of audio-only telehealth services. In addition to extending the Medicare telehealth waivers, the new legislation includes a two-year extension of the Acute Hospital Care at Home Program. Introduced in November 2020 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Acute Hospital Care at Home Program allows treatment for common acute conditions in home settings. As of Dec. 16, 259 hospitals across 37 states were participating in the program. The safe harbor for telehealth coverage for those with high deductible health plans (HDHPs) with health savings accounts (HSAs) will also be extended by two years if the new bill passes. The safe harbor provision enables people with HDHP-HSAs to receive telehealth coverage without meeting their annual deductible first. "Today, our Congressional telehealth champions on both sides of the aisle came through for the American people and for ATA and ATA Action members, by meeting our plea for more certainty around telehealth access for the next two years, while we continue to work with policymakers to make telehealth access a permanent part of our healthcare delivery for the future," said Kyle Zebley, senior vice president of public policy at American Telemedicine Association and executive director of the association's advocacy arm, ATA Action, in an emailed press release. But the new legislation does not include a similar two-year extension for the waiver of the Ryan Haight Act. The Ryan Haight Act of 2008 required providers to meet with a patient in person before being allowed to prescribe controlled substances for that person via telehealth. The in-person visit requirement was temporarily lifted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, several stakeholders, including the American Telemedicine Association and American Psychiatric Association, have asked that Congress permanently eliminate the Ryan Haight Act. The latest spending bill does, however, direct the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to create final regulations regarding the circumstances under which a special registration for telemedicine may be issued. Providers obtaining a special registration for telemedicine would be allowed to waive the in-person visit requirement. Earlier this month, the American Hospital Association had also asked that the DEA clarify regulations for the special registration process and provide recommendations for an interim plan. "…the hard work continues, as we persist in pressing telehealth permanency and creating a lasting roadblock to the 'telehealth cliff,'" said Zebley. "Additionally, we will continue to work with Congress and the Biden administration to make sure that a predictable and preventable public health crisis never occurs by giving needed certainty to the huge number of Americans relying on the clinically appropriate care achieved through the Ryan Haight in-person waiver." See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/spending-bill-to-extend-telehealth-hospital-at-home-waivers-by-2-years < Previous News Next News >

San Juan Regional Medical Center gets CARES Act funding to expand telehealth services By Hannah Grover, Farmington Daily Times February 15, 2021 AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. The pandemic changed things. San Juan Regional Medical Center and San Juan Health Partners worked quickly to expand telehealth offerings. Now the hospital is receiving CARES Act funding to help improve its technology and better provide that service. "Demand (for telehealth) was immediate and has continued to grow," Miliffe said. San Juan Regional Medical Center will receive $1.25 million in CARES Act funding to supply emergency generators as well as to make upgrades in the IT network, according to a press release from the office of Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-NM. IT upgrades, new generators on the way These technology upgrades will support telehealth and field hospital operation projects that have been implemented in an effort to bolster the hospital's response to COVID-19. The grant funding will be matched with $617,000 in local funds. All locations except for San Juan Health Partners Urgent Care began offering a mixture of telephone and video visits in an effort to comply with public health orders, sustain the services offered and prevent the spread of the coronavirus, according to Barbara Charles, administrative director for San Juan Health Partners. The medical center's network infrastructure wasn't designed to service the high demands of video consultations and Miliffe said the IT team has had to push the current capabilities. "However, significant upgrades to the wired and wireless infrastructure is needed to sustain and improve the existing experience, and allow for the continued growth in telehealth demands driven by the pandemic," he said. "This funding will make a fundamental difference in our ability to serve our community’s needs." Your stories live here. Fuel your hometown passion and plug into the stories that define it. Create Account COVID: State health department closes Home Depot over COVID-19 cases One of the barriers that the center has seen is the remote nature of the community. Many patients can only connect through phone due to limited internet connectivity or cell service that can't support video. "The inability to consistently connect by audio and video is an ongoing barrier," Charles said. This funding is part of more than $2.24 million of CARES Act money that will be coming to northwest New Mexico to address healthcare and economic needs. In addition to San Juan Regional Medical Center, the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments, which is based in Gallup, has been awarded $990,000 to address economic development needs of small businesses and entrepreneurs that have been harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments serves Cibola, McKinley and San Juan counties. According to the press release, the council of governments hopes to create 100 jobs and retain 100 jobs through a revolving loan fund that this funding will assist in creating. Legislative session:New Mexico lawmakers work to address economic impact of COVID-19 U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich Heinrich said in a press release that he has been "moved by the resiliency and grit" of rural New Mexico communities as they have faced a variety of public health and economic challenges related to the pandemic. "That is why I fought so hard to include funding in the CARES Act to help New Mexico’s rural health care systems, small businesses, and entrepreneurs to weather this storm," he said. "This funding is long-overdue and I will continue working for federal resources that New Mexico’s rural communities need