HHS to put $35M toward telehealth for family planning Kat Jercich November 29, 2021 The agency plans to use the funds to award about 60 one-time grants to Title X family planning providers, who must apply by February of next year. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced that it would make $35 million in American Rescue Plan funding available for Title X family planning providers to strengthen their telehealth infrastructure and capacity. Title X family planning clinics help to insure access to a broad range of reproductive health services for low-income or uninsured individuals. "I’ve seen first-hand the critical role that telehealth plays in serving communities, particularly to protect so many families from COVID-19," said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in a statement about the grant availability. "As providers transitioned from providing in-person primary care to offering telehealth services, we were able to test, vaccinate, and act as lifelines to communities disproportionately hit by the pandemic," he said. "Increasing our investment and access to telehealth services remains critical." WHY IT MATTERS The Office of Population Affairs funds 71 Title X family planning service grantees and supports hundreds of subrecipients and thousands of service sites around the country. Family planning includes a broad range of services related to reproductive health, including contraception, sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy testing. Although abortion care can be co-located with family planning services, Title X funds cannot be used to pay for it. Although some services require in-person treatment and exams, others can be carried out via telehealth – as evidenced by grantees' use of virtual care to help their patients during the COVID-19 crisis. Still, facilities may not have adequate technology available. "During the global COVID-19 pandemic, family planning programs have accelerated the use of telehealth," said Dr. Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for health, in a statement. "These ARP funds will facilitate the delivery of quality family planning services and reduce access barriers for people living in America who rely on the health care safety net for services," she added. HHS plans to use the funds to award about 60 one-time grants to active Title X grantees. Organizations must apply by February 3, 2022, and notices of awards will be announced before the project start date of May 1, 2022. THE LARGER TREND Even as the government has moved to shore up telehealth infrastructure via funding, the question of virtual care's future continues to hang over Congress. Despite requests from hundreds of advocacy organizations, legislators have so far failed to take action to permanently safeguard telehealth after the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency – what some activists have referred to as "the telehealth cliff." "We recognize there are many unknowns related to the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic over the next 12 to 24 months," said American Telemedicine Association CEO Ann Mond Johnson in October. "However, we implore Secretary Becerra to provide as much predictability and certainty as possible to ensure adequate warning before patients are pushed over this looming cliff." ON THE RECORD "The pandemic has laid bare the important role that telehealth can play in our nation’s healthcare service delivery, and we are profoundly grateful for the opportunity to support continued investments in telehealth for the nation’s family planning safety net," said Jessica Swafford Marcella, HHS deputy assistant secretary for population affairs, in a statement. < Previous News Next News >

San Juan Regional Medical Center gets CARES Act funding to expand telehealth services By Hannah Grover, Farmington Daily Times February 15, 2021 AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. The pandemic changed things. San Juan Regional Medical Center and San Juan Health Partners worked quickly to expand telehealth offerings. Now the hospital is receiving CARES Act funding to help improve its technology and better provide that service. "Demand (for telehealth) was immediate and has continued to grow," Miliffe said. San Juan Regional Medical Center will receive $1.25 million in CARES Act funding to supply emergency generators as well as to make upgrades in the IT network, according to a press release from the office of Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-NM. IT upgrades, new generators on the way These technology upgrades will support telehealth and field hospital operation projects that have been implemented in an effort to bolster the hospital's response to COVID-19. The grant funding will be matched with $617,000 in local funds. All locations except for San Juan Health Partners Urgent Care began offering a mixture of telephone and video visits in an effort to comply with public health orders, sustain the services offered and prevent the spread of the coronavirus, according to Barbara Charles, administrative director for San Juan Health Partners. The medical center's network infrastructure wasn't designed to service the high demands of video consultations and Miliffe said the IT team has had to push the current capabilities. "However, significant upgrades to the wired and wireless infrastructure is needed to sustain and improve the existing experience, and allow for the continued growth in telehealth demands driven by the pandemic," he said. "This funding will make a fundamental difference in our ability to serve our community’s needs." Your stories live here. Fuel your hometown passion and plug into the stories that define it. Create Account COVID: State health department closes Home Depot over COVID-19 cases One of the barriers that the center has seen is the remote nature of the community. Many patients can only connect through phone due to limited internet connectivity or cell service that can't support video. "The inability to consistently connect by audio and video is an ongoing barrier," Charles said. This funding is part of more than $2.24 million of CARES Act money that will be coming to northwest New Mexico to address healthcare and economic needs. In addition to San Juan Regional Medical Center, the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments, which is based in Gallup, has been awarded $990,000 to address economic development needs of small businesses and entrepreneurs that have been harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments serves Cibola, McKinley and San Juan counties. According to the press release, the council of governments hopes to create 100 jobs and retain 100 jobs through a revolving loan fund that this funding will assist in creating. Legislative session:New Mexico lawmakers work to address economic impact of COVID-19 U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich Heinrich said in a press release that he has been "moved by the resiliency and grit" of rural New Mexico communities as they have faced a variety of public health and economic challenges related to the pandemic. "That is why I fought so hard to include funding in the CARES Act to help New Mexico’s rural health care systems, small businesses, and entrepreneurs to weather this storm," he said. "This funding is long-overdue and I will continue working for federal resources that New Mexico’s rural communities need to take on the COVID-19 pandemic and rebuild our economy in a way that supports everyone." Heinrich as well as Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-NM, and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-NM, announced $2.24 million of CARES Act funding for northwest New Mexico on Feb. 12. San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois Hospital: Telehealth is here to stay San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois thanked the lawmakers for the funding in the press release and emphasized that the hospital provides essential healthcare services for the Four Corners area. "This funding will ensure that we can meet the diverse needs of our patients and community and improve care for those we are privileged to serve," he said. While the pandemic jump started the demand for telehealth in the community, Miliffe said the San Juan Regional Medical Center does not anticipate it fading away. "Looking ahead to post-pandemic times, we see a long term and stable need for these services in our community as patients look to receive their healthcare in more of a consumer fashion, with services and offerings tailored around them as the individual," Charles, of San Juan Health Partners, said. "It is expected that the need or demand for telemedicine will continue long term. Many patients with health needs that may not require an in-person or face-to-face visit may find this option more flexible and convenient. Additionally, given the unknowns of the pandemic – this remains a safe alternative to in-person visits for patient to seek as needed or routine healthcare needs." Charles said telehealth also plays a key role in the COVID to Home program, which allows COVID-19 patients to receive close monitoring while in self-isolation at their own houses. "Because of this program’s close monitoring through telehealth visits, many patients have been able to stay out of the hospital and manage their care at home through the telephone or video calls. In other cases, caregivers have been able to intervene to coordinate a higher level of care for patients who needed it," she said. "To date, the COVID to Home program has helped more than 1,200 patients manage their care at home, something that would not have been possible without telehealth." Hannah Grover covers government for The Daily Times. She can be reached at 505-564-4652 or via email at hgrover@daily-times.com . This story has been modified to correct the attribution on some quotes. < Previous News Next News >

