Report: Telehealth Programs Increase Workload for Nurses and Support Staff Katie Adams December 20, 2022 Many providers think their telehealth program increases the workload for nurses and support staff, according to a recent report. In 2023, hospitals and physician practices will have to focus on making their telehealth workflows more efficient, which may involve partnering with third-party administrators. Telehealth isn’t as widely utilized as it was at the dawn of the pandemic, but the care modality is definitely here to stay. However, many providers believe their telehealth program increases the workload for nurses and support staff, according to a recent report from research firm Sage Growth Partners. Providers also said they don’t think physicians enjoy using telehealth visits to treat patients. In 2023, hospitals and physician practices will have to focus on making their telehealth workflows more efficient, which may involve partnering with third-party administrators, the report said. In September, Sage Growth Partners surveyed 95 health system executives and 75 leaders of physician practices. Practices with fewer than five physicians were excluded from the survey. Most respondents said that their organizations will focus on optimizing and sustaining their current telehealth programs in 2023 rather than expanding them. In fact, only about 10% of participants — 11% of hospitals and 8% of practices — said they are looking to grow their telehealth offerings next year. Health system executives were more likely than practice leaders to say that telehealth visits should make up a higher percentage of their ideal in-person-to-telehealth visit mix. Health system leaders said the mix should be 30% telehealth and 70% office. Among practice leaders, the ideal mix looks more like 20% and 80%. Their difference of opinion also extended to another question on how they think telehealth utilization will grow by visit type over the next two years. Health system leaders said that utilization will fall slightly for most visit types — even behavioral health. They said that 36% of behavioral health visits were delivered via telehealth in September, but they expect this to fall to 33% in September 2024. Urgent care and telepathology were the two visit types for which health systems leaders predicted telehealth growth — they expect telehealth utilization to increase from 3% to 7% for urgent care and from 2% to 4% for telepathology. Practice leaders expected telehealth utilization to increase slightly or remain the same for most visit types. Specialty care was the only exception — for this visit type, practice leaders predicted utilization to fall from 23% to 20% over the next two years. Both groups agreed that telehealth actually increases burden on staff though practice leaders seem to feel it more acutely. More than half of practice leaders said telehealth has increased support staff’s workload, and 28% said it generates more work for nurses. Among health system executives, 35% said telehealth increased support staff’s workload, and 30% said it creates more work for nurses. Additionally, less than half of total respondents (46% of hospitals and 47% of practices) agreed that telehealth increases physician satisfaction and physicians like using telehealth visits to treat patients. A key reason for this is that many providers are operating their telehealth programs using inefficient workflows, according to the report. Nearly 60% of survey respondents said they have not yet created new workflows for telehealth visits. Instead, hospitals and physician practices are still relying on workflows that mirror in-person visits. In 2023, providers will need to improve these workflows, and many will consider bringing on the help of third-party telehealth administrators, such as Amwell or Caregility, the report said. Hospitals are more than twice as likely to use third-party partners to administer telehealth services — with 20% of hospitals doing this compared to 9% of practices. Hospitals were also more likely to say they would change their telehealth administering party over the next two years — with 44% of hospitals saying this compared to 25% of practices. Photo: Anastasia Usenko, Getty Images See original article: https://medcitynews.com/2022/12/report-telehealth-programs-increase-workload-for-nurses-and-support-staff/ < Previous News Next News >

Is telemedicine an answer to physician burnout and staffing shortages? Bill Siwicki May 24, 2022 A physician who works full time via telehealth – and in brick-and-mortar ERs on the side – discusses the benefits to herself and the industry. With the huge initial swell in the use of virtual care in the rearview mirror, many industry experts – from health plans to big tech and practicing clinicians – are considering whether a doubling down on telehealth is just what the doctor ordered for the future of patient care. Many clinicians are hungry for new opportunities that allow them to continue to serve patients without dealing with long-standing administrative burdens and the aftermath of burnout from COVID-19 in their hospitals, health systems and doctor's offices. With too many clinicians continuing to stress that they've lost passion in their careers and considering quitting their jobs altogether, experts say change is needed. The healthcare industry can't afford to lose these highly skilled clinical workers to other industries. On this note, Healthcare IT News interviewed Dr. Pooja Aysola, a practicing emergency department clinician in Boston and senior director of clinical operations at Wheel, a virtual care company. She talks about physicians' newfound familiarity with telehealth and what it means for the future, the possibility of physicians working full time in telemedicine, and how virtual care can help with staffing shortages in healthcare. Q. With the massive uptake in telemedicine during the past two years of the pandemic, clinicians have grown accustomed to delivering care virtually. What do you think this familiarity means for clinicians moving forward? A. I hadn't ever considered a career in virtual care until a few months into the pandemic. I was working in an emergency room in Boston when my shifts were cut after the hospital rolled back elective procedures. I started working in telemedicine as a temporary solution, but I ended up loving the flexibility to see patients at home and on my own schedule. I also quickly realized I didn't have to be in the same room as my patients to deliver great care. I can treat conditions such as UTIs through a screen and provide immediate value to my patients. I'm not alone in my sudden pivot from virtual-care skeptic to virtual-care advocate. Two in three clinicians now say treating patients in virtual only or hybrid care settings best fits their lifestyle, despite a significant lack of interest in telehealth before the pandemic. I'm hopeful this new trend will allow more clinicians to create career paths that work for them, rather than against them. Clinicians should have the flexibility to decide when they want to work, where they want to work, and how they want to work. If we're moving toward a hybrid care model, then we should enable clinicians to adopt hybrid careers, if that's what works best for them. In medical school, we're taught there's only one track you can follow: in-person care. But that's not the case anymore. I want every doctor and nurse to feel empowered to follow the career path that works best for them. Q. You seem to suggest that physicians looking for a change, perhaps due to burnout, can switch to telehealth full time. What would a move to virtual care look like for a physician? A. The past few years have been incredibly tough for clinicians. Burnout, frustration and fatigue are some of the many challenges facing clinicians today. Recent data shows more than half of clinicians have lost passion for their careers because of stress – and close to half believe burnout is the biggest threat to patient care today. Working in virtual care was a less-than-traditional career path before the pandemic. But now, many clinicians are considering working in virtual care to help combat burnout and increase flexibility. A move to virtual care will look different for everyone. For example, some clinicians enjoy having a set schedule each week to see patients. Others enjoy having more flexibility, where they can easily sign on after dropping their kids off at school, sign off before running an errand, or even split their time between virtual and in-person care. At Wheel, more than half of clinicians still work in a brick-and-mortar setting. One of our clinicians currently is driving around the country with her partner in an RV. She customizes her schedule based on her travel plans that day. She can see patients in the morning and go for a hike in the afternoon, or spend a few hours on the road before pulling over and seeing patients in the afternoon. Clinicians interested in telehealth should look for opportunities that prioritize and personalize their experience as clinicians. Some specific factors to consider include: What kind of electronic health record does the company use? And was the EHR created with your experience in mind? Do they offer ongoing training? And provide resources on important topics, such as "webside" manner and guidance on managing state licenses? Do they have a robust clinical quality program in place? How do they provide feedback on quality of care? Q. How can telehealth help with the staffing shortage in healthcare? A. Our current clinician staffing shortage is a national crisis. And it's only expected to get worse. According to an Elsevier study, almost half of U.S. clinicians plan to leave their jobs within the next few years. I've seen firsthand the impact shortages are having on clinician burnout and patient care. And I firmly believe this is a crisis that the entire industry must address. Ensuring clinicians feel encouraged to explore careers in virtual care, if that's what works best for them, is one of many steps to take. Another way for telehealth to help address staffing shortages is by powering the transition to what we call "virtual-first care." With virtual-first care, patients can start their care journey with telemedicine. By leaning on technology, healthcare organizations can more easily triage the patient's care needs and determine the best care setting – virtual, in-person or hybrid care. This is a more efficient way to approach care delivery while simultaneously increasing access to care. While telehealth alone is not the only solution, it is one of many steps we can take to help address staffing shortages and help ensure timely patient access to care. Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication. See original article: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/telemedicine-answer-physician-burnout-and-staffing-shortages < Previous News Next News >

