Could Telehealth Worsen Inequity? 'Not Under My Watch,' Says HHS Sec. Becerra Kat Jercich June 2021 Top health officials from HHS and VA have signaled their ongoing support for telemedicine in the long term, but also want to ensure that "technology is being used properly." In recent public appearances, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough both indicated their support for telemedicine in the long term. Even as states have moved to enact their own laws aimed at telehealth expansion, questions have persisted about a federal response. Becerra emphasizes equity in technology "We are absolutely supportive of efforts to give us the authority to be able to utilize telehealth in greater ways," said Becerra during a Washington Post live event earlier this week. "We want to make sure that we don't leave anyone behind … so that telehealth should be available to all Americans universally," Becerra continued. At the Post event, Becerra reiterated that the Biden administration is supportive of recent moves in Congress that would safeguard access to telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic. Becerra also emphasized the importance of making technology available to everyone, not just those with means. "That includes, of course, making sure broadband, and quality broadband, is out there for all communities," he said. When asked about the danger of telehealth exacerbating inequities – which many advocates have warned against – Beceerra said, "not under my watch." "We're going to do everything we can to include everyone. It should make no difference what Zip code you live in, in America," he said. "You should have access to whatever technologies we as a government through our taxpayer dollars make available, and so that's why we want to make sure we do this the right way and that there's accountability on both ends of the system," he continued. He also referred to concerns around spending and overutilization, which have dogged discussions of virtual care. "We want to make sure that these providers are providing a service that might not have been available had we not had telehealth, but that it also results in better quality services and treatment, because we don't want to be billed for things that don't result in better health for Americans," he said. When it came to interstate licensure, another sticky proposition, Becerra called it an "accountability issue." Though he avoided directly weighing in on whether doctors should be allowed to work outside their states, he seemed to lean against the issue. "The farther away you go from the direct connection between patient and provider, the more difficult it will be to try to provide for the accountability, quickly and fairly, for the patient," he said. "So if your doctor is 30 miles away, and you live in rural America, we can track down that doctor 30 miles away from you. But if your doctor was 3,000 miles away from you, that's a tougher sell for a consumer who is now trying to get accountability for a service that wasn't properly provided," he continued. When it came to broader technologies – beyond telehealth – Becerra pointed to the role digital health tools can play in strengthening U.S. public health infrastructure. "COVID-19 showed us where the holes are in our public health system. That's what happens when you have the most technologically advanced healthcare in the world, but it's not evenly distributed, and as a result, we had pockets in America where COVID was devastating," he said. "And technology helps us close those gaps faster, but once again, we want to make sure that technology is our friend and technology is being used properly, so accountability will be so important," he continued. Telehealth options are a hit with vets Meanwhile, VA Secretary McDonough appeared before the Senate Appropriations Committee this week to offer an update on veterans' use of telemedicine. "There were almost 230,000 visits at the end of February this year," said McDonough, as reported by the Military Times. "Nearly 2 million vets have had one or more episodes of video care. That tells us that there’s massive demand." McDonough noted that the department is working on addressing the reluctance of some staffers to pivot to virtual care. "There’s going to continue to need to be things that are done in person, but I think as a system we recognize the huge efficiency gains and and huge satisfaction gains which come from vets spending less time traveling to our facilities while still getting good care," he said. "We want to maintain it, because it’s ease of access for vets who don’t need to be seen in person," he said. The VA has faced scrutiny in other digital health arenas recently, with an Office of Inspector General audit finding that the Veterans Health Administration needs improvement when it comes to integrating non-VA medical data to veteran's electronic health records. Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said he'll encourage VA leaders to preserve the new telehealth options and explore avenues for Congress to enable them. "There’s going to be a tendency to want to snap back to pre-pandemic times, and I just think there’s going to be a patient revolt,” said Schatz, who praised telehealth in a recent interview for HIMSS TV. "Ten years ago, if you told someone to interact with their clinician via iPhone, it would be an insult. Now, if you can’t do that, that’s an insult," Schatz said. Source: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/could-telehealth-worsen-inequity-not-under-my-watch-says-hhs-sec-becerra < Previous News Next News >

FCC Announces Application Filing Window for Round Two of COVID-19 Telehealth Program Center for Connected Health Policy April 27, 2021 The application filing window for the second round of the COVID-19 Telehealth Program will open Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET The application filing window for the second round of the COVID-19 Telehealth Program will open Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET. Running one week, the filing window will close Thursday, May 6, 2021. The Program under the Federal Communications Commission was first established in April 2020 and provided with $200 million through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Congress provided an additional $249.95 million to the Program late last year through the Consolidated Appropriations Act, to support this second round of funding and further assist health care providers setting up the infrastructure necessary to provide services via telehealth. The new round of the program will be administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Applications for the Program may be filed through a dedicated application portal, available on the COVID-19 Telehealth Program webpage. Round 1 applicants that were not funded will need to submit a new application. For additional information on Round 2, please refer to the Universal Service Administrative Company’s website. If you have specific questions regarding the Round 2 application process, please reach out to USAC at Round2TelehealthApplicationSupport@usac.org . COVID-19 Telehealth Program (Invoices & Reimbursements): https://www.fcc.gov/covid-19-telehealth-program-invoices-reimbursements Universal Service Administrative Company: https://www.usac.org/about/covid-19-telehealth-program/ < Previous News Next News >

Medicare Telehealth: Actions Needed to Strengthen Oversight and Help Providers Educate Patients on Privacy and Security Risks U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) September 26, 2022 To help patients access care during the pandemic, Medicare temporarily waived restrictions on telehealth—health care services delivered via phone or video. The use of telehealth services rose tenfold: 53 million telehealth visits in Apr.-Dec. 2020 vs. 5 million during the same period in 2019. But Medicare hasn't comprehensively assessed the quality of care patients received, and lacks data on telehealth services delivered in patients' homes or via phone. Patients may also be unaware that their private health information could be overheard or inappropriately disclosed during their video appointment. Our recommendations address these issues. Highlights What GAO Found In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) temporarily waived certain Medicare restrictions on telehealth—the delivery of some services via audio-only or video technology. Use of telehealth services increased from about 5 million services pre-waiver (April to December 2019) to more than 53 million services post-waiver (April to December 2020). Total utilization of all Medicare services declined by about 14 percent post-waiver due to a 25 percent drop in in-person service use. GAO also found that, post-waiver, telehealth services increased across all provider specialties, and 5 percent of providers delivered over 40 percent of services. Urban providers delivered a greater percentage of their services via telehealth compared to rural providers; office visits and psychotherapy were the most common services. See full article: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104454 < Previous News Next News >

Academy Health Report Addresses Medicaid Directors Perspective on Telehealth Center for Connected Health Policy May 2021 Views on telehealth since the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) began In March 2021, Academy Health released a report detailing results from an environmental scan and discussions with Medicaid Medical Directors (MMDs) on their views on telehealth since the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) began. MMDs are physicians and clinical leaders in different specialties who advise Medicaid programs on clinical matters. During the pandemic, many have weighed in on telehealth and how it should be deployed in their states Medicaid program. The report breaks down views of Medicaid directors and resulting recommendations into three topic areas: Equity, Quality and Payment. Examples of recommendations made in the equity category include: 1. Medicaid programs should clearly communicate temporary telehealth policies and when those policies will expire. 2. Medicaid programs should support expansion of telehealth for purposes of equitable access if clinically appropriate and makes sense in terms of cost and quality. 3. Medicaid programs should work to reduce barriers to telehealth, including addressing the technology divide, digital literacy and underlying health disparities. For more details and recommendations related to quality and payment, read the full report. < Previous News Next News >

