How Does a Telemedicine Pain Program Work in Rural American with Multi-Vulnerable Patient Populations? Dax Trujillo, MD July 20, 2022 In April 2017 Summit Healthcare started a multi-disciplinary program to treat patients with chronic and acute pain in the White Mountains of Arizona. Our patient service area is HRSA-designated as having a shortage of providers and medically underserved. The area is the size of Rhode Island and includes Native American reservations and other vulnerable populations. Many of our patients live in a high poverty area which makes access to care challenging. In order to provide multi-disciplinary services that include interventional procedures, monitored medication management and cognitive behavior therapy, we needed to create a hybrid program. Our program incorporates in-person, video/audio and telephone visits. By using three different modes of care delivery we were able to reach and follow more patients with better outcomes. Since April 1, 2017 we have had over 900 patients participate in our telemedicine pain program. The visits include virtual appointments for medical management, behavioral therapy, and general wellness checks after an in-person visit; virtual check-ins for procedure or testing follow-ups and eVisits via email communication to answer questions and/or review prescription issues or re-ordering. Due to the rurality of the service area we estimate that patients were saved from having to travel 66,144 miles to a physician’s office. This was a significant relief to patients with limited means to transportation, knowing that their weekly, monthly in-patient visits were reduced to quarterly in-patient visits. Patient satisfaction has been high due to the reduction of travel time and costs. Simultaneously, the patient perceived they were being more closely monitored and their pain issues addressed in a timely manner. Another benefit is that more than one professional can join a telemedicine visit with the patient which allows a more holistic and comprehensive visit for better value based care of the patient. By providing virtual visits as part of the entire treatment program, we have saved thousands of dollars in chronic pain treatment costs. Through evidence-based research we know that patients are achieving better healthcare outcomes in this hybrid program by incorporating telemedicine technology. Our program has had overall success with addressing pain but there are some risks involved that must be addressed within your institution to provide a platform that is HIPPA compliant and protects critical sensitive health information. Providing a secure platform must be a top priority when delivering pain treatment virtually due to the sensitive nature of the disease/treatments with this patient population. While most patients do well with the hybrid program we do have patients for whom it is not appropriate. Due to our location, a subset of patients do not have access to broadband internet service so we cannot perform visits via video or sometimes audio. Other patients have expressed a preference for in-person visits while another group prefers all visits to be virtual. Patients needing neuraxial interventions or surgeries will need to be seen in-person. Each patient has their own unique circumstances so having a hybrid pain treatment program with various care delivery options allows us to reach more patients previously not being treated for their chronic pain issues. In the future we will purchase a remote patient monitoring platform/equipment that can be used with our chronic pain patients to better track their vitals, physical and mental health. This will also allow us to manage medications and behavioral issues related to pain and opioid addiction, both of which are prevalent in our service area. Our hospital system is also developing a hospital at home program which will incorporate the telemedicine pain program for patients with co-morbidities. The future of healthcare access is using hybrid delivery of care systems that include telemedicine, to improve accessibility and outcomes for chronic pain patients. For original article: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/how-does-telemedicine-pain-program-work-rural-american-multi-vulnerable-patient < Previous News Next News >

Is telemedicine an answer to physician burnout and staffing shortages? Bill Siwicki May 24, 2022 A physician who works full time via telehealth – and in brick-and-mortar ERs on the side – discusses the benefits to herself and the industry. With the huge initial swell in the use of virtual care in the rearview mirror, many industry experts – from health plans to big tech and practicing clinicians – are considering whether a doubling down on telehealth is just what the doctor ordered for the future of patient care. Many clinicians are hungry for new opportunities that allow them to continue to serve patients without dealing with long-standing administrative burdens and the aftermath of burnout from COVID-19 in their hospitals, health systems and doctor's offices. With too many clinicians continuing to stress that they've lost passion in their careers and considering quitting their jobs altogether, experts say change is needed. The healthcare industry can't afford to lose these highly skilled clinical workers to other industries. On this note, Healthcare IT News interviewed Dr. Pooja Aysola, a practicing emergency department clinician in Boston and senior director of clinical operations at Wheel, a virtual care company. She talks about physicians' newfound familiarity with telehealth and what it means for the future, the possibility of physicians working full time in telemedicine, and how virtual care can help with staffing shortages in healthcare. Q. With the massive uptake in telemedicine during the past two years of the pandemic, clinicians have grown accustomed to delivering care virtually. What do you think this familiarity means for clinicians moving forward? A. I hadn't ever considered a career in virtual care until a few months into the pandemic. I was working in an emergency room in Boston when my shifts were cut after the hospital rolled back elective procedures. I started working in telemedicine as a temporary solution, but I ended up loving the flexibility to see patients at home and on my own schedule. I also quickly realized I didn't have to be in the same room as my patients to deliver great care. I can treat conditions such as UTIs through a screen and provide immediate value to my patients. I'm not alone in my sudden pivot from virtual-care skeptic to virtual-care advocate. Two in three clinicians now say treating patients in virtual only or hybrid care settings best fits their lifestyle, despite a significant lack of interest in telehealth before the pandemic. I'm hopeful this new trend will allow more clinicians to create career paths that work for them, rather than against them. Clinicians should have the flexibility to decide when they want to work, where they want to work, and how they want to work. If we're moving toward a hybrid care model, then we should enable clinicians to adopt hybrid careers, if that's what works best for them. In medical school, we're taught there's only one track you can follow: in-person care. But that's not the case anymore. I want every doctor and nurse to feel empowered to follow the career path that works best for them. Q. You seem to suggest that physicians looking for a change, perhaps due to burnout, can switch to telehealth full time. What would a move to virtual care look like for a physician? A. The past few years have been incredibly tough for clinicians. Burnout, frustration and fatigue are some of the many challenges facing clinicians today. Recent data shows more than half of clinicians have lost passion for their careers because of stress – and close to half believe burnout is the biggest threat to patient care today. Working in virtual care was a less-than-traditional career path before the pandemic. But now, many clinicians are considering working in virtual care to help combat burnout and increase flexibility. A move to virtual care will look different for everyone. For example, some clinicians enjoy having a set schedule each week to see patients. Others enjoy having more flexibility, where they can easily sign on after dropping their kids off at school, sign off before running an errand, or even split their time between virtual and in-person care. At Wheel, more than half of clinicians still work in a brick-and-mortar setting. One of our clinicians currently is driving around the country with her partner in an RV. She customizes her schedule based on her travel plans that day. She can see patients in the morning and go for a hike in the afternoon, or spend a few hours on the road before pulling over and seeing patients in the afternoon. Clinicians interested in telehealth should look for opportunities that prioritize and personalize their experience as clinicians. Some specific factors to consider include: What kind of electronic health record does the company use? And was the EHR created with your experience in mind? Do they offer ongoing training? And provide resources on important topics, such as "webside" manner and guidance on managing state licenses? Do they have a robust clinical quality program in place? How do they provide feedback on quality of care? Q. How can telehealth help with the staffing shortage in healthcare? A. Our current clinician staffing shortage is a national crisis. And it's only expected to get worse. According to an Elsevier study, almost half of U.S. clinicians plan to leave their jobs within the next few years. I've seen firsthand the impact shortages are having on clinician burnout and patient care. And I firmly believe this is a crisis that the entire industry must address. Ensuring clinicians feel encouraged to explore careers in virtual care, if that's what works best for them, is one of many steps to take. Another way for telehealth to help address staffing shortages is by powering the transition to what we call "virtual-first care." With virtual-first care, patients can start their care journey with telemedicine. By leaning on technology, healthcare organizations can more easily triage the patient's care needs and determine the best care setting – virtual, in-person or hybrid care. This is a more efficient way to approach care delivery while simultaneously increasing access to care. While telehealth alone is not the only solution, it is one of many steps we can take to help address staffing shortages and help ensure timely patient access to care. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-answer-physician-burnout-and-staffing-shortages < Previous News Next News >