Common Wealth Fund Analyzes State COVID-19 Telehealth Changes Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 Recommending Longer Term Expansion Data to Determine Permanent Policies The Commonwealth Fund recently released an issue brief titled, States’ Actions to Expand Telemedicine Access During COVID-19 and Future Policy Considerations, to help inform future policy considerations for telehealth post-pandemic. Focusing on private insurance coverage, the authors reviewed pre-pandemic state telehealth statutes as well as state emergency actions related to telehealth between March 2020 and March 2021. The study found that 22 states made telehealth policy changes, mostly in regard to audio-only coverage, cost-sharing requirements, and reimbursement parity. Audio-only coverage and reimbursement parity were the most popular changes made to ensure expanded access to telehealth. Notable pre-pandemic findings include: -35 states required private insurance telehealth coverage -25 states required insurers to limit cost-sharing -15 states required private payer reimbursement parity -3 states explicitly required audio-only coverage Notable policy expansions during the pandemic included: -5 additional states required telehealth coverage -4 new states eliminated cost-sharing for services via telehealth -10 states added a requirement for private payer reimbursement parity -18 states moved to require audio-only coverage The report also looked at methods of emergency telehealth expansion by states, finding that policy changes came in a combination of legislation, executive orders, and other agency actions such as bulletins and notices. The study found 8 states passed legislation, but that the primary method was administrative action, given its ability to be made quickly. Administrative changes also appeared to often hinge on existing statutory authority or executive orders creating such authority. As part of the study’s methodology, the authors additionally interviewed insurance regulators in 10 states that had made telehealth expansions. Regulators highlighted the importance of audio-only coverage, both for older patients and their ease of use, as well as patients with behavioral health conditions that find it more comfortable. While some regulators expressed concerns related to increased costs with audio-only coverage, others highlighted billing parameters and how insurers have the ability to determine which audio-only visits qualify for reimbursement. The regulators also noted that almost all insurers were supportive of the temporary expansions, but that they’d likely oppose long-term payment parity requirements, even though one regulator commented how the work may be the same for a visit via telehealth as in-person. Interviews also revealed an insurer desire to pay lower rates for their third-party corporate telehealth providers, which regulators said may be less costly but also may fragment care, which can result in lower quality care and higher health care costs. The report also covers existing research around the benefits of telehealth and suggests the need to address insurance and audio-only coverage long-term to reduce access issues and stabilize the coverage landscape for providers to continue investing in telehealth use. The study concludes with the recommendation that maintaining telehealth expansions may benefit payers and consumers if telehealth can be shown to reduce health care costs. This will require access to longer-term information to monitor its use, including stakeholder workgroups and formal data collection mechanisms. Of course, longer-term data requires longer-term expansions, which could trend states toward temporary extensions in the short-term, such as those recently enacted in Connecticut and proposed in California. As policymakers continue the call for telehealth data, the primary response from researchers seems to be the same call. In addition to telehealth expansion impacts on health care costs, the issue of improved access to care must remain a primary focus of data collection and evaluation as well to truly result in equitable policy adoption. For more information on the actions states took to expand telehealth during COVID-19, read the Commonwealth Fund’s issue brief in its entirety - https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2021/jun/states-actions-expand-telemedicine-access-covid-19. CCHP’s Policy Finder tool can also be used to look up COVID telehealth policy documents by state. New Mexico policy finder - https://www.cchpca.org/new-mexico/. < Previous News Next News >

Amazon rolls out its telehealth service nationwide Annie Palmer, Bertha Coombs February 8, 2022 Amazon is launching its telehealth program, known as Amazon Care, nationwide and has signed up a handful of new companies to use its services. Amazon is rolling out its telehealth service, known as Amazon Care, nationwide, the company announced Tuesday. Amazon Care launched in 2019 as a pilot program for employees in and around the company's Seattle headquarters. The program provides virtual-care visits, as well as free telehealth consultations and in-home visits for a fee from nurses for testing and vaccinations. It has since expanded into more of a primary care service. To read this full article: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/02/08/amazon-care-telehealth-service-launches-nationwide.html < Previous News Next News >

Maximizing Telemedicine Benefits Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center August 2021 First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The United States and the world have seen a dramatic increase in the use of telemedicine since the inception of the COVID-19 public health emergency due in most part to stay at home restrictions for both providers and patients. Prior to this, telemedicine was used in a wide variety of clinical and related patient care applications for at least 30 years, and had been seeing steady but not exponential growth. In many cases programs were initiated quite rapidly using readily available and often low-cost equipment and tools, unless there was already an existing program and platform in place. Further, the use of telemedicine was facilitated at the state and federal levels but widespread waivers and measures being put into place to reduce barriers that were previously in place such as changes in reimbursements, requirements regarding patient and provider locations, cross-state licensure and privacy/security requirements. Those of us in the field for a long time are hopeful that many of these measures will stay in place, but there are clearly some that will or already have expired. We are additionally hopeful that even though in-person practices are clearly coming back full-tilt, that everyone has seen and/or experienced the benefits of telemedicine and will continue to use it to some degree as feasible and appropriate with their patients. As this occurs, however, providers will be faced with new challenges as they take their initial telemedicine set-ups and transition to this new hybrid world of services. As noted, some things will still be allowed (e.g., certain billing codes) but others will likely return to pre-COVID status (e.g., not being able to use non-HIPAA-compliant devices and software platforms). In addition to finding the best software for future telemedicine applications, there are other things to consider when trying to maximize telemedicine benefits. From my perspective, although the technology is critical, telemedicine success has very little to do with the technology and everything to do with the people and the environment within which they practice. Thus, in order to maximize telemedicine these are the elements one should consider and focus on in addition to carefully selecting the most appropriate technology for your practice and providers. First and foremost, the key to a successful telemedicine program is planning and figuring out exactly what role you expect telemedicine to play and how it fits in the mission and goals of your practice or institution. The use cases need to be clearly defined and must match an identified need. Then the who, what, where, why and when must be carefully delineated. Who needs to be involved (e.g., providers, billing, scheduling, IT, legal, administration), what clinical tasks can be accomplished via telemedicine, where will the technology and/or providers be located (e.g., clinic, home) and where will the patients be (e.g., primary care provider office, home, work, school), why will telemedicine be offered as an option (e.g., lack of sub-specialty providers, patients need to travel long distances, no show rates are too high) and when will telemedicine be offered (e.g., certain days/times, any opening in the schedule)? All of this can be accomplished by plotting out in a workflow diagram what the current practice is and how it needs to be adjusted in order to integrate telemedicine into that workflow. Again, the expectation is that although some practices might remain essentially virtual, the majority are going to evolve into a hybrid practice – but such a hybrid will not happen overnight or automatically. Workflow integration is going to be just as critical as integrating telemedicine technologies into a practice – it really is all about the people, setting expectations and establishing standard operating procedures and protocols for everyone that is going to be involved. Another thing that can be done to maximize a telemedicine practice is to properly train everyone on standard operating procedures and protocols, especially the providers who will be interacting with the patients. To date there are very few training programs that incorporate formally telemedicine as part of the curriculum. A number of programs are increasingly exposing trainees to telemedicine if offered at their institution, but typically as an elective or chance encounter in the clinic. There are however a number of organizations that are working on developing and promoting telemedicine competencies and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recently developed a set of Core Competencies. Although specific to medical college trainees, they are comprehensive enough to cover nearly every other specialty/profession in many respects. Very briefly, the AAMC Telehealth Competencies consist of three domains, each with a set of explicit skills that increase in complexity and responsibility across three stages of practice: entering residency, entering practice and experienced faculty physician. The skills from each prior stage of training should carry over to the next phase as the provider becomes more expert and acquires additional skill sets. The six domains are: patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth; access and equity in telehealth; communication via telehealth; data collection and assessment via telehealth; technology for telehealth; and ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth. Patient safety and appropriate use of telehealth includes 4 skill sets ranging from being able to explain to patients are caregivers the benefits and limitations of telemedicine to knowing when a patient is at risk and how/when to escalate care (e.g., convert to in-person) during an encounter. Access and equity in telehealth has 3 skill sets including knowing your biases and implications when considering healthcare, how telehealth can mitigate or amplify access to care gaps, and taking into account all potential cultural, social, physical and other factors when considering telemedicine. Communication via telehealth has 3 skills covering establishing rapport with patients, creating the right environment (e.g., lighting, sound) and knowing how to incorporate a patient’s social support into an encounter. Data collection and assessment via telehealth covers how to obtain a patient history, how to conduct an appropriate remote exam, and how to deal with patient-generated data. Technology for telehealth does not expect everyone to be an engineer or IT expert, but they should be able to explain equipment requirements for a visit, explain limitations and minimum requirements, and explain risks of technology failure and how to respond to them. Similarly, ethical practices and legal requirements for telehealth does not expect everyone to be a lawyer but should be able to describe local legal and privacy regulations, define components of informed consent, understand ethical challenges and professional requirements, and assess potential conflicts of interest (e.g., interest in commercial products/services). Many of these skills can be acquired by those already in practice by attending the wide variety of courses and webinars available for telemedicine skill building. It is also highly recommended that before engaging with patients for the first time via telemedicine to engage in some simulated practice sessions – from start to finish practicing each skill and developing your “style” for interacting with patients via this virtual medium. Finally, in order to maximize benefits you need to assess your program. This does not require a degree in statistics or setting up a complex experimental study. It really requires just two things – a set of metrics and a process. There are lots of metrics available and most have been studied in a wide variety of clinical applications so a good lit review will always help get you started. It is important to keep in mind that the things you measure need to reflect your goals/mission for using telemedicine and the bottom line of making a profit is not always the most appropriate metric to use. There are lots of relevant metrics and as a good starting place the article by Shore et al. “A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health” is a great place to get some ideas. Although developed for the telemental health community the metrics provided apply quite well to nearly any specialty or practice. The metrics include such things as patient/provider satisfaction, no shows, symptom outcomes, completion of treatment, wait times, number of services, cultural access, cost avoidance and patient safety. Once you decide on metrics that are appropriate for your practice (recommend starting with 2-3 then add more as your practice grows) there is a very easy, straight-forward process for getting to outcomes. First, consider a given measure an indicator – these are concrete activities, products etc. that can be measured readily (e.g., from the patient record). For example, you could measure A1C levels in patients as a function of being enrolled in a telenutrition program. The next step is to set performance targets – these are concrete goals that are time limited and based on the indicator metrics. For example, you would like to see a 25% reduction in A1C levels in at least 50% of patients enrolled in the telenutrition course at 6 months post-baseline. Finally, you will have quantifiable outcomes (without fancy statistics) at the end of your set time period – if you meet your 25% reduction goal in 50% of patients great. If not, then maybe reassess the program or whether your goals were realistic. In any case, you now have concrete outcomes of your program demonstrating its benefits that you can provide to funders, administration, your care team and even patients and the community. In order to maximize telemedicine benefits you need to get the word out about its availability and its effectiveness! < Previous News Next News >