Amazon's telehealth arm quietly expands to 21 more states By Katherine Khashimova Long March 8, 2021 An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector. An Amazon telehealth outfit that started as a pilot service for Seattle-area employees and their families has quietly filed paperwork to operate in 21 more states, a signal of Amazon's expanding ambitions for the $3.8 trillion medical sector.The service, Amazon Care, launched a year ago as an app providing on-demand chat and video consultations with medical professionals for Amazon's then-54,000 Puget Sound employees. Users can also book in-person visits at their home or office with clinicians. Payment for the service routes through Amazon.com. In recent weeks Amazon Care has incorporated in Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Wyoming, according to records filed with state agencies. The online health magazine Stat was first to report Amazon Care's expansion. Amazon did not respond to questions about whether access to the newly expanded service will continue to be limited to Amazon employees. But there are indications that Amazon may begin offering the service to a broader audience. In December, Business Insider reported that Amazon had pitched other companies, including Seattle-based Zillow, on the health care app. Amazon has been hiring health care practitioners, research scientists and product managers for the app around the country—including in California, Georgia and Texas, according to Stat. And with a nationwide group of home health care providers, Amazon Care on Wednesday announced it would begin lobbying lawmakers to ease regulations on what kind of health services can be performed outside of a doctor's office—potentially widening the services Amazon Care can provide. Amazon has not yet received professional licenses that would allow it to operate facilities like medical testing labs in the 21 states it has filed to do business. However, that paperwork may be coming down the line: In its Georgia business registration, Amazon indicated it planned to start doing business in the state this July. Amazon began nosing around the lucrative field of health care in 2017, when it made several high-profile hires from the sector. Former One Medical Vice President Christine Henningsgaard joined Amazon, as did Missy Krasner, from the digital health-records management company Box.Henningsgaard, who left Amazon in 2019 to start the maternity-focused health care venture Quilted Health, refers to herself on her LinkedIn profile as part of the "founding team" of Amazon Care, which she described as "bringing customer obsession, advanced technology, and last mile logistics to health care." Around the same time, the company formed an ill-starred health care consortium with Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase. The organization, later dubbed Haven, had a stated goal of offering better service and rates from health care providers on behalf of the triumvirate's nearly 1.2 million employees; Haven dissolved last month. Amazon purchased online drugstore Pillpack for $753 million in mid-2018; the next year, the company won landmark approval allowing its voice-activated artificial intelligence, Alexa, to transmit private patient information. When the coronavirus began infecting Amazon's hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers last summer, the company built hundreds of its own on-site laboratories to test employees. In November, Amazon launched an online pharmaceutical delivery service, sending drugstore share prices tumbling. Just weeks later, Amazon's cloud-computing division unveiled a health data management service for doctors and hospitals that complies with patient confidentiality regulations. Amazon Care has likely been in the works since at least early 2018, when Amazon hired Seattle geriatrician Dr. Martin Levine. Amazon Care clinicians are employed by Care Medical, formerly Oasis Medical, a company Levine founded shortly after he joined Amazon, according to business records. Amazon replaced Levine early last year with Dr. Sunita Mishra, a former executive at Providence St. Joseph, where she led the development of the health system's mobile app for on-demand medical care. Levine is now chief medical officer at The Polyclinic health system, which operates 14 sites around the Puget Sound region. Weeks after Mishra joined Amazon, the company expanded access to Amazon Care to all of its now-80,000 Washington state workers. < Previous News Next News >

Out-of-State Telehealth Aided Rural Residents Amid the Pandemic Mark Melchionna September 22, 2022 New research shows that several Medicare beneficiaries benefited from expanding out-of-state telehealth services, including rural residents and cancer survivors. September 22, 2022 - A study published in JAMA Health Forum found that many Medicare beneficiaries benefitted from the elimination of restrictions on out-of-state telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily those with cancer, rural residents, and those residing nearby state borders. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 95 percent of health centers used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This sharp uptake has prompted researchers to explore the effects of telehealth and the populations that use it the most. This study examined out-of-state telehealth data from January to June 2021. They selected this time period because it followed the abrupt onset of the pandemic and included vaccine distribution efforts. Further, state-based licensing flexibilities were still in effect during the study period, enabling out-of-state telemedicine. Most flexibilities were eliminated by mid-2021, after which pre-pandemic state licensing laws were reinstated. Overall, 8.3 million Medicare beneficiaries participated in a telehealth visit between January and June 2021. Of these, 422,547 (5 percent) had one or more out-of-state telehealth visits. Through geographical analysis, researchers determined that 57.2 percent of all out-of-state telehealth visits involved patients who lived near a state border, defined as within 15 miles of a border. Upon analyzing out-of-state visits, researchers found that 64.3 percent included a primary care or mental health clinician, and 62.6 percent were preceded by an in-person visit between March 2019 and the telehealth visit involving the same patient and provider. Researchers also found that rural residents were more likely to receive telehealth from an out-of-state location, with 33.8 percent of out-of-state visits involving a rural resident versus 21 percent of within-state telemedicine visits. Also, 9.8 percent of out-of-state telehealth visits were for cancer care, the highest rate among all specialties. Based on this data, researchers concluded that Medicare beneficiaries living in rural areas, seeking cancer care, and living nearby state borders were the most likely to obtain telehealth from an out-of-state clinician. The study results also imply that these populations are highly affected by restrictions that limit out-of-state telehealth. Researchers noted a few limitations within their study, including the potential bias associated with data from the traditional Medicare population and the use of home addresses to determine the state in which a patient resides. Various studies have collected data that reveal the difficulties some patients may face when obtaining care. Highlighting the care disparities between urban and rural residents, research from June found that Native American patients often faced difficulties when accessing cancer care. This was largely due to the large geographic distance between the areas in which American Indian and Alaska Native patients reside and the locations of clinics. Due to the high prevalence of access disparities, organizations often push for regulatory expansions related to telehealth. In September, 375 stakeholders signed a letter sent to the US Senate that requested the solidification of telehealth access for two years after the COVID-19 public health emergency has ended. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/out-of-state-telehealth-aided-rural-residents-amid-the-pandemic < Previous News Next News >