to take on the COVID-19 pandemic and rebuild our economy in a way that supports everyone." Heinrich as well as Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-NM, and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-NM, announced $2.24 million of CARES Act funding for northwest New Mexico on Feb. 12. San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois Hospital: Telehealth is here to stay San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois thanked the lawmakers for the funding in the press release and emphasized that the hospital provides essential healthcare services for the Four Corners area. "This funding will ensure that we can meet the diverse needs of our patients and community and improve care for those we are privileged to serve," he said. While the pandemic jump started the demand for telehealth in the community, Miliffe said the San Juan Regional Medical Center does not anticipate it fading away. "Looking ahead to post-pandemic times, we see a long term and stable need for these services in our community as patients look to receive their healthcare in more of a consumer fashion, with services and offerings tailored around them as the individual," Charles, of San Juan Health Partners, said. "It is expected that the need or demand for telemedicine will continue long term. Many patients with health needs that may not require an in-person or face-to-face visit may find this option more flexible and convenient. Additionally, given the unknowns of the pandemic – this remains a safe alternative to in-person visits for patient to seek as needed or routine healthcare needs." Charles said telehealth also plays a key role in the COVID to Home program, which allows COVID-19 patients to receive close monitoring while in self-isolation at their own houses. "Because of this program’s close monitoring through telehealth visits, many patients have been able to stay out of the hospital and manage their care at home through the telephone or video calls. In other cases, caregivers have been able to intervene to coordinate a higher level of care for patients who needed it," she said. "To date, the COVID to Home program has helped more than 1,200 patients manage their care at home, something that would not have been possible without telehealth." Hannah Grover covers government for The Daily Times. She can be reached at 505-564-4652 or via email at hgrover@daily-times.com . This story has been modified to correct the attribution on some quotes. < Previous News Next News >

CB Insights Report: Global Telehealth Investment is Still on The Rise Kat Jercich, Healthcare IT News August 2021 Researchers found a 169% year-over-year increase in global telehealth investment, with the top five deals alone worth $1.5 billion. A new report from CB Insights found that global telehealth investment rose for the fourth consecutive quarter in Q2 of 2021 – with teletherapy deals representing a substantial share. The State Of Telehealth report found that much of the growth was pushed by accelerating digital transformation initiatives, as well as patient experience prioritization. At the same time, stakeholders and thought leaders voiced concerns about health inequity, and lobbyists mounted the pressure for long-term regulatory reform. WHY IT MATTERS The telehealth train has continued to chug along, despite dire warnings from health advocates about what might happen if the public health emergency expires without any action from Congress. Indeed, the CB Insights report was optimistic from a financial perspective: It found that global telehealth investment grew 17% quarter-over-quarter compared to Q1 of 2021, and 169% year-over-year, to reach a record high of $5 billion across 163 deals. As far as segments go, telemedicine providers, platforms and marketplaces saw their first decline in six quarters, with mergers and acquisitions at a record high. Meanwhile, teletherapy – especially with regard to mental health and chronic diseases – was an investor hotspot, and virtual care enablement companies saw a funding high. Remote monitoring and diagnostics companies raised $841 million across 33 deals, with decentralized lab tests and vital sign monitors flagged as notable business development areas. And telepharmacy had a strong funding quarter, particularly when it came to direct-to-consumer brands. The report also found that telehealth visits appear to be stabilizing at levels above those pre-pandemic, although they are still below the rates seen in March and April 2020. THE LARGER TREND Retail giants in the United States appear to be betting big on telehealth, even amidst looming uncertainty about its regulatory future. Walmart Health and Amazon Care have both signaled their plans to expand virtual care throughout the country, while established telemedicine vendor Amwell announced two acquisitions this week. But it's not all rosy: Amwell competitor Teladoc reported a $133 million net loss this past quarter. ON THE RECORD "While all telehealth segments saw acquisitions during the quarter, the two biggest hot spots were virtual/digital care enablement and telemedicine providers, platforms and marketplaces," observed CB Insights researchers. < Previous News Next News >

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Licensure & Telehealth Mei Wa Kwong, JD September 12, 2022 ​ This video addresses the most frequently asked questions CCHP receives regarding licensure and telehealth for example: (1) What does the law says if your patient is going on vacation to another state, but still needs your services? (2) Do you really need a license in another state if you’re just consulting with a provider who is already licensed in that state? (3) ….and many more! View the PPT for this video here. See original video: https://www.cchpca.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions-regarding-licensure-telehealth/ < Previous News Next News >

