Search this site

Extended Reality for Telehealth The technologies enabling a more fully immersive telehealth experience of the future Jordan Owens September 20, 2022 There has been a digital transformation in telehealth in the form of remote meetings and video consultations. Just a few years ago, it was considered innovative to meet with a patient over video: now it’s seen as routine. Necessity can be a catalyst for innovation and telehealth is now here to stay. But that doesn’t mean the industry has finished growing, changing — or expanding. Extended reality (XR) is a catch-all term used to describe the many and various ways that technology can enhance what we perceive with our senses: how the real and virtual worlds can combine to extend perception, observation, and — in the case of telehealth — patient care and diagnosis. Using extended reality tools like augmented reality headsets and wearable devices, healthcare workers can diagnose with better accuracy, treat patients faster, and provide an optimal level of care — even when the patient is on the other side of the country (or the world). Some of the innovative ways that people are combining telehealth and extended reality include: Wearable technology to enhance remote patient monitoring You enter a remote telehealth session with a patient. You ask them what seems to be the issue. They respond, “Well, my ring says that my sleep patterns have been disturbed for the past few nights due to elevated heart rate, and then today my temperature has gone up. Here, look at the data for yourself.” Wearable technologies — from smart watches and wristbands to patches, rings, and even headsets — help collect valuable health data. These devices are already shaping the future of telehealth by making remote patient monitoring faster, easier, and more accurate than ever before. There are currently thousands of wearable devices on the market, tracking a variety of conditions. But as sensor technology improves, the accuracy of these devices improves as well. In fact, Gartner predicts that “by 2024, miniaturizing capabilities will advance to the point that 10% of all wearable technologies will become unobtrusive to the user,” leading to rapid market growth over the next three to five years. Virtual reality environments to set remote patients at ease The immersive nature of VR makes it a great way to distract patients from the stress they’re feeling. In fact, virtual reality has already proven effective in helping anxious in-office patients relax in stressful situations — like a child receiving a vaccine. This soothing, calming effect can be replicated in telehealth as well. Virtual environments can help alleviate some of the awkwardness of remote telehealth sessions, and help the patient feel closer — both physically and mentally — to the caregiver, which can improve patient care. According to a recent paper on the use of extended reality in telehealth: “Some patients report reluctance to self-advocate during typical telehealth sessions because of poor eye contact and audio interference if more than one person speaks at a time (….) Technologies that evoke presence—the perception, feeling, and interaction with simulations as if they were real — can meaningfully impact the practice and outcomes of telehealth.” While VR technology might not yet be advanced enough to create a fully immersive telehealth experience, it could be very soon. Imagine the possibilities. Augmented reality to improve patient care and diagnosis Wearables aren’t just for patients. There are many devices on the market that can augment and enhance the skills of medical caregivers as well. Visual overlays can help practitioners improve the accuracy of incisions, find difficult veins, take patient temperatures remotely, and much more. Many of these AR headsets, like those designed by RealWear, are also voice-controlled, leaving the practitioner’s hands free to do the work that needs to be done. They can also use the headsets to contact, and even video chat with, clinical specialists to get advice and guidance — making it easier for first responders in the field to accurately diagnose and treat illnesses and injuries before the patient even arrives at the hospital. Getting started with extended reality in telehealth As with any new technology, it’s important to work with partners who provide not only general support, but also vertical-centric support. Pexip is achieving this through partnering and working closely with headset manufacturers like RealWear and Hippo. We are also working with vertical-centric partners like SimplyVideo, allowing Pexip customers to add a variety of XR functionalities to their existing video telehealth platform. Pexip’s vision for the future is centered around leveraging technology to enhance and improve what people can achieve. We’re excited for the journey ahead and hope you will join us. About the Author Jordan Owens is the VP of Architecture for Pexip. He joined Pexip in 2012 from TANDBERG and Cisco where he led the Americas Technical Support organization, the Americas Product Engineering team, and a Pre-Sales Engineering organization for the previous 10+ years of his career. At Pexip, Jordan is responsible for leading the Americas engineering organization and serving as an extension of the global R&D organization. He can be reached at jordan@pexip.com See original article: https://www.americantelemed.org/blog/extended-reality-for-telehealth/ < Previous News Next News >

Grants & Funding The Federal government has numerous funding sources for telehelath support: USDA Community Connect Grants USDA Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants Other Telemedicine Grants FCC Rural Health Care - Healthcare Connect Fund USDA COMMUNITY CONNECT GRANTS This federal program funds broadband deployment into rural communities where it is not yet economically viable for private sector provi ders to deliver service. For more information, please visit USDA Community Connect Grants . USDA DISTANCE LEARNING AND TELEMEDICINE GRA NTS Th is federal program helps rural communities use telecommunications' unique connectivity capabilities to overcome effects of remoteness and low population density. Grant funds may be used for a cquisition of eligible capital assets, such as: Technical assistance and instruction for using eligible equipment Inside wiring and similar infrastructu re that further DLT services Acquisition of instructional programming as a capital asset Computer hardware, network components, and software Audio, video, and interactive vid eo equipment Terminal and data terminal equipment For more information , please visit USDA Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants . OTHER TELEMEDICINE GRANT OPPORTUNITES The Health and Human Services Division for telehealth and broadband related programs posts funding opp ortunities HE RE . HEALTHCARE CONNECT FUND The New Mexico Telehealth Alliance (N MTHA) manages the Southwest Telehealth Access Grid (SWTAG), a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved consortium for funding through the Healthcare Connect Fund (HCF). If you manage one or more healthcare provider sites serving clients in New Mexico, contact NMTHA to discuss joining SWTAG. Advantages to applying to SWTAG via NMTHA include: Lower application and administrative costs. Access to expert funding advice for a mix of rural and urban sites. Professional assistance with proven track record of funding success. Additional information on eligibility and application procedures can be found HERE . Community Connect Distance Learning Other Healthcare Connect

Audio-Only Telemedicine Services Special Announcement NMTHA's communication with the New Mexico Office of the Superintendent of Insurance about billing for AUDIO-ONLY telemedicine services February 2022 Update: New Mexico Audio-Only Telemedicine Services The New Mexico Telehealth Alliance (NMTHA) works hard to ensure telehealth is sustainable and meets healthcare needs in our State. The NMTHA has been instrumental in ensuring New Mexico has one of the leading telehealth laws in the country. Looking at the NM Telehealth Act, last amended in 2019, the New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance (OSI) has put out the following information around the continued ability to bill for telephonic services. What you need to know: The telemedicine definition allows the use of audio-only telemedicine services. The NM Telehealth Act: The New Mexico Telehealth Act, which was last amended in 2007, defines telehealth as “the use of electronic information, imaging and communication technologies, including interactive audio, video, data communications as well as store-and-forward technologies, to provide and support health care delivery, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, transfer of medical data and education.” § 24-25-3(C) NMSA. This definition clearly incorporates audio-only services, particularly as “the purpose of the New Mexico Telehealth Act is to provide a framework for health care providers to follow in providing telehealth services to New Mexico citizens in a manner that provides efficient and effective access to quality health services.” § 24-25-2(B) NMSA. What insurance this affects: This is only for fully-insured health plans regulated by the NM OSI, and for NM State employee, public school, and retiree health plans. It does not apply to Medicaid, Medicare, other federal health plans, or self-insured health plans. Access the final text of S.B.354 (2019) and chaptered statutes HERE . See the email communication from the NM OSI HERE . Sincerely, New Mexico Telehealth Alliance