Permanent Pay, Originating Site Policies Boost Access to Virtual Addiction Services Victoria Bailey Dec. 29, 2021 By making temporary reimbursement and site-originating policies permanent, legislators could help increase access to virtual opioid use disorder treatment, according to a new report. December 20, 2021 - Lawmakers have the power to solidify access to virtual opioid use disorder treatment by introducing policies that ensure reimbursement parity, solidify audio-only telehealth coverage, and expand the list of eligible originating sites, according to an issue brief from the Pew Charitable Trusts. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth proved to be a successful care modality for delivering opioid use disorder treatment to individuals across the country. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services (SAMHSA) lifted their restrictions and allowed buprenorphine prescribers to initiate medication treatment via telehealth without requiring an in-person visit first. However, these regulations are temporary and are set to expire once the public health emergency ends. In order to ensure access to virtual opioid use disorder treatment, state Medicaid agencies and policymakers should make these and other telehealth regulations permanent, Pew said. Legislatures should require public and private payers to reimburse providers for all opioid use disorder treatment services delivered via telehealth, including clinical assessments, prescriptions, medication management, and counseling sessions. Additionally, ensuring reimbursement for a variety of providers — including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and mental health professionals — could help solidify the virtual treatment process. According to Pew, states that offered coverage for buprenorphine prescribing via telehealth saw positive patient outcomes that were similar to in-person services. Policymakers should also establish payment parity between telehealth and in-person opioid use disorder treatment services under public and private payers alike. “Without assurances of sufficient reimbursement rates, providers may be unwilling to invest in telehealth infrastructure for their practices, or they may find it infeasible to increase the use of telehealth for OUD treatment,” researchers wrote in the brief. Medicaid programs can ensure reimbursement parity for telehealth services without submitting a plan amendment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Thirty-eight states and Washington D.C. have established payment parity for certain telehealth services, but not all programs include opioid use disorder services in their provisions. Originating-site restrictions must also be addressed, Pew researchers said. Some states allow patients to use telehealth but only from certain clinics that can serve as an originating site. By expanding the list of eligible originating sites to include the patient’s home, policymakers could make accessing virtual care more convenient for individuals. Medicare currently allows individuals to receive telehealth-based opioid use disorder treatment from their homes, according to the brief. Past studies have shown that patients can initiate buprenorphine safely and successfully while remaining in their homes. In addition, patients seemed to prefer receiving treatment from home. Further, Medicaid programs should make audio-only telehealth policies permanent to facilitate access to virtual care, Pew researchers recommended. Audio-only coverage is set to expire when the public health emergency ends. Ensuring that providers receive reimbursement for audio-only opioid use disorder services may help address care disparities and benefit underserved communities that tend to use the care modality most often, including Black and Hispanic populations, individuals with limited English proficiency, and communities with inadequate broadband access. At least 15 Medicaid programs offer reimbursement for audio-only telehealth as of February, but some states only provide coverage for certain services, the brief noted. Finally, Pew researchers recommended that policymakers allow correctional settings to offer telehealth-based opioid treatment. Jails and prisons typically allow incarcerated individuals to receive healthcare via telehealth but the option to receive virtual opioid use disorder treatment is far less common, the brief stated. If states allocated funding to these institutions, they could invest in the necessary telehealth resources to establish virtual opioid treatment services. A few correctional facilities, including one in Minnesota and one in Massachusetts, currently offer buprenorphine treatment, counseling sessions, and clinical assessments through telehealth. Even with these policy changes, states may face additional barriers to offering virtual opioid treatment services including a lack of funding for infrastructure and poor broadband access. Pew researchers suggested that states consider partnering with the National Consortium of Telehealth Resource Centers to receive assistance with launching a telehealth program. Additionally, state and local governments can leverage funding from the American Rescue Plan Act to invest in expanding internet access to communities that need it. https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/permanent-pay-originating-site-policies-boost-access-to-virtual-addiction-services < Previous News Next News >

States Expand Medicaid Reimbursement of School-Based Telehealth Services Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 49 states currently have policies allowing Medicaid reimbursement of telehealth in schools – 24 had existing policies, 31 recently expanded policies during the pandemic, and at least four states have indicated they may make the changes permanent. The National Academy for State Health Policy released a report last month on how states are increasing Medicaid coverage of school-based telehealth during COVID-19, as well as assessing which services can be effectively delivered via telehealth and how to best support equitable access to services via telehealth for students. The authors found that 49 states currently have policies allowing Medicaid reimbursement of telehealth in schools – 24 had existing policies, 31 recently expanded policies during the pandemic, and at least four states have indicated they may make the changes permanent. As far as services, the brief showed that most states cover audiology and speech-language therapy via telehealth, although behavioral health services had the greatest expansion and providing telemental health they found to be a recognized best practice. Half of all states cover individualized education program (IEP) plan services or Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services as well. The report also suggests that moving forward states should explore federal funding opportunities to expand technology and broadband access for students facing disparities in access to care. < Previous News Next News >

Patients Prefer Telehealth for Primary Care, Mental Health Needs Mark Melchionna October 31, 2022 A recent report shows that amid a return to in-person care, telehealth use has dropped among some populations, but it is still a popular modality for accessing primary and mental healthcare. October 31, 2022 - A recent report shows that although in-person care is the preferred channel of care, telehealth use remains highly used among young adults and those engaging in primary care and mental health services. Published by Stericycle Communication Solutions, the report was created in collaboration with Ipsos. It is based on a survey of 1,004 adults, 18 and older, from the continental US, Alaska, and Hawaii, conducted between July 5 and 8. In May 2022, over two years after the start of the pandemic, the FAIR Health Monthly Telehealth Regional Tracker reported an overall 10.2 percent increase in telehealth use. But while evaluating patient preferences related to healthcare access, the 2022 Stericycle Communication Solutions US Consumer Trends in Patient Engagement Survey shows that telehealth use has dropped amid a return to in-person healthcare. Within the year preceding the survey, 45 percent of adults claimed to have used telehealth on at least one occasion, while 25 percent only used it one to two times. This represents a drop from a previous survey, which showed that 39 percent of respondents used telehealth one or two times in the year prior. The report also noted that only 26 percent of older adults accessed telehealth one or more times within the past year. But the share of young adults between 18 and 34 that used telehealth remained high, reaching 61 percent. Further, the report showed that in-person care is popular among healthcare consumers. In total, 44 percent of survey respondents indicated that they prefer in-person visits. However, of those who are open to telehealth, patients prefer virtual visits for certain types of care, including primary care (55 percent) and mental healthcare (45 percent). On the other hand, patients do not prefer virtual visits for specialties such as dermatology, pediatrics, ENT, cardiology, urology, gynecology, orthopedics, and pulmonology. Patient satisfaction with telehealth is high. Among survey respondents, 90 percent indicated that their telehealth experience was either good or excellent. The top reasons for a patient choosing telehealth were convenience (58 percent) or safety (43 percent). Also, 24 percent said that telehealth helped them access a better provider. The report concluded that more evaluation is necessary to continue to optimize telehealth. For instance, since some patients requested in-person care for certain conditions, providers must consider the types of appointments that may be preferred via telehealth and invest accordingly, the report states. Several reports have provided further insight into patient satisfaction with telehealth. A study from the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society in October found that although patients over 65 preferred in-person care, they were also highly satisfied with telehealth. Using a seven-point scale, researchers evaluated the extent to which patients of this age felt satisfied with virtual care. They found that the median patient satisfaction score was six. More research from September found that telehealth continues to play a significant role in healthcare due to the satisfaction it provides patients. Following a survey, researchers found that 67 percent of patients claimed to have used telehealth within the preceding year. Of this population, 94 percent stated their intention to use telehealth again. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/patients-prefer-telehealth-for-primary-care-mental-health-needs < Previous News Next News >