Elo and 19Labs Partner To Offer Next Generation Telehealth Kiosks PR Newswire and 19 Labs July 2021 The partnership allows pharmacies, schools, and rural communities to go beyond just video calls and deploy eClinics with smart diagnostic devices and remote monitoring. The hospital-at-home trend is rapidly changing the healthcare industry. COVID-19 has accelerated telehealth technology's rate of innovation, and the industry has advanced by more than five years in just five months. Healthcare companies are now moving quickly to provide care in new locations and serve new use cases, bringing healthcare access not just to the home but also to other places like rural communities, schools, and pharmacies. 19Labs and Elo are working together to bring eClinics to these new locations globally. 19Labs' GALE eClinics are next generation point-of-care platforms that seamlessly integrate leading mobile and healthcare technologies into cost-effective and smart solutions such as telehealth carts, healthcare kiosks, or portable telehealth kits. They are highly secure, easily deployable, and can be operated by anyone with minimal training. "19Labs' eClinics enable our customers to easily deploy enhanced telehealth using the world's most advanced diagnostic devices: from ultrasound, ECGs, and even blood pressure," said Dan Ludwick, Chief Product Officer, Elo. "The eClinics do more than just video calls. They bring together Zoom, Amwell, custom wellness applications, and remote patient monitoring into a solution that can be easily used by anyone, which can drastically reduce operating and deployment costs." "Elo has been a great partner," says Ram Fish, 19Labs CEO & Founder. "They are a dynamic, innovative company with global reach, and we are happy to work with them in making healthcare more accessible worldwide. Their Android-based touchscreen systems are beautiful, well-engineered, and provide a unique, affordable solution to deploying kiosks in different form factors within the healthcare industry. Elo's tablets are built-to-last and highly reliable. Their commercial-grade hardware is complemented by great Android implementation. These make Elo's solutions perfect for enhanced telehealth." In Oaxaca, Mexico, the state's health ministry has been rapidly deploying 19Labs' eClinics. Dr. Lorena Ocampo, Chief Coordinator of Telemedicine at Oaxaca's Ministry of Health, says the next generation healthcare kiosks will significantly increase healthcare accessibility and quality in the region. "It's been a pleasure working with 19Labs and Elo. The impact these units have on the healthcare conditions within the community, and the ability to easily access advanced medical care, radically improves the quality of service that we are able to provide." About Elo As a leading global supplier of interactive solutions, #EloIsEverywhere. To date, we have deployed more than 25 million installations in over 80 countries. A new Elo touchscreen is installed every 21 seconds, on average, somewhere in the world. Built on a unified architecture, Elo's broad portfolio allows our customers to easily Choose, Configure and Connect & Control to create a unique experience. Choose from all-in-one systems, open-frame monitors and touchscreen monitors ranging from 10 to 70 inches. Configure with our unique Elo Edge Connect peripherals that allow use-specific solutions. Connect & Control with EloView®, a secure cloud-based platform for Android-powered devices. EloView enables secure deployment and management of a large network of interactive systems designed to reduce operating costs while increasing up-time and security. Consumers can find Elo touchscreen solutions in self-service kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, interactive signage, gaming machines, hospitality systems, point-of-care displays and transportation applications—to name a few. Learn more at EloTouch.com. About 19Labs 19Labs is the creator of GALE, Next Generation Point-of-Care platform for pharmacies, schools, and rural communities. GALE brings together "best of breed" diagnostic technologies from industry leaders like Zoom, Elo, Amwell, Eko, Samsung Mobile, MIR, Omron, Viasat, and many others in one smart, efficient, and cost-effective platform. It was designed from the ground up to be operated by non-healthcare professionals, in locations with limited infrastructure and optimized for low bandwidth and intermittent connectivity. To learn more about GALE, please visit www.19labs.com/platform. < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine Holds Potential to Help Climate Change Center for Connected Health Policy May 4, 2021 MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. The recent article highlights that the United States healthcare industry is a big contributor to carbon emissions, and although telemedicine doesn’t solve the problem, its increased use does lead the industry in the right direction. This has been proven in two research studies conducted on this very subject. The first study, published in the journal, PLoS One explores the carbon footprint of telemedicine and found that replacing in-person visits with telemedicine resulted in 40-70 times decrease in carbon emissions. They note in their conclusion that for telemedicine to make a significant difference, a paradigm shift is necessary where telemedicine is regarded as an ordinary part of health care rather than exclusively for those who lack access due to geography. The second study, conducted by the University of California Davis Health System, examined travel-related and environmental savings as a result of use of telemedicine appointments for outpatient specialty consultations at the university. They found that telemedicine consultations resulted in significant savings of total emissions and that their telemedicine program had a positive impact on environmental pollutants. CCHP also previously published a catalogue of environmental impacts studies, which included several international studies looking at this same issue and coming to the same conclusion regarding telemedicine’s positive impact on carbon emissions in the healthcare sector. As telehealth has become more widespread due to the COVID-19 public health emergency its not hard to imagine that telehealth will cement its place as a mainstream tool in healthcare as the authors in the PLoS study suggest. However, policy barriers have historically interrupted the growth of telehealth, and it is yet to be seen whether the end of COVID-19 will bring telehealth’s progress to a halt. In a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change, researchers found that as a whole, the temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during COVID-19 saw a decrease by as much as -26% on average, but note that the impact of 2020 annual emissions depends on government actions and economic incentives post-pandemic, which will shape the path forward for decades. It will be important as entities such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the congressional budget office, state governments and others conduct their analyses on cost estimates for telehealth that they factor in savings to travel costs incurred through the use of telehealth and the implications for the environment. To learn more, see the full mobihealth news article featuring this important issue. Mobile Health News: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/telemedicine-came-rescue-during-covid-19-could-it-help-climate-change-too < Previous News Next News >