Trends in Telehealth Prescription Laws Kirin Goff, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center July 2021 New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. States across the country are proposing or enacting legislation that supports making the increased access to telehealth that occurred during the pandemic permanent. However, many states seem to struggle with how to appropriately regulate remote prescribing requirements as there is wide variation in approaches and priorities emerging in these proposed and new laws. The most common approach is to carve separate requirements for controlled substances, and then clarify if and under what circumstances they can be prescribed via telehealth. Notably, concerns about addiction and access to mental healthcare are becoming increasing prevalent in telehealth legislation. Some states are attempting to address the latter by specifically expanding telehealth to meet these needs, including allowances for remote prescriptions. The Worsening Drug Epidemic As the COVID-19 pandemic took center stage, substance use also increased. Preliminary estimates indicate that in the first eight months of 2020, drug overdose deaths increased by 48.1% in Arizona and 46.8% in Colorado, compared to same period in 2019. In the U.S. as a whole, drug overdoses increased by 27% between September 2019 and August 2020, compared to the previous twelve months (all data are based on Commonwealth Fund examination of provisional data from CDC’s National Vital Statistics System). As more Americans become personally impacted by the opioid epidemic, opinions about drug policy seem to be shifting. In lieu of strict regulatory measures, harm reduction is becoming more mainstream, and approaches seem to increasingly favor policies that improve access to care for substance use disorders. For example, the American Medical Association put out an issue brief supporting policies that employ evidence-based harm reduction policies and “remove existing barriers for patients with pain to obtain necessary medications…[including] arbitrary dose, quantity and refill restrictions on controlled substances.” Controlled Substance Prescription Arizona has addressed this issue most directly and comprehensively by enacting HB 2454. This law allows providers to prescribe Schedule II drugs, which are defined as drugs with high potential for abuse, such as Vicodin, methadone, and OxyContin, via audio-visual examination and delegates review for more detailed requirements to a newly created Telehealth Advisory Committee. The committee will “review national and other standards for telehealth best practices and relevant peer-reviewed literature” and establish best practices for providers to follow. This committee must include several experts in behavioral health and substance use, indicating that optimal ways to regulate prescribing controlled substances are a high priority. In other Southwestern states, the majority of recent bills on the topic focus on cannabis. For example, New Mexico’s medical marijuana law (HB 2) allows providers to determine medical marijuana qualification via telehealth. Likewise, Utah recently passed a bill (SB 170) allowing for medical marijuana renewal via telehealth examination, although it still requires in-person exams for initial recommendations. Research and Access to Care Healthcare access issues are also of primary concern, and telehealth is seen as a potential solution, particularly in rural areas. For example, New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. Likewise, Utah attempted (HB 36) to extend the term of a grant for research about how telehealth can improve access to mental health care, particularly for underserved populations. The range of proposed and enacted laws reflects a lack of evidence as well as differing ideologies among legislators. It is unusual for such substantial changes to the legal framework to occur so quickly – without more incremental steps and without a significant body of experience and precedent to glean from other jurisdictions. Arizona’s HB 2454 provides an innovative approach to remote prescribing by providing both access and data, which will be key to watch as states continue to pass telehealth legislation. < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth's ‘great opportunity’ at community health centers Emily Olsen June 14, 2022 Ray Lowe, senior vice president and CIO at AltaMed Health Services, discusses his organization's move to virtual care at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and how such care can evolve. See original video: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/video/telehealths-great-opportunity-community-health-centers < Previous News Next News >

Maximizing Telemedicine Benefits Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center August 2021 First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The United States and the world have seen a dramatic increase in the use of telemedicine since the inception of the COVID-19 public health emergency due in most part to stay at home restrictions for both providers and patients. Prior to this, telemedicine was used in a wide variety of clinical and related patient care applications for at least 30 years, and had been seeing steady but not exponential growth. In many cases programs were initiated quite rapidly using readily available and often low-cost equipment and tools, unless there was already an existing program and platform in place. Further, the use of telemedicine was facilitated at the state and federal levels but widespread waivers and measures being put into place to reduce barriers that were previously in place such as changes in reimbursements, requirements regarding patient and provider locations, cross-state licensure and privacy/security requirements. Those of us in the field for a long time are hopeful that many of these measures will stay in place, but there are clearly some that will or already have expired. We are additionally hopeful that even though in-person practices are clearly coming back full-tilt, that everyone has seen and/or experienced the benefits of telemedicine and will continue to use it to some degree as feasible and appropriate with their patients. As this occurs, however, providers will be faced with new challenges as they take their initial telemedicine set-ups and transition to this new hybrid world of services. As noted, some things will still be allowed (e.g., certain billing codes) but others will likely return to pre-COVID status (e.g., not being able to use non-HIPAA-compliant devices and software platforms). In addition to finding the best software for future telemedicine applications, there are other things to consider when trying to maximize telemedicine benefits. From my perspective, although the technology is critical, telemedicine success has very little to do with the technology and everything to do with the people and the environment within which they practice. Thus, in order to maximize telemedicine these are the elements one should consider and focus on in addition to carefully selecting the most appropriate technology for your practice and providers. First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The use cases need to be clearly defined and must match an identified need. Then the who, what, where, why and when must be carefully delineated. Who needs to be involved (e.g., providers, billing, scheduling, IT, legal, administration), what clinical tasks can be accomplished via telemedicine, where will the technology and/or providers be located (e.g., clinic, home) and where will the patients be (e.g., primary care provider office, home, work, school), why will telemedicine be offered as an option (e.g., lack of sub-specialty providers, patients need to travel long distances, no show rates are too high) and when will telemedicine be offered (e.g., certain days/times, any opening in the schedule)? All of this can be accomplished by plotting out in a workflow diagram what the current practice is and how it needs to be adjusted in order to integrate telemedicine into that workflow. Again, the expectation is that although some practices might remain essentially virtual, the majority are going to evolve into a hybrid practice – but such a hybrid will not happen overnight or automatically. Workflow integration is going to be just as critical as integrating telemedicine technologies into a practice – it really is all about the people, setting expectations and establishing standard operating procedures and protocols for everyone that is going to be involved. Another thing that can be done to maximize a telemedicine practice is to properly train everyone on standard operating procedures and protocols, especially the providers who will be interacting with the patients. To date there are very few training programs that incorporate formally telemedicine as part of the curriculum. A number of programs are increasingly exposing trainees to telemedicine if offered at their institution, but typically as an elective or chance encounter in the clinic. There are however a number of organizations that are working on developing and promoting telemedicine competencies and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recently developed a set of Core Competencies. Although specific to medical college trainees, they are comprehensive enough to cover nearly every other specialty/profession in many respects. Very briefly, the AAMC Telehealth Competencies consist of three domains, each with a set of explicit skills that increase in complexity and responsibility across three stages of practice: entering residency, entering practice and experienced faculty physician. The skills from each prior stage of training should carry over to the next phase as the provider becomes more expert and acquires additional skill sets. The six domains are: patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth; access and equity in telehealth; communication via telehealth; data collection and assessment via telehealth; technology for telehealth; and ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth. Patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth includes 4 skill sets ranging from being able to explain to patients are caregivers the benefits and limitations of telemedicine to knowing when a patient is at risk and how/when to escalate care (e.g., convert to in-person) during an encounter. Access and equity in telehealth has 3 skill sets including knowing your biases and implications when considering healthcare, how telehealth can mitigate or amplify access to care gaps, and taking into account all potential cultural, social, physical and other factors when considering telemedicine. Communication via telehealth has 3 skills covering establishing rapport with patients, creating the right environment (e.g., lighting, sound) and knowing how to incorporate a patient’s social support into an encounter. Data collection and assessment via telehealth covers how to obtain a patient history, how to conduct an appropriate remote exam, and how to deal with patient-generated data. Technology for telehealth does not expect everyone to be an engineer or IT expert, but they should be able to explain equipment requirements for a visit, explain limitations and minimum requirements, and explain risks of technology failure and how to respond to them. Similarly, ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth does not expect everyone to be a lawyer but should be able to describe local legal and privacy regulations, define components of informed consent, understand ethical challenges and professional requirements, and assess potential conflicts of interest (e.g., interest in commercial products/services). Many of these skills can be acquired by those already in practice by attending the wide variety of courses and webinars available for telemedicine skill building. It is also highly recommended that before engaging with patients for the first time via telemedicine to engage in some simulated practice sessions – from start to finish practicing each skill and developing your “style” for interacting with patients via this virtual medium. Finally, in order to maximize benefits you need to assess your program. This does not require a degree in statistics or setting up a complex experimental study. It really requires just two things – a set of metrics and a process. There are lots of metrics available and most have been studied in a wide variety of clinical applications so a good lit review will always help get you started. It is important to keep in mind that the things you measure need to reflect your goals/mission for using telemedicine and the bottom line of making a profit is not always the most appropriate metric to use. There are lots of relevant metrics and as a good starting place the article by Shore et al. “A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health” is a great place to get some ideas. Although developed for the telemental health community the metrics provided apply quite well to nearly any specialty or practice. The metrics include such things as patient/provider satisfaction, no shows, symptom outcomes, completion of treatment, wait times, number of services, cultural access, cost avoidance and patient safety. Once you decide on metrics that are appropriate for your practice (recommend starting with 2-3 then add more as your practice grows) there is a very easy, straight-forward process for getting to outcomes. First, consider a given measure an indicator – these are concrete activities, products etc. that can be measured readily (e.g., from the patient record). For example, you could measure A1C levels in patients as a function of being enrolled in a telenutrition program. The next step is to set performance targets – these are concrete goals that are time limited and based on the indicator metrics. For example, you would like to see a 25% reduction in A1C levels in at least 50% of patients enrolled in the telenutrition course at 6 months post-baseline. Finally, you will have quantifiable outcomes (without fancy statistics) at the end of your set time period – if you meet your 25% reduction goal in 50% of patients great. If not, then maybe reassess the program or whether your goals were realistic. In any case, you now have concrete outcomes of your program demonstrating its benefits that you can provide to funders, administration, your care team and even patients and the community. In order to maximize telemedicine benefits you need to get the word out about its availability and its effectiveness! < Previous News Next News >