The future of telemedicine: purpose-built, integrated platforms Zoll Data Systems March 1, 2022 Integrated telemedicine solutions can address current pain points. By: Businessperson with tablet pointing to AI and data graphics Maximizing provider returns with big data Stethoscope and calculator on graphs How Emergency Medicine Physicians Can Increase Revenue in 2021 with Medicare PFS Cuts Looming person holding an insurance card. Billing Medicare and Private Payers for Telehealth Visits: What to Expect Post-Public Health Emergency Doctor talking to mother and daughter at reception desk Insurance Verification Technology Prevents Errors that Cause Costly Denials SPONSORED Global Edition Telehealth The future of telemedicine: purpose-built, integrated platforms Integrated telemedicine solutions can address current pain points. By: March 01, 2022 10:27 AM Photo Credit: adamkaz/Getty Images Propelled into mainstream use by the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine is becoming standard practice for many healthcare providers. According to David Ernst, MD, president of telemedicine innovator EPOWERdoc, these solutions will transform access to care and continue to drive more cost-effective delivery models, particularly at the EMS and emergency medicine level. Telemedicine’s technological pain points While telemedicine has undoubtedly come a long way, it still has significant limitations. One of the biggest limitations is provider usability. Often, telemedicine “platforms” are actually several disparate solutions cobbled together. These may include a video conferencing app, patient registration portal for demographic and insurance information, EMR, e-prescription app and discharge system. Consequently, providers must toggle between separate software programs to review and enter patient data for a single encounter. This inefficient approach can introduce errors, create frustration for patients and providers, and jeopardize the continuity of care. There is hope, however: Telemedicine technology is making rapid advancements through purpose-built platforms. Read full article here: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/future-telemedicine-purpose-built-integrated-platforms < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth 2.0: How Providence is taking its platform to the next level Laura Dyrda June 13, 2022 Telehealth became the prevailing mode for medical providers to see patients during the early days of the pandemic, and while use has leveled off in many areas, virtual care has become a permanent part of the healthcare ecosystem. Hospitals and health systems across the U.S. are now building telehealth, remote patient monitoring and hospital-at-home programs as part of their growth strategies. Patients also prefer telehealth as a convenient way to see their clinicians when an in-person visit isn't necessary. Most health systems have built a functioning telehealth program, but what opportunities are there to refine these programs for a better patient and clinician experience? Todd Czartoski, MD, chief medical technology officer at Renton, Wash.-based Providence, joined the Becker's "Digital Health + Health IT" podcast to talk about where the health system's virtual care program is headed. Click here to subscribe to the podcast and keep an eye out for Dr. Czartoski's episode. Note: Response below is edited lightly for clarity. Question: Where do you see telehealth becoming a better tool for clinicians and patients? How is virtual care at Providence evolving? Dr. Todd Czartoski: Over the last two years, our organization has done just over 4 million [telehealth] visits. For perspective, in 2019 we did 67,000 visits, and in one year we were doing 70,000 visits a week in April and May of 2020. That was a huge shift. Now, turning the lights on and being able to walk into the room is one thing, moving furniture around and optimizing the flow is another. A lot of our focus in the last couple years has been improving the experience for the provider, clinic staff and for the patient. We have really gotten it down to where the basic technical components of [telehealth] work pretty darn well, and we don't have a lot of issues with the connectivity piece. We've added interpreter services, and we've added in the ability to talk to more than one person at a time so you can have a family member in a different part of the country join the visit. Those types of things have been important add-ons, in addition to waiting room functionalities where you can add a survey or information tailored to the patient while they're waiting to see their provider in the virtual waiting room. Those are the things you're going to see continuing to evolve and emerge as additional capabilities. The support staff for the physician or provider's clinic also see their function and role evolving. If you think about a traditional clinic, a lot of those roles require putting patients in the room, checking their vitals, ordering labs or getting patients a follow-up appointment. Some of these things still exist, and some are going to be automated or done as part of a telehealth visit. That's where some of the opportunities are arising to continue to optimize the experience for the patients, staff and provider. You're going to see big trends overall here. Telehealth as a video visit, as a functionality, is somewhat limited. What we've learned is that whether you're a behavioral health specialist, a primary care provider or a subspecialty surgeon … all of those specialist visits can be done safely and effectively with telehealth. It's opened the door for looking at what else could we do beyond just a face-to-face visit. Specifically, the door has been opened for home monitoring. We have a remote patient monitoring solution that we built for COVID-19 home monitoring specifically, and because of the success of that, we've monitored over 30,000 patients up to two weeks who either confirmed or were under suspicion of having COVID-19. That opens the door for what we could do in terms of other types of home monitoring for COPD, diabetes, hypertension or whatever the case may be. That's a big area for growth and development. Finally, moving services outside the hospital, hospital-at-home, is a big initiative for us. We've been working on it for a long time and we're seeing some success. We're rapidly deploying that across our ecosystem and a lot of other health systems are as well. It really checks a lot of the boxes for patient experience; our patients absolutely love it. It's bending the cost curve, improving access and helping improve capacity so we don't have to build more super expensive towers and hospitals. Some of the outcomes with hospital-at-home have been shown to be better than traditional hospitalization when it comes to delirium, falls, length of stay and complications. People actually heal better on their own in a comfortable home environment. Those are a few examples of areas that we're going to see growth in our ecosystem. See original article: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/telehealth/telehealth-2-0-how-providence-is-taking-its-platform-to-the-next-level.html?origin=CIOE&utm_source=CIOE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter&oly_enc_id=1372I2146745E8F < Previous News Next News >

Transforming Homes And Communities Into Healthcare Hubs In The Post-Covid Future Ryan Hullinger and Sarah Markovitz August 2021 Hospital design experts Ryan Hullinger and Sarah Markovitz discuss the inevitable shifts in healthcare delivery as technology leads to new care settings and rethinking hospitals. The explosion of telehealth prompted by the Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated a shift in care delivery away from the hospital and clinic and into homes and communities. While hospitals have historically been the main hub of care, technology and new care models are enabling a different approach to care delivery. Rather than episodic preventative care, in which a patient periodically goes to a physician or hospital with a health concern, this new model of care is continuous and ubiquitous—with ongoing care reinforced in the home, office, school and throughout the community. There are three key aspects to this shift: advancing technology, new care settings, and the future evolution of hospitals. Advancing Technology Healthcare may follow a familiar path blazed by online retail. It was not that long ago that virtually everyone preferred in-person retail experiences to shopping online. The technology that would later make online shopping experiences superior to brick and mortar just didn’t exist. Telehealth, by comparison, is still in the dial-up days. It’s difficult to imagine now, but based on the patterns we have seen clearly in other technology sectors, it’s probable that some healthcare experiences will be better remotely than in-person—more convenient, and less stressful and time consuming. The technology that will transform telehealth is on the horizon. It will take several R&D cycles, but it will come. In fact, there’s evidence that in areas like behavioral health telehealth is already comparable in efficacy to in-person care. What might the next generation of telehealth look like? For one, rather than sequential visits with separate specialists, patients may be able to connect to a suite of caregivers, all working collaboratively to provide more coordinated, effective care. The type of continuous, convenient touch-bases and flow of information enabled by telehealth and wearable devices could be particularly effective for the elderly and those with chronic conditions, where communication and ensuring compliance with medication and preventive care are often an issue. There will also likely be an expansion in the types of care and services that can be provided, including everything from post-surgical appointments, to ED triaging, and eventually more complex tests as new diagnostic technologies emerge. Automated technologies and artificial intelligence will also play an increasingly vital role in improving health throughout the community. AI technologies are being used to scan patient records, identify patients with hypertension and diabetes, and remind physicians to check in regularly with them. Hospitals have already shown good results using telehealth, texting and improved monitoring to help vulnerable populations and those with chronic conditions. Improved telehealth and health data capabilities could extend widescale efforts like these, improving population health efforts. New Care Settings With technology acting as a facilitator, more and more forms of care, especially routine procedures, will migrate away from hospitals and clinics. The home could become the new healthcare hub, with prefabricated telehealth units for the home that integrate medical technologies with telehealth capabilities. The explosion of smart home, home health and health monitoring devices, encompassing everything from sensors that detect sudden falls to smart watches that monitor heart rate and O2 levels, is only the tip of the iceberg. With the ability to monitor health data and communicate effectively with caregivers, the home could be a crucial site for preventive medicine, chronic disease management and ongoing care. The home health model is only one possible model—the technologies that enable it may have shortcomings, or prove unaffordable to large segments of the population, further exacerbating health inequities and the digital divide. But healthcare can still be provided in a wide range of locations distributed throughout communities. Libraries, schools, community centers, homeless shelters and pharmacies could become hubs for telehealth resources and care, serving a vital role in improving the health of communities. A key consideration will be access and location—ensuring that healthy equity and care for vulnerable populations drives where these new care hubs emerge. How Hospitals May Evolve As care becomes increasingly continuous and ubiquitous, the role of the hospital may evolve. Rather than serving as a destination for all patient types, it will become increasingly specialized and streamlined, focusing on high acuity cases. They may expand their capabilities and efficiency in areas like perioperative and high-end imaging that are not available in community settings. In the process, hospitals are likely to become more compact, high performing and efficient by narrowing their focus. As part of this evolution, hospitals may also need to bolster their ability to expand capacity by 50-100% in anticipation of emergencies like epidemics, mass casualties and weather-related crises. In the last 20 years, many hospitals have invested heavily in improving patient comfort and satisfaction, and have even borrowed processes and designs directly from the hospitality industry—creating patient environments that nearly resemble hotel lobbies and guestrooms. Patient satisfaction will continue to be a driver, but the environments that promote satisfaction are likely to change drastically. New environments that convey a sense of safety and cleanness will begin to feel more comfortable than the hospitality-informed designs of the past. As this shift and gradual downsizing takes place, there may be opportunities to adapt existing space for other uses. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the dramatic impact of stress on healthcare workers. Hospitals now have an opportunity to provide sufficient and appropriate space for staff, helping to build resiliency to counter staff burnout and ensure the well-being of these truly essential workers. Hospitals could also aim to provide more community, patient and staff resources, such as spaces to demonstrate telehealth technologies and how to use them, or new hybrid offices equipped for telehealth. As technologies, new care settings, and hospitals evolve, care will become more embedded in our daily lives. The pandemic may have spurred new interest in telehealth, but the trends shaping the future of care predate social distancing. They will continue to transform how and where care is delivered, ushering in a new era of ubiquitous healthcare. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/coronavirusfrontlines/2020/10/26/transforming-homes-and-communities-into-healthcare-hubs-in-the-post-covid-future/?sh=133370e04153 < Previous News Next News >