Over-the-Phone-Therapy: Rand Report Findings Dr. Maheu May 8, 2022 Preference for Over-the-Phone Therapy Visits A recently published RAND Corporation report confirms telehealth can improve healthcare access and high utilization of over-the-phone-therapy visits, also known as audio-only telehealth visits. Suggestions regarding reimbursement are included. However, the report cautions that more research is needed to ensure the equitable delivery of quality healthcare when using audio-only telehealth. In a bid to assist healthcare centers, the California Healthcare Foundation established a quality assurance program, the Connected Care Accelerator program (CCA), in July 2020. RAND researchers worked with 45 CCA health centers in compiling the report, “Experiences of Health Centers in Implementing Telehealth Visits for Underserved Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” RAND Report Findings The RAND report found that the number of clinical visits remained the same during the study period compared to before COVID-19. However, over-the-phone therapy for behavioral health issues was a standout in terms of services received by patients. Audio-only visits were favored for both primary health and behavioral health practitioners when the study started. Many primary health visits had reverted to in-person consultations, but over-the-phone therapy for behavioral health care remained high by the end of the study. There were significant differences in video consultations across health centers, particularly behavioral healthcare. Health centers transitioning from audio-only telehealth visits to video visits had varying degrees of success. Of those that transitioned to video visits, the most successful shared these characteristics: Telehealth video platforms were easy to use. Clinicians obtained leadership support and staff training. Everyone involved experienced a sense of urgency. Patients were willing to try the technology. Health center staff who took part in the study noted that it was challenging to set up video calls, which led to the preference for over-the-phone therapy. Also significant were the changes in the telehealth reimbursement policy. Audio Telehealth Can Bridge the Digital Gap According to the RAND report, healthcare centers had varying degrees of success in implementing telehealth. The availability of digital assets is one of the barriers to entry regarding telehealth access. The report suggested that telehealth phone calls offer the next best option where other telehealth resources are lacking. The American Medical Association (AMA) issued a brief, Equity in Telehealth: Taking Key Steps Forward, which recently provided more data about audio-only telehealth. The report points out that one in five adults in the US does not have broadband, which means that these people cannot avail themselves of the benefits of video-based telehealth. The study also reported that 15% of patients don’t have a smartphone to facilitate a video connection with a provider. AMA suggests that hospitals and healthcare providers should invest in initiatives to broaden the reach of telehealth for the inclusion of marginalized communities. According to the brief, some health centers have increased their support staff to help bridge the digital gap. They have also made available wi-fi and telehealth booths. The AMA report also states: The AMA urges health plans to be required to cover telemedicine-provided services on the same basis as in-person services and not limit coverage only to services provided by select corporate telemedicine providers. Telehealth Reimbursement for Over-the-Phone-Therapy In recent years, telehealth reimbursements and healthcare coverage changes are another reason why over-the-phone therapy and audio-only telehealth visits have gained popularity. Before the pandemic, telehealth reimbursement for over-the-phone therapy was rare. Medicare and many states did not classify audio-only calls as part of telehealth services. Many have now increased telehealth reimbursement to include audio-only telehealth visits. See TBHI’s previous articles related to telehealth reimbursement for more information: 7 States Change Telehealth Coverage for Telehealth Reimbursement Telehealth Expansion: 6 Additional States Announce Telehealth Coverage Audio-Only & Other Telehealth Services Approved for Reimbursement Moving Forward with Over-the-Phone-Therapy and Audio-Only Telehealth Reimbursement It is difficult to monitor how audio-only telehealth visits are now being used because historically there were no codes and modifiers on the claims applications. Medicare and Medicaid providers have recently added audio-only modifiers and coding to their listings. See Telehealth Reimbursement Alert: 2022 Telehealth CPT Codes Released. Data collection regarding telehealth phone calls will be forthcoming as a result. There is a general belief that over-the-phone therapy is open to improper use and can lead to increased costs and inequitable use. Data transparency may help mitigate this belief as clinicians’ preference for other modalities is revealed. See Audio-Only Telehealth: A Classic Solution to a Modern Crisis. RAND Report Recommendations The RAND report concluded that audio-only telehealth policies should be limited until evidence is better gathered and understood since audio-only telehealth data is lacking. Implementing policies with in-person and video requirements and different telehealth reimbursement rates is recommended. It pointed out that healthcare centers and professionals need support and resources for effective telehealth implementation. Professional training is also available. A complementary and recently published report described telehealth systems’ use, access, and quality. It showed how telehealth reimbursement and services have spread into all primary forms of healthcare to the satisfaction of providers and their clients. Over-the-phone therapy will remain an essential part of ensuring that clients receive the care they need until we bridge the digital divide. Policymakers need to balance their concerns with interpretations that support audio-only telehealth policies to reduce digital inequities while efforts are made to reduce the digital divide. < Previous News Next News >