Telehealth Elements in American Rescue Plan COVID Relief Bill Center for Connected Health Policy April 2021 $50 million in grants for local behavioral health services, including via telehealth, and $140 million for information technology, telehealth and electronic health records at the Indian Health Service. March marked the passage of the third major COVID-9 relief bill (HR 1319), titled the American Rescue Plan. While the bill didn’t include significant changes in telehealth policy as past relief legislation has, it did have some nuggets for telehealth. For example, it establishes an Emergency Rural Development for Rural Healthcare Grant pilot that would, among other things, support telehealth programs. The bill also allots $50 million in grants for local behavioral health services, including via telehealth, and sets aside $140 million for information technology, telehealth and electronic health records at the Indian Health Service. To learn more, see the full text of the bill. American Rescue Plan: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1319/BILLS-117hr1319enr.pdf Indian Health Services: https://www.ihs.gov/ < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth Remains Key Modality for Behavioral Healthcare Delivery eVista December 19, 2022 A Michigan-based provider leveraged a telehealth solution to expand critical access to behavioral healthcare as demand for these services skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic. After reaching new heights during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth use is leveling off in several clinical care areas. But there is one prominent exception: behavioral healthcare. Healthcare stakeholders are continuing to flock to telehealth for behavioral health services. An analysis of data from January 2020 to March 2022 shows that mental health conditions were the most common telehealth diagnoses at the national level. In addition, data shows that amid a drop in overall telehealth use since 2020, telemental healthcare has grown. In the first quarter of 2019, 32.4 percent of all telehealth visits were related to behavioral healthcare, according to a market research report. That figure jumped to 59.9 percent by Q1 2022. This data, along with the ongoing mental health crisis in America, signifies the importance of providing virtual care options for behavioral healthcare. At Michigan-based Easterseals MORC, telehealth has been integral to behavioral healthcare delivery since 2019. Then, amid the pandemic, the organization saw its virtual visit volumes skyrocket, and they continue to show no signs of slowing down. "We went from 25 telehealth users before the pandemic to 300," says Clarissa Hulleza, Chief Information Officer of Easterseals MORC. "Those numbers are still going up. We're not seeing any decrease." WHY THE ORGANIZATION IMPLEMENTED TELEHEALTH Easterseals MORC, an affiliate of the national Easterseals organization, serves over 21,000 individuals annually. It provides a wide array of behavioral health services, including therapy, psychiatric care, and substance abuse treatment, as well as long-term care for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In 2019, the organization decided to implement a telehealth solution. One of the key goals of the move was to expand access to behavioral healthcare across the state. “The reason we pursued a telehealth solution was so that people who couldn't get to us regularly or at all, could be provided the opportunity to still receive care," says Hulleza. "We serve all of Michigan, and not all of Michigan has access to transportation, or maybe their closest local provider is 20 miles away. So, it was really creating more opportunities for access." Additionally, telemedicine was already becoming popular as a mode of physical healthcare delivery, prompting behavioral healthcare providers to catch up. "It was one of those, 'well, why aren't we doing the same?'" Hulleza says. Easterseals MORC partnered with eVisit to launch a telehealth pilot program in May 2019. A little under a year later, the COVID-19 pandemic hit, compelling providers across the country to rapidly scale up their telehealth programs. According to Hulleza, already having a telehealth solution and vendor partnership in place enabled Easterseals MORC to expand virtual care use seamlessly. "I would say that the absolute benefit was that we never had to close our doors," she adds. "In a time that people needed behavioral healthcare the most, we were able to provide it." IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES AND KEY LESSONS LEARNED Easterseals MORC leverages telehealth for nearly all of its services, including case management, one-on-one and group therapy. The organization even provided Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy virtually, which aims to improve social behaviors using interventions. But implementing a telehealth solution for behavioral healthcare has its challenges. For Easterseals MORC, those challenges ranged from clinician training to technology issues among those receiving services. Clinicians were not only providing care in a new way, they also had to become tech support in helping those they served navigate the new technology. Training is a critical aspect of telehealth technology implementation. If training is not provided proactively, it can result in clinicians avoiding virtual care use as they might find it difficult and overwhelming. “Pilot testing the solution before a full rollout was critical to ensuring that clinicians had adequate training to use the technology and that workflows were not negatively impacted,” Hulleza says. Partnering with the right vendor was a vital aspect of this effort, as the vendor was able to provide clinician training resources as well as suggest new policies and processes required to promote and support the telehealth program. “Ultimately, we selected our vendor because we were looking for a partnership that would improve the overall behavioral healthcare delivery experience. This meant that we needed a tool that offered more than a two-way video solution — one that integrated with, and empowered, the clinical workflow with value-added technology,” Hulleza shares. “There were multiple tools in the marketplace that solved the video connection challenge, but Easterseals MORC was looking to do more than simply move the clinical interaction to a video screen.” Further, choosing the right partner and then piloting the telehealth solution allowed the organization to test the supporting technology infrastructure before a full rollout. Easterseals MORC tested laptop specifications and made sure the solution worked equally well on different devices, including mobile phones and tablets. "We even went as far as making sure our bandwidth at all of our locations was increased so that if we had 20 people doing telehealth at the same time, there wouldn't be any degradation in services," Hulleza says. On the side of those receiving services, Easterseals MORC had to consider the digital divide facing its population. "[The people we serve] don't always have the newest phones, the best bandwidth," she says. "They don't have the luxury of going to a bedroom and closing the door. They might have shared living arrangements. We had to make sure we were accommodating all of those things." To address individuals' technology access needs, the organization applied for various grants and used those to provide iPads and iPhones with built-in data plans. Another essential aspect of closing the digital divide is identifying the viability of an individual to receive services via telehealth. Easterseals MORC uses a checklist tool provided by the telehealth vendor to identify these individuals and the barriers they face. "Do you have a private place? Do you have a microphone? What model phone do you have or mobile device?" Hulleza adds. "The tool goes through all of these questions and allows providers to evaluate if telehealth is an option." Easterseals MORC plans to solidify telehealth as a key behavioral health delivery mechanism within its business. It is unclear if Congress will make the temporary telehealth flexibilities enacted during the pandemic permanent — but for Hulleza, there is no going back. "I absolutely want to grow telehealth here," she says. "The need amplified because of the pandemic, but telehealth was going to exist for our organization even if the pandemic didn’t happen." ____________________________ About eVisit eVisit is an enterprise virtual care delivery platform built for health systems and hospitals. It delivers innovative virtual experiences in care navigation, care delivery, and care engagement, improving margins at scale without sacrificing quality or patient and provider satisfaction. eVisit works seamlessly across enterprise service lines and departments to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and boost revenue. Based in Phoenix, Ariz., eVisit helps healthcare organizations innovate and succeed in today’s changing healthcare market. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/telehealth-remains-key-modality-for-behavioral-healthcare-delivery < Previous News Next News >

Congress' last-minute $1.7 trillion omnibus package: 8 healthcare takeaways Molly Gamble December 20, 2022 Lawmakers rolled out a roughly $1.7 trillion year-end spending bill Dec. 20 to fund the U.S. government through most of 2023, tacking on proposals to extend telehealth and hospital-at-home flexibilities while leaving out other healthcare asks. Lawmakers have until the end of Dec. 23 to clear the 2023 Omnibus Appropriations bill or federal funds are set to run out, bringing key agencies and programs to a halt. The package consists of all 12 annual appropriations bills Congress must pass and would fund the government through the remainder of fiscal 2023, which runs through September. Eight healthcare- and hospital-specific notes out of the 4,155-page bill: 1. The legislation curbs a scheduled cut of nearly 4.5 percent to the Medicare physician fee schedule that was set to take effect in 2023, narrowing the cut to 2 percentage points in the year ahead with a scheduled cut of 3.25 percentage points in 2024. The American Medical Association, which lobbied against the cuts, said it is "extremely disappointed and dismayed" with the cuts that made it to the bill. 2. While physicians did not get the relief they sought with complete aversion of fee schedule payment cuts, the spending bill would avert the 4 percent Statutory Pay-As-You-Go reduction, which would have amounted to cuts of approximately $36 billion, from taking effect in 2023. 3. The legislation extends incentives under the alternative payment model, which were set to expire this year, but reduces the amount from 5 percent to 3.5 percent. The incentive is designed to offset losses in revenue physicians may incur as they move from fee-for-service to participation in value-based care models. 4. The package extends Medicare telehealth flexibilities through 2024. The deadline for these flexibilities has been tied to 151 days after the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, meaning the precise date was unclear as HHS has continued to renew the PHE in 90-day increments. Under the legislation, providers would be able to lean on flexibilities guaranteed throughout 2024. 5. The package extends acute hospital care at home waivers and flexibilities for two years through 2024. Similar to telehealth flexibilities, the deadline for hospital care at home waivers was tied to the status of the PHE. CMS has approved more than 250 hospitals to participate in the acute hospital care at home program. 6. The legislation extends the low-volume hospital payment adjustment and Medicare-dependent hospital programs through fiscal year 2024, or Sept. 30, 2024. 7. The legislation includes $118.7 billion — a 22 percent increase — for VA medical care. Other healthcare end medical allotments include $47.5 billion for the National Institutes of Health (a 5.6 percent increase); $9.2 billion for the CDC; $1.5 billion for NIH's second-year Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health and $950 million for the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, according to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy. 8. The American Hospital Association expressed satisfaction with a number of measures in the legislation, including the extension of telehealth, hospital-at-home and programs to help rural hospitals, but signaled toward the work that remains to garner funding for hospitals. "In the new year, we will continue to advocate for Congress and the administration to take action to address patient discharge backlogs, support our current workforce and increase the pipeline into the future, hold commercial health insurers accountable for policies that compromise patient safety and add burden to care providers, and strengthen hospitals that care for a disproportionate number of patients covered by government programs or are uninsured, to name a few of our priorities," association President and CEO Rick Pollack said in a statement shared with Becker's. See original article: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/congress-last-minute-1-7-trillion-omnibus-package-8-healthcare-takeaways.html < Previous News Next News >