What an eventual end to the PHE would mean for telehealth Andrea Fox October 17, 2022 Among other impacts, ending the PHE would represent access challenges and a loss of Medicaid coverage for millions, and would end medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder without an in-person exam. Since the COVID-19 public health emergency was declared in 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services has renewed the legislation every 90 days. Close to the end of the most recent expiration date, October 13, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra again signed a renewal determination and it was posted without announcement late in the day. There had been no official news, but a lot of hearsay that the PHE would be renewed once more, because the Biden Administration indicated it would give two months' notice before its expiration. There is also the matter that open enrollment begins on November 1, and without the relaxed enrollment provisions for Medicaid that the PHE provides, the national uninsured rate along with health premium costs would certainly rise. But by definition an "emergency" can't last forever. The inevitable end of the PHE could result in the loss of Medicaid to millions when states review enrollee eligibility and in other impacts to healthcare operations. Questions regarding what will happen to telehealth benefits and the continuum of care in the absence of the PHE loom large. There has been extensive support for making the changes that have launched telehealth and provided the opportunity to serve more patients, but some people want to halt the prescribing of controlled substances via telehealth for mental health and substance abuse disorders and see the Ryan Haight Act – the online pharmacy consumer protection act of 2008 – reinstated. What's at stake Despite the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, which provides a 151-day extension on some flexibilities granted during the COVID-19 public health emergency once the PHE ends, providers and other healthcare professionals engaged in telehealth are eager to prepare for the expiration date. There has been mounting pressure from the Republican Party, including a September 19 letter from Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., with numerous questions about ending emergency powers after President Joe Biden remarked during his September 60 Minutes appearance that "the pandemic is over." "Without a clear plan to wind down pandemic-era policies, the deficit will continue to balloon and the effectiveness of public health measures will wane as the American people continue to be confused by mixed messages and distrust of federal officials," wrote Burr. Despite economic concerns, ending the legal waivers afforded under the PHE could ricochet, hammering against gains made in increased patient access. Dr. Adrienne Boissy, Qualtrics chief medical officer (and former Cleveland Clinic chief experience officer), notes that patients continue to rely on expanded digital access as mental health effects from the pandemic linger. She says that a reversal would limit digital health access, which an overly burdened and understaffed industry has come to rely on. "The ease and convenience telehealth provides are consistent sources of positive patient experiences, as well as decreased total costs of care and less time away from the workplace," she said in a statement to Healthcare IT News. "Comparing 2016 to 2022, clinicians also report better health outcomes for patients, efficiency and less stress/burnout as major drivers for adopting digital tools, including telehealth," she said. "With the PHE, we saw the industry put patients and their access to care first – no longer hindered by location or demographics. "To revert back to reimbursement models that only support in-person care unravels the gains of meeting people where they are – physically and emotionally," said Boissy. "We can’t turn back now," Boissy said. Brad Kittredge, CEO and cofounder of Brightside Health, adds that the country will be short of psychiatrists – by 14,280 to 31,109 – in just a few years. Ending the PHE presents a reduced ability to serve the growing number of patients in need of or seeking mental healthcare, he said. "While there’s no silver bullet solution, telehealth offers the best and most immediate solution to this growing challenge by increasing patient access to mental health specialists without being limited to geographic regions or facilities," Kittredge explained in a statement sent to HITN. "More significantly, telehealth enables us to use technology and data to help clinicians be more efficient and effective at treating their patients, maximizing the impact they can make," he said. Telehealth in legislative limbo During a recent American Telemedicine Association policy update, the ATA's federal and state-level telehealth policy experts described efforts to develop a consistent regulatory framework so telehealth can be deployed across states, be fully leveraged and address the patchwork of 50 different state requirements. Legislators have also proposed broadening access to telehealth through the Telehealth Benefit Expansion for Workers Act, the Telehealth Extension Act and the Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2021, which was passed by the House of Representatives in July, received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance, where it sits. Also at play are a number of loosened restrictions that opened the gateway to online treatment of certain conditions when uptake surged and access to in-person medical care was restricted. Healthcare organizations and retailers entering the space through mergers and acquisitions with healthcare providers have urged the U.S. Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Agency to revise telehealth controlled substance rules. The bill H.R. 7666 – the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 – introduced by Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., which was passed in the House, aims to address this hot-button issue for mental telehealth providers. The bill would permanently eliminate the X waiver, currently not required under the PHE. To qualify for the waiver to dispense buprenorphine for maintenance or detoxification treatment, the practitioner must take an eight-hour training and may only treat up to 30 opioid use disorder patients. Dr. Kristin Mack, a physician in Ticonderoga, N.Y., told MedPage Today that she would like to see the X waiver eliminated permanently. According to the story, rural communities are some of the hardest hit by the opiate epidemic. "We work really hard with community resources to provide counseling and things like that. But if I were to tell somebody, 'Oh, you have to go an hour away to a city to get care for this,' and then they need to be seen monthly, it's just not an option," she said. The Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 was received in the Senate and was referred to its Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions at the time of reporting. Treating opioid use disorders via telehealth It has been more than 10 years since the Ryan Haight Act mandated that DEA establish a rule ensuring that healthcare providers can successfully prescribe controlled substances via telehealth, but there has been no rule set forward. The SUPPORT Act again mandated the DEA issue rulemaking by October 2019 and the fiscal year 2021 final appropriations report requested that the agency establish these rules, according to the website of Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. This past year he urged the Biden Administration to finalize regulations that allow doctors to prescribe controlled substances through telehealth. "In practice, the DEA’s failure to address this issue means that a vast majority of healthcare providers that use telehealth to prescribe controlled substances to and otherwise treat their patients have been deterred in getting them the quality care they need. These restrictions have been temporarily waived during the COVID-19 public health emergency, and I welcome that, but patients and providers need a more permanent and long-term solution to this long-delayed rulemaking," Warner wrote in May 2021. Under the PHE, several virtual behavioral health startups focused on medication-assisted treatment for substance abuse disorder received investment rounds, according to Chris Larson at Behavioral Health Business. According to the story, Doug Nemecek, the chief medical officer of behavioral health for Evernorth, said that not enough people are accessing MAT, and that overdose rates have reached historic highs. "If regulations come back that prevent those companies from being able to deliver care in that way, we’re concerned that it’s going to have a negative impact on patients and our ability to make sure that people have access to the MAT that we want them to have access to," Nemecek said. Evernorth, part of Cigna Corp., is connected to digital MAT companies like Quit Genius. The cofounder of Quit Genius, Dr. Maroof Ahmed, explained in an email to Healthcare IT News that telehealth has filled a void that existed before the PHE. "Telehealth flexibilities and ePrescribing waivers have been crucial in enabling providers to care for patients during the pandemic and have greatly expanded access to care in situations where patients were unable or unwilling to travel to a physical location," he insists. Reinstating Ryan Haight Act requirements also has support Amending the Ryan Haight Act law is an effort largely supported in the healthcare and mental health space. However, Dr. Mimi Winsberg, CMO and the other cofounder of Brightside Health, shared another point of view regarding the dubious practice of prescribing controlled substances without an initial in-person visit. "To count on a public health emergency temporary lifting of laws in order to stimulate growth of your business is perhaps a questionable practice," she told Healthcare IT News, noting that Brightside adhered to not prescribing controlled substances over telemedicine despite the legal waivers. "While a lot of medical visits moved to tele during this sort of difficult part of the pandemic, that now in most specialties, they have gone back to in-person, but what we are seeing in mental health is about 80% have stayed remote," she added. "And so patients are continuing to get their mental healthcare largely through telemedicine." Winsberg entertained the question out loud: "Will they be resistant to in-person appointments if they need certain kinds of prescriptions?" "I don't think they will because we have seen that they're willing to go back to the doctor for other reasons," she added. The net growth of prescription drugs issued – stimulants and other controlled substances – grew during the pandemic, and she says she questions if the growth was largely driven by online practices "that were taking advantage of the lifting of the Ryan Haight Act." Winsberg did acknowledge, however, that an inability to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth for substance abuse disorder, "is potentially an issue," she said. "These laws exist for a reason, and what we have to balance in medicine is the willingness to help people with the do no harm principle." Establishing systematic monitoring of controlled-substance prescribing via telehealth could be achievable, Winsberg said. "But, we'd like to move towards appropriate prescriptions of controlled substances, and if we can find a way to meaningfully regulate that online, then great," she concluded. Equal treatment for mental health disorders In January, Dr. Robert Field and doctoral candidate Kimberly Williams at Drexel University published a commentary on the National Academy of Medicine website on the long overdue policy update needed to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth. The authors say that those who need treatment for opioid use disorder should have the same level of telehealth access as others who receive treatment for other medical concerns. They also noted that the DEA has not created a registration process through the online pharmacy consumer protection act, despite Congressional requests and statutory actions. "Doing so would not only ensure increased access to treatment but also set the stage for systematic monitoring of telemedicine and telephone services to confirm they meet the same rigorous standards of care as in-person services. "Such quality assurance efforts could promote the development of best practice guidelines and reduce variations in care as usage of these modalities increases," they argue. For the mental telehealth provider community wondering if the ability to prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth fades away in five months – if the Biden Administration does not intervene and extend the PHE, Congress does not pass legislation and the DEA does not create a registration process for prescribing controlled substances for opioid use disorder via telehealth – the U.S. may face even higher overdose rates. Andrea Fox is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Email: afox@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/what-eventual-end-phe-would-mean-telehealth < Previous News Next News >