Update on Risks of Payments in Arrangements With Telemedicine Companies: OIG Warns of Prosecution Risks and Identifies Seven Criteria for Caution When Entering Into Telemedicine Payment Arrangements, and the Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act Passes Andrea M. Ferrari, Nadia de la Houssaye August 26, 2022 On July 20, 2022, the Office of Inspector General of the US Department of Health & Human Services (OIG) issued a Special Fraud Alert urging healthcare practitioners to exercise caution when entering into arrangements with telemedicine companies. OIG issued this Special Fraud Alert the same day the US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced criminal charges against 36 defendants in 13 federal districts as part of the DOJ’s Nationwide Coordinated Law Enforcement Effort to Combat Telemedicine, Clinical Laboratory, and Durable Medical Equipment Fraud.[1] The Special Fraud Alert notes that OIG has recently conducted dozens of investigations of alleged fraud schemes involving companies that provide telehealth, telemedicine, or telemarketing services (collectively, Telemedicine Companies). It also notes that in many of these investigations, OIG found evidence that the Telemedicine Companies intentionally paid physicians and non-physician practitioners (collectively, Practitioners) kickbacks to generate orders or prescriptions for medically unnecessary durable medical equipment, genetic testing, wound care items, or prescription medications. The Special Fraud Alert warns that such kickback schemes implicate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and can lead to Practitioners, Telemedicine Companies, and others that participate in the schemes being held liable criminally, civilly, and administratively. Liability may arise from (1) paying or receiving payment in violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; and (2) causing submission of fraudulent claims to federal healthcare programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare, which may constitute a violation of the federal False Claims Act and other federal laws. As a cautionary guide, the Special Fraud Alert identifies seven arrangement characteristics that may raise OIG scrutiny: 1. The patients for whom a Practitioner orders or prescribes items or services are identified or recruited by a Telemedicine Company, sales agent, recruiter, call center, or health fair, and/or through internet, television, or social media advertising for free or low-cost out-of-pocket items or services. 2. A Practitioner does not have sufficient contact with or information from the purported patient to meaningfully assess the medical necessity of the items or services ordered or prescribed. 3. A Telemedicine Company compensates a Practitioner based on the volume of items or services ordered or prescribed, which may be characterized to the Practitioner as compensation based on the number of medical records that the Practitioner reviewed. 4. A Telemedicine Company furnishes items and services only to federal healthcare program beneficiaries and does not accept insurance from any other payor. 5. A Telemedicine Company claims to furnish items and services only to individuals who are not federal healthcare program beneficiaries but may, in fact, bill federal healthcare programs. 6. A Telemedicine Company only furnishes one product or a single class of products (e.g., durable medical equipment, genetic testing, diabetic supplies, or various prescription creams), potentially restricting a Practitioner’s treatment options to a predetermined course of treatment. 7. A Telemedicine Company does not expect Practitioners to follow up with patients, nor does it provide Practitioners with the information required to follow up with patients (e.g., the Telemedicine Company does not require Practitioners to discuss genetic testing results with each purported patient). OIG advises in the Special Fraud Alert that this list of suspect criteria is illustrative and not exhaustive. Therefore, even arrangements that do not specifically fit one or more of these suspect criteria may still be suspect. However, OIG also indicates that it recognizes there are many legitimate telemedicine and telehealth arrangements, and explicitly states that the Special Fraud Alert is not intended to discourage those legitimate arrangements. Rather, OIG is using the Special Fraud Alert to encourage Practitioners (and, by extension, their advisors) to use heightened scrutiny, exercise caution, and consider the above list of suspect criteria before entering into arrangements with Telemedicine Companies. Telehealth Expansion Legislation Significantly, a week after OIG issued the Special Fraud Alert, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly (416-12) passed the Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act of 2022 (HR 4040), which encourages broad use of telehealth by expanding and extending for at least an additional two years — through December 2024 — the Medicare telemedicine payment policies that were introduced for the COVID-19 public health emergency. The House bill removes geographic restrictions and expands originating sites for telehealth services, continues expansion of the practitioners eligible to provide telehealth services, allows mental health services to be provided via telehealth and telecommunications, and continues certain COVID-19 allowances for audio-only telehealth services. The bill is now pending in the Senate. [1] Press Release, US Department of Justice, Justice Department Charges Dozens for $1.2 Billion in Health Care Fraud (July 20, 2020), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-charges-dozens-12-billion-health-care-fraud. © 2022 Jones Walker LLP National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 238 See Original article: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/update-risks-payments-arrangements-telemedicine-companies-oig-warns-prosecution < Previous News Next News >

Closing 2022 with New Telehealth G-Codes for HHAs, Uncertainty for Telehealth Startups, Plus State & Federal Telehealth Developments (and much more!) CCHP December 13, 2022 New G-Code Reporting Requirements for HHAs under CY 2023 CMS PPS Rule The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized new G-codes to report use of telecommunications technology under the home health benefit for Home Health Agencies (HHAs) under their finalized Calendar Year (CY) 2023 Home Health Prospective Payment System (PPS) Rate Update. HHAs are asked to voluntarily start reporting on January 1, 2023, and the requirement to report would kick in July 2023. CMS notes that in 2020 the home health benefit was temporarily altered due to COVID-19 (and made permanent in 2021) requiring any provision of remote patient monitoring or other services furnished via a telecommunications system to be included in the plan of care. The telecommunication service, however is not allowed to substitute for a home visit ordered by the plan of care or for purposes of eligibility or payment. Reporting of the new G-codes will allow CMS to analyze the characteristics of beneficiaries utilizing services remotely and have a broader understanding of the social determinants that affect who benefits most from these services. The codes HHAs will be asked to submit are detailed in a Medicare Learning Network (MLN) document, and include: G0320: Home health services furnished using synchronous telemedicine rendered via a real-time two-way audio and video telecommunications system G0321: Home health services furnished using synchronous telemedicine rendered via telephone or other real-time interactive audio-only telecommunications system G0322: The collection of physiologic data digitally stored and/or transmitted by the patient to the home health agency (for example, remote patient monitoring) For more details on the G-codes and reporting expectations, see the full MLN Guidance and the full text of the finalized CY 2023 Home Health PPS Rate Rule. Falling Investment for Telehealth Startups A recent article in Politico [subscription required] brings to light the stark decrease in investment in telehealth companies in 2022 (compared to 2021), as the pandemic subsides and a recession likely kicks in. In fact, while telehealth funding for digital health in the US peaked in 2021 with $11 billion dollars, that has fallen to only $3 billion by the third quarter of 2022. The effects of this slow down in capital is bound to ripple across the industry. As a result, many startups are laying off workers and focusing on just a few key offerings. Adding to the uncertainty of the future for these companies is how telehealth policies will impact them moving forward as state and federal governments shift from pandemic era temporary policies to often stricter permanent telehealth requirements with greater oversight. Cerebral, a digital mental health company, for example is currently under federal investigation for over-prescribing ADHD medication. This is the type of occurrence other telehealth companies may take note of and may shape the way they think about the future of their products and services in order to avoid such situations. Additionally, consumer demand has shifted post-pandemic. While consumers were enthusiastic about utilizing telehealth for most forms of healthcare in order to avoid crowded doctors’ offices and hospitals at the height of the pandemic, they now prefer to use it for check-ins with their doctors, mental health visits and addiction treatment, according a survey by the American Medical Association. This necessitates a shift for many telehealth start-ups, and according to Megan Zweig, COO of Rock Health, many companies are struggling with this. For more information, read the full Politico article [subscription required]. World Health Organization Telemedicine Implementation Guidance In November the World Health Organization (WHO) released a telemedicine implementation guide based on knowledge and learnings the WHO has gathered since releasing their first report on telemedicine in 2010. The set of recommendations within the new guide is aimed at optimizing the implementation of telemedicine services by providing an overview of key planning, implementation and maintenance processes to inform an investment plan and support countries across different stages in developing telehealth solutions. The guide contains three phases to developing a successful telehealth program, including (1) a situational assessment; (2) planning the implementation; and (3) monitoring and evaluation, and continuous improvement. There are a total of eleven steps within the three phases, including tasks such as performing a landscape analysis, establishing standard operating procedures, developing a budget and determining monitoring and evaluation goals, as well as an adaptive management plan for improvement. Several case studies from different countries, including India, Cabo Verde, Indonesia, Qatar and Mali are also provided in the annex section of the document. Download the full telemedicine implementation document from the WHO’s website for all the detailed steps outlined in their recommended procedures for telemedicine implementation. See full article: https://mailchi.mp/cchpca/closing-2022-with-new-telehealth-g-codes-for-hhas-uncertainty-for-telehealth-startups-plus-state-federal-telehealth-developments-and-much-more < Previous News Next News >