The Data Challenge to Prove Telehealth’s Importance Continues Jan Ground, PT, MBA November 17, 2022 A group of telehealth leaders from 18 states worked the past two years on proving the value of telehealth with data to convince payors and legislators that continuing reimbursement post-COVID 19 is the right thing to do. Over the course of two years, 40 people, including five physicians, four nurses, four other clinicians, and 27 telehealth leaders in provider organizations, contributed to the effort. The group chose to focus initially on video visits for those in need of mental health care. We succeeded in step one: we surveyed 16 mental health provider organizations to find out what data they were collecting, and how success was being measured in 2020. The organizations ranged from large university medical centers to private practices in nine states. Not surprisingly, the data and metrics varied widely, even across large university-based systems. For example, in response to the question “What, if anything, is being measured regarding clinical outcomes?” Four organizations reported no clinical outcomes measurements Four organizations used a wide variety of validated and commonly used clinical outcome metrics: PHQ-9 (used by 3 of 4 ) Patient Health Questionnaire (columbia.edu) GAD7 (used by 2 of 4) GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7) - MDCalc BASIS-24 (use) BASIS-24® — eBASIS ACES ACE.pdf (odmhsas.org) Adverse Childhood Experiences Study EDE-Q PDFfiller - ede q online(1).pdf (uslegalforms.com) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire OCI-R Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) (psychology-tools.com) SF-12 The SF-12v2 PRO Health Survey (qualitymetric.com) Short Form Health Survey BAI beck-anxiety-inventory.pdf (jolietcenter.com) EDE-Q ede-q_quesionnaire.pdf (corc.uk.net) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire EDY-Q Microsoft Word - Hilbert, van Dyck_EDY-Q_English Version_2016 (harvard.edu) Eating Disorders in Youth Questionnaire McMaster Family Assessment Device STAI-C-S State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-CH) - Assessments, Tests | Mind Garden - Mind Garden State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Child Version – State only DERS Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (novopsych.com.au) PCL-5 PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) - Fillable Form (va.gov) Post-traumatic Checklist In another question on cost savings, the survey question was “What, if anything, is being measured regarding cost savings?” 13 organizations reported no cost savings measurements Two of the three organizations reported savings measurements shared the following metrics (video visits vs in person visits) Handouts, parking vouchers, meal vouchers In person clinicians paid salary, video visit clinicians paid per hour, Future: space cost savings (video visit clinicians providing care from home) In our next effort we wanted to add payor leaders or legislators to join the conversation to determine which, if any of the metrics being used and data being collected, might convince them to support continued reimbursement post-COVID 19. The 40 participants were all associated with provider organizations with insufficient connections with payors/legislators to successfully bring them into the conversation. The group took a break and then decided on a new approach. We came up with what we THINK would be most important to payors/legislators, based on our understanding of what drives their success. Here’s the list: Compare the following data for specific groups of mental health patients (e.g., based on location, disorder, gender, age, first time vs return patients, newly diagnosed vs existing patient, prior telemedicine use, other relevant demographics, and characteristics), with or without access to care by video: number of ED visits number of hospitalizations suicide rates survey results that measure mental health status using validated tools (e.g., PHQ9) timing to access -(i.e., length of time to get patients in front of provider for first visit) provider and patient satisfaction and retention (i.e., remain in care) Interestingly, I have since learned that, in fact, there are many data sources on these topics with many peer-reviewed articles based on well-controlled studies. That leads me to a different question: Why were none of the 40 participants, including me, aware of these data sources and how to access them? It perhaps has its roots in the type of data available. Much of the data available comes from academic institutions reporting on research studies and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. These can be readily found through a PubMed or Google Scholar search using appropriate search terms (e.g., telemental health, outcomes, cost) but if one is unfamiliar with conducting this type of search these articles will not be available to review. Other sources of information include websites of the professional societies of which the providers are members (e.g., American Psychiatric Association) and government websites (e.g., Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, but one has to know about these before they can be searched. Finally is the fact that although many healthcare systems and funders collect data, they use these data for internal purposes only and simply do not publish or share them. We are currently in search of a few provider organizations interested in/willing to collect some of these data. We have not had success. If you are interested in joining this collaborative effort, please contact me at: janground@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-ground-3089742/ A new thought is to focus on a current hot topic in the US, such as COVID 19, to identify data to prove (or not!) the value of care by video. Perhaps we could find an organization willing to provide some funding to more likely successfully identify organizations willing to collect the data. It should not have to be this hard! About the Author Jan Ground PT, MBA, led innovation and virtual care at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, where she worked for 18 years. She is the Colorado Liaison to the Southwest Telehealth Resource Center and the Colorado Ambassador to Telehealth and Medicine Today, an online peer-reviewed journal. Active in the American Telemedicine Association, Jan leads a group looking to prove, with data, that telehealth is worth paying for. Jan’s expertise is in leading change, and in clearly defining a problem before implementing a new approach to care. Her greatest passion is to lower the cost of the American healthcare system without lowering clinical outcomes. See original article: https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2022/data-challenge-prove-telehealth-s-importance-continues < Previous News Next News >

CCHP: Audio only vs. Live Video Use... Center for Connected Health Policy February 15, 2022 The National Telehealth Policy Resource Center The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) Office of Health Policy recently released a new Issue Brief titled National Survey Trends in Telehealth Use in 2021: Disparities in Utilization and Audio vs. Video Services. The analysis found a number of trends that can be helpful in understanding remaining telehealth barriers and their interaction with health care disparities. Utilizing Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS) information from 2021, the study focused on differences in use between live video and audio-only telehealth modalities. Overall findings showed that telehealth use was common and utilization rates were generally similar across most demographic subgroups, except those that were uninsured. Utilization rates of live-video telehealth, however, were found to be lower among underserved populations, such as those with lower incomes and Black, Latino, and Asian respondents. To read the full article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/new-aspe-issue-brief-addresses-audio-only-vs-live-video-use-and-interaction-with-healthcare-disparities < Previous News Next News >