New Mexico Telehealth Alliance TELEHEALTH RESOURCES | COMMUNITY | PROGRAM SUPPORT Connecting New Mexicans to Better Health. The New Mexico Telehealth Alliance (NMTHA) is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation dedicated to promoting telehealth solutions that deliver quality healthcare throughout the State. The NMTHA is a network of members representing a broad spectrum of public and private healthcare organizations. The NMTHA provides program support enabling members to eff ectively share resources. Board members and officers are all volunteers. Vision: Through the efforts of the NMTHA’s work on policy, quality, and equitable access to telehealth services, New Mexicans will be able to get the care they need when they need it. Mission: Advance effective use, equitable access, and sustainable telehealth service delivery in New Mexico. About Innovating Remote Access to Care Bridging Health Equity Gaps / Disparities AI + Digital Innovation Medicare Telehealth HCA/Turquoise Care Vision & Strategies View Presentations Why does New Mexico need a Telehealth Alliance? Click HERE to learn more... Be part of the solution! Join the Ne w Mexico Telehe alth Alliance Telehealth and telemedicine are no longer an innovative approach to healthcare - they are a necessary part of it. More than ever, access to quality healthcare, especially in New Mexico, is fundamental to the well-being of many communities, especially in rural and territorial areas. Supporting the New Mexico Telehealth Alliance through membership helps ensure access to meaningful information and supports the viability of telehealth services in New Mexico. Membership matters! Benefits of Membership Stay Connected! Stay connected with the NMTHA community by signing up to receive updates and notifications on industry trends, the latest telehealth news, events, and more. Thanks for connecting with NMTHA! Submit

Telehealth May Be Rural Healthcare’s Lifeline Corey Scurlock December 28, 2022 As a new year dawns, it seems like a stock-taking time in U.S. healthcare. Skyrocketing costs, underwater margins, a depleted workforce and sicker patients have most hospitals and systems thinking existential thoughts about 2023, none more so than rural facilities. According to a report by the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, 116 rural hospitals across 31 states closed between 2010 and 2019. Many of them were small critical access hospitals. Federal Covid-19 relief funding is believed to have prevented additional closures—only two rural hospitals closed in 2021. Now, though, 631 rural hospitals are threatened with possible closure within the next few years, according to the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform. As the CEO and founder of an acute care telehealth company, I’ve observed firsthand that workforce needs are one of the primary drivers of telehealth adoption. What was once a staff shortage is now a crisis, particularly in nursing, but also among physicians. From 2020 to 2021, the total supply of registered nurses decreased by over 100,000, the largest drop in four decades. By 2025, there could be a shortage of 200,000 to 450,000 nurses in the U.S. Rural hospitals are at a particular disadvantage since they tend to have worse workforce shortages than urban hospitals. According to the BPC, “urban areas have 30.8 physicians per 10,000 residents; rural ones have 10.9 physicians per 10,000.” There are also often fewer specialists—such as cardiologists, psychiatrists, radiologists and obstetricians—in rural areas. Opportunities To Improve Care Rural hospitals have for years contracted with academic medical centers for remote episodic help with patients with clinically complex conditions, such as stroke and sepsis. To make care more affordable, we’re seeing more rural healthcare leaders embracing telehealth for supplemental care, filling in coverage gaps or for specialized consultations on complex cases so that people get the right care at the right time in the right setting. In previous articles, I wrote about how telehealth can provide clinical expertise, how telehealth specialists target “hot spots” along the patient care journey and about virtual nursing, in which veteran RNs with specialty expertise guide bedside staff and patients through the care process. Rural hospitals are in dire need of expert care at patient transition points. Virtual care often starts in what is now the front door of a hospital: the emergency room. Rural and critical access hospitals often have to park patients in the hallway as they triage. A remote intensivist steeped in critical care medicine can track the vital signs of patients and do the intake, often guiding inexperienced staff to the right site of care and helping them through tests, diagnoses and procedures. Inappropriate patient transfers are a source of inefficiencies and poor-quality care. Patients may be sent to intensive care who don’t need to be. Some can be easily treated in the ER and sent home. Others may need a complex operation, for which a transfer to a level 1 trauma center is needed. Outcomes for ER patients with delayed care are, not surprisingly, poorer. Maximizing A Stretched Workforce The BPC examined three evidence-based programs that involve using digital technology—one of which was tele-ICU—to see how they could optimize a stretched healthcare workforce and ensure that patients receive quality care in their local hospitals. Tele-ICU programs can be episodic, such as enabling two-way audiovisual communication between telehealth providers and local ICUs to get answers to questions, or they can be continuous, where a remote physician has complete access to electronic medical records, imaging systems and other databases to get timely information that informs decisions about a patient’s care. According to the BPC, “studies have demonstrated that tele-ICU programs enhanced care plans, improved clinical outcomes, reduced hospital transfers, and were associated with increased best-practice adherence.” Telehealth also facilitates the mentoring of young nurses and assesses where there are gaps in current knowledge. The BPC report mentions a study that found that 27% of hospitals with ICUs have tele-ICU capabilities. Such capabilities can potentially lead to substantial savings: The report cites a 2019 cost-benefit analysis that found that a telehealth ICU program saved $3.14 million over six months by “reducing ICU variable costs per case, decreasing length of stays and decreasing ICU mortality.” It’s a fairly straightforward story: Remote intensivists can monitor dozens of patients remotely at a time, while tele-ICU nurses can keep track of 30 to 50 patients simultaneously, compared with just three for a bedside RN. Bedside clinicians typically can deal with only one emergency at a time, while remote intensivists can handle up to four codes at once. A Path Forward Pretty soon, the pressures of the workforce shortage will likely compel many, if not most, acute care providers to adopt some virtual care across the enterprise. So it’s crucial for rural hospitals to take steps now to ingrain telehealth into their operations and make it part of the fabric of care—that way, it’s there when they need it. Here are some things for rural hospitals to think about when choosing a telehealth partner. • There are many entities offering telehealth services, ranging from large academic medical centers to consortiums of providers to vendors large and small. Make sure you have complete trust in your chosen partner. • Ensure that all of the entity’s physicians are licensed to practice medicine in your state(s). If not, they cannot order tests, prescribe medications or do anything but recommend a course of action. • Does the telehealth provider have a network of specialists in every area? For example, many vendors lack psychiatrists, who are in short supply nationally amid the explosion in demand for mental health services. • Make sure your telehealth partner understands patient flow optimization techniques that support level-loading and optimized bed utilization. Final Thoughts Through my travels and in conversations with executives across the nation, I’ve found that the word “telehealth” doesn’t sound techy anymore and that the understanding of the benefits delivered by digitally enabled care is more mature. Telehealth is now recognized as a tool that, as part of a strategic process to remedy gaps in care delivery, can be combined with change management to drive real value. Soon, in fact, “telehealth” may be replaced by “health” when we look at the evolution of care through technology. Dr. Corey Scurlock MD, MBA is the CEO & founder of Equum Medical. See original article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2022/12/28/telehealth-may-be-rural-healthcares-lifeline/?sh=1f7657be3e9d < Previous News Next News >

Now is the time for doctors to shape what’s next on telehealth Tanya Albert Henry, Contributing News Writer, American Medical Assoc. More than a year and a half into this pandemic, medicine finds itself with a unique opportunity: A chance to rethink and overhaul the way care is delivered. More than a year and a half into this pandemic, medicine finds itself with a unique opportunity: A chance to rethink and overhaul the way care is delivered. Telehealth, which a minority of patients and physicians used prior to COVID-19’s emergence, is now a household word. And survey after survey shows that patients like the convenience, believe they are getting quality care and still feel connected to their physicians. Most physicians, too, have found telehealth to be a great way to connect with patients when appropriate. “There is no question at this point in time, when you think back on the past 18 months, it’s our opportunity to change completely how we deliver care,” according to Joseph C. Kvedar, MD, professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School and the American Telemedicine Association’s board chair. Dr. Kvedar made that point during a virtual gathering as part of the AMA Telehealth Immersion Program. The boot camp event featured experts and stakeholders from around the country, who discussed the potential for long-term telehealth programs, raised the questions that need to be considered as telemedicine evolves, and examined the challenges that physicians and patients face moving forward. “I would urge you not to think of virtual video visits as the sky or the ceiling or the vision, but as the floor and the beginning, and the first step into what I would call a real hybrid world with digital-first, with digital tools for our patients where patients instinctively turn to a digital device when they need health care and go from there,” Dr. Kvedar said. The boot camp also included a panel discussion about health-at-home models and strategies, as well as breakout sessions on creating telehealth value in obstetrics and gynecology, and renal medicine. The Telehealth Immersion Program is part of the AMA STEPS Forward™ Innovation Academy , which enables physicians to learn from peers and experts and discover ways to implement time-saving practice innovation strategies. Many questions to answer Data may show that the percentage of telehealth visits as a whole are down compared with the beginning of the pandemic, but Dr. Kvedar said there’s another story to be told. Data from one large payer shows that telehealth is shifting from local physicians and health care organizations to national care providers. In April 2020, 96% of all telehealth claims were local, while national providers accounted for just 4%. One year later, the share of national-provider claims rose to 11%. One big question going forward, he asked, is who is going to deliver telehealth services? “Do we want our own doctors to be providing these telehealth services or do we want to go through a third party,” said Dr. Kvedar, co-chair of the AMA Digital Medicine Payment Advisory Group. “The good news is you will have access either way. But … we have to ponder how we want that to go, and I think we have a role to play in making those decisions or at least in influencing them.” Among the other questions that need to be answered going forward: How do you plan while facing payment uncertainty? What will it cost a practice to offer telehealth and what will make the most financial sense for each practice? How do you rethink calculations of overhead? What are the workforce implications? For example, what new roles will be needed to accommodate telehealth properly? How do you define when it will be best to see a patient via telehealth versus coming into the office? Advocate, advocate, advocate Dr. Kvedar asked the boot-camp attendees to send their elected officials a letter describing what has worked in telemedicine and what is needed. He also recommended talking to your human resource professional and health plan contact to let them know what you and your patients need to create a health system that works best. The benefits of expanded telemedicine are clear. Join physicians who are advocating to permanently expand virtual care coverage. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/now-time-doctors-shape-what-s-next-telehealth?smclient=9a5368e1-1650-11ec-83c8-18cf24ce389f&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default < Previous News Next News >