Teletherapy Aimed to Make Mental Health Care More Inclusive. The Data Show a Different Story Jamie Ducharme June 14, 2021 Case studies suggest teletherapy can work well when it’s integrated into the traditional, in-person medical system. For years, teletherapy has been pitched as the next frontier in mental-health care. Unlike medical disciplines requiring a more hands-on approach—say, physical therapy or surgery—talk therapy has long seemed a natural and effective fit for telehealth. And by taking appointments off the therapist’s couch and into patients’ homes via their devices, advocates argued, telehealth could make counseling more accessible and convenient for everyone, with particular benefits for those who lived in health care deserts or who couldn’t regularly drive back and forth to see a clinician. The hope was that virtual therapy could help democratize a system that allowed almost 20% of white Americans to receive mental-health care in 2019, but fewer than 10% of people identifying as Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian or Pacific Islander. Then, of course, the pandemic hit, sending the U.S. health care system into a panic and shuttering clinics and private practices nationwide. Telehealth, once psychiatry’s up-and-comer, was suddenly its lifeline. With impressive speed, a system built around face-to-face visits shifted almost exclusively online. By May 2020, 85% of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) surveyed clinician members said they were conducting the majority of their sessions virtually, up from just 2% prior to the pandemic. It was the perfect pressure test for the promise of virtual mental-health care. If there was ever a time for teletherapy to shine, it was during the pandemic. But the data aren’t so shiny. Telehealth has indisputably improved mental-health care access—but not to such an extent that it delivers on promises of revolutionizing the mental-health system. The same problems that kept many people—particularly those who are lower-income or of color—from seeking care before the pandemic still exist, even with the expansion of telehealth. As a result, mental-health usage in the U.S. hasn’t changed as drastically as many advocates would have liked. In a series of TIME/Harris Poll national surveys conducted this winter and spring, about half of respondents reported using telehealth since the pandemic began, compared with about 25% who said they had beforehand. Increases in telehealth usage during the pandemic, broken down by demographic groups But only about 5% said they’d gotten mental-health care for the first time during the COVID-19 crisis. That suggests the expansion of telehealth didn’t bring in an influx of new patients to the mental-health system. Government data show a similar picture: about a quarter of U.S. adults received mental-health care in the winter of 2021, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), up from about 19% in 2019. That’s an improvement, but not an enormous one. The number of U.S. adults reporting mental health problems grew significantly during the pandemic, but the number of those getting treatment did not Similarly, a March 2021 study from California’s Kaiser Permanente health system found that telehealth allowed clinicians to conduct 7% more psychiatric visits in spring 2020 than 2019—but most of those were with patients who already had a psychiatric diagnosis. Among people without a pre-existing diagnosis, volume declined by more than 40%, suggesting that virtual appointments were more helpful for people already served by the mental-health system than those outside it. On the opposite U.S. coast, telehealth allowed McLean Hospital, a psychiatric institution near Boston, to increase outpatient volume by about 15%, counting both new and existing patients, but psychiatrist-in-chief Dr. Scott Rauch says there’s “absolutely the recognition that there are some populations,” like certain older adults, “that are having difficulty accessing the technology.” In fact, despite the increased availability of telehealth, the share of American adults with an unmet mental-health need increased from August 2020 to February 2021, from 9% to almost 12%, according to CDC data. That’s understandable, given elevated levels of anxiety, depression and stress during the pandemic, but it also suggests teletherapy is not a panacea. And that means the harder work is still ahead. There are lots of ways to think about access to care. The most obvious—making it easy for a patient to speak directly with a clinician, either in person or via a device—is only one. There are also financial barriers. A single therapy session can easily top $100 (without insurance) in many parts of the country, and telehealth has done little to change that. Rightly so, argues Dr. Joe Kvedar, a former president of the American Telemedicine Association, since there’s no evidence to suggest virtual therapy is lower quality than face-to-face. Be that as it may, high price tags mean both therapy and teletherapy remain unattainable for many. Another limitation: there are simply not enough therapists to go around. More than 125 million people in the U.S. live in an area with a shortage of mental-health practitioners, according to U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration estimates. Whether they’re seeing patients virtually or in the flesh, there are a finite number of mental-health professionals with a finite number of hours in their days. Rauch, from McLean Hospital, says telehealth can increase appointment capacity somewhat, mainly because patients are less likely to cancel or no-show, but “as long as it requires an hour of clinician time to deliver an hour of clinical service, expanded access won’t be drastically enhanced.” To meet demand, the U.S. needs not only more therapists generally, but also more therapists from diverse backgrounds. A 2020 study concluded that just 10% of U.S. psychiatrists identify as Black, Hispanic, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander. That means many patients of color can’t find a therapist whom they trust and with whom they can form a close rapport, a barrier that dissuades many people from getting the help they need or prevents them from reaping the full benefits of therapy, says Dr. Amanda Calhoun, a psychiatry resident at Yale and a fellow on the APA’s Council on Minority Mental Health and Health Disparities. “There are many patients who want a Black therapist and they can’t get it,” Calhoun says. “If we truly want to reduce the gap [in mental-health care usage] we need to make it a trustworthy system where people feel they can connect with their therapist or psychiatrist.” Patients who do not speak fluent English, or who feel more comfortable using another language, may also struggle to find