Rural Providers Weigh Telehealth Investment Against Regulatory Uncertainty Holly Vossel June 8, 2022 Hospices are leveraging expanded telehealth options to maximize access for hard-to-reach rural patients despite lingering regulatory uncertainties. Case in point, the Providence Institute for Human Caring last year launched a tele-palliative care program aimed at addressing rural patients’ unmet needs. Thus far, the initiative has yielded positive results, but the process hasn’t always been easy, according to Dr. Gregg VandeKieft, executive medical director of the institute’s Palliative Practice Group. Snags along the way included dairy cows blocking staff from reaching patients. “For the first time we’re able to offer equitable access to specialty palliative care services for patients who need and want them in this rural setting,” VandeKieft told local news. “But we often have to balance providing health care with the time schedules and welfare of livestock, crops and other realities of rural living.” Washington-based Providence Health System provides a range of facility- and home-based care, including senior services and hospice. The company has more than 119,000 employees serving communities in six states. The TelePC program has increased care collaboration between Providence and the patients’ other providers, including family caregivers. It has also reduced travel time for the palliative care team and curbed unnecessary patient transfers and recurring hospitalizations. Hospice and palliative care providers have wrangled for decades with obstacles that complicate access to rural patients and make their care more expensive. For starters, rural regions are less likely to have a Medicare-certified hospice than urban counties. The service areas of the nearest hospices may not extend far enough to reach some of the people in those zones. When rural patients do have a provider in range, those hospices do their best to deliver care while contending with lower patient volumes, a smaller labor pool, long-travel times between home visits and the resulting travel costs. Some of the challenges are very unique to rural areas, like livestock schedules, lack of nearby caregiver support and limited internet bandwidth capacity. Telehealth has been an important part of improving providers’ ability to reach rural patient populations, according to Dr. Michael Fratkin, chief medical officer for ResolutionCare, a Vynca company. Fratkin founded palliative care provider ResolutionCare in 2015. Advanced care planning technology company Vynca acquired the company last year in its first move into the clinical care space. The pressures on rural providers go beyond the logistical. A successful tele-palliative care program requires not only greater access to high-speed internet in those areas, but also the confidence of the people they serve. Many rural residents place a lower value on telehealth services compared to the in-person care they are used to, said Fratkin. “The advantages of telehealth are the gain of seeing people at home and instantaneously sharing space with them,” Fratkin told Hospice News. “We are not physically entering their private space, not requiring them or staff to drive. What’s most important is creating that safe space to share. There are biases that virtual care is second rate. We have to blast through these biases. They are a bigger barrier to palliative and hospice care than dairy cows.” Then came the pandemic, and with it broad expansion of how providers can use telehealth — at least for the time being. Rapid deployment of telemedicine during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) has created “a new pathway” for bringing palliative and hospice care specialists to rural areas, according to authors of a recent report published in the JAMA Health Forum. Additional studies further support the claim that changes to telehealth policy improved access. But without further regulatory or legislative action, those pathways will close when the federally declared emergency ends. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) most recently extended the PHE period to expire in July. The agency has not indicated whether or not they will renew it. As hospices navigate how they will use telehealth in the long-term, these uncertainties put them in a bind. Many are trying to weigh the benefits of telehealth investments against the possibility that they may soon have to shut down or cut back those programs. One factor policymakers might need to consider is that people may now expect that these services will remain available to them. The events of the past two years have opened the eyes of many patients to telehealth’s potential , according to Fratkin. “The pandemic telehealth experiment is unmeasured, but what we’ve discovered by being thrust into this experiment is that I don’t think patients want to give it up,” Fratkin told Hospice News. “They discovered the value of communications technology allowing them to stay in their lives and not interrupt care. Some of these providers are running back to the status quo as if it was working, but we’re going forward, not backward in this.” < Previous News Next News >

Opportunity Knocking — Empanelment, COVID-19 and Telehealth By Trudy Bearden, PA-C, MPAS February 17, 2021 Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment. Do you know what it is? Probably not if you’re not “in” primary care. You may know the patient side of empanelment, though. If you have a primary care provider (PCP), it usually means you have been empaneled to that provider. Empanelment is a foundational component of primary care and is essential in population health management. In 2019, the People-Centered Integrated Care collaborative, participants from 10 countries developed an overview of empanelment and a comprehensive definition: Empanelment is a continuous, iterative set of processes that identify and assign populations to facilities, care teams, or providers who have a responsibility to know their assigned population and to proactively deliver coordinated primary health care. That definition is accurate and comprehensive, but we must appreciate the recent, succinct statement by my Empanelment Learning Exchange colleague Elizabeth Wala, Global Advisor, Health and Nutrition at Aga Khan Foundation: “Empanelment is grouping patients under providers.” Opportunity. As a primary care clinician and health care consultant, I have been thinking hard since April 2020 about the importance of empanelment, telehealth and the COVID-19 pandemic. Just to be clear, I’m using the term telehealth as defined by the discrete set of services described by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) List of Telehealth Services. Similarly, there are amazing opportunities for other remote services, including chronic and principal care management, remote patient monitoring, virtual check-ins and more that lend themselves to applying empanelment to improve health and well-being. Maybe for another blog … Most clinicians use electronic health records (EHRs) these days and can run or request reports on their patient panels to identify which patients may need health care services. Empanelment provides each clinician with a list of names of their patients along with additional information such as age, date last seen, diagnoses, preventive and chronic care that is due and more. Here are some of the ways we can leverage empanelment and telehealth to keep people safe, expand access and capture revenue. Check in on the unseen and unknown. Empanelment is not just about those who seek health care services from us, although that’s often how it starts. The beauty of empanelment is that there should be no people on a clinician’s panel who are “unseen and unknown.” However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 41% of U.S. adults have delayed or avoided medical care during the pandemic because of concerns about COVID-19, which presents us with an opportunity. Identify who hasn’t been seen in the past 6-12 months for each clinician’s panel. Have clinicians go through the list and identify who should receive a check-in call and who should be scheduled for a telehealth visit. There may not be reimbursement for those check-in calls; although there are service codes and reimbursement for virtual check-ins, those check-ins are technically supposed to be initiated by the patient. Conduct advance care planning. If ever there was a time! And it can be accomplished by telehealth — using codes 99497 (~$85) and 99498 (~$74) — with decent reimbursement. Start with all individuals 65 and older in your panel. Ensure high-risk patients know about telehealth. Now more than ever, know who your top 5-10% highest risk patients are, including those at highest risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. These patients will benefit from having telehealth as an option perhaps more than any other population in your practice. Conduct targeted outreach to the top 5-10% high-risk patients to schedule a telehealth visit, if needed or to let them know about telehealth as an option. Address chronic and preventive gaps in care. As people delay care and as team-based care and pre-visit planning workflows seem to fall by the wayside, I am concerned that missed and delayed diagnoses will soar, which is both terrible for individuals and families, but is also one of the most common reasons for malpractice claims. Use panel data to identify who’s due for what: Chronic conditions, e.g., office visits, tests, vaccines, prescription renewals Preventive services, e.g., well-child visits, colorectal cancer screening (CRC), vaccinations Advise patients about the services that are due by phone, text or letter and schedule those for telehealth visits, if needed. Consider this a call to action for primary care practices! If you’re not already leveraging empanelment to optimize telehealth, expand access, make sure people are doing okay and keep people safe, what can you do by next Tuesday to up your game? < Previous News Next News >