As 'telehealth cliff' Looms, Hundreds of Healthcare Orgs Urge Congress to Act Mike Miliard, Healthcare IT News July 2021 More than 400 healthcare and technology organizations are calling on Capitol Hill to eliminate arbitrary restrictions, while helping FQHCs and critical access hospitals offer wider access to virtual care. Leading healthcare industry stakeholders on Monday implored top leaders in the House and Senate to help ensure, among other imperatives, that "Medicare beneficiaries [don't] abruptly lose access to nearly all recently expanded coverage of telehealth." WHY IT MATTERS In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, 430 organizations – including the American Telemedicine Association, HIMSS (parent company of Healthcare IT News), Amazon, Amwell, Teladoc, Zoom, Epic, Allscripts, Kaiser Permanente, Mayo Clinic, Mass General Brigham, UPMC and many others – called on them to capitalize on the progress that's been made on telehealth before it's too late. If they don't act before the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, the groups said, Medicare beneficiaries "will lose access to virtual care options which have become a lifeline to many." The groups also called on Congress to get rid of arbitrary restrictions on where patients can use telehealth services, remove limitations on telemental health services, authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to allow additional telehealth "practitioners, services and modalities," and help ensuring that federally qualified health centers, critical access hospitals, rural health centers and providers like them can can furnish telehealth services. Flexibilities enabled under the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act and the CARES Act "have allowed clinicians across the country to scale delivery and provide all Americans – many for the first time – access to high-quality virtual care," the groups wrote," the groups said. "In response, health care organizations across the nation have dramatically transformed and made significant investments in new technologies and care delivery models, not only to meet COVID driven patient demand, but to prepare for America’s future health care needs. "Unfortunately, this progress is in jeopardy," they wrote. "Many of the telehealth flexibilities are temporary and limited to the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Without action from Congress, Medicare beneficiaries will abruptly lose access to nearly all recently expanded coverage of telehealth when the COVID-19 PHE ends. This would have a chilling effect on access to care across the entire U.S. healthcare system, including on patients that have established relationships with providers virtually, with potentially dire consequences for their health." Telehealth, these stakeholders argue, "is not a COVID-19 novelty, and the regulatory flexibilities granted by Congress must not be viewed solely as pandemic response measures. Patient satisfaction surveys and claims data from CMS and private health plans tell a compelling story of the large-scale transformation of our nation’s health care system over the past year and, importantly, demonstrate strong patient interest and demand for telehealth access post-pandemic." The letter notes that over the past year and half, virtual care has become ubiquitous, popular, efficient – and has helped address care disparities. One in four Medicare beneficiaries – 15 million – accessed telehealth between the summer and fall of 2020, and 91% of them said they were satisfied with their video visits. Some 75% oof Americans "now report having a strong interest in using telehealth moving forward," the letter notes. "Congress not only has the opportunity to bring the U.S. health care system into the 21st century, but the responsibility to ensure that the billions in taxpayer funded COVID investments made during the pandemic are not simply wasted but used to accelerate the transformation of care delivery, ensuring access to high quality virtual care for all Americans," the groups said. The letter calls on Congress to ensure HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra "has the tools to transition following the end of the public health emergency and ensure telehealth is regulated the same as in-person services." In addition, it asks lawmakers to attend to four key priorities: 1. Remove Obsolete Restrictions on the Location of the Patient and Provider. Congress must permanently remove the Section 1834(m) geographic and originating site restrictions to ensure that all patients can access care where they are. The response to COVID-19 has shown the importance of making telehealth services available in rural and urban areas alike. To bring clarity and provide certainty to patients and providers, we strongly urge Congress to address these restrictions in statute by striking the geographic limitation on originating sites and allow beneficiaries across the country to receive virtual care in their homes, or the location of their choosing, where clinically appropriate and with appropriate beneficiary protections and guardrails in place. 2. Maintain and Enhance HHS Authority to Determine Appropriate Providers, Services, and Modalities for Telehealth. Congress should provide the Secretary with the flexibility to expand the list of eligible practitioners who may furnish clinically appropriate telehealth services. Similarly, Congress should ensure that HHS and CMS maintain the authority to add or remove eligible telehealth services – as supported by data and demonstrated to be safe, effective, and clinically appropriate – through a predictable regulatory process that gives patients and providers transparency and clarity. Finally, Congress should give CMS the authority to reimburse for multiple telehealth modalities, including audio-only services, when clinically appropriate. 3. Ensure Federally Qualified Health Centers, Critical Access Hospitals, and Rural Health Clinics Can Furnish Telehealth Services After the PHE. FQHCs, CAHs, and RHCs provide critical services to underserved communities and have expanded telehealth services after restrictions were lifted under the CARES Act and through executive actions. Congress should ensure that FQHCs, CAHs, and RHCs can offer virtual services post-COVID and work with stakeholders to support fair and appropriate reimbursement for these key safety net providers and better equip our healthcare system to address health disparities. 4. Remove Restrictions on Medicare Beneficiary Access to Mental and Behavioral Health Services Offered Through Telehealth. Without Congressional action, a new requirement for an in-person visit prior to access to mental health services through telehealth will go into effect for most Medicare beneficiaries. We urge Congress to reject arbitrary restrictions that would require an in-person visit prior to a telehealth visit. Not only is there no clinical evidence to support these requirements, but they also exacerbate clinician shortages and worsen health inequities by restricting access for those individuals with barriers preventing them from traveling to in-person care.15 Removing geographic and originating site restrictions only to replace them with in-person restrictions is short-sighted and will create additional barriers to care. THE LARGER TREND The concept of a "telehealth cliff" – an abrupt end to the progress made in expanding and enabling virtual care once the pandemic is finally over – has been of concern for some time. Since early 2021, an array of telehealth-focused bills have been introduced in the House and Senate, but the major concerns outlined in the July 26 letter are still outstanding and yet to be addressed by statute. ON THE RECORD "With 430 stakeholders in lockstep, and unprecedented bipartisan support for these legislative priorities, we urge Congress to act swiftly to ensure that telehealth remains permanently available following expiration of the public health emergency," said Kyle Zebley, VP of public policy at the American Telemedicine Association in a statement. "The ATA remains committed to working collaboratively to ensure Medicare beneficiaries can continue to access care when and where they need it." “Evidence-based connected care has been at the core of our nation’s health resiliency throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and has established its important role in improving healthcare quality, access, and value for all Americans," added Rob Havasy, managing director of the Personal Connected Health Alliance. "HIMSS and PCHAlliance urge Congress to swiftly act to make the Medicare coverage changes permanent, to give patients and providers access to the tools they need and deserve." < Previous News Next News >