a therapist with whom they can communicate freely. Increased use of language interpretation could be an essential tool for expanding access, Calhoun says. It seems naive, or at least wildly optimistic, to think telehealth could overcome some of these entrenched structural issues. And in some cases, virtual care actually worsens disparities. Some people don’t have a reliable Internet connection or a smart device, for example. About 7% of American adults don’t use the Internet at all, according to Pew Research Center, and those without advanced education and people of color—i.e., those already often underserved by the mental-health system—are least likely to be “digitally literate,” according to a 2020 Health Affairs article. Further, elderly adults, an estimated 20% of whom have some sort of mental-health condition, may struggle to navigate virtual platforms even if they have quality Internet access. And online platforms aren’t perfect. Some people feel uncomfortable sharing their most intimate thoughts through a screen, and any digital system runs the risk of malfunctioning or being hacked. That recently happened in Finland, when a data breach led thousands of patients’ sensitive appointment notes to land in hackers’ hands. Plus, teletherapy is only convenient if you’re able to step away from work and other responsibilities to conduct the call in a private place. While the pandemic has many white collar workers drowning in time at home, surrounded by devices, that’s far from a universal experience. For essential workers, a disproportionate number of whom are people of color, it may be only slightly easier to steal away for a teletherapy appointment than it would have been to schedule an in-person visit with a clinician. Perversely, teletherapy may be making it easier than ever for people who already had access to mental-health care to get it, while leaving behind the people who arguably need it most. If teletherapy isn’t doing the trick, the question then becomes how to better serve those still not getting the mental-health care they need. Calhoun says any real solution needs to take a step backward and investigate why many people either cannot or choose not to seek help. For people of color, centuries of neglect and mistreatment by the medical institution are not easily forgotten. In the 1700 and 1800s, influential American doctors coined since-discredited diagnoses like “drapetomania” (psychosis or madness causing an enslaved person to run away) and “negritude” (essentially, the “disease” of not being white). Many contemporary providers aren’t aware of those offensive diagnostic frameworks, Calhoun says, but the cultural legacy of that racism is still widely felt in communities of color. Training more clinicians from underserved backgrounds is the single most impactful way to encourage people of color to get help, Calhoun says. But that process takes time. In the interim, she says, all clinicians need to be educated about psychiatry’s problematic past so they can acknowledge and understand why some patients may not feel comfortable seeking help, and then hopefully address those issues in their own practices. Looking beyond telehealth and focusing on community-based programs—like church-run mental-health groups or the Confess Project, a nationwide initiative that trains barbers to be mental-health advocates—may also help build that trust. Case studies also suggest teletherapy can work well when it’s integrated into the traditional, in-person medical system. For the past decade-plus, Massachusetts has run a program that allows participating primary-care providers to teleconference in a psychiatrist during a child’s checkup, for example. Such programs don’t eliminate mistrust of the medical system, but they can at least make it easier to introduce people to the mental-health system. Mental-health apps—while not appropriate for patients with serious diagnoses, and clearly not an option for those without a smartphone—can also provide a cheap (or even free) stopgap measure for people struggling to find or afford an appointment with a clinician, Rauch says. And in some cases, adds Dr. Adrienne Robertson, a family medicine physician who works with the online medical startup Nurx, through which people can request prescription medicines and diagnostic tests simply by filling out a form, eliminating face-to-face interactions with providers can actually put patients of color at ease, because they can “just [be] a patient like everyone else.” Policy also plays a role. Nordic countries, like Sweden, have among the most robust and widely used telemedicine programs in the world, boosted by affordable, state-sponsored medical networks. Unlike in the U.S., where insurance limitations and out-of-pocket costs are roadblocks for some patients regardless of platform, many people in Nordic countries have a public option for virtual care. Last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services made it easier for Medicare holders to use telehealth services, a policy that allowed more than a quarter of Medicare beneficiaries (and more than 30% of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries) to use telehealth during the fall and summer of 2020, but it’s not clear what will happen after the pandemic ends. Permanent federal action for Medicare and Medicaid holders—many of whom are low-income or elderly adults—could open up therapy to millions of people who can’t currently afford it. And changing federal policies that currently limit clinicians to treating patients located in the state where they are licensed could help even out distribution of the mental-health workforce. All of these fixes are considerably more complex than bringing appointments online; they require rebuilding the system, rather than simply shifting it to a new platform. That work needs to happen sooner rather than later, Calhoun says. Already, according to TIME/Harris Poll data, many people are returning to in-person medical appointments, both psychological and physical. In May, more than half of respondents who’d received mental-health care said they’d had an in-person appointment since the start of the pandemic, up from 37% in February. While some patients and clinicians are sure to stick with teletherapy after the pandemic, much of the system will seemingly revert back to how it was—and without concerted effort, the same problems may persist for years to come. This article can be found at https://time.com/6071580/teletheraphy-mental-health/. < Previous News Next News >