Prescribing via Telehealth Post-Pandemic Center for Connected Health Policy July 2021 Another result of telehealth policies being in flux is uncertainty around the long-term landscape in terms of prescribing controlled substances post-pandemic. Another result of telehealth policies being in flux is uncertainty around the long-term landscape in terms of prescribing controlled substances post-pandemic. Existing federal law, mainly the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, restricts the prescribing of controlled substances via telemedicine except in very specific and limiting circumstances. Given these federal restrictions, this may be a telehealth policy barrier states have trouble tackling completely on their own. There is a potential pathway for the prescribing of certain controlled substances without an in-person exam post-PHE, which is if the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) creates the telemedicine special registry they were mandated to establish rules for by October 2019 but never did. Thus, the specific medications and the criteria to qualify for the registry is yet to be seen. In the first official mention of the long awaited regulations since December 2019, last month the DEA said in response to comments on a recently proposed (yet unrelated) rule about narcotics: “Although these comments regarding telemedicine special registration are beyond the scope of this rule, DEA understands commenters' frustration with the delay. DEA intends to promulgate regulations for the telemedicine special registration in the near future.” In addition, a few of the current federal bills CCHP is tracking that would alter the Ryan Haight Act include: * S. 445/HR 1384 – Makes exceptions for narcotic drugs in schedules II, IV, or V for community health aides or community health practitioners prescribing to an individual for treatment or detoxification * S. 340 – Allows for a telehealth evaluation for schedule III or IV drugs under certain circumstance * S 1457 – Similar language to S. 340 is in Sec. 205 of bill. CCHP will continue to track this issue and provide updates as they occur. Existing federal laws around prescribing can be found on CCHP’s website through both the policy finder tool and the pending federal legislation page at https://www.cchpca.org/federal/pending-legislation/. < Previous News Next News >

Review of Veterans Health Administration’s Use of Telehealth During Pandemic Center for Connected Health Policy April 2021 Veteran’s Affairs Office of the Inspector General (OIG) assessed the Veterans Health Administration’s virtual primary care response to the COVID-19 pandemic. From February 7 to June 16, 2020, the Veteran’s Affairs Office of the Inspector General (OIG) assessed the Veterans Health Administration’s virtual primary care response to the COVID-19 pandemic, based upon reviewing primary care encounter data, interviews with VHA leaders, and use of primary care provider questionnaires. In its report, the OIG found that face-to-face primary care visits decreased by 75% and contact by telephone represented 81% of all primary care encounters. In regards to VA Video Connect (VVC), providers stated that not only were there technical complications related to specifically scheduling VVC visits, but many patients didn’t have internet access or the appropriate equipment needed for video calls. The OIG identified the need for additional training and support for veterans and test visits with patients and staff to walk through the process before the visit. In addition, the OIG recommended the Under Secretary for Health evaluate veteran access to reliable internet connectivity necessary for use of VVC and take appropriate action. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General: https://www.va.gov/oig/ Veterans Health Administration: https://www.va.gov/health/ < Previous News Next News >

FCC Announces Application Filing Window for Round Two of COVID-19 Telehealth Program Center for Connected Health Policy April 27, 2021 The application filing window for the second round of the COVID-19 Telehealth Program will open Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET The application filing window for the second round of the COVID-19 Telehealth Program will open Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET. Running one week, the filing window will close Thursday, May 6, 2021. The Program under the Federal Communications Commission was first established in April 2020 and provided with $200 million through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Congress provided an additional $249.95 million to the Program late last year through the Consolidated Appropriations Act, to support this second round of funding and further assist health care providers setting up the infrastructure necessary to provide services via telehealth. The new round of the program will be administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Applications for the Program may be filed through a dedicated application portal, available on the COVID-19 Telehealth Program webpage. Round 1 applicants that were not funded will need to submit a new application. For additional information on Round 2, please refer to the Universal Service Administrative Company’s website. If you have specific questions regarding the Round 2 application process, please reach out to USAC at Round2TelehealthApplicationSupport@usac.org . COVID-19 Telehealth Program (Invoices & Reimbursements): https://www.fcc.gov/covid-19-telehealth-program-invoices-reimbursements Universal Service Administrative Company: https://www.usac.org/about/covid-19-telehealth-program/ < Previous News Next News >

The value of telehealth and the move to digitally enabled care — 3 insights Becker's Hospital Review In Collaboration with American Medical Association Nov. 1, 2021 During the pandemic, healthcare organizations embraced telehealth to ensure they could provide access and high quality care to their patients. Now, nearly two years later, organizations are contemplating how best to move forward, including how to safeguard and optimize opportunities to move towards digitally enabled care. During the pandemic, healthcare organizations embraced telehealth to ensure they could provide access and high quality care to their patients. Now, nearly two years later, organizations are contemplating how best to move forward, including how to safeguard and optimize opportunities to move towards digitally enabled care. During Becker's 6th Annual Health IT + Revenue Cycle Virtual Conference, the American Medical Association sponsored a roundtable discussion on this topic. The AMA's Lori Prestesater, Vice President of Health Solutions, and Meg Barron, Vice President of Digital Health Innovations, talked with healthcare executives from around the country about their digital health successes and challenges. Three insights: 1. Providers want virtual care to continue as long as their key concerns are addressed. "Physicians are enthusiastic about digital health technologies," Ms. Barron said. "However, that enthusiasm is directly tied to a solution's ability to help them take better care of patients or reduce their administrative burdens." Four key concerns consistently expressed by physicians when evaluating digital solutions are whether a solution works and has an evidence base, how providers will be compensated, what liability and privacy issues exist, and how implementation and change management will occur. 2. One of the major advantages of telehealth is improved access. Access can be widely defined; virtual technology has made significant inroads in improving access in multiple ways: COVID-19 access. The department chair of a hospital in the Northeast noted that telehealth helped them provide quick access and treatment to patients during the pandemic. "It worked extremely well in this emergency situation," he said. "Patients would call in and report symptoms, and we could make decisions about their care. We provided pulse oximeters and followed up via telehealth." Specialty access. A CMO from a Midwestern health network — who is the father of a daughter with a chronic illness — shared his personal experience with specialty care from multiple systems. "I can't imagine how my daughter could receive specialty care without telehealth. Care that was previously siloed can now be accessed nationally, if not internationally." Behavioral health access. A chief population health officer from a health system in the Midwest said telehealth access to mental health services was a big success. "Patients found the pandemic very rough, and many needed some behavioral health services, but they didn't necessarily want to try to see somebody because of the stigma associated with it," she said. "Being able to offer telebehavioral health services to our patients, and frankly, even to our employees, was a great success." 3. Challenges such as patient hesitancy, bandwidth issues and measurement of value remain. Although patients are generally positive about telehealth, some have found it difficult to onboard to telehealth platforms. One provider in the Northeast said younger patients love the ability to text and connect virtually, but elderly patients often prefer in-person visits for the human connection. Also, many healthcare organizations have faced connection issues. A West Coast CMO explained, "We have 24 hospitals, and many of them are in rural areas. We really struggled with bandwidth." Finally, measuring the value of these technologies remains a challenge. Ms. Prestesater pointed out that it can be a "many-year equation to evaluate the value for a chronically ill patient." AMA has a recently released Return on Health value framework that can help an organization quantify the comprehensive value of virtual care. Although some participants warned that virtual care may not be less expensive, it can be hard to quantify savings from things like avoiding emergency care. A Midwest hospital executive said, "Home-based care has led to a substantial reduction in visits to the emergency room and days in the hospital for us. The problem in the whole equation is it's hard to measure something that doesn't happen." < Previous News Next News >