Leveraging Telehealth Platforms to Enhance Provider Workflows, Adoption eVisit December 28, 2022 Implementing a telehealth platform can positively impact provider workflows in numerous ways, including easing administrative burdens, thereby leading to greater provider adoption and satisfaction. The pandemic drove telehealth use to new heights. Even though usage appears to be stabilizing, healthcare stakeholders largely agree that telehealth is here to stay, and they are making virtual care a vital part of their care delivery model. Polls conducted by the American Medical Association show that 80 percent of physicians said they were using telehealth tools in 2022, up from 28 percent in 2019 and only 14 percent in 2016. Further, in 2022, about 75 percent of physicians said being able to offer remote care was an important reason to use digital health tools, up from 60 percent in 2016. From the patient perspective, the benefits of telehealth, such as improved healthcare quality and patient experience, have become increasingly apparent. Epic conducted a research study analyzing 35 million telehealth visits between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022. They found that "in nearly every specialty studied, most patients who had a telehealth visit did not require an in-person follow-up appointment in that specialty in the next three months." Only two of the 31 specialties — fertility and obstetrics — saw in-person follow-up rates above 50 percent, while genetics, nutrition, endocrinology, and mental health/psychiatry had in-person follow-up rates of 15 percent or less. But, as telehealth is integrated alongside in-person care, provider organizations must ensure they are selecting the right platform for their facility's unique needs and implementing them in a way that addresses — rather than adds to — clinician workflow challenges. KEY TELEHEALTH CAPABILITIES TO IMPROVE PROVIDER WORKFLOWS Amid the rapid rise in the adoption and use of telehealth during the pandemic, providers have faced several challenges in setting up telehealth programs. One of the most significant difficulties is related to the technology available, notes Eric Thrailkill, Venture Partner, Founder of the Telehealth Academy, and Chairman of Project Healthcare at the Nashville Entrepreneur Center. "While these solutions 'worked' per se, they were not designed to help health systems facilitate a hybrid care model with a goal to provide personalized care, regardless of location," he says. "During the shutdowns, almost all provider organizations were completely dedicated to supporting COVID-related patients and/or working through the backlog of previously scheduled appointments. Telehealth, due to the relaxation of certain federal and state regulatory requirements, consisted of phone-based services and two-way video technologies — speed to deploy was the operating mantra." Provider organizations succeeded in rapidly deploying new technologies, but they did not have time to optimize their workflows to account for certain processes — like documentation and revenue cycle — and support overarching population health and chronic care goals. During the pandemic, 'offering telehealth' could simply mean offering a two-way video solution. But now, with a couple of years of experience and data to pull from, providers are able to build robust telehealth programs to pair with in-person care. In short, a telehealth program looks at creating both a personal and efficient experience for the provider and patient before, during, and after the visit. Two-way video technology is just one piece of the puzzle. "Telehealth platforms should contain a virtual triage where location and assignment of a provider could occur," Thrailkill says. "This would also enable an appropriate assessment to ensure higher acuity visits are prioritized over lower acuity visits." For effective triage, relevant care teams must be able to easily coordinate their team and the patients in the virtual waiting room, chat with the patient ahead of, during, and post-visit, access the appointment, and interact with the patients while accurately documenting the encounter in their EHR and scheduling follow-up appointments. The digital experience should be smooth and the UI/UX strong to support adoption and satisfaction. Anything captured by the telehealth platform, say an image or an attachment, must have bidirectional clinical data flows enabled with the EHR to ensure the complete patient picture is captured for the patient's health record and billing and reporting purposes. Additionally, Thrailkill notes that as provider organizations become increasingly focused on addressing social determinants of health needs, they should consider telehealth platforms that can ingest data from multiple sources. Having this data at their fingertips at the point of care can help clinicians provide wraparound care services, including connecting patients with social services and community resources. Not only is a platform's ability to gather data from various sources essential to the success of hybrid care models, but so is seamless data exchange, which helps ensure continuity of care. "Continuity of care is the set of processes whereby the patient and his/her physician-led care team are involved and cooperating over time to achieve the highest level of quality of care," Thrailkill says. "This is difficult, if not impossible, given the fragmentation and healthcare data silos that exist today — both outside and inside provider organizations and health systems." Thus, telehealth platforms should have integration capabilities that provide clinicians with data from prior visits and information from facilities outside the organization where the patient has received care. But Thrailkill also cautions that providers should keep in mind patient rights regarding consent, privacy, and security when developing hybrid care models that leverage telehealth. IMPROVING WORKFLOWS ENHANCES PROVIDER SATISFACTION Selecting the right platform can help healthcare organizations optimize provider workflows, thereby boosting provider adoption and satisfaction. Providers at every level want to practice at "the top of their license," that is, utilize the highest level of their education and experience to deliver care, Thrailkill notes. For physicians, the health system's most expensive clinician, tasks like documentation and prior authorization processes can get in the way of this goal. Prior authorization, in particular, is a critical pain point, as some healthcare payers have complex processes that require much time and effort. "All of these administrative burdens are no doubt contributing to workforce challenges present today across essentially every professional level," Thrailkill says. But by using telehealth platforms with integration capabilities and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based application programming interface structures, provider organizations can reduce administrative burdens like prior authorization processes through automation and enable them to lean on their medical assistants during the triage process of the telehealth visit. This increases the time available for patient care and optimizes capacity for the clinical team, he adds. Further, when implementing telehealth into hybrid care models, healthcare organizations should take a long-term view rather than regard telemedicine as a replacement for in-person care. "This will challenge the organization to think about the role of medical assistants, nurses, and specialty consult providers — not as follow-on activity, but incorporated into the visit," Thrailkill says. "This will ultimately lead to operational efficiencies and reduce the amount of administrative burden existing in early deployments of telehealth." As noted above, reducing administrative burdens and improving care delivery processes can lead to higher provider satisfaction, engagement levels, and adoption of virtual care across the health system. Incorporating telehealth is not a passing phase, and demand will likely grow in the years ahead. But to ensure its success, provider organizations must select technology that enhances provider workflows, thereby improving satisfaction and adoption. About eVisit eVisit is an enterprise virtual care delivery platform built for health systems and hospitals. It delivers innovative virtual experiences in care navigation, care delivery, and care engagement, improving margins at scale without sacrificing quality or patient and provider satisfaction. eVisit works seamlessly across enterprise service lines and departments to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and boost revenue. Based in Phoenix, Ariz., eVisit helps healthcare organizations innovate and succeed in today’s changing healthcare market. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/leveraging-telehealth-platforms-to-enhance-provider-workflows-adoption < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth Requires Efforts to Improve Access to Reach Full Potential Mark Melchionna November 29, 2022 New research found that telehealth expansion lacks benefits when efforts to improve access are not present, which may often lead to health disparities. Regions with limited healthcare resources may not benefit from telehealth expansion, prompting the need for efforts to improve access, a new JAMA Network Open study finds. Throughout the recent expansion of telehealth, researchers continuously gained insight into new methods for reaching areas with limited amounts of healthcare resources, highlighting many areas and populations facing limited healthcare resources. The fact and theories about the relationship between telehealth and health disparities led researchers to conduct a cross-sectional study containing 2015 to 2019 American Community Survey data which was linked to national, state, and county-level metrics of healthcare access. Prior to the study, the authors hypothesized that internet access was poor in areas that lacked sufficient access to traditional healthcare resources. Known as healthcare deserts, communities with limited healthcare services such as pharmacies, hospitals, PCPs, and low-cost health centers were reviewed for the study. The data sources included dataQ and GoodRx databases for 60,249 pharmacies, federal information on primary care health professional shortage areas, and geospatial information. Researchers calculated the proportion of populations with internet access and the expected number of healthcare deserts, which represented the population-weighted mean number of deserts in a given region. They also noted statistics for metropolitan status for each state. Among 3,140 counties reviewed in the study, researchers determined that healthcare access and internet service availability corresponded with one another. They found that the states with the largest percentage of households without internet service were Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, West Virginia, and Alabama. The states with the lowest number of households without internet service and the lowest fitted number of healthcare deserts were Washington, New Hampshire, Colorado, Utah, California, and Maryland. Rural areas were more likely to have more health deserts and less internet service availability —78 percent compared to 26 percent of urban counties. Based on these findings, researchers concluded that telehealth expansion may not produce benefits within counties where telehealth is highly needed. Key factors that contribute to rural-urban health disparities in the US may include telehealth expansion without improving internet access as well as clinician shortages. Despite this conclusion, researchers noted limitations, which mainly related to the lack of digital literacy data that may have increased urban-rural disparities, along with the co-occurrence of poor internet and healthcare access across six domains. Previously, however, efforts have been made to support rural communities in obtaining telehealth resources. In September, Equum Medical worked with the National Rural Health Association to provide underserved rural communities with virtual resources. The goal of the collaboration was to assist rural hospitals as they aim to fill gaps in specialty care through tools such as of patient transfer assistance, remote patient monitoring, and help with telehealth implementation. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/telehealth-requires-efforts-to-improve-access-to-reach-full-potential < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth, physical therapy and the pandemic: Lessons for all Bill Siwicki February 14, 2022 A University of Washington clinical instructor explains the benefits and challenges of therapy and technology. For vulnerable patient populations – and for those who just prefer the convenience of care at home – telemedicine has been a success. But it still has its limitations. For example, the precise movements and exercises involved in physical therapy rehab are hard for a patient to accomplish remotely. A provider on a video call may seem about as valuable as a YouTube video. But there are new technologies and strategies that link patients, safely, to at-home physical therapy care that balances telemedicine with in-person visits. Many experts say this is the future of telemedicine: a hybrid of in-person and virtual care. To read the entire article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-physical-therapy-and-pandemic-lessons-all < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth now serves unmet needs, says athenahealth Andrea Fox October 04, 2022 Virtual care is playing a more significant role in filling gaps in delivery, having evolved from pandemic-era visit replacement, according to a new study from the cloud IT developer. Increased telehealth utilization points to wider use as a diagnostic and triage tool, particularly among those with chronic conditions. WHY IT MATTERS New research, based on a Dynata survey of 2,000 U.S. adults that was commissioned by athenahealth conducted in June and July of this year, and data on booked and completed appointments through the athenahealth electronic health record suggest telehealth is now integrated across the care continuum. "Our data shows that after the height of the pandemic, many physicians continue to rely on telehealth, as they see the tremendous value it can provide," said Jessica Sweeney-Platt, vice president of research and editorial strategy at athenahealth, in a statement. The use of telehealth is especially evident among those with chronic conditions. While 24% of those surveyed say their health concern didn't warrant an in-person visit, 23% of respondents indicated their telehealth visits were scheduled check-ins related to chronic conditions, and 9% used telehealth as well for ad hoc care for their conditions. The respondents with chronic conditions reported using telehealth in place of as well as between visits to help manage their conditions, suggesting telehealth is serving a previously unmet need for proactive healthcare. Telehealth has also increased the willingness of patients to seek mental healthcare, with 25% of survey respondents indicating they opted for telehealth sessions to address new mental health conditions. Twenty-three percent shared that they were more likely to ask for mental health support because telehealth was available to them. The findings also revealed patterns of use based on gender and race. The EHR data from January 1, 2019, through April 30, 2022, evaluated in the study showed that in 2021, male providers had 24% lower odds of providing a telehealth visit than their female counterparts. Provider gender also affected patient adoption of telehealth. Patients who worked with a single male provider had 60% lower odds of adoption compared to patients with only a female provider. "Additionally, previous research has shown that female clinicians tend to spend more time with patients, which could further explain higher provider adoption of telehealth among females compared to males, with female providers using telehealth as an additional tool for connecting with patients," said Sweeney-Platt. The research also showed Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to use telehealth services, but less likely to do so with one dedicated provider, suggesting improved access to care but not improved continuity of care. THE LARGER TREND A previous study of 40.7 million commercially-insured adults in the United States – a study of a nationally representative population – published earlier this year found that patients with acute clinical conditions who first sought care via telehealth were more likely to follow up at the emergency room or be admitted to the hospital that those who sought care in person. However, when it came to chronic conditions, follow-up was less likely for those with an initial telehealth visit, finding telehealth comparable to in-person care. The researchers from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, along with collaborators from Blue Health Intelligence and the Digital Medicine Society compared telehealth and in-person encounters by looking at factors associated with changing patterns of telehealth use beyond the initial months of the pandemic. ON THE RECORD "Our research brings to light the vital role telehealth can play in patient care. Not only does it increase access to care, but it can drive better patient outcomes when used as an extension of in-person visits to provide continuity of care," said Sweeney-Platt in announcing the findings. "Telehealth is now a core tenet of healthcare delivery in the U.S.," said Greg Carey, director of regulatory and government affairs at athenahealth, according to a prepared statement about telehealth fulfilling its promise on the company's website. Correction: The original version of the article indicated that the Dynata survey was of athenaOne network patients. Andrea Fox is senior editor of Healthcare IT News. Email: afox@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telehealth-now-serves-unmet-needs-says-athenahealth < Previous News Next News >