2022 In Review: State Telehealth Policy Legislative Roundup CCHP December 06, 2022 LEGISLATIVE ROUNDUP As the year winds down, the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) is providing its annual State Legislation Roundup. Enacted state telehealth bills in the 2022 legislative session followed trends forged in the previous 2021 legislative cycle, although at a slightly lesser volume. While 2020 was largely focused on scrambling to meet the needs of the population during the COVID pandemic through temporary telehealth waivers and flexibilities, both 2021 and 2022 challenged states to decide how to translate their temporary COVID policies into permanent telehealth policies, and in many cases making adjustments to their previously passed laws concerning telehealth. There was also a proliferation of legislation that addressed cross-state licensing issues in earnest through registration processes, targeted licensing exceptions and compacts. Among 41 states and DC, 180 legislative bills tracked by CCHP passed in the 2022 legislative session. While this is down from the 201 legislative bills enacted in 47 states in 2021, it’s still significantly higher than the bills passed in 2020 (104 bills). The number of bills in each individual topic area CCHP tracks varied from previous years. For example, while bills addressing private payer reimbursement, Medicaid reimbursement and regulatory requirements were lower this cycle than 2021 levels, bills addressing cross-state licensing were significantly up, while bills addressing online prescribing, and demonstrations, studies and reports were also somewhat higher than in 2021. Note that CCHP began tracking Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands legislation in September 2022 for the first time. However, no enacted bills were found related to telehealth in either of the territories during the 2022 session. See full article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/2022-in-review-state-telehealth-policy-legislative-roundup < Previous News Next News >

Social Determinants of Health Continue to Limit Access to Care via Telehealth Center for Connected Health Policy April 2021 A study published in JAMA Network Open found that over 27% of visits were conducted virtually in socially advantaged neighborhoods, compared to nearly 20% in disadvantaged areas. While telehealth increased care delivery during COVID-19, social determinants of health continue to limit access and highlight existing disparities related to the digital divide. A study published in JAMA Network Open found that over 27% of visits were conducted virtually in socially advantaged neighborhoods, compared to nearly 20% in disadvantaged areas. Meanwhile 24% of visits in urban areas were virtual compared to 14% in rural areas. The study also found that virtual care occurred more frequently for mental health visits than medical, that higher age and number of chronic diseases also correlated with higher telehealth utilization, and that increased use of telehealth was seen in areas with “COVID-19 hot spots” as well. The researchers stated that they hope these findings guide policymakers when looking to address ensuring access to care for all populations via telehealth moving forward. JAMA Network Study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2777779 < Previous News Next News >

Senator Warner Encourages DEA Action on Telehealth & Prescribing Center for Connected Health Policy May 2021 A lack of a more permanent fix to the prescribing issue could create hurdles for patients to access treatment to SUD services. Earlier this month Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland regarding the long-delayed regulations from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) for a telehealth registry to prescribe controlled substances. In the letter, Senator Warner expressed great concern for the delay and that “the DEA’s failure to address this issue means that a vast majority of health care providers that use telehealth to prescribe controlled substances to and otherwise treat their patients have been deterred in getting them the quality care they need.” The Ryan Haight Act of 2008 allowed for certain exemptions to the use of telehealth to provide controlled substances without the telehealth provider having seen the patient in-person first, however these exemptions are narrowly tailored. Two such exemptions are: when a public health emergency (PHE) is declared, and if a provider is registered on a telehealth registry that the DEA will create. Due to the current COVID-19 PHE, providers now are able to prescribe a controlled substance without an in-person visit, but the exemption will disappear once the PHE is declared over. In 2018 under the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act, Congress directed the DEA to promulgate final regulations for the registry by the end of 2019. Although a December 2019 regulatory posting indicated the DEA’s intent to publish the rule, the deadline came and went without even draft regulations being released for public comments. In March 2020, a PHE for COVID-19 was declared allowing one of the exceptions for prescribing to be activated. However, the PHE is not slated to last indefinitely and many, including Senator Warner, are looking for a more lasting change. Senator Warner also sent inquiries to the previous administration regarding the status of the registry regulations that went unanswered. During COVID-19, concern for the ability of patients with substance use disorders (SUD) to access services rose as demands on health services focused on responding to the pandemic and people sheltered in place. While much of the country is beginning to open up again, a lack of a more permanent fix to the prescribing issue could create hurdles for patients to access treatment to SUD services. < Previous News Next News >