A Decade of Telehealth Policy: A New Report From CCHP Mei Kwong- Center for Connected Health Policy August 2022 Ten years ago, in the early months of 2012, the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) faced a decision of potentially great significance. The U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORPH) Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT) had released a Funding Opportunity Announcement for their Telehealth Resource Center Grant Program and the incumbent contractor for the National Telehealth Resource Center for Policy (NTRC-P) contract would not be reapplying. After weighing the pros and cons of acting as the NTRC-P, CCHP decided to take the plunge and applied. On September 1, 2012, CCHP officially started its work as the federally designated National Telehealth Policy Resource Center and have been serving that role for the past decade. To mark CCHP’s ten-year anniversary as the NTRC-P, we are releasing a look back on telehealth policy in the United States. For the past decade, CCHP has tracked and followed policy development for all 51 jurisdictions in the United States (District of Columbia included) as well as at the federal level providing us with the unique opportunity to observe and study the development of telehealth policy in the United States on both the state and federal levels. This past decade also happens to be the period that encompasses some of the most significant telehealth policy developments seen thus far in the United States. The report is not intended to be an in-depth study on telehealth policy development and history as that could easily be an entire novel given the complexities and nuances that would need to be considered. The National Telehealth Resource Center for Policy Ten-Year Anniversary Report is intended to capture some of the highlights, significant changes, and environmental factors that have had an impact on telehealth policy development in the nation. Considering the increased interest in telehealth policy, CCHP believes this report also will be useful to provide context on how telehealth policy came to be where it is today, particularly for those who may be newer to the field. Additionally, the report is meant to be a celebration of the time CCHP has spent as the NTRC-P including the contributions the organization has made to the telehealth field. This report is dedicated to the memory of Mario Gutierrez, CCHP Executive Director from 2011-2017. Mario was the original visionary who decided in 2012 that CCHP should apply for the project. A special thank you must also be extended to CCHP staff, both past and present, who have truly been the engine that continues to drive the work of the organization forward. Special acknowledgment must be made of Laura Stanworth, Deputy Director, and Christine Calouro, Senior Policy Associate, both who have been with CCHP from the beginning of its role as the NTRC-P and who, along with myself, have seen this past decade of telehealth policy development, including producing all information and navigating CCHP through those first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope you will enjoy this report and find the information useful. CCHP looks forward to continuing on the ever evolving telehealth policy journey with all of you. See full report: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/a-decade-of-telehealth-policy-our-10-year-anniversary-report < Previous News Next News >

UCHealth slashes code blues up to 70% with telehealth technologies Bill Siwicki December 20, 2022 The academic medical center uses tele-sitter and virtual ICU platforms for a program it calls Virtual Deterioration. UCHealth is a non-profit healthcare organization based in Colorado made up of 12 hospitals across the state. THE PROBLEM The organization had a new use case for virtual care, a program called Virtual Deterioration. Essentially, it was trying to find patients who were deteriorating in the hospital sooner in order to provide rescue and treatment faster to give them the best outcome. "What we were seeing prior to this program was a lot of variability as we tried to detect deterioration, and then once we were detecting it, reaching out to the bedside caregivers as to what happened next," said Dr. Diana Breyer, chief medical officer of the Northern Region at UCHealth. "And so, this was very much a part of our plan to decrease that variability for patients that were staying in place for us to be able to monitor them consistently with more frequent vital signs to make sure we really had rescued them and utilized technology to keep an extra set of eyes on them," she added. PROPOSAL UCHealth already had implemented vendor AvaSure's TeleSitter platform for patient safety and the vendor's Verify for virtual ICU. It expanded use of these technologies to Virtual Deterioration. Prior to implementing the technology, the process for virtual deterioration involved staff in a remote clinical command center working in tandem with frontline staff. "And we did try a process before we employed the technology, where it was a lot of secure chat through our EHR, similar to texting, in addition to a lot of phone calls and not really being able to visualize our patients," said Amy Hassell, RN, senior director for the Virtual Health Center at UCHealth. "This approach created a lot of friction and interruption to the bedside staff who were trying to do hands-on tasks with the patient," she continued. "So we decided to bring in an audio-visual connection. We have mobile carts, and some of our hospitals have cameras in the ceiling so we can just turn on that camera when a deterioration event is occurring." With the camera in the room, physicians and nurses in the command center now can see and interact with the patient as well as the care team. "They're able to see what's occurring so that it's just like we're in the room with that care team member," Hassell explained. "When we do this, it helps us cut down on phone calls and interruptions at the bedside, allowing us to still participate and do our part of the program. "The program provides support and makes sure milestones of care are being met throughout that deterioration event, and help triage if needed," she continued. Because it's a clinical command center that operates a lot of equipment and different platforms, staff have a weekly operational meeting with the IT team that supports the area. "They were part of our planning phases; further, we did our own IT technical dress rehearsals ahead of implementation with the clinical folks each time we went live," Hassell explained. "IT is in lockstep with us and have been very helpful to getting this deployed by helping support us, navigate us through the bumps, as we push the envelope. They're great partners to us and have been since the very beginning." MARKETPLACE There are many vendors of telemedicine technology and services on the health IT market today. Healthcare IT News published a special report highlighting many of these vendors with detailed descriptions of their products. Click here to read the special report. MEETING THE CHALLENGE Today, the Virtual Deterioration technology is a separate platform. There's going to be context-aware linking soon, and that will help because then staff can go right in from the patient's chart through that portal. Clinicians at the bedside use this technology. Nursing staff and physician staff are the ones pulling the monitoring equipment into the room and using it at the bedside. On the reciprocal end, it's the remote clinical command staff who are accessing that camera to participate with the team and interact with them. UCHealth is in the midst of developing a new role called the "patient technology technician." "The patient technology technician is a staff member who brings the mobile device into the room so that nurses and physicians don't have to be responsible for setting it up, and they can remain focused on the patient," Hassell said. "That's been successful. We're really trying to get all of our folks operating at the top of their license. "This role will be very helpful as we continue to scale it, so the nursing staff aren't the ones having to bring monitoring equipment to that rapid response," she added. RESULTS When UCHealth started looking at this project, it looked for deterioration in particular, such as what are the metrics being sought. One of them that is well-established in the literature is around decreasing code events in the acute care setting, Breyer noted. "Those patients ideally are brought to the ICU and if they're going to code, code there, or if they're rescued," she said. "So we have seen improvement throughout the work that we've been doing around deterioration in this space both in the northern and southern region of UCHealth where we've implemented the solution. "And that's probably our biggest metric that we're able to measure," she continued. "I'll add that in the space of deterioration, it is sometimes difficult to measure what you're doing because you're trying to show that you're now doing something that you were previously not doing. And measuring that omission can be a challenge." The other thing staff are measuring as a process metric is for those patients who stay in place and are not being moved to a higher level of care at the time of their rapid response event. "We are measuring a consistent post-RRT intervention that we previously did not have," Breyer said. "That's another area that we're monitoring. Ultimately, we would like to see this improve mortality, but that's more of a lagging indicator, and that one is a little more variable in the literature as to how much they affect these deterioration events." Hassell stresses the organization is going to have to continue to trend this and the lagging indicator of mortality within the patient population being touched. "But we have early data where we've seen our rapid response rates increase anywhere from 26% up to about an 86% increase, depending on what location you're looking at as we've done this across our system," she reported. "And then, in early data again, we've seen our code blue events in our acute care areas go down by 25% to 70%. "We've seen our code blue events drop, which helps us know we're going in the right direction, we're detecting deterioration earlier, thus reducing a bad outcome from a code blue," she continued. To Breyer's point, UCHealth has seen the post-monitoring period, because it's leaving that camera in place for six hours and virtual staff are helping oversee and watch that patient in conjunction with the frontline staff who are very busy. "And so we've seen an increase in post-rapid response vitals anywhere from a 39% increase up to 152% increase of vitals being ordered, and then working on getting them completed," Hassell explained. "It's been a large range that we've seen, but a lot of intentionality because resources are tied up in that rapid response call. "Once the patient is stabilized, and they're staying on the floor, the nurses then go see other patients that they've not seen for a while," she continued. "And so we've got to make sure that we're taking time to watch over the patient in that kind of fragile window when they still could continue to deteriorate and need a higher level of care. That's where we put a lot of focus and energy, and those are some of our early metrics." ADVICE FOR OTHERS The piece Hassell likes about the technology currently in use is that staff have been able to flex it for a different use case that's been highly valuable. "We're still working on making it an improved platform with the company, but I also think that it's been instrumental and opened up pathways for us that we wouldn't have previously had," she noted. "We weren't seeing the success that we're seeing now until we introduced the camera piece because it solved those issues we mentioned. "And so if you are considering any sort of hybrid approach from, for example, a clinical command center or nursing workflows, you want to have a great platform that you feel your staff can use and interact with seamlessly and with ease," she advised. From a technology standpoint, having it be easy and seamless for the bedside team is key, Breyer said. "While there are now great technology solutions to some of these problems, the heavy lift is the change management with your bedside team, the non-technology piece," she concluded. "And so that's where a lot of the energy for a successful project must be." Follow Bill's HIT coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Siwicki Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/uchealth-slashes-code-blues-70-telehealth-technologies?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=womeninhit < Previous News Next News >