CDC: Increased Use of Telehealth Reduces Risk of Overdose Brendan Rodenberg August 31, 2022 BISMARCK, ND (KXNET) — A new study done by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) suggests the expansion of ‘telehealth’ programs plays an important part in reducing the risk of drug overdoses and keeping people in treatment. The term ‘telehealth’ often refers to the distribution of health services and health-related information — including long-distance consultation with medical professionals, medical education, counseling, and intervention — via social technology such as phones and computers. A study published in the journal JAMA Psychiatry noted that during the pandemic, individuals with opioid use disorders (OUDs) who took part in telehealth services not only remained in treatment longer than usual but were also less likely to suffer drug-related overdoses. An increase in individuals taking MOUD (medications for opioid use disorder) was also reported. The key takeaways from the study include the following information: When two groups of Medicare beneficiaries (one that received OUD care before the COVID-19 pandemic and one that received OUD during the pandemic) were compared, people in the pandemic group were much more likely to receive OUD-related telehealth services compared to the pre-pandemic group (19.6% compared to the pre-pandemic’s 0.6%). They were also more likely to receive MOUD services (12.6% compared to pre-pandemic’s 10.8%) Among the COVID-19 pandemic group, receipt of OUD-related telehealth services was associated with significantly better MOUD treatment retention and lower risk of medically-treated overdoses. “Strategies to increase access to care and MOUD receipt and retention are urgently needed, and the results of this study add to the growing research documenting the benefits of expanding the use of telehealth services for people with OUD,” said the acting director of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control at the CDC and study’s lead author Dr. Christopher M. Jones in a press release. “The findings from this collaborative study also highlight the importance of working across agencies to identify successful approaches to address the escalating overdose crisis.” Mass-overdose events happening across US, DEA warns While successful health services were reported in the study, and telehealth programs have been associated with reduced overdoses and increased treatment, it was also noted that some groups — particularly non-Hispanic black persons and individuals living in the southern United States — were less likely to receive these services. The study and CDC state that this information further highlights the need for more efforts to eliminate the ‘digital divide’ and reduce inequalities in access to care and services. “The expansion of telehealth services for people with substance use disorders during the pandemic has helped to address barriers to accessing medical care for addiction throughout the country that have long existed,” said deputy director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and senior author of the study Wilson Compton, M.D., in the release. “Telehealth is a valuable service and when coupled with medications for opioid use disorder can be lifesaving. This study adds to the evidence showing that expanded access to these services could have a longer-term positive impact if continued.” If you or someone close to you needs help for a substance use disorder, talk to your doctor or call SAMHSA’s National Helpline at 1-800-662-HELP or go to SAMHSA’s Behavioral Health Treatment Services  website. See original article: https://www.kxnet.com/news/national-news/cdc-increased-use-of-telehealth-reduces-risk-of-overdose/ < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine and diagnosis Adriana Albini September 27, 2022 The adoption of telemedicine and its range of applications grew exponentially in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the general consensus now is that it is here to stay, albeit perhaps with a more hybrid bias of in-person and remote visits. Telediagnosis, or TeleDx, i.e., the identification of a disease at a site remote from the patient, has expanded to include primary care, revolutionising the way in which patients and doctors communicate with each other and establish rapport. It is still early days to fully evaluate the effect of virtual vs in-person visit on diagnostic error, but there are guidelines for health professionals to conduct effective virtual examinations, and many best practice examples, both in terms of ways to gather information from the patient (from wording of questionnaires to digital records, home environment, and so on) and technological innovations. In cancer care, pathology plays a central role in the final diagnosis upon which clinicians will develop treatment for their patient, and remote pathology can offer many advantages, such as easier access to pathology experts, consultation among specialists, timely and secure availability of images, and so on. Up until the 1990s, pathologists worked almost entirely within the constraints of the analogue world, with physical glass slides and microscopes. Some attempts were made at capturing virtual images of slides through a tiling method, which was time consuming and prone to error, as it required accurate placing and extensive stitching together of images. But at the end of that decade, engineer Dirk G. Soenksen (founder, and CEO of Aperio) devised a much more efficient system based on a linear scanner, the ScanScope, that allowed for tightly focussed and fast slide image capture, opening a new era for the practice of pathology. Whole slide imaging, or WSI, was first employed in education and research but in recent years, with the improvement of its technology, it has received regulatory approval by the FDA and around the world for diagnostic use as well. The potential for feeding AI algorithms to provide diagnostical support is massive, as virtual slides are accumulating fast and standardised databases are being built. “Telemedicine in Cancer Care Continuum: implementation and integration”, was an online conference developed by the SPCC in collaboration with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), which took place on 6-7 May 2022. In his presentation, Liron Pantanowitz, Professor of Pathology, and Director of Anatomical Pathology at the University of Michigan, talked about telepathology in both its non-acute and acute settings, focussing more extensively on the latter. The term ‘telepathology’ was coined by Ronald S. Weinstein in 1986, after he organised the first public event of satellite-enabled dynamic-robotic distant pathology, but the very first live telepathology ever performed dates as far back as to 1968. Massachusetts General Hospital set up a two-way television link with Boston’s Logan Airport that enabled doctors at the hospital to remotely study blood smears, urine samples and X-rays for patients at the airport, and even listen to their heartbeat with an electronic stethoscope. However, as in the case of telehealth in general, the adoption of digital pathology had to wait until the Covid-19 pandemic to be widely implemented. To facilitate continuity of healthcare while social distancing, certain restrictions were lifted, such as CLIA in the US, allowing pathologists to work from home and sign out cases. The first use of telepathology Prof. Pantanowitz looked at was for frozen section consultation. There are several challenges when a pathologist is asked to provide an intraoperative consultation. The pathology specimen is fresh, not easy to cut. The frozen section itself is difficult to prepare and is often filled with artifacts. These artifacts not only make it hard to read the glass slides but can compound the problem when using digital images. The turnaround time needs to be rapid. Usually, pathologists strive for less than 20 minutes to provide the surgeon with an answer. And they are under serious diagnostic pressure because if they get it wrong, it is difficult to reverse the surgical decision that has been made based on their diagnosis. Over the past 54 years different modes of practising telepathology have been developed. A pathologist on site can take static images, which is easy but too time-consuming. There is also video microscopy, live streaming from one pathologist to another. If there is no pathologist present on site to read the slides, there are systems such as robotic microscopy, where the pathologist can remotely take control of the functions on a microscope, such as navigation and focus. And there is also Whole Slide Imaging, which is the entire digitization of a slide to be remotely reviewed. Thanks to advancements in technology, hybrid devices are now available from many vendors with robotics and Whole Slide Imaging functions in one scanner. See full article: https://cancerworld.net/telemedicine-and-diagnosis/ < Previous News Next News >

Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy Webinar Center for Connected Health Policy April 30, 2021 Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy Webinar April 30 Telehealth has demonstrated that it has the potential to make healthcare more accessible for hard-to-reach patient populations in medically underserved communities. However, some lessons from telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic have raised concerns about access gaps for these patients. Join the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) and leading Medicaid experts on Friday, April 30, 2021 for the first webinar in our Spring webinar series, Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy. This webinar will feature presentations from Medicaid administrators and policy staff on trends in telehealth access and equity and strategies to address these gaps. Stay tuned for more information on confirmed speakers for this webinar. This event is free and open to the public. Register: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_B-EIOkBkQW-QvcxUcqHxKA < Previous News Next News >

Packard Foundation COVID-19 Policy Flexibilities Report – Impacts and Recommendations Related to Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 Telehealth ensured better access to distant and specialized services, especially for those in rural areas and needing services in nearby states, as well as the potential to reduce disparities and address workforce shortages, such as those related to pediatric specialists. Last month the Lucile Packard Foundation released a report on COVID-19 policy flexibilities that focused on impacts and recommendations related to children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN). In addition to analyzing emergency policies, they looked to clinicians, family advocates, and other stakeholders to identify both challenges and opportunities based on their experiences. The number one policy change highlighted by all interviewees was how greater use of telehealth expanded access to care and had significant advantages, particularly for CYSHCN and their families. Telehealth ensured better access to distant and specialized services, especially for those in rural areas and needing services in nearby states, as well as the potential to reduce disparities and address workforce shortages, such as those related to pediatric specialists. Stakeholders also spoke to how telehealth addresses transportation and logistical barriers, mitigating challenges such as traveling long distances, missing work, and bringing other family members along as well as cumbersome medical equipment. The report also noted that the greatest challenges were identified as systemic infrastructure issues affecting broadband access, digital literacy, and lack of interpretation services. Based on their analysis and interviews, the report recommended CMS and state Medicaid programs extend emergency flexibilities on payment parity, audio-only and synchronous reimbursement, as well as remove geographic or rural/urban site restrictions and ease cross-state licensing laws. They also suggested the use of targeted federal funding to reduce disparities and providing grants for telehealth infrastructure and training, as well as increasing flexibility of privacy rules. For state Medicaid programs in particular, they recommended piloting additional modalities for future use such as texting, expanding school-based reimbursement and guidance, and considering reimbursement in childcare settings. The authors heard universally from stakeholders that reimbursement and payment parity requirements were essential to the availability of telehealth. According to their review, 38 states plus DC provided Medicaid payment parity by the end of April 2020, and by September, 17 states enacted laws requiring payment parity from private insurers. In addition, some clinicians reported that telehealth reduced emergency room and inpatient utilization, but because the costs saved were not shared with hospitals, the hospital shut down the program and they are now seeing increased emergency room use and negative health outcomes. For more information, please access the full report at https://www.lpfch.org/sites/default/files/field/publications/covid-19-hma-report_1.pdf. < Previous News Next News >

What you need to know about standing up a virtual nursing unit Bill Siwicki February 15, 2022 Jennifer Ball, RN, director of virtual care at Saint Luke's Health System of Kansas City, describes the workings and many benefits of the telehealth approach. The U.S. nursing shortage has reached critical levels during the pandemic battle, paired with an aging population. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects the need for 1.1 million new RNs for expansion and replacement of retirees. To serve its inpatient population and overcome the nursing shortage, St. Luke's Health System of Kansas City has developed an innovative approach leveraging virtual care. The organization created and implemented one of the nation's first virtual nursing units to reduce the burden on bedside nurses and much more. In her HIMSS22 educational session entitled "Lessons Learned from Launching a Virtual Nursing Unit," Jennifer Ball, RN, director of virtual care at Saint Luke's Health System of Kansas City will offer attendees next month a deep dive into the workings of the virtual nursing unit. She has been a nurse for 35 years, with a clinical background in ICU, trauma and ED, and has 25 years of experience in nursing management. To read the full article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-you-need-know-about-standing-virtual-nursing-unit < Previous News Next News >

The Data Challenge to Prove Telehealth’s Importance Continues Jan Ground, PT, MBA November 17, 2022 A group of telehealth leaders from 18 states worked the past two years on proving the value of telehealth with data to convince payors and legislators that continuing reimbursement post-COVID 19 is the right thing to do. Over the course of two years, 40 people, including five physicians, four nurses, four other clinicians, and 27 telehealth leaders in provider organizations, contributed to the effort. The group chose to focus initially on video visits for those in need of mental health care. We succeeded in step one: we surveyed 16 mental health provider organizations to find out what data they were collecting, and how success was being measured in 2020. The organizations ranged from large university medical centers to private practices in nine states. Not surprisingly, the data and metrics varied widely, even across large university-based systems. For example, in response to the question “What, if anything, is being measured regarding clinical outcomes?” Four organizations reported no clinical outcomes measurements Four organizations used a wide variety of validated and commonly used clinical outcome metrics: PHQ-9 (used by 3 of 4 ) Patient Health Questionnaire (columbia.edu) GAD7 (used by 2 of 4) GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7) - MDCalc BASIS-24 (use) BASIS-24® — eBASIS ACES ACE.pdf (odmhsas.org) Adverse Childhood Experiences Study EDE-Q PDFfiller - ede q online(1).pdf (uslegalforms.com) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire OCI-R Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) (psychology-tools.com) SF-12 The SF-12v2 PRO Health Survey (qualitymetric.com) Short Form Health Survey BAI beck-anxiety-inventory.pdf (jolietcenter.com) EDE-Q ede-q_quesionnaire.pdf (corc.uk.net) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire EDY-Q Microsoft Word - Hilbert, van Dyck_EDY-Q_English Version_2016 (harvard.edu) Eating Disorders in Youth Questionnaire McMaster Family Assessment Device STAI-C-S State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-CH) - Assessments, Tests | Mind Garden - Mind Garden State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Child Version – State only DERS Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (novopsych.com.au) PCL-5 PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) - Fillable Form (va.gov) Post-traumatic Checklist In another question on cost savings, the survey question was “What, if anything, is being measured regarding cost savings?” 13 organizations reported no cost savings measurements Two of the three organizations reported savings measurements shared the following metrics (video visits vs in person visits) Handouts, parking vouchers, meal vouchers In person clinicians paid salary, video visit clinicians paid per hour, Future: space cost savings (video visit clinicians providing care from home) In our next effort we wanted to add payor leaders or legislators to join the conversation to determine which, if any of the metrics being used and data being collected, might convince them to support continued reimbursement post-COVID 19. The 40 participants were all associated with provider organizations with insufficient connections with payors/legislators to successfully bring them into the conversation. The group took a break and then decided on a new approach. We came up with what we THINK would be most important to payors/legislators, based on our understanding of what drives their success. Here’s the list: Compare the following data for specific groups of mental health patients (e.g., based on location, disorder, gender, age, first time vs return patients, newly diagnosed vs existing patient, prior telemedicine use, other relevant demographics, and characteristics), with or without access to care by video: number of ED visits number of hospitalizations suicide rates survey results that measure mental health status using validated tools (e.g., PHQ9) timing to access -(i.e., length of time to get patients in front of provider for first visit) provider and patient satisfaction and retention (i.e., remain in care) Interestingly, I have since learned that, in fact, there are many data sources on these topics with many peer-reviewed articles based on well-controlled studies. That leads me to a different question: Why were none of the 40 participants, including me, aware of these data sources and how to access them? It perhaps has its roots in the type of data available. Much of the data available comes from academic institutions reporting on research studies and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. These can be readily found through a PubMed or Google Scholar search using appropriate search terms (e.g., telemental health, outcomes, cost) but if one is unfamiliar with conducting this type of search these articles will not be available to review. Other sources of information include websites of the professional societies of which the providers are members (e.g., American Psychiatric Association) and government websites (e.g., Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, but one has to know about these before they can be searched. Finally is the fact that although many healthcare systems and funders collect data, they use these data for internal purposes only and simply do not publish or share them. We are currently in search of a few provider organizations interested in/willing to collect some of these data. We have not had success. If you are interested in joining this collaborative effort, please contact me at: janground@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-ground-3089742/ A new thought is to focus on a current hot topic in the US, such as COVID 19, to identify data to prove (or not!) the value of care by video. Perhaps we could find an organization willing to provide some funding to more likely successfully identify organizations willing to collect the data. It should not have to be this hard! About the Author Jan Ground PT, MBA, led innovation and virtual care at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, where she worked for 18 years. She is the Colorado Liaison to the Southwest Telehealth Resource Center and the Colorado Ambassador to Telehealth and Medicine Today, an online peer-reviewed journal. Active in the American Telemedicine Association, Jan leads a group looking to prove, with data, that telehealth is worth paying for. Jan’s expertise is in leading change, and in clearly defining a problem before implementing a new approach to care. Her greatest passion is to lower the cost of the American healthcare system without lowering clinical outcomes. See original article: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/data-challenge-prove-telehealth-s-importance-continues < Previous News Next News >