How Amazon, Walmart & 7 Others are Expanding Their Telehealth Business Katie Adams, Becker's Hospital Review July 2021 Companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. It's unclear how widely telehealth services will be used once the pandemic subsides, but companies are remaining active in their efforts to grow their telehealth businesses. Below are updates on how nine companies are expanding their telehealth business, as covered by Becker's Hospital Review during the past three months. UnitedHealth Group subsidiary Optum on April 15 deployed a new telehealth product across all 50 states. The product, dubbed Optum Virtual Care, aims to integrate physical care, virtual care, home care and behavioral care. Amwell on April 28 unveiled its new Converge telehealth platform, which can host and operate digital offerings from Cleveland Clinic, Google Cloud and others. Ro, a direct-to-consumer telehealth app for pharmacy services, inked its first retail collaboration with Walmart April 28. Under the new partnership, Ro will launch its Roman health and wellness products and digital services in more than 4,600 Walmart stores across the country. On May 19, Ro acquired reproductive health company Modern Fertility for more than $225 million. Amazon on May 5 signed its first enterprise client for its telehealth service, Amazon Care. It has since secured multiple companies as clients for the telehealth service, and it is eyeing expansion into rural markets. Walmart Health on May 6 entered an agreement to acquire on-demand, multispecialty telehealth provider MeMD. By acquiring MeMD, Walmart will begin providing virtual care services for urgent, behavioral and primary care to complement its in-person Walmart Health Centers. Telehealth provider Doctor On Demand and clinical navigation platform Grand Rounds completed their merger May 11. On May 26, the combined company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Included Health, a comprehensive healthcare platform for patients who are LGBTQ and BIPOC. Teladoc Health on May 11 launched its new mental healthcare service MyStrength Complete, which offers personalized mental health services to consumers as an integration of Teladoc's virtual platform. On July 14, Teladoc integrated its hospital telehealth platform with Microsoft Teams. The Clinic, a joint digital health venture between Cleveland Clinic and Amwell, on May 18 launched new health offerings as part of its virtual second opinion service. The offering expansion is for patients with brain tumors and prostate cancers, since there are multiple treatment options for these conditions. Membership-based primary care network One Medical on June 7 entered an agreement to acquire Iora Health, a tech-powered primary care provider focusing on serving Medicare patients. The acquisition will allow One Medical to offer 24/7 digital and in-person care, as well as extend the provider into full-risk Medicare reimbursement models. < Previous News Next News >

AHA Statement Stresses Importance of Telehealth in CVD Care Yael L. Maxwell November 16, 2022 With ongoing challenges related to reimbursement, access, and acceptance, the writing committee offers potential solutions. Stressing the importance of telehealth in cardiovascular care, especially given its increased prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new scientific statement from the American Heart Association (AHA) outlines the current barriers to this type of care and offers some strategies for continued access. As in-person visits were shut down in the spring of 2020, many clinicians and patients turned to telehealth, with subsequent studies and surveys showing related gains in heart failure and nonemergent cardiovascular care. Other research showed that patients who were more likely to use telehealth tended to be younger and privately insured, have more comorbidities, and be from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. As the pandemic has waned, however, reimbursement for telephone and video visits has been a larger concern. Earlier this month, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2023 Physician Fee Schedule, which includes continued coverage for telehealth, but only for 5 months following the end of the public health emergency, which some say is not long enough for clinicians to make long-term plans and invest in necessary infrastructure. “This paper in a way summarizes the importance of telehealth and the benefits of telehealth in patient care,” writing committee chair Edwin A. Takahashi, MD (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), told TCTMD. “Payment parity is so important in sustaining telehealth. So I hope that CMS and insurance companies will see the importance highlighted in this paper and reconsider their reimbursement plans with it.” What Is Telehealth? The statement, published online this week in Circulation, begins by defining the concept of telehealth, breaking it down into clinician-to-patient visits and clinician-to-clinician consults. The former includes real-time virtual visits, either video or audio, as well as digital communication, called eVisits, initiated by either the physician or patient. The latter includes both real-time virtual consults, which may also include the patient, as well as digital exchange of low-complexity medical information between clinicians, called eConsults, or second opinions on more-complex concerns. A final hybrid category includes remote monitoring for patients and predictive analysis for clinicians—both machine initiated. Takahashi and colleagues point out some commonly used telehealth tools for cardiovascular home monitoring, including machines for monitoring risk factors like blood pressure, weight, smoking, and diet; medication tracking apps and smart pillboxes for managing medication adherence; and tools like home EGC, pulse oximeter, and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring devices. While there are an undefined number of ways in which telehealth can be useful within cardiovascular care, Takahashi said it’s most effective in tracking disease progression for heart failure and CAD, improving stroke outcomes by decreasing time to diagnosis, and monitoring PAD progression, as well as preventing ulcers and tracking patients postoperatively. The paper outlines advances in telestroke, teleradiology, and telehealth in PAD management. Challenges and Potential Solutions Many challenges remain in order for telehealth to flourish in a nonpandemic era. In his experience, Takahashi said, the biggest barrier to using telehealth relates to “having patients accept it as a replacement for inpatient visits.” But overall, challenges like infrastructure—including broadband internet and hardware for patients—to complete telehealth visits as well as reimbursement stand in the way of telehealth use more generally, he said. “In order for people to adopt and use telehealth, people need to be able to bill for using it. Otherwise, it just is not sustainable.” The statement also stresses the importance that clinician attitude, biases, and acceptance play in the success of telehealth. Difficult to use technological platforms hindered by HIPAA-compliant encryption can also make it more difficult for clinicians to access telehealth appointments. Beyond increases in reimbursement for telehealth, the authors propose a few strategies for continued success. They advocate for government programs to improve broadband internet access across the country, more research to elucidate the specific benefits telehealth can have across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease care, and increased standardization for methods in assessing telehealth quality. “The COVID-19 pandemic improved the telehealth infrastructure through necessity but also uncovered systemic weakness, limitations, and inequities,” they conclude. “Further research into barriers for telehealth implementation and equitable execution are important to ensure the delivery of high-quality care for patients.” Yael L. Maxwell by Yael L. Maxwell Editor, Fellows Forum Yael L. Maxwell is Senior Medical Journalist for TCTMD and Section Editor of TCTMD's Fellows Forum. She served as the inaugural… Read Full Bio See original article: https://www.tctmd.com/news/aha-statement-stresses-importance-telehealth-cvd-care < Previous News Next News >