CMS Proposes to Extend Telehealth Flexibilities Through 2023 Thomas Sullivan Oct 24, 2021 CMS Proposes to Extend Telehealth Flexibilities Through 2023 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed in the 2022 Physician Fee Schedule to extend telehealth flexibilities through 2023 instead of through the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, which is expected to run through this year. Physician groups in comments on the rule called for a permanent solution beyond the dates set by CMS. Groups also submitted comments on MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs), ACO policies, and pending payment cuts. The final rule is expected around November 1, 2021. Telehealth Telehealth advocates called upon CMS to amend the proposed 2022 Physician Fee Schedule to permanently extend emergency measures on telehealth access and coverage that were enacted to deal with the pandemic. Many also called upon Congress to expand telehealth services. “The ATA commends the Biden Administration for their actions in support of telehealth, and we appreciate CMS’ intent to ensure Medicare beneficiaries continue to have access to quality healthcare when and where they need it,” ATA CEO Ann Mond Johnson said in its letter to CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure. “However, as important as the Physician Fee Schedule is, we urge Congress to act before the vast majority of Medicare beneficiaries go off the ‘telehealth cliff’ at the end of the public health emergency.” “The ATA understands that CMS is simply following Congress’ lead, though we are hopeful Congress will correct this wrong in the statute,” Johnson said. “There is no clinical evidence for an arbitrary in-person requirement before a patient can access telehealth services. However, in the proposed rule, CMS considers requiring an in-person visit, not only within the ‘six-month period prior to the first time’ the provider furnishes telehealth to the individual, as stated by law, but also within six months prior to subsequent telehealth visits. This effectively creates a new, arbitrary requirement for the patient to have an in-person mental health visit every six months should the patient plan to seek telehealth services with that provider.” The Medical Group Management Association also commented that removing services after a “predetermined or prescriptive date” could create a major administrative burden for practices already strained financially by the pandemic. “Member group practices report that adjusting workflows to operationalize the use of new telehealth codes requires additional resources, such as clinician and staff training and patient education,” MGMA said in comments. “Removing telehealth services from the covered code list will prove disruptive to both practices and patients alike, as patients have become accustomed to receiving these services virtually.” MIPS Value Pathways and ACOs The proposed rule calls for beginning use of the value pathways program in MIPS for 2023 and having it replace MIPS entirely in 2027. MVP is intended to align clinician reporting requirements, but the American Hospital Association (AHA) said it’s unclear whether the program would reduce administrative burden as expected or that it would be equitable across specialties. AHA said it “believes that unless and until CMS can address several conceptual issues with MVPs … CMS should not set a date certain for transitioning to mandatory MVP participation.” The Medical Group Management Association also had concerns, particularly about provider burden. Group purchasing organization Premier addressed the proposed rule’s changes to reporting from accountable care organizations. It applauded the more gradual move to using electronic clinical quality measures, citing the reporting burden associated with them. Premier also asked CMS to recognize that ACO reporting is “fundamentally different from reporting by clinicians and groups.” The National Association of ACOs echoed those comments. Pay Cuts In comments on the proposed rule, physician groups were also worried about a looming 3.75% cut in the 2022 Medicare conversion factor, which calculates reimbursement for procedures under fee-for-service. The cuts are mandated under a budget neutrality provision in Congress and comes after a pay bump from Congress that expires in 2022. The AMA said that it is urging CMS to work with Congress for relief on the budget neutrality issue. “CMS should exercise the full breadth and depth of its administrative authority to avert or, at a minimum, mitigate these unconscionable payment cuts,” the group added. https://www.policymed.com/2021/10/cms-proposes-to-extend-telehealth-flexibilities-through-2023.html < Previous News Next News >

AHA Requests Information on Telehealth Prescriptions for Controlled Substances Mark Melchionna December 05, 2022 The American Hospital Association has asked the Drug Enforcement Administration to release information regarding future telehealth regulations for prescribing controlled substances. Representing nearly 5,000 member hospitals, health systems, and other healthcare organizations, a letter from the American Hospital Association (AHA) asked that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) clarify future telehealth regulations for prescribing controlled substances and provide recommendations for an interim plan. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, some policies prohibited the use of telehealth for certain medical activities. For example, the Ryan Haight Act of 2008 amended the Controlled Substance Act to eliminate providers' ability to prescribe controlled substances through telehealth with no in-person visit beforehand. The act detailed the need for initial in-person evaluations before virtual prescribing controlled substances. However, exceptions to the in-person visit requirement can be enacted during public health emergencies (PHEs). This led the DEA to temporarily lift the in-person visit requirement during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to continue receiving controlled substance medications. Through the pandemic, the flexibilities helped support patients in various ways, including enabling prescriptions of controlled substances to be delivered via telehealth and allowing providers to use telephone evaluations to initiate buprenorphine prescribing, the AHA noted. The AHA sent the letter to the DEA to obtain further information regarding the future of these telehealth flexibilities. About 14 years ago, the Ryan Haight Act established the requirement that agencies issue a regulation that outlines the special registration process for telemedicine to waive the in-person requirement. Three years ago, the SUPPORT Act reinforced this policy. However, providers are continuing to wait for guidance with the concern that the expiration of the COVID-19 PHE will put them in a position where they cannot provide treatment. "With the expiration of the COVID-19 PHE currently scheduled for next year, this situation could come to pass as early as mid-January," the AHA wrote. Thus, the AHA has asked the DEA to provide proposed rules for the special registration for telemedicine process, noting that issues such as staffing shortages, provider burnout, and financial constraints would benefit from more time to reallocate resources to operationalize new regulation requirements. The letter also included a request for the DEA to provide an interim plan to support the continuity of care between the expiration of the COVID-19 PHE and the implementation of the special registration for telemedicine final rules. According to the AHA, the interim plan should include waiving the in-person requirement for prescribing buprenorphine. Further, the waiver should be transitioned and incorporated under the Opioid Epidemic PHE, according to the association. The letter also recommends that the DEA provide patients engaged in an episode of care that began virtually before the end of the COVID-19 PHE with a solution and support those who initiated an episode of care between the end of the COVID-19 PHE and the establishment of the final rules for special registration for telemedicine. The AHA letter comes as healthcare stakeholders urge Congress to solidify various telehealth flexibilities enacted during the pandemic. In December, a letter composed by the Connected Health Initiative (CHI) to the leaders of the US Senate and House Representatives asked that Congress continue the safe harbor for telehealth coverage by high-deductible health plans (HDHPs). In this letter, CHI noted its support for removing restrictions to telehealth access facing Medicare beneficiaries; however, it also asked that Congress separately extend the safe harbor for HDHPs to cover telehealth with first-dollar coverage. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/aha-requests-information-on-telehealth-prescriptions-for-controlled-substances < Previous News Next News >