Studies Show How Telehealth Can Increase Equitable Access to Care Center for Connected Health Policy May 24, 2022 Focus on the relationship between telehealth and disparities in access to care continues to result in new research examining pandemic era data and the use of telehealth among disadvantaged populations. While policymakers and studies often try to put findings into two groups, whether telehealth increases or decreases inequities, recent research shows that the study framework used and considerations made may impact outcomes more so than telehealth itself. For instance, this month a new study published in Health Affairs found that as a result of emergency federal telemedicine coverage expansions access increased for all Medicare populations, including those in the most disadvantaged areas. The study was framed to examine the impact of expanded telehealth coverage policies on different populations, rather than looking at access generally where inequities have unfortunately always existed. Comparing pre-COVID temporary waiver data with post-waiver implementation data, the authors discovered that the highest odds of utilization were among those in disadvantaged and metropolitan areas. As reported in a Managed Healthcare Executive article on the study, the Johns Hopkins researchers concluded that the results suggest that increased Medicare telemedicine coverage policies improve access to underserved populations without worsening disparities. An additional study just published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health and covered in a healthleaders article showed that a virtual care program at Penn Medicine is reducing barriers to access specifically for Black patients and eliminating historic disparities. The authors looked at approximately one million appointments per year in both 2019 and 2020 for Philadelphia area patients and found that Black patients used telehealth more than non-Black patients and that appointment completion gaps between Black and non-Black patients closed. Also recently released, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) produced a white paper titled The Future of Telehealth Roundtable: The Potential Impact of Emerging Technologies on Health Equity, which focuses on how to ensure telehealth increases equitable access to care. Following up on its previous pandemic telehealth work, in late 2021 NCQA pulled together a multidisciplinary panel of equity and technology experts for a discussion on equitable access and virtual health care delivery. Reviewing hypothetical case studies and responding to various questions, participants highlighted potential challenges and identified three primary ways to ensure equitable access in telehealth delivery: Tailoring Telehealth Use and Access to Individual Preferences and Needs Addressing Regulatory, Policy and Infrastructure Barriers to Fair Telehealth Access Leveraging Telehealth and Digital Technologies to Promote Equitable Care Delivery The white paper suggests the need to prioritize language and cultural humility, address digital literacy, and optimize telehealth for people with disabilities. In addition, in terms of barriers, the authors stress the need to address broadband infrastructure and licensure limitations, while also updating laws and regulations that restrict telehealth use, including payment policies. Another Health Affairs article published this month, Policy Considerations to Ensure Telemedicine Equity, also looked at various factors that must be taken into account to allow telehealth to increase equitable access to care. The author clarifies that equity is a matter beyond telehealth and is related to patient-level barriers that include family, community, and general health care delivery level factors, such as issues related to the digital divide. In addition, the article cautions against policies focusing on increased utilization concerns, stating that increased use may mean that patients are finally attaining the care they need, in addition to the fact that increased access may reduce overall health care costs. Therefore, policies seeking to reduce reimbursement or limit audio-only modalities to address utilization and cost concerns may instead primarily reduce clinicians’ willingness to offer telehealth and modalities that mitigate access barriers for historically excluded groups. The article also highlights how varying payer policies, such as those that allow reimbursement for telehealth visits with new patients versus those that do not, creates inequities, and that differing medical licensing and/or prescribing regulations by state can create inequitable access issues on top of differing coverage policies. These policy considerations are key to ensuring telemedicine mitigates inequities rather than exacerbates them. While the pandemic generally has highlighted and exacerbated existing inequities, it has also provided the information necessary to show telehealth’s ability to address disparities and increase equitable access to care. It is important that policymakers take such findings and opportunities from studies on telehealth equity into account when looking to potentially make pandemic policies permanent in order to properly preserve telehealth’s positive impacts. It is also important that the framework used in the study be placed in context to help explain why some research speaks to telehealth disparities, or health care disparities, versus how telehealth is decreasing health care disparities. As shown in the aforementioned studies and articles, the difference in framing showcases that telehealth in and of itself does not create or exacerbate disparities, rather it is a tool that can be utilized to decrease disparities in access to care. The tool has to be allowed to be effective, however, and that is where the role of public policy comes in. Policies must support broadband and telehealth infrastructure and promote the use of technology to deliver care equal to the delivery of in-person care. For instance, Medicaid policies that limit when telehealth can be used and/or certain allowable modalities can create inequities in comparison to more expansive commercial policies that guarantee better telehealth access to non-Medicaid patients. Therefore, policymakers must recognize that regulatory restrictions around telehealth cannot prevent already existing general access disparities, rather it is often the regulatory restrictions around telehealth that lead to exacerbating disparities. It becomes vital that research be put into context so that subsequent policies are implemented that allow telehealth to reach its full potential to reduce disparities. For full article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/the-latest-telehealth-research-studies-show-how-telehealth-can-increase-equitable-access-to-care < Previous News Next News >

New SAMHSA Telehealth Guide: Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 Telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and its National Mental Health and Substance Use Policy Laboratory recently released a new evidence-based resource guide titled, Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders, to support implementation of telehealth across diverse mental health and substance use disorder treatment settings. The guide examines the current telehealth landscape, including evidence on effectiveness and examples of programs that have integrated telehealth modalities (live-video, telephone, and web-based applications) for the treatment of serious mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Also included is guidance and resources for evaluating and implementing best practices which are presented across a continuum of services, such as screening and assessment, treatment, medication management, care management, recovery support, and crisis services. The report speaks to how telehealth is known to improve access to care during emergencies and in rural and underserved areas, but stresses that implementation should be expanded outside of such situations and integrated into an organization’s standard practices to improve provider and patient communication, satisfaction, timeliness and continuity of care. The authors highlight how this is increasingly important when it comes to mental health issues, which impact millions of Americans that often face unique treatment gaps and barriers. Ultimately, it is suggested that with the right resources and upfront work, the evidence shows telehealth has the capability to address these barriers, improve health outcomes and care coordination, decrease costs and reduce health disparities. Notable findings related to telehealth use and mental health include: *Telehealth use doubled from 14% to 28% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth visits for mental health increased 556% between March 11 and April 22, 2020 *SUD treatment via telehealth increased from 13.5% to 17.4% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth use increased 425% for mental health appointments among rural Medicare beneficiaries between 2010 and 2017 The guide presents specific strategies to increase patient access and comfort using telehealth, such as providing devices to those that need them and offering trial sessions to address any technological challenges. It is also suggested that providers first screen patients for their willingness and readiness to receive care via telehealth, as it may not be appropriate for some patients. Additionally, telephone should be encouraged when it reduces prior structural and institutional barriers that have made contacting underserved communities difficult. The guide also offers strategies to increase provider comfort using telehealth, such as: *trainings and designating certain staff to support and evaluate its use *how to create a similar environment to that of an in-person visit for patients *addressing organizational infrastructure issues Understanding and knowledge of relevant and ever-evolving regulatory and reimbursement policies is included as an important consideration as well, to which the authors offer a variety of tracking resources, including the policy finder tool on CCHP’s new website. Regardless of where state and federal telehealth policies land, the guide includes a number of telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth. Additional resources can be accessed on the SAMHSA website. For more information read the full SAMHSA resource guide- https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/SAMHSA_Digital_Download/PEP21-06-02-001.pdf < Previous News Next News >