October 2022: Funding and Grant Opportunities Southwest Telehealth Resource Center October 2022 SWTRC NEWSLETTER- OCTOBER 2022 Bringing you up-to-date telehealth information resources on the southwest region and the USA Funding and Grant Opportunities There are many funding and grant opportunities for community and health-related organizations wanting to increase broadband capabilities and bring in needed funds for unique community health programming. Here’s a list of funding sources in the Southwest focused on broadband and health: AZ HEALTH Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona Grants | Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona (lfsaz.org) The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona (LFSAZ) is a private foundation that grants funds to nonprofit organizations promoting population health and community wellness in Cochise and eastern Santa Cruz counties. Arizona Systems Change Grants Grants Archive - Vitalyst Health Vitalyst Health Foundation provides Systems Change Grants for collaborative work designed to transform systems through changes to policies and practices to improve health in Arizona communities. Applicants from tribes and rural areas are encouraged to apply. Successful applications will propose projects designed to make a significant, sustainable impact that address the intersection of 2 or more elements of a healthy community through an equity lens. Flinn Foundation Seed Grants Program Seed Grants Program - Flinn Foundation The Flinn Foundation’s 2022 Seed Grants to Promote Translational Research Program is funding 10 research teams, affiliated with an Arizona university, research institution, or health-care system, focused on advancing new products or services to improve patient care. The proposed projects must address compelling clinical needs in the areas of precision medicine, diagnostics, devices, therapeutics, or health-care-delivery processes and have significant potential to turn bench results into viable products or systems impacting patients in Arizona and beyond. CO BROADBAND Colorado Broadband Deployment Board Grant Cycles The Broadband Fund | DORA - COPRRR (colorado.gov) Access to broadband has a strong correlation with economic well-being. Nationwide, the impact it has on the communities it connects is real and measurable. The Broadband Fund exists to connect communities and fuel economic growth in unserved areas across Colorado. The Broadband Deployment Board provides grants through the Broadband Fund to deploy broadband service in unserved areas of the state. The Board has awarded $19.6 million in grants to 29 projects since 2016. As a result, over 17,000 rural households across Colorado will benefit from Broadband Internet access. HEALTH Anschutz Family Foundation Grants Funding Details: Anschutz Family Foundation Grants - Rural Health Information Hub The Anschutz Family Foundation provides grants to organizations in Colorado that work to strengthen families and communities and help individuals become productive and responsible citizens. In 2021, 45% of funding was dedicated to efforts in rural Colorado. Colorado Capital Infrastructure – Increasing Access to Care for Coloradans of Color Funding Opportunity: Capital Infrastructure – Increasing Access to Care for Coloradans of Color | The Colorado Health Foundation This funding opportunity is designed to improve the capacity of clinics to serve more Coloradans of color with high-quality, comprehensive team-based primary care centered on patients’ preferences, needs and values. It will provide shovel-ready capital funding to safety net practices in Colorado. NV BROADBAND Broadband Funding Opportunities Funding Opportunities (nv.gov) Grants are funded on a competitive basis. The evaluation criteria and selection process is outlined in each Request for Applications (RFA). Each grant proposal is evaluated by a team of experts assembled by OSIT. Generally, proposals are evaluated based on: the quality of the proposal and adherence to RFA guidelines; the ability of the organization to accomplish the proposal’s goals; and the impact the proposal will have on Nevada. Applicants that are awarded funding are required to submit regular fiscal and programmatic reports that detail progress toward agreed upon performance metrics and meet State and/or federal reporting guidelines. Awarded projects are subject to inspection and testing prior to final reimbursement. HEALTH Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): Research on Barriers to Care and Risk of HIV-Associated Comorbidities among Vulnerable Population Groups NOT-HL-22-010: Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): Research on barriers to care and risk of HIV-associated comorbidities among vulnerable population groups (nih.gov) This opportunity is a Notice of Special Interest (NOSI) for research that analyzes barriers to care and risk of HIV-associated comorbidities among disproportionally vulnerable and affected population groups of people living with or at risk for HIV infection. Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for Community-Based Behavioral Health Services and Support SAPTAGrants (nv.gov) This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is intended to solicit applications from private, public, non-profit and coalitions for the Community Mental Health and the Community Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Agency Block Grant funds which includes COVID-19 Supplemental and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Behavioral Health grants reflect Nevada's health care system's strong emphasis on coordinated and integrated care along with the need to improve services for persons in crisis or with behavioral health disorders. These funds will provide Nevada the opportunity to focus on the specific needs of our State to address gaps in the behavioral health delivery system and crisis services focusing on direct and preventative services. NM BROADBAND Connect New Mexico Pilot Program Connect New Mexico Pilot Program - New Mexico Department of Information Technology (nm.gov) The Connect New Mexico Pilot Program (“Pilot Program”) aims to bridge the digital divide and foster socioeconomic progress by providing infrastructure grants for broadband deployment to unserved and underserved communities across New Mexico. HEALTH CDC Traditional Food Sovereignty and Tribal Workforce Development Fellowship Zintellect - Climb Higher The Centers for Disease Control offers a one year fellowship in Albuquerque, New Mexico working with the Healthy Tribes Program. The program is designed to strengthen the public health infrastructure, promote cultural and traditional practices that support health and wellness, and integrate evidence-based chronic disease interventions to improve the health of tribal communities. New Mexico McCune Charitable Foundation Grants Apply - McCune Charitable Foundation (nmmccune.org) McCune Charitable Foundation Grants are awarded to New Mexico community-based organizations working in one of the following areas: leveraging opportunities in healthcare, local food industry development, strategies for rural development, capacity building in the nonprofit sector, economic development and family asset building, education transformation, building links between arts and community engagement, stewardship of community and natural resources, and influencing planning of built environments. Tribal BROADBAND NTIA Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program | National Telecommunications and Information Administration (ntia.gov) A $980 million program directed to tribal governments to be used for broadband deployment on tribal lands, as well as for telehealth, distance learning, broadband affordability, and digital inclusion. NTIA Digital Equity Program Digital Equity Programs | BroadbandUSA (doc.gov) Too many communities lack access to high-speed internet. Many more can't afford it or don't know how to use it. The divide between those who have internet access and those who don't is stark. To create an equitable economy, we all need access to reliable and affordable high-speed internet. The Digital Equity Act provides $2.75 billion to establish three grant programs that promote digital equity and inclusion. They aim to ensure that all people and communities have the skills, technology, and capacity needed to reap the full benefits of our digital economy. HEALTH Support for 988 Tribal Response Cooperative Agreements Funding Details: Support for 988 Tribal Response Cooperative Agreements - Rural Health Information Hub Resources to improve response to 988 crisis contacts (including calls, chats, and texts) originating in tribal communities and/or activated by American Indians/Alaskan Natives. National BROADBAND State Digital Equity Program Department of Commerce - State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program | BroadbandUSA (doc.gov) The Digital Equity Act, established by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), dedicates $2.75 billion to establish three grant programs that promote digital inclusion and equity to ensure that all individuals and communities have access to the skills and tools needed to for full participation in the society and economy of the United States. The goal of these programs is to promote digital inclusion and advance equity for all to ensure all communities have affordable access and can use the Internet to improve their lives, including low-income households, aging populations, incarcerated individuals, veterans, individuals with disabilities, individuals with a language barrier, racial and ethnic minorities, and rural inhabitants. State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program: $60 million formula grant program for states and territories to develop digital equity plans. FCC Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program FCC Establishes Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program | Federal Communications Commission The Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program will provide funding to support eligible partners in their outreach efforts to increase awareness of the ACP. In the Order, the FCC recognizes the importance of accessible outreach and strongly encourages grantees to make ACP outreach funded through the grant program accessible to individuals with disabilities. A key objective of the grant program is to expand and support diverse and impactful outreach efforts to diverse communities, including persons with disabilities. The FCC encourages entities of all types and diverse organizations, including organizations serving, led, or owned by persons with disabilities, to submit applications for the Outreach Grant Program once a Notice of Funding Opportunity is released. HEALTH Barclay-Giel Seed Grants Barclay-Giel ​Seed Grants - PHS (phscof.org) Grants for public health projects that have a strong disease and/or injury prevention component that impacts the health of a community by promoting wellness, early detection, and early interventions. Past awards have been given for projects in rural and tribal communities. See full article: https://southwesttrc.org/resources/newsletters/2022/2022-10 < Previous News Next News >