CMS Proposes to Extend Telehealth Flexibilities Through 2023 Thomas Sullivan Oct 24, 2021 CMS Proposes to Extend Telehealth Flexibilities Through 2023 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed in the 2022 Physician Fee Schedule to extend telehealth flexibilities through 2023 instead of through the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, which is expected to run through this year. Physician groups in comments on the rule called for a permanent solution beyond the dates set by CMS. Groups also submitted comments on MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs), ACO policies, and pending payment cuts. The final rule is expected around November 1, 2021. Telehealth Telehealth advocates called upon CMS to amend the proposed 2022 Physician Fee Schedule to permanently extend emergency measures on telehealth access and coverage that were enacted to deal with the pandemic. Many also called upon Congress to expand telehealth services. “The ATA commends the Biden Administration for their actions in support of telehealth, and we appreciate CMS’ intent to ensure Medicare beneficiaries continue to have access to quality healthcare when and where they need it,” ATA CEO Ann Mond Johnson said in its letter to CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure. “However, as important as the Physician Fee Schedule is, we urge Congress to act before the vast majority of Medicare beneficiaries go off the ‘telehealth cliff’ at the end of the public health emergency.” “The ATA understands that CMS is simply following Congress’ lead, though we are hopeful Congress will correct this wrong in the statute,” Johnson said. “There is no clinical evidence for an arbitrary in-person requirement before a patient can access telehealth services. However, in the proposed rule, CMS considers requiring an in-person visit, not only within the ‘six-month period prior to the first time’ the provider furnishes telehealth to the individual, as stated by law, but also within six months prior to subsequent telehealth visits. This effectively creates a new, arbitrary requirement for the patient to have an in-person mental health visit every six months should the patient plan to seek telehealth services with that provider.” The Medical Group Management Association also commented that removing services after a “predetermined or prescriptive date” could create a major administrative burden for practices already strained financially by the pandemic. “Member group practices report that adjusting workflows to operationalize the use of new telehealth codes requires additional resources, such as clinician and staff training and patient education,” MGMA said in comments. “Removing telehealth services from the covered code list will prove disruptive to both practices and patients alike, as patients have become accustomed to receiving these services virtually.” MIPS Value Pathways and ACOs The proposed rule calls for beginning use of the value pathways program in MIPS for 2023 and having it replace MIPS entirely in 2027. MVP is intended to align clinician reporting requirements, but the American Hospital Association (AHA) said it’s unclear whether the program would reduce administrative burden as expected or that it would be equitable across specialties. AHA said it “believes that unless and until CMS can address several conceptual issues with MVPs … CMS should not set a date certain for transitioning to mandatory MVP participation.” The Medical Group Management Association also had concerns, particularly about provider burden. Group purchasing organization Premier addressed the proposed rule’s changes to reporting from accountable care organizations. It applauded the more gradual move to using electronic clinical quality measures, citing the reporting burden associated with them. Premier also asked CMS to recognize that ACO reporting is “fundamentally different from reporting by clinicians and groups.” The National Association of ACOs echoed those comments. Pay Cuts In comments on the proposed rule, physician groups were also worried about a looming 3.75% cut in the 2022 Medicare conversion factor, which calculates reimbursement for procedures under fee-for-service. The cuts are mandated under a budget neutrality provision in Congress and comes after a pay bump from Congress that expires in 2022. The AMA said that it is urging CMS to work with Congress for relief on the budget neutrality issue. “CMS should exercise the full breadth and depth of its administrative authority to avert or, at a minimum, mitigate these unconscionable payment cuts,” the group added. https://www.policymed.com/2021/10/cms-proposes-to-extend-telehealth-flexibilities-through-2023.html < Previous News Next News >

CCHP Releases Updated Telehealth Billing Guide Center for Connected Health Policy March 16, 2021 The Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) has released a new updated telehealth billing guide as a follow up to its 2020 billing guide to provide a helpful tool for healthcare entities trying to navigate the complexities of billing for telehealth and virtually delivered services. The Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) has released a new updated telehealth billing guide as a follow up to its 2020 billing guide to provide a helpful tool for healthcare entities trying to navigate the complexities of billing for telehealth and virtually delivered services. Policy changes during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) have only made telehealth billing rules more nuanced. The updated billing guide addresses whether or not there is reimbursement for telehealth both generally and/or during the PHE, as well as how to correctly bill for a telehealth encounter, which is one of the most common policy questions CCHP receives as the National Telehealth Policy Resource Center (NTRC – P). Further complicating the billing process is the need to understand whether current rules are only applicable during the pandemic as well as the fact that payer policies continue to vary from payer to payer. For example, policies that apply to a Medicare beneficiary remain different than those that apply to a state Medicaid enrollee or to patients that have private insurance. DOwnload the guide here: https://www.cchpca.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/2021BillingGuideFINAL.pdf Please note, this resource is only provided as a guide and should not be considered legal advice. < Previous News Next News >