CMS-Supported Telehealth Will Continue To Be A Driving Force – But Watch for Greater OIG Enforcement The National Law Review March 3, 2022 As mindsets pivoted to a post-pandemic life, telehealth advocates petitioned CMS to embrace telehealth as a permanent care option, and CMS responded with regulatory action at the end of 2021. During the Covid-19 Pandemic, telehealth usage surged as patients and providers turned to it as a safer care alternative. McKinsey estimated telehealth claim volumes reached 80 times pre-pandemic levels at its peak, ultimately stabilizing at 38 times pre-pandemic levels by early 2021.1 This increase was mostly driven by CMS’ waivers and relaxation of regulatory constraints for telehealth reimbursement. But, the temporary nature of both left questions regarding telehealth’s future. In December 2021, CMS issued new regulations which, collectively, steer telehealth toward becoming a part of the telebehavioral health toolkit accepted by Medicare post-pandemic. In the CY2021 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule2 , further discussed here, CMS broadly expanded access to telebehavioral health services. Specifically, Medicare permanently authorized payment for telehealth services furnished “for purposes of diagnosis, evaluation or treatment of a mental health disorder” under the following relaxed criteria:3. Read full article here: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/cms-supported-telehealth-will-continue-to-be-driving-force-watch-greater-oig < Previous News Next News >

Effects on Patient Access to Telehealth as Some State Emergencies End Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 With state of emergency declarations expiring or being lifted in states, there is growing concern patients are being left with reduced access if no permanent telehealth policy changes have been enacted. With state of emergency declarations expiring or being lifted in states, there is growing concern patients are being left with reduced access if no permanent telehealth policy changes have been enacted. According to the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), nearly 20 states no longer are under emergency orders, with many soon to follow. Many states attached telehealth flexibilities to the federal public health emergency (PHE) while others made them contingent on state emergency declarations. Some states have successfully passed legislation to extend certain telehealth flexibilities in advance of state of emergency expirations, such as Connecticut and Delaware. The federal government Emergency Preparedness and Response for Home and Community Based (HCBS) 1915(c) Waivers were often originally tied to state emergencies, but appear to now extend 6 months after the federal PHE ends. Alaska is one of the states no longer under a state of emergency. During the pandemic a local outlet reported thousands of patients were being referred to out-of-state providers, especially in Washington, via telehealth for a variety of reasons including lack of specialty care and long wait times. Once the emergency licensing waivers expired, however, Seattle hospitals were sent rushing to reschedule Alaska patients and resume the more stringent process of becoming licensed in Alaska. According to recent local reports, Florida’s emergency expiration also took away audio-only and the ability to use telehealth to prescribe controlled substances and recertify medical cannabis patients. The Florida Medical Association told the local news outlet they will continue the push to make telehealth changes permanent in the next state legislative session, especially those requiring insurer reimbursement and payment parity, without which they say telehealth will simply no longer be made available to patients. For more information on the status of the emergency orders in each state visit the NASHP website - https://www.nashp.org/governors-prioritize-health-for-all/. < Previous News Next News >

Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy Webinar Center for Connected Health Policy April 30, 2021 Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy Webinar April 30 Telehealth has demonstrated that it has the potential to make healthcare more accessible for hard-to-reach patient populations in medically underserved communities. However, some lessons from telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic have raised concerns about access gaps for these patients. Join the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) and leading Medicaid experts on Friday, April 30, 2021 for the first webinar in our Spring webinar series, Access and Equity in Medicaid Telehealth Policy. This webinar will feature presentations from Medicaid administrators and policy staff on trends in telehealth access and equity and strategies to address these gaps. Stay tuned for more information on confirmed speakers for this webinar. This event is free and open to the public. Register: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_B-EIOkBkQW-QvcxUcqHxKA < Previous News Next News >

22 States Changed Telemedicine Laws During the Pandemic Kat Jercich June 2021 Most pursued changes via administrative action, according to a new Commonwealth Fund report, which may not be a permanent solution after the COVID-19 public health emergency ends. The Commonwealth Fund released an issue brief this week reviewing state actions to expand individual and group health insurance coverage of telemedicine between March 2020 and March 2021. It found that 22 states changed laws or policies during that time period to require more robust insurance coverage of telemedicine. "If telemedicine proves to be a less costly way to deliver care, payers and consumers may benefit from expanding coverage of telemedicine after the pandemic," wrote report authors. WHY IT MATTERS In March 2020, federal regulators temporarily relaxed restrictions for telemedicine visits for Medicare patients, raising payments to the same level as in-person visits and reducing cost-sharing, among other changes. Officials encouraged states and insurers to provide similar flexibility under private insurance – and many took that encouragement to heart. Of the 22 states that expanded access to telemedicine during the pandemic, the report found that most pursued changes via administrative action. "Use of executive authority allowed states to move relatively quickly during the crisis, though it has meant that the new telemedicine coverage requirements are temporary," wrote the researchers. They noted, for example, that seven governors included specific telemedicine coverage requirements in executive orders, which will expire after the public health emergency. Some states used bulletins, notices, or executive orders from the department of insurance or a similar agency to enhance coverage. New legislation, which takes more time, but is necessary for permanent changes, passed in eight states. Utah, Illinois, West Virginia, New Hampshire and Massachusetts – which had not previously required coverage – changed their policies during the pandemic. At this point, 40 states require coverage. These policies do not all carry equal impact. Eighteen states required coverage of audio-only services for the first time during the pandemic, bringing the total number up to 21. Four states eliminated cost-sharing for telemedicine services, and three added a requirement that cost sharing not exceed in-person identical services. And 10 states newly required insurers to pay providers the same for telemedicine and in-person visits. Report authors noted that insurers were cooperative with these changes, but longer-term adoption of policies like reimbursement parity "would likely be contentious." They pointed out the states will need data to inform debates on how best to regulate telemedicine. In 2021, at least 30 states have weighed legislation that would revise telemedicine coverage standards, found the Commonwealth Fund. Despite the known benefits of telemedicine, researchers also cautioned that it has not been equally beneficial to all patients. "Research shows telemedicine use is lower in communities with higher rates of poverty and among patients with limited English proficiency, potentially undermining goals of expanding access to underserved communities and exacerbating health inequities," read the report. THE LARGER TREND As the report notes, multiple states have implemented pro-telehealth policies to enable access during and beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency. But a major question remains regarding federal legislation, which could fill in many state-by-state gaps and prevent a so-called "telehealth cliff." "If Congress does not act before the public health emergency ends, regulatory flexibilities that now ensure all Medicare beneficiaries maintain access to telehealth will go away," said Kyle Zebley, director of public policy at the American Telemedicine Association, during a conference panel earlier this month. ON THE RECORD "Whether telemedicine reduces overall healthcare costs depends on how services are reimbursed and if virtual visits reduce other services or simply add to utilization," said Commonwealth researchers. "Having access to data can help stakeholders understand how longer-term expansion of telemedicine affects access, cost, and quality of care." Source: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/22-states-changed-telemedicine-laws-during-pandemic < Previous News Next News >

Making Telemedicine Feasible for Everyone – Especially Those With Physical Challenges Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center August 2021 In the context of healthcare, nondiscrimination on the basis of disability means equal access to available health care services, whether those services are provided in-person or via telehealth. Telemedicine has for years been touted as providing access to healthcare for everyone, anywhere, anytime and it has been quite successful in doing so in many respects but disparities still exist among a number of patient populations. In particular, those who traditionally have challenges accessing healthcare due to physical challenges often experience similar or even greater challenges with telemedicine. Think about for a minute. Telemedicine is predominantly provided using audio and/or video-based telecommunications technologies. This fundamental fact of how telemedicine visits occur can actually exacerbate digital disparities. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), an individual with a disability is defined as: 1. a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major activities; or 2. a person who has a history or record of such an impairment; or 3. a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment Under Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from the participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any services, programs, or activities of the covered entity (e.g., healthcare providers). In the context of healthcare, nondiscrimination on the basis of disability means equal access to available health care services, whether those services are provided in-person or via telehealth. Some basic facts highlight the problem. About 15% of American adults (37.5 million) over 18 report some trouble hearing, 2 to 3 per 1,000 US children are born with detectable hearing loss in one or both ears and overall 1 in 8 people (13%) 12 years or older has hearing loss in both ears. Interestingly, non-Hispanic white adults are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups to have hearing loss and non-Hispanic black adults have the lowest prevalence among adults aged 20-69. Rates increase with age. The statistics for vision impairments are equally high. About 12 million people over 40 years have a vision impairment, with 1 million who are blind and 6.8% of children younger than 18 have a diagnosed eye and vision condition. The annual economic impact of major vision problems for those over 40 is over $145 billion! For blindness, access to healthcare is especially critical as 90% of blindness caused by diabetes is preventable and early detection and treatment of conditions such as diabetic retinopathy is efficacious and cost effective. So what can we do in the telemedicine community to help ameliorate these disparities? The National Consortium of Telehealth Resource Centers has developed a fact sheet to help providers. Some of the key recommendations are actually fairly easy to carry out. Inventory products, services, and factors required to provide effective telehealth services to patients and ensure they meet basic accessibility requirements for people with disabilities. Consider compatibility of assistive technology (e.g., alternative keyboards) and whether they can work effectively with your chosen telehealth modality. Learn about and incorporate accessibility features (e.g., close-captioning) of software programs you use. Be sure to include the patient’s caregiver, family member, or home health aide during telehealth visits. Increase your knowledge and awareness on cultural competency and linguistic sensitivity. The easiest thing to do ask patients with disabilities about their accessibility requirements! Some additional aids to consider may take a little more effort but are worth it. For those with hearing loss consider: qualified sign language interpreter, qualified cued-speech interpreter, qualified tactile interpreter, real-time captioning or communication access real-time translation (CART), video remote interpreting (VRI), use written materials, ensure the patient has access to headphones or a headset, confirm participants are wearing their hearing aids or amplification device, and use video whenever possible to allow lip reading and provide visual clues like gestures. For those with vision loss consider: a qualified reader, information in large print, Braille, or electronically for use with a computer screen-reading program, have an audio recording of printed information, be aware of your background - there needs to be contrast between you and your background and blurring the background may make it challenging for the patient, ensure lighting is bright enough for patients to clearly see your face, use simplified and enlarged text, ensure patients have a computer-screen reading program for transmission of electronic information and try providing an audio recording of printed information provided during the appointment. Additional ideas and tips can be found on the Health & Human Services (HHS) website There is also good news in terms of funding. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced that under the National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP), also called “iCanConnect,” may provide up to $10 million annually from the interstate telecommunications relay service fund (TRS Fund) to support local programs that distribute equipment to eligible low-income individuals who are deafblind to access telecommunications service, Internet access service, and advanced communications services. This is clearly a boon for telemedicine applications. The announcement includes a state-by-state list of the initial allocations for the 56 covered jurisdictions. Hearing and vision loss are just two common challenges deal with. Other physical, mental and behavioral challenges are very common as well, and many of the tips above can be adapted to these patients as well, especially simply reaching out and asking them what their needs are and how you can help meet them as well as involving the patient’s caregiver, family member, or home health aide during telehealth visits. Basically telemedicine must be available to any patient and programs should make it a priority to develop strategies and tools to empower all patients no matter what their resources and capabilities to access safe, effective and efficient care. < Previous News Next News >