22 States Changed Telemedicine Laws During the Pandemic Kat Jercich June 2021 Most pursued changes via administrative action, according to a new Commonwealth Fund report, which may not be a permanent solution after the COVID-19 public health emergency ends. The Commonwealth Fund released an issue brief this week reviewing state actions to expand individual and group health insurance coverage of telemedicine between March 2020 and March 2021. It found that 22 states changed laws or policies during that time period to require more robust insurance coverage of telemedicine. "If telemedicine proves to be a less costly way to deliver care, payers and consumers may benefit from expanding coverage of telemedicine after the pandemic," wrote report authors. WHY IT MATTERS In March 2020, federal regulators temporarily relaxed restrictions for telemedicine visits for Medicare patients, raising payments to the same level as in-person visits and reducing cost-sharing, among other changes. Officials encouraged states and insurers to provide similar flexibility under private insurance – and many took that encouragement to heart. Of the 22 states that expanded access to telemedicine during the pandemic, the report found that most pursued changes via administrative action. "Use of executive authority allowed states to move relatively quickly during the crisis, though it has meant that the new telemedicine coverage requirements are temporary," wrote the researchers. They noted, for example, that seven governors included specific telemedicine coverage requirements in executive orders, which will expire after the public health emergency. Some states used bulletins, notices, or executive orders from the department of insurance or a similar agency to enhance coverage. New legislation, which takes more time, but is necessary for permanent changes, passed in eight states. Utah, Illinois, West Virginia, New Hampshire and Massachusetts – which had not previously required coverage – changed their policies during the pandemic. At this point, 40 states require coverage. These policies do not all carry equal impact. Eighteen states required coverage of audio-only services for the first time during the pandemic, bringing the total number up to 21. Four states eliminated cost-sharing for telemedicine services, and three added a requirement that cost sharing not exceed in-person identical services. And 10 states newly required insurers to pay providers the same for telemedicine and in-person visits. Report authors noted that insurers were cooperative with these changes, but longer-term adoption of policies like reimbursement parity "would likely be contentious." They pointed out the states will need data to inform debates on how best to regulate telemedicine. In 2021, at least 30 states have weighed legislation that would revise telemedicine coverage standards, found the Commonwealth Fund. Despite the known benefits of telemedicine, researchers also cautioned that it has not been equally beneficial to all patients. "Research shows telemedicine use is lower in communities with higher rates of poverty and among patients with limited English proficiency, potentially undermining goals of expanding access to underserved communities and exacerbating health inequities," read the report. THE LARGER TREND As the report notes, multiple states have implemented pro-telehealth policies to enable access during and beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency. But a major question remains regarding federal legislation, which could fill in many state-by-state gaps and prevent a so-called "telehealth cliff." "If Congress does not act before the public health emergency ends, regulatory flexibilities that now ensure all Medicare beneficiaries maintain access to telehealth will go away," said Kyle Zebley, director of public policy at the American Telemedicine Association, during a conference panel earlier this month. ON THE RECORD "Whether telemedicine reduces overall healthcare costs depends on how services are reimbursed and if virtual visits reduce other services or simply add to utilization," said Commonwealth researchers. "Having access to data can help stakeholders understand how longer-term expansion of telemedicine affects access, cost, and quality of care." Source: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/22-states-changed-telemedicine-laws-during-pandemic < Previous News Next News >

Study: Teletherapy program reduces OCD symptoms Emily Olsen May 23, 2022 Researchers found a 43.4% mean reduction in patient-rated obsessive-compulsive symptoms. A teletherapy program reduced symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and most patients maintained improvements up to a year later, according to a study published in JMIR. The treatment, from digital mental health company NOCD, included twice-weekly video appointments that used exposure and response prevention (ERP) therapy for three weeks. Patients then underwent six weeks of weekly half-hour video check-ins. Researchers followed up with the patients three, six, nine and twelve months after the therapy program. The study found a 43.4% mean reduction in patient-rated obsessive-compulsive symptoms as well as a 44.2% mean reduction in depression, a 47.8% mean reduction in anxiety and a 37.3% mean reduction in stress symptoms. Of the more than 3,500 patients included in the study, more than 1,600 participated in follow-up surveys. The study's authors were employed by NOCD or reported they had received payments from NOCD while conducting the study. "The effect size was large and similar to studies of in-person ERP. This technology-assisted remote treatment is readily accessible for patients, offering an advancement in the field in the dissemination of effective evidence-based care for OCD," researchers wrote. WHY IT MATTERS The study's authors noted the virtual intervention took about 12 weeks and fewer than 11 therapist hours. "Technology assistance likely played an important role in this treatment’s ability to both engage and treat a large number of patients in wide-ranging geographic locations and to achieve a high mean rate of symptom improvement and a high rate of treatment response," they wrote. "Teletherapy using video allows people in remote locations to access treatment and to be able to complete, in-session, in vivo exercises in places and situations that are most relevant to, or triggering of, their symptoms." THE LARGER TREND NOCD announced it had raised $33 million in Series B funding in September last year. That brought its total financing to $50 million, according to Crunchbase. Mental health technology funding increased 139% globally in 2021, compared with 2020, bringing in $5.5 billion, according to a CB Insights report. Meanwhile, mental healthcare makes up a large portion of telehealth utilization in the U.S. Though utilization fell nationally in February, mental health diagnoses still made up more than 64% of telehealth claim lines, according to FAIR Health's tracker. For original article: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/study-teletherapy-program-reduces-ocd-symptoms < Previous News Next News >

2022 Proposed Physician Fee Schedule Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 ...I want my MTV (Mental Telehealth Visits)! On July 13, 2021, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released their proposed CY 2022 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). The PFS is historically where CMS will make administrative changes to telehealth policy in the Medicare program. As the pandemic begins to stabilize and restrictions begin to lift, there has been great concern as to what will happen with the temporary telehealth changes on the federal level. The CY 2022 proposed PFS is one step towards addressing those questions. Telehealth Services & Communications Technology Based Services (CTBS) The PFS is traditionally where CMS will add additional telehealth services to the eligible telehealth services list for Medicare. No new services were added in the CY 2022 proposal. Instead, CMS made permanent adoption of G2252, virtual check-in service of 11-20 minutes, which was introduced in last year’s PFS and noted that the temporary services they had placed in Category 3, also in last year’s PFS, will remain active until the end of CY 2023 and not the end of the year that the public health emergency (PHE) is declared over. Mental Health & Audio-Only The most significant proposals involve the provision of mental health services via telehealth and utilization of audio-only to deliver those services. In December 2020, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) which included a change to federal telehealth policy. That change allowed for the provision of mental health services in the home and without the geographic limitation, if the patient had an in-person visit with the telehealth provider within six months prior to the telehealth service taking place. CMS is implementing that policy and outlined details in the PFS noting that the in-person visit would need to have taken place before each telehealth encounter. Therefore, if you had an in-person visit with your telehealth provider a month before you received services via telehealth, that visit would qualify. But if you wanted a follow-up visit eight months later via telehealth, you would need to have another in-person visit with that provider. Additionally, CMS stated that because of the likelihood that mental health services provided via technology will continue post-pandemic, the concern about cutting off people who receive such services, and the efficacy of utilizing audio-only to provide mental health services, the agency is revisiting its stance on how it defines “interactive telecommunications system.” In federal statute, telehealth is provided through a “telecommunications system.” There is no federal definition for “telecommunications system.” In regulations, CMS added the word “interactive” before “telecommunications system.” CCHP has always maintained and provided comments to CMS over the years that given the lack of a federal statutory definition for “telecommunication system,” it is within CMS’ power to change the definition to be more expansive. In comments to last year’s PFS and at the end of the year when the public was solicited for comments regarding the temporary waivers, CCHP reiterated this position. In their response to comments in last year’s PFS, CMS noted that they “continue to believe that our longstanding regulatory definition of “telecommunications system” reflected the intent of statute and that the term should continue to be defined as including two way, real-time, audio/video communications technology.” In the proposed CY 2022 PFS, CMS has reassessed their position. Based on data from COVID-19 and other factors, CMS is proposing to allow the use of audio-only to provide mental health services in the Medicare program if: It is for an established patient; The originating site is the patient’s home; The provider has the technical capability to use live video but, The patient cannot or does not want to use live video and There must be an in-person visit within six months of the telehealth service. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)/Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) CCHP has maintained that additional flexibilities may be given to FQHCs and RHCs without Congressional action by redefining what constitutes as a “visit” for these entities. CMS is proposing to expand the definition of a “mental health visit” for FQHCs and RHCs by including that definition mental health services provided through “interactive, real-time telecommunications technology” including audio-only. For the latter, the patient must not be capable or not consent to the use of live video. Additionally, the rate paid to FQHCs and RHCs will be their prospective payment system (PPS) rate or all-inclusive rate (AIR). It should be noted that FQHCs and RHCs will still be not be considered distant providers providing telehealth services. This is a definition change to what constitutes a “mental health visit” for these entities. Therefore, that would also mean that the statutory limitations on the use of telehealth, such as geographic limits, would presumably not apply if CMS is not viewing this as “telehealth” but simply as a visit for these entities. Other items were proposed in the CY 2022 PFS. To read about those proposals and a more in-depth look at the aforementioned ones, download CCHP’s fact sheet (below). Public comments on the PFS are due September 13, 2021. CCHP’s fact sheet - https://www.cchpca.org/2021/07/Proposed-CY-2022-Physician-Fee-Schedulefinal.pdf < Previous News Next News >