Congress' last-minute $1.7 trillion omnibus package: 8 healthcare takeaways Molly Gamble December 20, 2022 Lawmakers rolled out a roughly $1.7 trillion year-end spending bill Dec. 20 to fund the U.S. government through most of 2023, tacking on proposals to extend telehealth and hospital-at-home flexibilities while leaving out other healthcare asks. Lawmakers have until the end of Dec. 23 to clear the 2023 Omnibus Appropriations bill or federal funds are set to run out, bringing key agencies and programs to a halt. The package consists of all 12 annual appropriations bills Congress must pass and would fund the government through the remainder of fiscal 2023, which runs through September. Eight healthcare- and hospital-specific notes out of the 4,155-page bill: 1. The legislation curbs a scheduled cut of nearly 4.5 percent to the Medicare physician fee schedule that was set to take effect in 2023, narrowing the cut to 2 percentage points in the year ahead with a scheduled cut of 3.25 percentage points in 2024. The American Medical Association, which lobbied against the cuts, said it is "extremely disappointed and dismayed" with the cuts that made it to the bill. 2. While physicians did not get the relief they sought with complete aversion of fee schedule payment cuts, the spending bill would avert the 4 percent Statutory Pay-As-You-Go reduction, which would have amounted to cuts of approximately $36 billion, from taking effect in 2023. 3. The legislation extends incentives under the alternative payment model, which were set to expire this year, but reduces the amount from 5 percent to 3.5 percent. The incentive is designed to offset losses in revenue physicians may incur as they move from fee-for-service to participation in value-based care models. 4. The package extends Medicare telehealth flexibilities through 2024. The deadline for these flexibilities has been tied to 151 days after the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, meaning the precise date was unclear as HHS has continued to renew the PHE in 90-day increments. Under the legislation, providers would be able to lean on flexibilities guaranteed throughout 2024. 5. The package extends acute hospital care at home waivers and flexibilities for two years through 2024. Similar to telehealth flexibilities, the deadline for hospital care at home waivers was tied to the status of the PHE. CMS has approved more than 250 hospitals to participate in the acute hospital care at home program. 6. The legislation extends the low-volume hospital payment adjustment and Medicare-dependent hospital programs through fiscal year 2024, or Sept. 30, 2024. 7. The legislation includes $118.7 billion — a 22 percent increase — for VA medical care. Other healthcare end medical allotments include $47.5 billion for the National Institutes of Health (a 5.6 percent increase); $9.2 billion for the CDC; $1.5 billion for NIH's second-year Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health and $950 million for the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, according to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy. 8. The American Hospital Association expressed satisfaction with a number of measures in the legislation, including the extension of telehealth, hospital-at-home and programs to help rural hospitals, but signaled toward the work that remains to garner funding for hospitals. "In the new year, we will continue to advocate for Congress and the administration to take action to address patient discharge backlogs, support our current workforce and increase the pipeline into the future, hold commercial health insurers accountable for policies that compromise patient safety and add burden to care providers, and strengthen hospitals that care for a disproportionate number of patients covered by government programs or are uninsured, to name a few of our priorities," association President and CEO Rick Pollack said in a statement shared with Becker's. See original article: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/congress-last-minute-1-7-trillion-omnibus-package-8-healthcare-takeaways.html < Previous News Next News >

Consumer Survey Data Supports Use of Virtual Visits Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 The top reasons patients said they liked having their appointments virtually was because of the ease in attending, reduced chance of getting COVID-19, and that it made scheduling and sharing medical information easier. The Deloitte Center for Technology, Media & Telecommunications released the second edition of their Connectivity and & Mobile Trends 2021 survey, which gathered information from consumers about their relevant experiences during the pandemic. Using an online methodology of over two thousand consumers surveyed in March 2021, the report looks broadly at how the pandemic has influenced innovation and the “digital home,” including the increase in virtual doctor visits and patient telehealth preferences. In regard to telehealth, they found that over half of Americans had a virtual visit, 80% of those patients were satisfied with their experiences, and 62% were likely to schedule future telehealth visits post-pandemic. Almost 30% of consumers reported assisting someone else in their household with a telehealth visit. The top reasons patients said they liked having their appointments virtually was because of the ease in attending, reduced chance of getting COVID-19, and that it made scheduling and sharing medical information easier. While 30% of consumers reported no challenges, others did report they found the lack of human connection challenging, as well as the inability to have their vitals collected which was indicated more frequently among older patients. The report also looked at individual use of “wearables” to advance health and wellness, presuming their ability to support health care providers will continue to grow along with telehealth – although the authors also stated both will likely require the evolution of the regulatory landscape. Interestingly enough, use of wearables was actually found to be mixed during the pandemic and 39% said cost is the primary reason they haven’t bought one. Also, of note for those that had used wearables was that 60% claimed not to be concerned about privacy of their wearable-generated data, which is often raised as one of the main regulatory concerns related to increased innovation in health care. To review additional details about the information gathered, please view the findings in their entirety - https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/articles/6978_TMT-Connectivity-and-mobile-trends/DI_TMT-Connectivity-and-mobile-trends.pdf#page=8. < Previous News Next News >