CCHP Leadership Provides A Look Back at Telehealth Policy in 2022: Yes...The Year is Almost Over! Mei Kwong December 20, 2022 As another full year of living under the public health emergency (PHE) for COVID-19 comes to an end, we are taking a look back to see what has happened this year with telehealth policy on both the federal and state level. Since the PHE is still in place and likely to continue into 2023, permanent changes on the federal level have been fewer in comparison to what many states have been doing. In fact, some states began making permanent telehealth policy changes as early as late 2020. Other states have taken similar actions to their federal counterparts and put a definitive future expiration date on temporary telehealth policies. FEDERAL The most significant federal legislative telehealth policy action seen this year took place in the Budget Act of 2022 which included language extending some of the temporary waivers to telehealth in Medicare for an additional 151 days after the PHE. This statutory change led to additional clarifications that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) made in their Physician Fee Schedule for 2023 (PFS). CCHP also recently released a fact sheet on the relevant telehealth policies. The final result as the policy stands now is: For 151 Days After the PHE: Certain providers including federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), Rural Health Clinics (RHCs), occupational therapists, and physical therapists may continue to provide eligible services via telehealth under the Medicare program. The list of temporary services eligible to be delivered via telehealth and covered by the Medicare program will continue to be available during this 151-day period. The geographic limitations under permanent telehealth Medicare policy will be suspended during this 151-day period and the home will continue to be an eligible originating site for all eligible services during the extension. Audio-only can continue to be used as a modality for eligible services during the 151-day extension. Permanent policy requirements such as a previous in-person visit for mental health services taking place in a non-geographically eligible location, in the home or via audio-only is suspended during this 151-day period. Certain other federal waivers that exist under the PHE are currently not included in this 151-day grace period. This includes the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) exercising discretion in enforcing HIPAA which OCR has noted will expire when the PHE is declared over or expires, whichever comes first. As can be seen by the foregoing, very little has changed this year regarding permanent policy, just what will happen in the immediate aftermath of the end of the PHE. There have been some indications that Congress may pass legislation to extend the federal waivers, or at least some of them, beyond the 151-day period. HR 4040 authored by Representative Liz Cheney (R, WY) passed the House earlier this year, but no further action was taken. That bill would have extended some of the temporary waivers for an additional two years. However, what might be considered by Congress now is rumored to be only a one-year extension. It remains to be seen if some additional action will be taken legislatively. Feeding into the federal policymakers’ decision-making process have been several reports from various federal agencies in the past year. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released several reports around telehealth in 2022 including: Telehealth Was Critical for Providing Services to Medicare Beneficiaries During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic Certain Medicare Beneficiaries, Such as Urban and Hispanic Beneficiaries, Were More Likely Than Others to Use Telehealth During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic Medicare Telehealth Services During the First Year of the Pandemic: Program Integrity Risks The last study listed above is important to take note of given the concerns raised by policymakers for the potential of abuse and fraud. However, the OIG report noted that in the first year of COVID-19, less than 1% of telehealth claims made to Medicare raised flags for potential fraud, which should provide some reassurance to policymakers. Broadband has been an issue both on federal and state policymakers’ minds. While connectivity is a greater issue beyond how it impacts telehealth, it cannot be denied that telehealth will simply not work if the patient and provider cannot connect, although policy expansions related to audio-only have sought to mitigate this gap to a certain extent. In 2022, the Federal Communications Commission transitioned the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program into the Affordable Connectivity Program which provides assistance in paying for connectivity. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) compiled federal funding opportunities that support broadband planning, digital inclusion and deployment projects on one site. States have also been gearing up activity around broadband, some of it funded by the federal government such as NTIA awards to Nebraska to develop strategic plans to expand high-speed broadband and other investments made by the state itself. No doubt, broadband will continue to be a significant issue in 2023. STATES As CCHP’s recent Legislative Roundup newsletter noted, 2022 was another active year for state telehealth policy legislation, though not as robust as it was in 2021. Overall, in 2022, of the bills enacted and subjects CCHP tracked, licensure proved to be the most popular policy issue addressed with 61 bills across the states passing. This was followed by 27 enacted bills related to professional regulations and telehealth, many having to do with prescribing and 18 bills for pilot/studies/demonstrations. Enacted Medicaid and private payer reimbursement bills were 17 and 12, respectively. The licensure focus is of particular interest to note. While many of the pieces of legislation passed related to joining licensure compacts, states also made exceptions to licensure for specific situations. States are starting to address the various situations usually involving an already established relationship between patients and providers that prior to the pandemic had remained grey areas. A common concern raised during the pandemic related to licensure involved a patient temporarily re-locating to another state, perhaps as a college student, going on vacation or caring for a family member, but still wanting to receive services from their own provider in their home state. Kentucky passed HB 188 that forbids a regulatory board from promulgating regulations related to telehealth that prohibit “the delivery of telehealth services to a person who is not a permanent resident of Kentucky who is temporarily located in Kentucky by a provider who is credentialed by a professional licensure board in the person’s state of permanent residence.” While clarity is always welcomed, the exceptions individual states are passing will create more complexity in the telehealth policy landscape particularly for practitioners who provide services in multiple jurisdictions. Reimbursement is an area that generates significant interest. For Medicaid related legislation, the type of modality used and services that would be covered under the program were popular issues addressed through legislation. For example, Virginia SB 426 requires the Medicaid state plan be amended to allow for remote patient monitoring (RPM) services for patients with certain types of medical conditions such as high-risk pregnancy and transplant patients when there is evidence that use of RPM is likely to prevent readmission to a hospital. Private payer telehealth legislation can also be quite specific. Louisiana HB 304 now requires telehealth coverage and payment parity equivalent to in-person services for physical therapy in particular. However, what we also saw were legislators moving towards ensuring there were patient protections/choice codified in state laws related to private payer plans and telehealth. Mississippi SB 2738, among other things, states that insurers cannot limit coverage of services to select third-party organizations. Commercial plans only offering telehealth delivered services to enrollees through a third party and not allowing their in-network providers to use telehealth has been a concern that was growing even prior to the pandemic. This stems from concerns raised by policymakers regarding patient choice or patients being “forced” to use telehealth and continuity of care concerns that continue to exist today. Overall, the number of states expanding telehealth policies increased. As noted in CCHP’s latest update to its 50 State Telehealth Policy Summary Report, Fall 2022, compared to its Fall 2021 update, three more state Medicaid programs are covering store-and-forward telehealth, five more states are covering RPM under Medicaid, and state Medicaid programs covering audio-only went up from 22 states to 34 states and DC. Additionally, three states have added payment parity requirements to their private payer laws. WHAT’S NEXT FOR 2023? As noted above, rumors have swirled around that there may be movement on the federal level to extend some of the telehealth waivers beyond the 151-day grace period, similar to what was proposed in the Cheney bill. However, it is likely that any such change will be included in a larger bill, such as the budget bill, rather than a standalone telehealth bill. There are also several outstanding issues that continue to not be addressed such as the registry for telehealth that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was to finalize regulations for in 2019. Some may recall that among the list of exceptions to allowing telehealth to be used to prescribe a controlled substance without the telehealth provider having examined the patient in-person included when a PHE was declared and the creation of a registry. For the registry, presumably once a provider is qualified to be on the registry, they need not have to meet any of the other narrow exceptions to prescribe via telehealth. That registry has never been created, though Congress had directed the DEA to finalize regulations by the end of 2019. On the state level, we likely can expect to see continued action around coverage, licensure, and professional regulations, as well as continued discussion around patient choice. During this past year, there has been increased discussions regarding “telehealth-first” health plans and the impact on patient choice. Whether policymakers take a more active role in regulating these plans remains to be seen, but the discussion around patient choice protections will continue. One thing is clear: the telehealth policy landscape is by no means “settled” as 2022 draws to a close. Outstanding questions around temporary policies still remain and even settled policies implemented a year or so ago have been tweaked in some states. To hear more about what's occurred in 2022, plus what we can anticipate for 2023, watch CCHP's newest short video. As we head into 2023 we can be certain that the telehealth policy landscape will continue to evolve and change, and we look forward to having you continue on this journey alongside CCHP. Have a Happy New Year and see everyone in 2023! Mei Kwong, CCHP Executive Director See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/cchp-leadership-provides-a-look-back-at-telehealth-policy-in-2022-yesthe-year-is-almost-over < Previous News Next News >