Accessibility to Telehealth Andrew Donnellan, Nov 03, 2021 Access to accessible Telehealth should not be based on the coincidence of location, but on the coincidence of being human. Telehealth has many benefits including reduced, or eliminated travel and wait times; decreased exposure to communicative diseases; easier access to healthcare professionals and therapeutic interventions; and greater flexibility. However, for many individuals with disabilities, Telehealth and its associated benefits may be out of reach due to web inaccessibility. Benefits can become barriers because of websites’ inconsistent compatibility with screen readers, closed captions, magnifiers, speech to text software (used by individuals with limited dexterity), easy to understand instructions and hyperlinks (for individuals with cognitive disabilities), and alternative text formats. Although Telehealth companies provide guidance on ensuring accessibility by conforming to guidelines laid out in Section 508 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, it is only voluntary because the Act only applies to federal agencies and not private companies. So, while an individual with a disability will be met with a relatively accessible federally funded Telehealth website, that same individual may be greeted by an inaccessible private Telehealth website. But wait! What about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)?! Surely it requires public accommodations like Telehealth websites to be accessible?! While the ADA does require brick-and-mortar private businesses that are labeled as public accommodations to be accessible, there is no such mandate for websites. Because of this, federal courts are split by jurisdiction on how to apply the ADA to websites: some jurisdictions say the ADA applies to all websites; some say it is inapplicable to all websites; and others conclude it applies only if the website has a connection, or "nexus," to the physical, brick-and-mortar place it represents. This lack of consistency can leave a disabled Telehealth user without an accessible Telehealth website simply because they live in a jurisdiction that does not ensure accessibility to websites. What can be done to help solve this problem? Perhaps the most comprehensive solution would be for the Department of Justice (DOJ), the federal Department tasked with enforcing the ADA, to finally answer the repeated calls by private business owners, courts, and other federal agencies for guidance by issuing a concrete rule requiring website accessibility under the ADA. However, because the Department proposed such a rule in 2010 and then withdrew from its proposal in 2017, it appears that those calls for guidance will go unanswered, save for a few amicus briefs and unofficial statements. Another, and perhaps more viable, solution is to lobby state senators to implement legislation requiring accessible Telehealth. It appears the ball has already started rolling because just this year, the New Jersey legislature has proposed a new bill that requires Telehealth to “ include accessible communication to facilitate the use of… Telehealth by individuals with a disability….” Access to accessible Telehealth should not be based on the coincidence of location, but on the coincidence of being human. Since we are all human, we all deserve accessible Telehealth — it is a right. This right will not be realized unless, and until, we stand up and demand mandated accessible websites. https://southwesttrc.org/blog/2021/accessibility-telehealth < Previous News Next News >

New SAMHSA Telehealth Guide: Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders Center for Connected Health Policy June 2021 Telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and its National Mental Health and Substance Use Policy Laboratory recently released a new evidence-based resource guide titled, Telehealth for the Treatment of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders, to support implementation of telehealth across diverse mental health and substance use disorder treatment settings. The guide examines the current telehealth landscape, including evidence on effectiveness and examples of programs that have integrated telehealth modalities (live-video, telephone, and web-based applications) for the treatment of serious mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Also included is guidance and resources for evaluating and implementing best practices which are presented across a continuum of services, such as screening and assessment, treatment, medication management, care management, recovery support, and crisis services. The report speaks to how telehealth is known to improve access to care during emergencies and in rural and underserved areas, but stresses that implementation should be expanded outside of such situations and integrated into an organization’s standard practices to improve provider and patient communication, satisfaction, timeliness and continuity of care. The authors highlight how this is increasingly important when it comes to mental health issues, which impact millions of Americans that often face unique treatment gaps and barriers. Ultimately, it is suggested that with the right resources and upfront work, the evidence shows telehealth has the capability to address these barriers, improve health outcomes and care coordination, decrease costs and reduce health disparities. Notable findings related to telehealth use and mental health include: *Telehealth use doubled from 14% to 28% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth visits for mental health increased 556% between March 11 and April 22, 2020 *SUD treatment via telehealth increased from 13.5% to 17.4% between 2016 and 2019 *Telehealth use increased 425% for mental health appointments among rural Medicare beneficiaries between 2010 and 2017 The guide presents specific strategies to increase patient access and comfort using telehealth, such as providing devices to those that need them and offering trial sessions to address any technological challenges. It is also suggested that providers first screen patients for their willingness and readiness to receive care via telehealth, as it may not be appropriate for some patients. Additionally, telephone should be encouraged when it reduces prior structural and institutional barriers that have made contacting underserved communities difficult. The guide also offers strategies to increase provider comfort using telehealth, such as: *trainings and designating certain staff to support and evaluate its use *how to create a similar environment to that of an in-person visit for patients *addressing organizational infrastructure issues Understanding and knowledge of relevant and ever-evolving regulatory and reimbursement policies is included as an important consideration as well, to which the authors offer a variety of tracking resources, including the policy finder tool on CCHP’s new website. Regardless of where state and federal telehealth policies land, the guide includes a number of telehealth implementation and outcome evaluation tools that will continue to assist treatment providers and organizations seeking to increase access to mental health services via telehealth. Additional resources can be accessed on the SAMHSA website. For more information read the full SAMHSA resource guide- https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/SAMHSA_Digital_Download/PEP21-06-02-001.pdf < Previous News Next News >

CMS Releases Final Calendar Year (CY) 2023 Physician Fee Schedule CCHP November 08, 2022 Last week, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final rule for the CY 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). CMS finalized many of their telehealth proposals, which primarily focused on what services will be covered by the program and what will happen immediately following the end of the public health emergency (PHE), including during the 151-day grace period included in the 2022 Budget Act. CMS clarified that the list of services that were temporarily allowed to be delivered via telehealth and reimbursed by Medicare during the PHE, will still be allowed during the 151-day grace period. Additionally, CMS added more of the temporary telehealth PHE list codes to a category of services that would remain through the end of 2023. The rule also reiterates the requirement for an in-person visit in the first 6-months of an initial telehealth mental health visit and every 12 months afterward (with exceptions), and clarifies that won’t be implemented until 152 days after the end of the PHE. They will address the specifics around coding and reporting these types of services through guidance and a sub-regulatory process in the future to ensure a smooth transition after the PHE ends. Stay tuned for an in-depth In Focus write up from CCHP on the 2023 PFS next week, as well as a new factsheet focused on the telehealth elements in the final rule. See original article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/its-here-cms-releases-2023-physician-fee-schedule-plus-new-resources-on-telehealth-policy-from-hhs-cchp < Previous News Next News >