Updated Version of CONNECT for Health Act Introduced in Congress Center for Connected Health Policy May 4, 2021 Last week an updated version of the CONNECT for Health Act was introduced in Congress. Last week an updated version of the CONNECT for Health Act was introduced in Congress. The bill, which was first introduced in 2016 but has been repurposed in this newest version to remove restrictions on telehealth for mental health, stroke care and home dialysis in certain circumstances. It also addresses several of the restrictions in Medicare, including geographic limitations, expanding originating sites to include the home, restrictions on federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) reimbursement and gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services the ability to waive other telehealth restrictions permanently. For more information, see the press release, or read the bill’s summary published by Senator Schatz office. Stay tuned for a deeper dive and further analysis from CCHP next week. Press Release: https://www.schatz.senate.gov/press-releases/schatz-wicker-lead-bipartisan-group-of-50-senators-in-reintroducing-legislation-to-expand-telehealth-access-make-permanent-telehealth-flexibilities-available-during-covid-19-pandemic Summary: https://www.schatz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CONNECT%20for%20Health%20Act%20of%202021_Summary.pdf < Previous News Next News >

Trends in Telehealth Prescription Laws Kirin Goff, Southwest Telehealth Resource Center July 2021 New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. States across the country are proposing or enacting legislation that supports making the increased access to telehealth that occurred during the pandemic permanent. However, many states seem to struggle with how to appropriately regulate remote prescribing requirements as there is wide variation in approaches and priorities emerging in these proposed and new laws. The most common approach is to carve separate requirements for controlled substances, and then clarify if and under what circumstances they can be prescribed via telehealth. Notably, concerns about addiction and access to mental healthcare are becoming increasing prevalent in telehealth legislation. Some states are attempting to address the latter by specifically expanding telehealth to meet these needs, including allowances for remote prescriptions. The Worsening Drug Epidemic As the COVID-19 pandemic took center stage, substance use also increased. Preliminary estimates indicate that in the first eight months of 2020, drug overdose deaths increased by 48.1% in Arizona and 46.8% in Colorado, compared to same period in 2019. In the U.S. as a whole, drug overdoses increased by 27% between September 2019 and August 2020, compared to the previous twelve months (all data are based on Commonwealth Fund examination of provisional data from CDC’s National Vital Statistics System). As more Americans become personally impacted by the opioid epidemic, opinions about drug policy seem to be shifting. In lieu of strict regulatory measures, harm reduction is becoming more mainstream, and approaches seem to increasingly favor policies that improve access to care for substance use disorders. For example, the American Medical Association put out an issue brief supporting policies that employ evidence-based harm reduction policies and “remove existing barriers for patients with pain to obtain necessary medications…[including] arbitrary dose, quantity and refill restrictions on controlled substances.” Controlled Substance Prescription Arizona has addressed this issue most directly and comprehensively by enacting HB 2454. This law allows providers to prescribe Schedule II drugs, which are defined as drugs with high potential for abuse, such as Vicodin, methadone, and OxyContin, via audio-visual examination and delegates review for more detailed requirements to a newly created Telehealth Advisory Committee. The committee will “review national and other standards for telehealth best practices and relevant peer-reviewed literature” and establish best practices for providers to follow. This committee must include several experts in behavioral health and substance use, indicating that optimal ways to regulate prescribing controlled substances are a high priority. In other Southwestern states, the majority of recent bills on the topic focus on cannabis. For example, New Mexico’s medical marijuana law (HB 2) allows providers to determine medical marijuana qualification via telehealth. Likewise, Utah recently passed a bill (SB 170) allowing for medical marijuana renewal via telehealth examination, although it still requires in-person exams for initial recommendations. Research and Access to Care Healthcare access issues are also of primary concern, and telehealth is seen as a potential solution, particularly in rural areas. For example, New Mexico prioritizes gathering evidence about cannabis by requiring an annual report evaluating the needs of patients who live in rural areas, subsidized housing and Indian nations, tribes or pueblos. While it does not refer to telehealth specifically, it is a clear consideration for non-urban populations. Likewise, Utah attempted (HB 36) to extend the term of a grant for research about how telehealth can improve access to mental health care, particularly for underserved populations. The range of proposed and enacted laws reflects a lack of evidence as well as differing ideologies among legislators. It is unusual for such substantial changes to the legal framework to occur so quickly – without more incremental steps and without a significant body of experience and precedent to glean from other jurisdictions. Arizona’s HB 2454 provides an innovative approach to remote prescribing by providing both access and data, which will be key to watch as states continue to pass telehealth legislation. < Previous News Next News >

Amazon’s New Partnership With Teladoc Is A Huge Milestone For Telemedicine Sai Balasubramanian, M.D., J.D., Contributor March 23, 2022 Last month, global technology and e-commerce giant Amazon and telemedicine company Teladoc announced a landmark new initiative: providing virtual care through Amazon Alexa devices. The announcement indicates that “Customers in the U.S. will now be able to connect with a Teladoc care provider 24/7 from supported Echo devices for general medical needs. Teladoc on Alexa will initially launch via audio with video visits coming soon.” Donna Boyer, Chief Product Officer of Teladoc, explained further: “Teladoc Health’s collaboration with Amazon is yet another step in breaking down barriers to healthcare access […] By introducing and integrating our virtual first care experience with Echo devices, we are providing an innovative and convenient way for users to connect with a doctor. We are meeting consumers where they are, to continue to deliver value and high-quality care to members.” Indeed, this is a huge milestone for both companies. Teladoc went public in a deal worth nearly $157 million dollars in 2015, right when digital health and telehealth were becoming more prominent concepts in care delivery. However, Teladoc found its true stride during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, when people worldwide were forced into isolation and quarantine—highlighting the value of virtual care services. Indeed, the concept has significant promise in solving many modern day healthcare problems. Congruently, Amazon has continued to make its own strides in healthcare. With the launch of Amazon Care as well as its robust pharmaceutical services, the company is slowly but surely developing an entire ecosystem which will likely soon become a mainstream modus of care delivery. Now, with this new partnership, both companies are significantly increasing their reach. With 100s of millions of Alexa devices currently in use, the potential value of this partnership is endless. It provides consumers with a convenient, easy, and creative way to get their healthcare services inside of their own homes. The process is relatively simple: “To get started, customers can say, ‘Alexa, I want to talk to a doctor,’ to their supported Echo device to get connected with the Teladoc call center. Customers will then get a call back on their Echo devices from a Teladoc doctor for virtual visits related to non-emergency health needs, such as experiencing symptoms of a cold, flu, or allergies. The cost per visit can be as low as $0 per visit with insurance or $75 without insurance.” For full article click this link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/saibala/2022/03/23/amazons-new-partnership-with-teladoc-is-a-huge-milestone-for-telemedicine/?sh=7acb8fcd7f18 < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth Industry Expected to Grow from $26.4 Billion in 2020 to $70.19 Billion by 2026, at a CAGR of 17.7% DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE) August 5, 2020 The present situation of COVID-19 has a great impact on the Telehealth market, where home care services are increasing through the modes of telehealth services. Information is passed through telecommunication where a patient can access the treatment from the clinician and can take advice without approaching to the doctor and without going out for the hospital. This situation gives immense opportunity for the telehealth market players. Market Highlights The Telehealth Market is estimated to reach USD 70.19 billion by 2026, from USD 26.4 billion in 2020 and registering a CAGR of ~17.7% during the forecast period. The growing technologies in the telecommunications sector to reach the patients in time play a major role in the telehealth services, which raise the growth in the Telehealth market. Based on the application of Telehealth - Telehealth services market is segmented into three segments, including Teleradiology, Tele-consultation, Tele-ICU, Tele-stroke, Tele-psychiatry, and Tele-dermatology. Teleradiology had achieved a major share in the telehealth market in the last year due to increasing mental health issues among people. The insufficient health services providers give the scope of opportunities in the telehealth industry to fulfill the demand of the end-users. The market components cover the segments of Software & Services and Hardware. The segment of software & services accounted for the larger share of the global telehealth market in 2019. Telehealth market based on the end-user segment classified into Providers, Payers, and Patients. The end-users, such as providers segment accounted for the largest share in 2019. Telehealth segmentation is based on geography includes North America, Europe, APAC, and RoW. North America accounts for the largest share in the telehealth market in the entire world. The Telehealth market is growing enormously in the region of North American countries, which is very advanced in the technological perspective and in the advanced medical facilities. The increase of chronic diseases like cancer, asthma, and other diseases driving the adoption of the home healthcare services to avoid the expensive costs charged by hospitals, these are some aspects which increased the growth in the telehealth market in this region. In the last recent years, Europe is also another region in the telehealth market region where market players experienced tremendous growth due to knowing the awareness of remote monitoring and healthcare from home. The telehealth market is expanding globally during the forecasting period. The factors which give opportunities for this market are lack of physicians, increasing chronic diseases that need immediate attention from the physicians. However, the reimbursement or coverage of the fee, illiteracy of some people who cannot adopt the current advanced telecommunication are the challenges faced by the telehealth market. Key Players in the Telehealth Market The key players in the market are Teladoc, Doctor on Demand, GE Healthcare, SnapMD, Encounter Telehealth, GlobalMed, HelloMD, MDLIVE Inc, InTouch Technologies, Dictum Health, Inc., LLC, and American Well. Globally, advancements in the technologies and growing awareness of remote services increased the demand for telehealth services. In the coming future, emerging countries/regions play an important role in the telehealth services market. This study will help the market players to understand the key market trends, market dynamics, and end-users pain-points. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the study will enhance the user experience of the study. The competitive analysis of the major players enables users to understand the dynamic strategies such as technology innovation, partnerships, merger & acquisitions and joint ventures of the key players This report also provides the portfolio analysis and capability analysis of the leading players. Quantitative analysis of the market enables users to understand the actual facts of the market across four major regions. Companies Mentioned AMC Health American Well Asahi Kasei Corporation Cerner Corporation Chiron Health Cisco Systems E Healthcare Imediplus Iron Bow Technologies Koninklijke Philips Medtronic Medvivo Group Medweb Siemens Healthineers AG Teladoc Health Telespecialists Vsee Zipnosis For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/kyppo0 Contacts ResearchAndMarkets.com Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 < Previous News Next News >