New ULC Uniform Telehealth Act Highlights Important Policy Considerations & Licensure Trends Center for Connected Health Policy August 2022 The new Uniform Telehealth Act states that services can be provided via telehealth consistent with existing practitioner standards of care and it also establishes a registration process allowing out-of-state providers to deliver services through telehealth to patients in states that choose to adopt the Act. For full post see: https://www.cchpca.org/resources/new-ulc-uniform-telehealth-act-highlights-important-policy-considerations-licensure-trends/ < Previous News Next News >

Maximizing Telemedicine Benefits Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center August 2021 First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The United States and the world have seen a dramatic increase in the use of telemedicine since the inception of the COVID-19 public health emergency due in most part to stay at home restrictions for both providers and patients. Prior to this, telemedicine was used in a wide variety of clinical and related patient care applications for at least 30 years, and had been seeing steady but not exponential growth. In many cases programs were initiated quite rapidly using readily available and often low-cost equipment and tools, unless there was already an existing program and platform in place. Further, the use of telemedicine was facilitated at the state and federal levels but widespread waivers and measures being put into place to reduce barriers that were previously in place such as changes in reimbursements, requirements regarding patient and provider locations, cross-state licensure and privacy/security requirements. Those of us in the field for a long time are hopeful that many of these measures will stay in place, but there are clearly some that will or already have expired. We are additionally hopeful that even though in-person practices are clearly coming back full-tilt, that everyone has seen and/or experienced the benefits of telemedicine and will continue to use it to some degree as feasible and appropriate with their patients. As this occurs, however, providers will be faced with new challenges as they take their initial telemedicine set-ups and transition to this new hybrid world of services. As noted, some things will still be allowed (e.g., certain billing codes) but others will likely return to pre-COVID status (e.g., not being able to use non-HIPAA-compliant devices and software platforms). In addition to finding the best software for future telemedicine applications, there are other things to consider when trying to maximize telemedicine benefits. From my perspective, although the technology is critical, telemedicine success has very little to do with the technology and everything to do with the people and the environment within which they practice. Thus, in order to maximize telemedicine these are the elements one should consider and focus on in addition to carefully selecting the most appropriate technology for your practice and providers. First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The use cases need to be clearly defined and must match an identified need. Then the who, what, where, why and when must be carefully delineated. Who needs to be involved (e.g., providers, billing, scheduling, IT, legal, administration), what clinical tasks can be accomplished via telemedicine, where will the technology and/or providers be located (e.g., clinic, home) and where will the patients be (e.g., primary care provider office, home, work, school), why will telemedicine be offered as an option (e.g., lack of sub-specialty providers, patients need to travel long distances, no show rates are too high) and when will telemedicine be offered (e.g., certain days/times, any opening in the schedule)? All of this can be accomplished by plotting out in a workflow diagram what the current practice is and how it needs to be adjusted in order to integrate telemedicine into that workflow. Again, the expectation is that although some practices might remain essentially virtual, the majority are going to evolve into a hybrid practice – but such a hybrid will not happen overnight or automatically. Workflow integration is going to be just as critical as integrating telemedicine technologies into a practice – it really is all about the people, setting expectations and establishing standard operating procedures and protocols for everyone that is going to be involved. Another thing that can be done to maximize a telemedicine practice is to properly train everyone on standard operating procedures and protocols, especially the providers who will be interacting with the patients. To date there are very few training programs that incorporate formally telemedicine as part of the curriculum. A number of programs are increasingly exposing trainees to telemedicine if offered at their institution, but typically as an elective or chance encounter in the clinic. There are however a number of organizations that are working on developing and promoting telemedicine competencies and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recently developed a set of Core Competencies. Although specific to medical college trainees, they are comprehensive enough to cover nearly every other specialty/profession in many respects. Very briefly, the AAMC Telehealth Competencies consist of three domains, each with a set of explicit skills that increase in complexity and responsibility across three stages of practice: entering residency, entering practice and experienced faculty physician. The skills from each prior stage of training should carry over to the next phase as the provider becomes more expert and acquires additional skill sets. The six domains are: patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth; access and equity in telehealth; communication via telehealth; data collection and assessment via telehealth; technology for telehealth; and ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth. Patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth includes 4 skill sets ranging from being able to explain to patients are caregivers the benefits and limitations of telemedicine to knowing when a patient is at risk and how/when to escalate care (e.g., convert to in-person) during an encounter. Access and equity in telehealth has 3 skill sets including knowing your biases and implications when considering healthcare, how telehealth can mitigate or amplify access to care gaps, and taking into account all potential cultural, social, physical and other factors when considering telemedicine. Communication via telehealth has 3 skills covering establishing rapport with patients, creating the right environment (e.g., lighting, sound) and knowing how to incorporate a patient’s social support into an encounter. Data collection and assessment via telehealth covers how to obtain a patient history, how to conduct an appropriate remote exam, and how to deal with patient-generated data. Technology for telehealth does not expect everyone to be an engineer or IT expert, but they should be able to explain equipment requirements for a visit, explain limitations and minimum requirements, and explain risks of technology failure and how to respond to them. Similarly, ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth does not expect everyone to be a lawyer but should be able to describe local legal and privacy regulations, define components of informed consent, understand ethical challenges and professional requirements, and assess potential conflicts of interest (e.g., interest in commercial products/services). Many of these skills can be acquired by those already in practice by attending the wide variety of courses and webinars available for telemedicine skill building. It is also highly recommended that before engaging with patients for the first time via telemedicine to engage in some simulated practice sessions – from start to finish practicing each skill and developing your “style” for interacting with patients via this virtual medium. Finally, in order to maximize benefits you need to assess your program. This does not require a degree in statistics or setting up a complex experimental study. It really requires just two things – a set of metrics and a process. There are lots of metrics available and most have been studied in a wide variety of clinical applications so a good lit review will always help get you started. It is important to keep in mind that the things you measure need to reflect your goals/mission for using telemedicine and the bottom line of making a profit is not always the most appropriate metric to use. There are lots of relevant metrics and as a good starting place the article by Shore et al. “A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health” is a great place to get some ideas. Although developed for the telemental health community the metrics provided apply quite well to nearly any specialty or practice. The metrics include such things as patient/provider satisfaction, no shows, symptom outcomes, completion of treatment, wait times, number of services, cultural access, cost avoidance and patient safety. Once you decide on metrics that are appropriate for your practice (recommend starting with 2-3 then add more as your practice grows) there is a very easy, straight-forward process for getting to outcomes. First, consider a given measure an indicator – these are concrete activities, products etc. that can be measured readily (e.g., from the patient record). For example, you could measure A1C levels in patients as a function of being enrolled in a telenutrition program. The next step is to set performance targets – these are concrete goals that are time limited and based on the indicator metrics. For example, you would like to see a 25% reduction in A1C levels in at least 50% of patients enrolled in the telenutrition course at 6 months post-baseline. Finally, you will have quantifiable outcomes (without fancy statistics) at the end of your set time period – if you meet your 25% reduction goal in 50% of patients great. If not, then maybe reassess the program or whether your goals were realistic. In any case, you now have concrete outcomes of your program demonstrating its benefits that you can provide to funders, administration, your care team and even patients and the community. In order to maximize telemedicine benefits you need to get the word out about its availability and its effectiveness! < Previous News Next News >