Report: Telehealth Programs Increase Workload for Nurses and Support Staff Katie Adams December 20, 2022 Many providers think their telehealth program increases the workload for nurses and support staff, according to a recent report. In 2023, hospitals and physician practices will have to focus on making their telehealth workflows more efficient, which may involve partnering with third-party administrators. Telehealth isn’t as widely utilized as it was at the dawn of the pandemic, but the care modality is definitely here to stay. However, many providers believe their telehealth program increases the workload for nurses and support staff, according to a recent report from research firm Sage Growth Partners. Providers also said they don’t think physicians enjoy using telehealth visits to treat patients. In 2023, hospitals and physician practices will have to focus on making their telehealth workflows more efficient, which may involve partnering with third-party administrators, the report said. In September, Sage Growth Partners surveyed 95 health system executives and 75 leaders of physician practices. Practices with fewer than five physicians were excluded from the survey. Most respondents said that their organizations will focus on optimizing and sustaining their current telehealth programs in 2023 rather than expanding them. In fact, only about 10% of participants — 11% of hospitals and 8% of practices — said they are looking to grow their telehealth offerings next year. Health system executives were more likely than practice leaders to say that telehealth visits should make up a higher percentage of their ideal in-person-to-telehealth visit mix. Health system leaders said the mix should be 30% telehealth and 70% office. Among practice leaders, the ideal mix looks more like 20% and 80%. Their difference of opinion also extended to another question on how they think telehealth utilization will grow by visit type over the next two years. Health system leaders said that utilization will fall slightly for most visit types — even behavioral health. They said that 36% of behavioral health visits were delivered via telehealth in September, but they expect this to fall to 33% in September 2024. Urgent care and telepathology were the two visit types for which health systems leaders predicted telehealth growth — they expect telehealth utilization to increase from 3% to 7% for urgent care and from 2% to 4% for telepathology. Practice leaders expected telehealth utilization to increase slightly or remain the same for most visit types. Specialty care was the only exception — for this visit type, practice leaders predicted utilization to fall from 23% to 20% over the next two years. Both groups agreed that telehealth actually increases burden on staff though practice leaders seem to feel it more acutely. More than half of practice leaders said telehealth has increased support staff’s workload, and 28% said it generates more work for nurses. Among health system executives, 35% said telehealth increased support staff’s workload, and 30% said it creates more work for nurses. Additionally, less than half of total respondents (46% of hospitals and 47% of practices) agreed that telehealth increases physician satisfaction and physicians like using telehealth visits to treat patients. A key reason for this is that many providers are operating their telehealth programs using inefficient workflows, according to the report. Nearly 60% of survey respondents said they have not yet created new workflows for telehealth visits. Instead, hospitals and physician practices are still relying on workflows that mirror in-person visits. In 2023, providers will need to improve these workflows, and many will consider bringing on the help of third-party telehealth administrators, such as Amwell or Caregility, the report said. Hospitals are more than twice as likely to use third-party partners to administer telehealth services — with 20% of hospitals doing this compared to 9% of practices. Hospitals were also more likely to say they would change their telehealth administering party over the next two years — with 44% of hospitals saying this compared to 25% of practices. Photo: Anastasia Usenko, Getty Images See original article: https://medcitynews.com/2022/12/report-telehealth-programs-increase-workload-for-nurses-and-support-staff/ < Previous News Next News >

San Juan Regional Medical Center gets CARES Act funding to expand telehealth services By Hannah Grover, Farmington Daily Times February 15, 2021 AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. AZTEC — Before COVID-19, San Juan Regional Medical Center used telehealth in a limited fashion to support providers and to do provider consultations, according to Chief Information Officer Matt Miliffe. The pandemic changed things. San Juan Regional Medical Center and San Juan Health Partners worked quickly to expand telehealth offerings. Now the hospital is receiving CARES Act funding to help improve its technology and better provide that service. "Demand (for telehealth) was immediate and has continued to grow," Miliffe said. San Juan Regional Medical Center will receive $1.25 million in CARES Act funding to supply emergency generators as well as to make upgrades in the IT network, according to a press release from the office of Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-NM. IT upgrades, new generators on the way These technology upgrades will support telehealth and field hospital operation projects that have been implemented in an effort to bolster the hospital's response to COVID-19. The grant funding will be matched with $617,000 in local funds. All locations except for San Juan Health Partners Urgent Care began offering a mixture of telephone and video visits in an effort to comply with public health orders, sustain the services offered and prevent the spread of the coronavirus, according to Barbara Charles, administrative director for San Juan Health Partners. The medical center's network infrastructure wasn't designed to service the high demands of video consultations and Miliffe said the IT team has had to push the current capabilities. "However, significant upgrades to the wired and wireless infrastructure is needed to sustain and improve the existing experience, and allow for the continued growth in telehealth demands driven by the pandemic," he said. "This funding will make a fundamental difference in our ability to serve our community’s needs." Your stories live here. Fuel your hometown passion and plug into the stories that define it. Create Account COVID: State health department closes Home Depot over COVID-19 cases One of the barriers that the center has seen is the remote nature of the community. Many patients can only connect through phone due to limited internet connectivity or cell service that can't support video. "The inability to consistently connect by audio and video is an ongoing barrier," Charles said. This funding is part of more than $2.24 million of CARES Act money that will be coming to northwest New Mexico to address healthcare and economic needs. In addition to San Juan Regional Medical Center, the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments, which is based in Gallup, has been awarded $990,000 to address economic development needs of small businesses and entrepreneurs that have been harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments serves Cibola, McKinley and San Juan counties. According to the press release, the council of governments hopes to create 100 jobs and retain 100 jobs through a revolving loan fund that this funding will assist in creating. Legislative session:New Mexico lawmakers work to address economic impact of COVID-19 U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich Heinrich said in a press release that he has been "moved by the resiliency and grit" of rural New Mexico communities as they have faced a variety of public health and economic challenges related to the pandemic. "That is why I fought so hard to include funding in the CARES Act to help New Mexico’s rural health care systems, small businesses, and entrepreneurs to weather this storm," he said. "This funding is long-overdue and I will continue working for federal resources that New Mexico’s rural communities need to take on the COVID-19 pandemic and rebuild our economy in a way that supports everyone." Heinrich as well as Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-NM, and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-NM, announced $2.24 million of CARES Act funding for northwest New Mexico on Feb. 12. San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois Hospital: Telehealth is here to stay San Juan Regional Medical Center President and CEO Jeff Bourgeois thanked the lawmakers for the funding in the press release and emphasized that the hospital provides essential healthcare services for the Four Corners area. "This funding will ensure that we can meet the diverse needs of our patients and community and improve care for those we are privileged to serve," he said. While the pandemic jump started the demand for telehealth in the community, Miliffe said the San Juan Regional Medical Center does not anticipate it fading away. "Looking ahead to post-pandemic times, we see a long term and stable need for these services in our community as patients look to receive their healthcare in more of a consumer fashion, with services and offerings tailored around them as the individual," Charles, of San Juan Health Partners, said. "It is expected that the need or demand for telemedicine will continue long term. Many patients with health needs that may not require an in-person or face-to-face visit may find this option more flexible and convenient. Additionally, given the unknowns of the pandemic – this remains a safe alternative to in-person visits for patient to seek as needed or routine healthcare needs." Charles said telehealth also plays a key role in the COVID to Home program, which allows COVID-19 patients to receive close monitoring while in self-isolation at their own houses. "Because of this program’s close monitoring through telehealth visits, many patients have been able to stay out of the hospital and manage their care at home through the telephone or video calls. In other cases, caregivers have been able to intervene to coordinate a higher level of care for patients who needed it," she said. "To date, the COVID to Home program has helped more than 1,200 patients manage their care at home, something that would not have been possible without telehealth." Hannah Grover covers government for The Daily Times. She can be reached at 505-564-4652 or via email at hgrover@daily-times.com . This story has been modified to correct the attribution on some quotes. < Previous News Next News >