HHS to maintain COVID-19 public health emergency past January Jakob Emerson November 11, 2022 The U.S. will extend the COVID-19 public health emergency past January 11, 2023, CNBC reported Nov. 11. A 12th extension of the PHE since the first in January 2020 is also likely because of a lack of public statement from HHS warning about a termination. The agency last renewed the PHE Oct. 13 for an additional 90 days to Jan. 11, 2023 — it also told states it would provide a notice 60 days before if it did decide to end it, or Nov. 11. The PHE allows the country to continue operating under pandemic-era policies, which led to a complete overhaul of telehealth and who can use it, fast-tracked approvals of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, and preserved healthcare coverage for millions of Medicaid beneficiaries nationwide. Eleven states also still have coinciding public health emergency orders in place. As of now, Medicare telehealth flexibilities will end 151 days after the PHE expires. In July, the House passed The Advancing Telehealth Beyond COVID-19 Act, but the legislation must still be approved by the Senate for Medicare patients to continue using telehealth through 2024. "It's not that we necessarily want to continue the PHE for a long period of time," Nancy Foster, AHA's vice president of quality and patient safety, told Becker's in October. "What has not yet happened is fully thinking through how to unwind some of the [telehealth] flexibilities we currently have, and how to perhaps make permanent some of the others." In addition, the end of the PHE will trigger a Medicaid redetermination process that will cause a major disenrollment of beneficiaries. Over the course of about a year, HHS estimates up to 15 million people could lose health coverage. Payers are prepping for the redetermination period, as they expect to lose Medicaid members and hope to switch some to ACA coverage. With the Inflation Reduction Act's extension of ACA premium tax credits through the end of 2025, the nation's largest insurers have all recently announced plans to majorly expand exchange offerings in 2023, including UnitedHealthcare, Elevance, Aetna, Cigna and Centene. The extension of the federal emergency past January may have been unexpected for insurers, as UnitedHealth Group executives told investors Oct. 14 they thought the PHE would end in January. "Our tailwinds will be weighed against one known headwind, and that is the membership attrition and related impacts on our Medicaid business as eligibility redeterminations are conducted over the course of the next year," Elevance Health's CFO John Gallina told investors Oct. 19. The extension also comes amid uncertainty around public health as winter looms. New Omicron strains — dubbed "escape variants" for their immune evasiveness — have become the dominant strains in the U.S., accounting for 40 percent of all cases in the week ending Nov. 12. Daily cases in the country are expected to grow 39 percent from Nov. 3-17. Hospital admissions trends are expected to remain stable or be more uncertain, with 1,300 to 7,300 new admissions likely reported on Nov. 25, according to the CDC. As of Nov. 4, the nation's seven-day average of new hospital admissions was 3,273. See original article: https://www.beckerspayer.com/policy-updates/hhs-to-extend-covid-19-public-health-emergency-through-april.html < Previous News Next News >

Video Archives Telehealth Educational Series - 2021 Play Video Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Search video... Now Playing 53:29 Play Video FCC Rural Health Care Program Funding Opportunities Now Playing 01:00:09 Play Video New Mexico’s Telehealth Statute Simplified: What You Need to Know Now Playing 55:32 Play Video New Mexico Broadband A Brighter Future by Gar Clarke Now Playing 57:44 Play Video Show Me the Data: How COVID-19 Impacted Telehealth Claims & What's Next Now Playing 01:02:42 Play Video Telehealth and COVID - Lessons Learned by Van Roper, PhD Now Playing 01:00:26 Play Video HIPAA still applies: Safeguarding patient data in a work-from-anywhere world Now Playing 57:21 Play Video Developing Telehealth Workflow for the Best Possible Patient and Provider Experience Now Playing 56:01 Play Video Care Integration in the Time of Covid: Focus on Patient Experience Now Playing 01:00:43 Play Video Using Remote Monitoring Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes & Retain Staff

OIG Looking Closely at Telehealth as it Weighs Future Enforcement Mike Miliard, Healthcare IT News August 2021 In a HIMSS21 session with updates on the HHS inspector general's oversight and compliance efforts, officials said they plan to ensure virtual care is provided with integrity, and will take aim at telehealth fraud schemes. The Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services works to ensure the integrity of federal healthcare programs and to safeguard the health and welfare of those programs' beneficiaries. In a session at HIMSS21 on Tuesday, two HHS OIG leaders offered a look at the enforcement priorities the agency has in mind these days, and some hints about the compliance responsibilities healthcare organizations should be prioritizing in the coming months. OIG claims to recover three taxpayer dollars for every dollar it spends, and recoups billions in misspent money every year. Speaking via webcam, Lisa Re, assistant inspector general of legal affairs at OIG, offered an update on some of the legal liabilities and risk areas in the health IT space, related to the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. She recounted some of the agency's enforcement actions in recent years, with companies such as athenahealth, CareCloud, eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion required to pay millions to settle cases. Andrew Vanlandingham, senior counselor for Medicaid Policy and acting health IT lead at OIG, called attention to recent revisions to safe harbors under the Anti-Kickback Statute and Civil Monetary Penalty Rules around coordinated care. He also highlighted a major new priority at OIG: telehealth. "As policymakers, we want to look at what telehealth might look like after the pandemic," said Vanlandingham. "All of those questions are centered around where do they plan on taking this? How will this impact their expenditures for healthcare programs? How to make sure that patients are getting good quality care from telehealth? And I think it's important for us to recognize that we don't know a whole lot right now." He said the OIG is guided by a philosophy summed up in a quote from HHS Principal Deputy Inspector General Christi A. Grimm: "It is important that new policies and technologies with potential to improve care and enhance convenience achieve these goals and are not compromised by fraud, abuse or misuse." When new technologies such as telehealth – with huge upside, but also potential risks – become more commonplace, "it's up to OIG and other healthcare stakeholders to make sure they do live up to that promise and aren't compromised by fraud, abuse or misuse," said Vanlandingham. "And we recognize that a lot of folks in the audience are doing just that: implementing telehealth so it works for patients, for the providers, and is a good tool to enhance care." He said OIG is "working hard to assess how telehealth utilization changed during the pandemic – what that means for corporate integrity, what that means for access, what that means for health equity. We have roughly eight audits and studies ongoing right now that we hope will really be the first down payment for OIG to be part of the broader conversation about what telehealth will look like after the pandemic." The goal is to "help the health technology community and providers as they continue to refine their development of telehealth and enhance virtual care," he said. "This is going to be a whole-of-government and whole-of-industry approach," he added. "It's really up to us to make sure that, since we are at this early stage of implementation of telehealth, that we can avoid issues to make sure that this works as intended, and really ensure that it drives the efficiency and effectiveness and really improves healthcare for all Americans." There have already been some ripe areas for enforcement, said Vanlandingham. "We've had several large-scale national takedown actions involving telefraud schemes with sham or fake telehealth companies," he said. (One of them occurred just this week.) "No one is billing for those telehealth visits fraudulently. They're not submitting a telehealth claim to Medicare. Instead, sophisticated criminal organizations are partnering with telemarketing companies and sometimes unscrupulous doctors to essentially cold call Medicare beneficiaries, get them online with a doctor. And the doctor [asks] a few questions, and then will forge or prescribe expensive equipment that Medicare will pay for durable medical equipment like back braces, or even genetic testing that beneficiaries don't need." DME fraud has been around since Medicare started reimbursing for it, of course. "But for these schemes, what used to be, let's say, $30 or $40 million dollars, maybe $100 million dollars, you've really seen an explosion of exploiting this virtual care model to really bill for a large amount of fraud," said Vanlandingham. "One scheme went for $1.6 billion, with a B, of alleged fraud. So that's obviously very alarming." No one quite knows yet what "telehealth 2.0" will look like, he said. "But I think it is a good example that, as we expand telehealth, there are likely to be instances of large-scale criminal activity that takes advantage of this. And it's up to OIG to assess those risks, and inform policymakers and stakeholders of those risks, and then from those policymakers and stakeholders to adjust." OIG's job now, he said, is to decide "how we can better increase oversight and enforcement to make sure that whatever Congress, CMS and others should decide about how telehealth should be used as providers continue to adopt it, that we've got safeguards to maximize the benefit of telehealth for patients and providers." < Previous News Next News >