CMS Releases Final Calendar Year (CY) 2023 Physician Fee Schedule CCHP November 08, 2022 Last week, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final rule for the CY 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). CMS finalized many of their telehealth proposals, which primarily focused on what services will be covered by the program and what will happen immediately following the end of the public health emergency (PHE), including during the 151-day grace period included in the 2022 Budget Act. CMS clarified that the list of services that were temporarily allowed to be delivered via telehealth and reimbursed by Medicare during the PHE, will still be allowed during the 151-day grace period. Additionally, CMS added more of the temporary telehealth PHE list codes to a category of services that would remain through the end of 2023. The rule also reiterates the requirement for an in-person visit in the first 6-months of an initial telehealth mental health visit and every 12 months afterward (with exceptions), and clarifies that won’t be implemented until 152 days after the end of the PHE. They will address the specifics around coding and reporting these types of services through guidance and a sub-regulatory process in the future to ensure a smooth transition after the PHE ends. Stay tuned for an in-depth In Focus write up from CCHP on the 2023 PFS next week, as well as a new factsheet focused on the telehealth elements in the final rule. See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/its-here-cms-releases-2023-physician-fee-schedule-plus-new-resources-on-telehealth-policy-from-hhs-cchp < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth integrated into EHR is the way to go for CarDon & Associates Bill Siwicki October 19, 2021 The skilled nursing organization has a 90% treat-in-place rate for all telehealth encounters, and data from its platform has helped identify areas for improvement. Just before the COVID-19 pandemic struck, CarDon & Associates, which operates 20 senior housing/skilled nursing communities in the Midwest, was exploring different ideas to give its staff time back, improve resident outcomes and reduce rehospitalizations. THE PROBLEM The organization wanted an effective telehealth platform with new technologies to streamline the process for contacting physicians and improving documentation in its system of record. It also wanted to give its nurses a sense of confidence with technology that could guide them through assessments to keep residents in-house. "Once the pandemic started, we had to act fast and implement new portable devices and temporary solutions to provide virtual physician and consult visits as well as provide our residents a way to connect with their families and friends," said Brandy Armstrong, RN, director of clinical information at CarDon & Associates. "The swift implementation worked, but we still wanted a better, more secure solution that would assist our staff and provide quality care for our residents. The pandemic made searching for a telehealth platform a higher priority." PROPOSAL CarDon & Associates turned to Third Eye Health for a telehealth solution. The telehealth technology offered fast connectivity with access to board-certified, state-licensed physicians who are trained to provide care in a post-acute setting. Coverage includes nights, weekends and holidays. "The solution includes a care coordination team that facilitates communication between our care team and their physicians," Armstrong explained. "Our care team could communicate with telehealth physicians and the care coordination team through the platform. The system sends alerts to the user's email for new messages, watch lists and new encounters. "The purpose of the platform was to provide an easy-to-use application on a portable device that would give our nurses quick access to physicians to treat our residents in-house, improve documentation and provide reporting and analytics." Brandy Armstrong, RN, CarDon & Associates "They also offer a cloud-based, HIPAA-compliant platform that integrates with our EHR," she continued. "All telehealth-generated documentation includes a wet signature that imports from their platform into our system of record." Lastly, the vendor offers reporting and analytics that measure clinical performance, usage, resident encounters treated in place and chief complaints. "The purpose of the platform was to provide an easy-to-use application on a portable device that would give our nurses quick access to physicians to treat our residents in-house, improve documentation and provide reporting and analytics," she said. MARKETPLACE There are many vendors of telemedicine technologies and services on the health IT market today. Healthcare IT News has published a special report detailing many of the vendors and their offerings. Click here to read the special report. MEETING THE CHALLENGE Before implementing the telehealth solution, CarDon & Associates distributed iPads to all nurses and CNAs, so it was already starting to transition to a more mobile workflow. After it deployed portable devices, the organization started implementing the new telehealth solution with training provided by vendor staff. "Our nurses use the telehealth platform heavily as part of their everyday workflow during the evening and weekend coverage time," Armstrong noted. "The nurses have a portable device to use specifically for telehealth encounters. They sign in at the beginning of their shift and contact the telehealth provider when needed. "The nurses use the platform for new admissions, readmissions, bridging scripts and changes in condition," she added. "They can have video encounters with the touch of a button and interact with a physician within two minutes." The telehealth solution is integrated with the organization's system of record from vendor MatrixCare. The organization collaborates with telehealth vendor staff along with MatrixCare staff to ensure successful integration with each facility at which it implements the technology, she said. RESULTS To date, CarDon & Associates has a 90% treat-in-place rate for all telehealth encounters. Out of 2,090 consults, 1,826 residents were treated in place. Using the data in the telehealth platform, the organization was able to identify areas for improvement. And improved documentation has been integrated with the system of record. ADVICE FOR OTHERS Armstrong has a variety of tips for healthcare organizations considering similar telehealth systems integrated with EHR technology: Identify what problems you are trying to solve, what goals you are trying to meet and how you will evaluate outcomes. Determine who in your organization will develop a policy and procedure, and who will be involved with planning, implementation and evaluation. Involve frontline staff in discussions to get their input, insight and buy-in. Buy-in will be necessary for the implementation phase. Consider appointing a champion to help with ongoing education to ensure the technology is being used the way it was intended. Share your outcomes with staff members within your organization. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-integrated-ehr-way-go-cardon-associates < Previous News Next News >