Telemedicine Holds Potential to Help Climate Change Center for Connected Health Policy May 4, 2021 MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. MobiHealth News is shining the light on a much-overlooked benefit of telemedicine: how it can help curb greenhouse gas emissions and thus help in the fight against climate change. The recent article highlights that the United States healthcare industry is a big contributor to carbon emissions, and although telemedicine doesn’t solve the problem, its increased use does lead the industry in the right direction. This has been proven in two research studies conducted on this very subject. The first study, published in the journal, PLoS One explores the carbon footprint of telemedicine and found that replacing in-person visits with telemedicine resulted in 40-70 times decrease in carbon emissions. They note in their conclusion that for telemedicine to make a significant difference, a paradigm shift is necessary where telemedicine is regarded as an ordinary part of health care rather than exclusively for those who lack access due to geography. The second study, conducted by the University of California Davis Health System, examined travel-related and environmental savings as a result of use of telemedicine appointments for outpatient specialty consultations at the university. They found that telemedicine consultations resulted in significant savings of total emissions and that their telemedicine program had a positive impact on environmental pollutants. CCHP also previously published a catalogue of environmental impacts studies, which included several international studies looking at this same issue and coming to the same conclusion regarding telemedicine’s positive impact on carbon emissions in the healthcare sector. As telehealth has become more widespread due to the COVID-19 public health emergency its not hard to imagine that telehealth will cement its place as a mainstream tool in healthcare as the authors in the PLoS study suggest. However, policy barriers have historically interrupted the growth of telehealth, and it is yet to be seen whether the end of COVID-19 will bring telehealth’s progress to a halt. In a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change, researchers found that as a whole, the temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during COVID-19 saw a decrease by as much as -26% on average, but note that the impact of 2020 annual emissions depends on government actions and economic incentives post-pandemic, which will shape the path forward for decades. It will be important as entities such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the congressional budget office, state governments and others conduct their analyses on cost estimates for telehealth that they factor in savings to travel costs incurred through the use of telehealth and the implications for the environment. To learn more, see the full mobihealth news article featuring this important issue. Mobile Health News: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/telemedicine-came-rescue-during-covid-19-could-it-help-climate-change-too < Previous News Next News >

US Reps Push for Extension of Telehealth Flexibilities for HDHP Members Mark Melchionna December 15, 2022 Three US Representatives led a bipartisan group of lawmakers in submitting a request to Congress to extend telehealth flexibilities for some high-deductible health plan members. In anticipation of critical telehealth flexibilities expiring on Dec. 31, US Representatives Michelle Steel (CA-48), Brad Schneider (IL-10), and Susie Lee (NV-3), along with a bipartisan group of 30 Congress members, sent a letter requesting that House leadership include two pieces of legislation that extend some flexibilities in a year-end package. When the COVID-19 pandemic began, patients and providers turned to telehealth in droves to maintain care. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there was a 154 percent increase in telehealth visits when comparing data from the last week of March 2020 with that of March 2019. This uptake of telehealth was likely associated with the withdrawal of regulatory restrictions in response to the limitations placed on in-person care during the public health emergency. As part of the CARES Act of 2020, Congress passed reforms that expanded access to telehealth services. For instance, prior to the CARES Act, Americans with high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) coupled with health savings accounts (HSAs) had to reach the minimum deductible before they qualified for telehealth coverage. However, Section 3701 of the CARES Act eliminated this requirement initially through Dec. 31, 2021. The provision was later extended through the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022. This led to wider coverage of telehealth services as health plans and employers were able to expand access to virtual care services for individuals with HDHP-HSAs pre-deductible. According to the representatives, increased access has led to many benefits for patients, particularly those without access to transportation services and those who reside far away from clinical locations. “Access to telehealth has also provided a significant portion of the U.S. workforce relief at a time when household costs are rising. Telehealth has allowed families to avoid taking time off from work to travel to and from appointments, and timely care has helped prevent costly visits to urgent care or the emergency room. Unfortunately, those with a high deductible may decide to skip critical preventative services – including primary care and behavioral health services – if the deductible is not waived, often leading to poor health outcomes and more costly care down the line,” the letter states. Due to the increasingly apparent benefits of telehealth, the US representatives are requesting that House leadership include the Primary and Virtual Care Affordability Act and the Telehealth Expansion Act in the end-of-the-year package. The Telehealth Expansion Act would make the telehealth flexibility permanent for people with HDHP-HSAs. The Primary and Virtual Care Affordability Act would both extend the flexibility and allow insurance providers to cover primary care services pre-deductible. This letter is part of a larger effort among healthcare stakeholders to ensure that expanded access to telehealth is solidified. Another letter written by the Connected Health Initiative (CHI) requested that Congress extend the safe harbor for telehealth coverage by HDHPs. In the letter, CHI noted its support for removing restrictions impeding telehealth access among Medicare beneficiaries. It also emphasized the upcoming telehealth deadline Americans with HDHPs will face at the end of 2022. Due to this, CHI requested that Congress extend the safe harbor for HDHPs to cover telehealth with first-dollar coverage. This would also allow them to maintain HDHP status. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/us-reps-push-for-extension-of-telehealth-flexibilities-for-hdhp-members < Previous News Next News >

Workers Report Burnout Due to Healthcare Cybersecurity Concerns Jill McKeon Oct. 6, 2021 Three-quarters of industry professionals reported having healthcare cybersecurity concerns about protected health information being communicated via unsecured communication devices. Physician burnout was a growing problem prior to the pandemic, but other healthcare professionals are reporting significant levels of burnout as well, according to a survey conducted by Spok. Over 50 percent of IT staff and contact center staff reported feeling a considerable level of burnout. Meanwhile, over 60 percent of clinical executives reported feeling “a great deal” of burnout since the pandemic. Healthcare professionals overwhelmingly agreed that the risk of clinician burnout is a public health crisis “that demands action by healthcare institutions, governing bodies, and regulatory authorities.” Many credited complicated technologies and poor technological integration as some of the leading factors in clinician burnout. The research suggested that improved communication tools could lessen the risk of clinician burnout. “Survey respondents seem to agree that improving communication technology could help address the risk of burnout through increasing efficiency of workflows, improving exchange of data between care members, and adopting mobile technologies,” the study explained. COVID-19 reshaped many aspects of care delivery, and also highlighted the need for secure communication technologies that can simultaneously comply with HIPAA and seamlessly integrate into an organization’s operations. Just over 80 percent of surveyed healthcare workers reported believing that COVID-19 played a role in protected health information (PHI) being communicated via unsecured or personal communication tools. Researchers surveyed over 200 healthcare executives, physicians, IT personnel, nurses, and contact center representatives about the state of communication in their organizations. Results revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic not only caused significant healthcare worker burnout, but also shifted resources away from valuable cybersecurity initiatives. “With security and privacy issues on the rise in 2021, perhaps it’s not unexpected that survey respondents are concerned,” the survey report stated. “Looking ahead, hospitals and health systems may need to bolster initiatives to meet HIPAA standards for PHI protection and to avoid noncompliance, reputational harm, and serious financial penalties. It could also signify the need for health systems to have in place an advanced, HIPAA-compliant critical communication solution.” All industries have become increasingly reliant on communication technologies, especially during the pandemic when mobile communication devices became the primary method of communication for many workplaces. Smartphones have remained the number one most supported device in healthcare since 2012, as in-house pager use continues to decrease. However, pagers still play a key role in care team communications. Most respondents reported that their organization’s budget constraints continue to prevent them from updating their outdated communication devices. In addition, the complexity of meeting HIPAA requirements and insufficient leadership support are major obstacles in advancing a healthcare organization’s internal communication tactics. Implementing new communication tools also presents new cybersecurity risks and calls for enterprise-wide training programs. Just under half of respondents reported that their teams paused outstanding IT communication projects during the pandemic. While 43 percent of respondents expected to resume these projects within the next six months, the rising prevalence of the Delta variant may alter that timeline. < Previous News Next News >