Telehealth Remains Key Modality for Behavioral Healthcare Delivery eVista December 19, 2022 A Michigan-based provider leveraged a telehealth solution to expand critical access to behavioral healthcare as demand for these services skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic. After reaching new heights during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth use is leveling off in several clinical care areas. But there is one prominent exception: behavioral healthcare. Healthcare stakeholders are continuing to flock to telehealth for behavioral health services. An analysis of data from January 2020 to March 2022 shows that mental health conditions were the most common telehealth diagnoses at the national level. In addition, data shows that amid a drop in overall telehealth use since 2020, telemental healthcare has grown. In the first quarter of 2019, 32.4 percent of all telehealth visits were related to behavioral healthcare, according to a market research report. That figure jumped to 59.9 percent by Q1 2022. This data, along with the ongoing mental health crisis in America, signifies the importance of providing virtual care options for behavioral healthcare. At Michigan-based Easterseals MORC, telehealth has been integral to behavioral healthcare delivery since 2019. Then, amid the pandemic, the organization saw its virtual visit volumes skyrocket, and they continue to show no signs of slowing down. "We went from 25 telehealth users before the pandemic to 300," says Clarissa Hulleza, Chief Information Officer of Easterseals MORC. "Those numbers are still going up. We're not seeing any decrease." WHY THE ORGANIZATION IMPLEMENTED TELEHEALTH Easterseals MORC, an affiliate of the national Easterseals organization, serves over 21,000 individuals annually. It provides a wide array of behavioral health services, including therapy, psychiatric care, and substance abuse treatment, as well as long-term care for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In 2019, the organization decided to implement a telehealth solution. One of the key goals of the move was to expand access to behavioral healthcare across the state. “The reason we pursued a telehealth solution was so that people who couldn't get to us regularly or at all, could be provided the opportunity to still receive care," says Hulleza. "We serve all of Michigan, and not all of Michigan has access to transportation, or maybe their closest local provider is 20 miles away. So, it was really creating more opportunities for access." Additionally, telemedicine was already becoming popular as a mode of physical healthcare delivery, prompting behavioral healthcare providers to catch up. "It was one of those, 'well, why aren't we doing the same?'" Hulleza says. Easterseals MORC partnered with eVisit to launch a telehealth pilot program in May 2019. A little under a year later, the COVID-19 pandemic hit, compelling providers across the country to rapidly scale up their telehealth programs. According to Hulleza, already having a telehealth solution and vendor partnership in place enabled Easterseals MORC to expand virtual care use seamlessly. "I would say that the absolute benefit was that we never had to close our doors," she adds. "In a time that people needed behavioral healthcare the most, we were able to provide it." IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES AND KEY LESSONS LEARNED Easterseals MORC leverages telehealth for nearly all of its services, including case management, one-on-one and group therapy. The organization even provided Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy virtually, which aims to improve social behaviors using interventions. But implementing a telehealth solution for behavioral healthcare has its challenges. For Easterseals MORC, those challenges ranged from clinician training to technology issues among those receiving services. Clinicians were not only providing care in a new way, they also had to become tech support in helping those they served navigate the new technology. Training is a critical aspect of telehealth technology implementation. If training is not provided proactively, it can result in clinicians avoiding virtual care use as they might find it difficult and overwhelming. “Pilot testing the solution before a full rollout was critical to ensuring that clinicians had adequate training to use the technology and that workflows were not negatively impacted,” Hulleza says. Partnering with the right vendor was a vital aspect of this effort, as the vendor was able to provide clinician training resources as well as suggest new policies and processes required to promote and support the telehealth program. “Ultimately, we selected our vendor because we were looking for a partnership that would improve the overall behavioral healthcare delivery experience. This meant that we needed a tool that offered more than a two-way video solution — one that integrated with, and empowered, the clinical workflow with value-added technology,” Hulleza shares. “There were multiple tools in the marketplace that solved the video connection challenge, but Easterseals MORC was looking to do more than simply move the clinical interaction to a video screen.” Further, choosing the right partner and then piloting the telehealth solution allowed the organization to test the supporting technology infrastructure before a full rollout. Easterseals MORC tested laptop specifications and made sure the solution worked equally well on different devices, including mobile phones and tablets. "We even went as far as making sure our bandwidth at all of our locations was increased so that if we had 20 people doing telehealth at the same time, there wouldn't be any degradation in services," Hulleza says. On the side of those receiving services, Easterseals MORC had to consider the digital divide facing its population. "[The people we serve] don't always have the newest phones, the best bandwidth," she says. "They don't have the luxury of going to a bedroom and closing the door. They might have shared living arrangements. We had to make sure we were accommodating all of those things." To address individuals' technology access needs, the organization applied for various grants and used those to provide iPads and iPhones with built-in data plans. Another essential aspect of closing the digital divide is identifying the viability of an individual to receive services via telehealth. Easterseals MORC uses a checklist tool provided by the telehealth vendor to identify these individuals and the barriers they face. "Do you have a private place? Do you have a microphone? What model phone do you have or mobile device?" Hulleza adds. "The tool goes through all of these questions and allows providers to evaluate if telehealth is an option." Easterseals MORC plans to solidify telehealth as a key behavioral health delivery mechanism within its business. It is unclear if Congress will make the temporary telehealth flexibilities enacted during the pandemic permanent — but for Hulleza, there is no going back. "I absolutely want to grow telehealth here," she says. "The need amplified because of the pandemic, but telehealth was going to exist for our organization even if the pandemic didn’t happen." ____________________________ About eVisit eVisit is an enterprise virtual care delivery platform built for health systems and hospitals. It delivers innovative virtual experiences in care navigation, care delivery, and care engagement, improving margins at scale without sacrificing quality or patient and provider satisfaction. eVisit works seamlessly across enterprise service lines and departments to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and boost revenue. Based in Phoenix, Ariz., eVisit helps healthcare organizations innovate and succeed in today’s changing healthcare market. See original article: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/telehealth-remains-key-modality-for-behavioral-healthcare-delivery < Previous News Next News >