Emergency telemedicine poised to grow in pandemic’s new phase Tanya Albert Henry, Contributing News Writer May 23, 2022 Emergency medicine is likely not the first specialty that comes to mind when thinking about the clinical areas that can benefit greatly from telehealth. But this digitally enabled mode of health care delivery that took off at the pandemic’s onset was helping in the emergency medicine setting before COVID-19 and will only continue to grow. An AMA Telehealth Immersion Program event co-hosted with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) provided an overview of the innovative ways telemedicine is being used in emergency settings and discussed how telehealth can continue to help physicians provide better care for patients. Emergency medicine doesn’t take place in one spot in the hospital and emergency physicians are trained to take care of emerging acute care situations in any setting, said Aditi U. Joshi, MD, chair of ACEP’s telehealth section. That includes the kind of asynchronous care that can be part of telehealth. Triage involves determining which kind of care presenting patients require. “Can they stay at home, do they need to go to an urgent care, primary care, or do they need to come into the emergency department?” she said. “We are uniquely skilled in that.” Telestroke was another form of telehealth in use before the COVID-19 pandemic, and telehealth was in use at freestanding emergency departments and urgent care centers. And here are a few ways that virtual care is poised to continue to grow: Triage. This can include, for example, talking to the emergency medical services unit on the way to the hospital, long-term acute care (LTAC) triage, and telemedicine screening exams. Direct, acute unscheduled care. For example, virtual urgent care, ED consults to help with things such as transfer stabilization treatment advice, LTAC, correctional medicine, or skilled nursing facility consults. Virtual (out of ED) observation. For example, post-ED follow-up visits, remote home monitoring, and hospital at home. The AMA helps guide physicians, practices and health systems in optimizing and sustaining telehealth at their organizations through the AMA Telehealth Immersion Program. The program builds on The Telehealth Initiative and is part of the AMA STEPS Forward® Innovation Academy, which enables physicians to learn from peers and experts and discover ways to implement time-saving practice innovation strategies. Benefits in the rural setting Over the past decade, 120 U.S. hospitals closed and 31 states have seen at least one rural hospital among those closures. With 20% of the population living and working in a rural area where hospitals often have limited staff, wait times for EDs in the rural hospitals are higher than the national average that is already at 24 minutes—and that is to see a nonphysician such as a nurse practitioner or physician assistant. It’s not uncommon for a physician to have to be called to come in from home at night because there are not enough doctors to staff the hospital 24/7. Emergency physician Kelly Rhone, MD, interim chief medical officer and vice president of innovation and outreach at Avel eCare, said their virtual health system—started in 1993—works with rural hospitals across the country to provide emergency care. They are hard-wired into EDs where health professionals with the push of a button can connect to their virtual emergency department, staffed with emergency physicians and nurses, to direct those who have their hands on the patients who may be in cardiac arrest, suffering from a stroke or facing other life-threatening injuries. “We are making a difference in rural health and bringing cutting-edge emergency medicine to the bedside,” Dr. Rhone said. Emergency telehealth in big cities too Telemedicine in the ED setting has benefits in large urban areas such as Los Angeles, too. Moshen Saidinejad, MD, directs pediatric emergency medicine at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, and said many children go to EDs that aren’t set up for pediatric patients and telemedicine allows those trained in pediatric emergency medicine to consult with those treating a child. The benefits of expanded telemedicine are clear. Join physicians who are advocating to permanently expand virtual care coverage. For more information see full article: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/emergency-telemedicine-poised-grow-pandemic-s-new-phase?smclient=f760e669-8538-11ec-83c8-18cf24ce389f&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default < Previous News Next News >

Advances in telemedicine are on the way in 2022 Bill Siwicki Dec. 20, 2021 A physician expert in virtual care talks technological advances, reimbursement legislation and the continued evolution of remote patient monitoring. 2020 and 2021 saw the mainstreaming of telehealth and the rise of remote patient monitoring. These changes to the healthcare landscape were helped partly by requirements of the COVID-19 pandemic and partly by the subsequent loosening of telemedicine reimbursement and licensure regulations by the government. But what's to happen in 2022? Will the government and commercial payers continue to reimburse for telemedicine? Will new virtual-care legislation pass? Will there be technological advances that push the care paradigm further forward? And what of the future of remote patient monitoring? Healthcare IT News sat down with Dr. Ian Tong, chief medical officer at Included Health, a telehealth technology and services company, to get his read on these questions and his predictions for telehealth in 2022 and beyond. Q. What do you see in the realm of technological advances in telemedicine in 2022? A. While 2021 saw many healthcare technology mergers and acquisitions in response to the pandemic, and growing virtual-care adoption among payers, providers and consumers, much of the technology of these combined entities remains fractured. Though promoted as one offering, consumers still are having to navigate two or more platforms and work to connect the dots themselves. The technology needs to become invisible – so good that you don't even realize it's there. The technology for virtual-care appointments also will continue to advance beyond 1:1 doctor-patient video conferencing. For example, in response to the rising behavioral health provider shortage, we can expect to see technology that can enable group sessions with multiple patients receiving counsel and support at once. Whether it's behavioral, acute or chronic care, the most important role that technology will play is enabling all physicians to have the same window into a patient's medical history and care plan so they can provide integrated, longitudinal care. The technology is what will enable this industry to realize the full potential of virtual care beyond transactional, one-time interactions. Q. All the temporary reimbursement moves by government and payers for the sake of the pandemic really pushed telehealth into the mainstream. What do you foresee happening with reimbursement for virtual care in 2022? Will it become permanent? Will it be expanded? A. With usage rates 38 times higher than pre-pandemic, and the inarguable value for the people who need it most – seniors and the immunocompromised who can't afford in-person exposure – I believe the government will and should expand virtual-care access. Pre-pandemic virtual care was used for urgent, low-complexity issues – cough, cold, rashes. But today, the real value is for integrated chronic-disease management or ongoing behavioral-health therapy, where people need not be burdened by the constant travel in and out of doctors' offices. The more care that shifts to virtual, the less burden of disease the patients will have, which will lead to better outcomes. This is an opportunity that should be afforded to everyone, especially our most vulnerable and historically underserved communities. Q. Remote patient monitoring is a form of telehealth that is of growing interest to healthcare provider organizations. What do you see happening with RPM in 2022? A. Adoption of remote patient monitoring devices continues to rise, and we don't see it slowing down any time soon. Today, one third of consumers are more likely to choose a provider that allows them to share data from a connected health device, which only promotes more positive outcomes. The more real-time data that we can collect in the comfort of people's homes, the more personalized, data-driven virtual care we can provide. However, to really launch adoption in this sector, the costs of these devices need to come down. As costs come down, health plans can more easily find an ROI [return on investment] to subsidize the use of these devices. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/advances-telemedicine-are-way-2022 < Previous News Next News >

How Amazon, Walmart & 7 Others are Expanding Their Telehealth Business Katie Adams, Becker's Hospital Review July 2021 Companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. It's unclear how widely telehealth services will be used once the pandemic subsides, but companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. Below are updates on how nine companies are expanding their telehealth business, as covered by Becker's Hospital Review during the past three months. UnitedHealth Group subsidiary Optum on April 15 deployed a new telehealth product across all 50 states. The product, dubbed Optum Virtual Care, aims to integrate physical care, virtual care, home care and behavioral care. Amwell on April 28 unveiled its new Converge telehealth platform, which can host and operate digital offerings from Cleveland Clinic, Google Cloud and others. Ro, a direct-to-consumer telehealth app for pharmacy services, inked its first retail collaboration with Walmart April 28. Under the new partnership, Ro will launch its Roman health and wellness products and digital services in more than 4,600 Walmart stores across the country. On May 19, Ro acquired reproductive health company Modern Fertility for more than $225 million. Amazon on May 5 signed its first enterprise client for its telehealth service, Amazon Care. It has since secured multiple companies as clients for the telehealth service, and it is eyeing expansion into rural markets. Walmart Health on May 6 entered an agreement to acquire on-demand, multispecialty telehealth provider MeMD. By acquiring MeMD, Walmart will begin providing virtual care services for urgent, behavioral and primary care to complement its in-person Walmart Health Centers. Telehealth provider Doctor On Demand and clinical navigation platform Grand Rounds completed their merger May 11. On May 26, the combined company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Included Health, a comprehensive healthcare platform for patients who are LGBTQ and BIPOC. Teladoc Health on May 11 launched its new mental healthcare service MyStrength Complete, which offers personalized mental health services to consumers as an integration of Teladoc's virtual platform. On July 14, Teladoc integrated its hospital telehealth platform with Microsoft Teams. The Clinic, a joint digital health venture between Cleveland Clinic and Amwell, on May 18 launched new health offerings as part of its virtual second opinion service. The offering expansion is for patients with brain tumors and prostate cancers, since there are multiple treatment options for these conditions. Membership-based primary care network One Medical on June 7 entered an agreement to acquire Iora Health, a tech-powered primary care provider focusing on serving Medicare patients. The acquisition will allow One Medical to offer 24/7 digital and in-person care, as well as extend the provider into full-risk Medicare reimbursement models. < Previous News Next News >

Expanded Medicare Telehealth Coverage for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Services Furnished by Opioid Treatment Programs Sunny J. Levine Hannah E. Zaitlin Nathaniel M. Lacktman November 09, 2022 Starting January 1, 2023, Medicare will cover telehealth-based treatment services delivered by federally-accredited opioid treatment programs (OTPs), commonly referred to as “methadone clinics.” This new reimbursement is intended to further the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) objectives in its 2022 Behavioral Health Strategy, with a particular focus on improving access to substance use disorder (SUD) prevention, treatment, and recovery services. To this end, CMS added several expansion opportunities for OTPs, including telehealth coverage. However, these flexibilities do not extend to SUD treatment provided outside an OTP, such as office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) services. Details of the new coverage rules are contained in the 2023 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule (Final Rule), and summarized below. Background and History of Medicare Telehealth Coverage of SUD Treatment Prior to the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), to initiate treatment with buprenorphine at an OTP, a practitioner needed to perform a complete in-person physical evaluation. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrating (SAMHSA) waived this requirement for the duration of the PHE, allowing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) practitioners to initiate treatment with buprenorphine via audio-video telehealth and/or audio-only telephone communications without an initial in-person evaluation (subject to state law restrictions). This temporary exemption only applies to OTP patients treated with buprenorphine; it does not apply to new patients treated with methadone. CMS also extended coverage for SUD treatment services provided via telehealth. While Medicare telehealth services fall under Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, which generally limits payment for telehealth services to patients located in specific types of medical settings (originating sites) in mostly rural areas, the SUPPORT Act amended Section 1834(m), by removing the originating site and geographic limitation for telehealth services provided to individuals with a diagnosed or co-occurring mental health disorder (including a SUD) delivered on or after July 1, 2019. In 2020, CMS established a new Part B benefit category for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provided by OTPs. The covered benefit includes MAT for patients with OUD, a leading treatment modality that combines prescribing FDA-approved medication (e.g., methadone and buprenorphine) with counseling and other behavioral therapy, to provide a whole person approach. Subsequently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA) permanently removed the geographic restrictions and added the patient’s home as a qualifying originating site for telehealth services provided for the diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a mental health disorder. Under the CY 2022 PFS final rule, CMS revised the definition of “interactive telecommunication system” to allow the use of audio-only communications technology for telemental health services under certain conditions when the beneficiary is located at their home. New Changes to Medicare OTP Telehealth Services Under the Final Rule, CMS made the following changes relating to OTP telehealth services: 1. OTPs can use the OTP intake add-on code to bill for the initiation of buprenorphine treatment through two-way interactive audio-video communication technology, as clinically appropriate, and in compliance with all applicable requirements (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). 2. Audio-only telephone calls can be used to initiate buprenorphine treatment at OTPs when two-way audio-video communications technology is not available to the beneficiary, and all other requirements are met. 1. CMS interprets “not available to the beneficiary” to include “circumstances in which the beneficiary is not capable of or has not consented to the use of devices that permit a two-way, audio/video interaction because in each of these instances audio/video communication technology is not able to be used in furnishing services to the beneficiary.” 3. After the initiation of buprenorphine treatment, OTPs can continue to use audio-only telephone calls to perform periodic patient assessments when two-way audio-video is not available (provided such flexibilities are authorized by DEA and SAMHSA at the time service is furnished). This flexibility will be in place until the end of CY 2023. CMS Recognized Broad Stakeholder Support for Telehealth SUD Treatment In comments to the new rules, stakeholders lauded the benefits of two-way audio-video communications technology used to initiate treatment with buprenorphine. CMS concurred, noting it is “of critical importance to individuals who have limited ability to attend in-person appointments or who are disincentivized to do so due to perceived stigma and fear.” CMS also acknowledged that audio-only flexibilities “further promote equity for individuals who are economically disadvantaged, live in rural areas, are racial and ethnic minorities, lack access to reliable broadband or internet access, or do not possess devices with video functions.” CMS declined to address comments relating to issues outside the scope of the final rule, including: 1) comments related to allowing prescribers to initiate buprenorphine treatment for SUDs without an in-person evaluation in other settings (outside of OTPs); 2) coordinating with DEA to create a special registration for telehealth providers under the Ryan Haight Act; and 3) developing an add-on code for Contingency Management. While the final rule does not extend coverage to OBOT treatment – which has proven a successful treatment option during the COVID-19 PHE – it evidences CMS’s view of technology as a viable way to provide life-saving SUD treatment to vulnerable beneficiaries. © 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 313 See original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/expanded-medicare-telehealth-coverage-opioid-use-disorder-treatment-services < Previous News Next News >

Athena Health Telehealth Adoption Report Center for Connected Health Policy May 2021 How providers are taking advantage of virtual care and their perceived benefits Athena Health began conducting research in 2020 on de-identified data from across their healthcare network (which spans the nation) to understand how providers are feeling about the increased adoption of telehealth. With the onset of COVID-19, the use of telehealth has skyrocketed, and beyond understanding the increased utilization numbers, it’s also important to understand provider adoption rates, their attitudes toward telehealth, which specialties and what services telehealth is being used in the most. An interactive infographic tool on their website can be utilized to identify the amount of care across their system that has gone virtual by specialty (primary care, mental health, cardiology, pediatrics, OB/GYN or all specialties). Users can also view by specialty how providers are taking advantage of virtual care and their perceived benefits (for example, virtual appointments are more convenient), and the reasons why providers are turning to telehealth to keep their practices running. For a complete breakdown of their findings, visit Athena Health’s interactive webpage: https://www.athenahealth.com/knowledge-hub/clinical-trends/the-athenahealth-telehealth-insights-dashboard. < Previous News Next News >